feat: Add workflow verification system with dual analysis

- Create /workflow:verify command for plan validation before execution
- Implement gemini strategic analysis and codex technical analysis
- Add cross-validation framework with user approval workflow
- Enhance brainstorm auto.md with comprehensive pre_analysis configuration
- Include specialized verification prompt templates for structured analysis

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2025-09-24 10:01:20 +08:00
parent 7c7f2f1298
commit 0afbeac710
5 changed files with 752 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
Strategic validation of workflow implementation plan from architectural and business perspective:
## Required Strategic Analysis:
1. **Architectural Soundness Assessment**
- Evaluate overall system design coherence
- Assess component interaction patterns
- Validate architectural decision consistency
- Identify potential design conflicts or gaps
2. **Task Decomposition Logic Evaluation**
- Review task breakdown methodology and rationale
- Assess functional completeness of each task
- Evaluate task granularity and scope appropriateness
- Identify missing or redundant decomposition elements
3. **Dependency Coherence Analysis**
- Map task interdependencies and logical flow
- Validate dependency ordering and scheduling
- Assess circular dependency risks
- Evaluate parallel execution opportunities
4. **Business Alignment Verification**
- Validate alignment with stated business objectives
- Assess stakeholder requirement coverage
- Evaluate success criteria completeness and measurability
- Identify business risk and mitigation adequacy
5. **Strategic Risk Identification**
- Identify architectural risks and technical debt implications
- Assess implementation complexity and resource requirements
- Evaluate timeline feasibility and milestone realism
- Document potential blockers and escalation scenarios
## Output Requirements:
### Strategic Assessment Report:
- **Architecture Grade** (A-F): Overall design quality assessment
- **Decomposition Grade** (A-F): Task breakdown effectiveness
- **Risk Level** (Low/Medium/High): Combined implementation risk
- **Business Alignment Score** (1-10): Requirement satisfaction level
### Detailed Recommendations:
- **Critical Issues**: Must-fix problems that could cause failure
- **Improvement Opportunities**: Non-blocking enhancements
- **Alternative Approaches**: Strategic alternatives worth considering
- **Resource Implications**: Staffing and timeline considerations
### Action Items:
- **Immediate**: Changes needed before implementation starts
- **Short-term**: Improvements for early phases
- **Long-term**: Strategic enhancements for future iterations
Focus on high-level strategic concerns, business alignment, and long-term architectural implications. Provide actionable recommendations with clear rationale and priority levels.