feat: migrate all codex team skills from spawn_agents_on_csv to spawn_agent + wait_agent architecture

- Delete 21 old team skill directories using CSV-wave pipeline pattern (~100+ files)
- Delete old team-lifecycle (v3) and team-planex-v2
- Create generic team-worker.toml and team-supervisor.toml (replacing tlv4-specific TOMLs)
- Convert 19 team skills from Claude Code format (Agent/SendMessage/TaskCreate)
  to Codex format (spawn_agent/wait_agent/tasks.json/request_user_input)
- Update team-lifecycle-v4 to use generic agent types (team_worker/team_supervisor)
- Convert all coordinator role files: dispatch.md, monitor.md, role.md
- Convert all worker role files: remove run_in_background, fix Bash syntax
- Convert all specs/pipelines.md references
- Final state: 20 team skills, 217 .md files, zero Claude Code API residuals

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/roles/evaluator/role.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+---
+role: evaluator
+prefix: EVAL
+inner_loop: false
+message_types: [state_update]
+---
+
+# Evaluator
+
+Scoring, ranking, and final selection. Multi-dimension evaluation of synthesized proposals with weighted scoring and priority recommendations.
+
+## Phase 2: Context Loading
+
+| Input | Source | Required |
+|-------|--------|----------|
+| Session folder | Task description (Session: line) | Yes |
+| Synthesis results | <session>/synthesis/*.md files | Yes |
+| All ideas | <session>/ideas/*.md files | No (for context) |
+| All critiques | <session>/critiques/*.md files | No (for context) |
+
+1. Extract session path from task description (match "Session: <path>")
+2. Glob synthesis files from <session>/synthesis/
+3. Read all synthesis files for evaluation
+4. Optionally read ideas and critiques for full context
+
+## Phase 3: Evaluation and Scoring
+
+**Scoring Dimensions**:
+
+| Dimension | Weight | Focus |
+|-----------|--------|-------|
+| Feasibility | 30% | Technical feasibility, resource needs, timeline |
+| Innovation | 25% | Novelty, differentiation, breakthrough potential |
+| Impact | 25% | Scope of impact, value creation, problem resolution |
+| Cost Efficiency | 20% | Implementation cost, risk cost, opportunity cost |
+
+**Weighted Score**: `(Feasibility * 0.30) + (Innovation * 0.25) + (Impact * 0.25) + (Cost * 0.20)`
+
+**Per-Proposal Evaluation**:
+- Score each dimension (1-10) with rationale
+- Overall recommendation: Strong Recommend / Recommend / Consider / Pass
+
+**Output**: Write to `<session>/evaluation/evaluation-<num>.md`
+- Sections: Input summary, Scoring Matrix (ranked table), Detailed Evaluation per proposal, Final Recommendation, Action Items, Risk Summary
+
+## Phase 4: Consistency Check
+
+| Check | Pass Criteria | Action on Failure |
+|-------|---------------|-------------------|
+| Score spread | max - min >= 0.5 (with >1 proposal) | Re-evaluate differentiators |
+| No perfect scores | Not all 10s | Adjust to reflect critique findings |
+| Ranking deterministic | Consistent ranking | Verify calculation |
+
+After passing checks, update shared state:
+- Set .msg/meta.json evaluation_scores
+- Each entry: title, weighted_score, rank, recommendation