diff --git a/.claude/skills/workflow-lite-plan/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/workflow-lite-plan/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f3484d18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/workflow-lite-plan/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+---
+name: workflow-lite-plan
+description: Lightweight planning and execution skill - route to lite-plan or lite-execute with prompt enhancement. Triggers on "workflow:lite-plan", "workflow:lite-execute".
+allowed-tools: Skill, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
+---
+
+# Workflow Lite-Plan
+
+Unified lightweight planning and execution skill. Routes to lite-plan (planning pipeline) or lite-execute (execution engine) based on trigger, with prompt enhancement for both modes.
+
+## Architecture Overview
+
+```
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│  SKILL.md (Router + Prompt Enhancement)              │
+│  → Detect mode → Enhance prompt → Dispatch to phase │
+└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘
+                       │
+           ┌───────────┼───────────┐
+           ↓                       ↓
+     ┌───────────┐           ┌───────────┐
+     │ lite-plan │           │lite-execute│
+     │ Phase 1   │           │ Phase 2    │
+     │ Plan+Exec │──handoff─→│ Standalone │
+     └───────────┘           └───────────┘
+```
+
+## Mode Detection & Routing
+
+```javascript
+const args = $ARGUMENTS
+const mode = detectMode()
+
+function detectMode() {
+  if (skillName === 'workflow:lite-execute') return 'execute'
+  return 'plan'  // default: workflow:lite-plan
+}
+```
+
+**Routing Table**:
+
+| Trigger | Mode | Phase Document | Description |
+|---------|------|----------------|-------------|
+| `workflow:lite-plan` | plan | [phases/01-lite-plan.md](phases/01-lite-plan.md) | Full planning pipeline (explore → plan → confirm → execute) |
+| `workflow:lite-execute` | execute | [phases/02-lite-execute.md](phases/02-lite-execute.md) | Standalone execution (in-memory / prompt / file) |
+
+## Prompt Enhancement
+
+Before dispatching to the target phase, enhance context:
+
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Check for project context files
+const hasProjectTech = fileExists('.workflow/project-tech.json')
+const hasProjectGuidelines = fileExists('.workflow/project-guidelines.json')
+
+// Step 2: Log available context
+if (hasProjectTech) {
+  console.log('Project tech context available: .workflow/project-tech.json')
+}
+if (hasProjectGuidelines) {
+  console.log('Project guidelines available: .workflow/project-guidelines.json')
+}
+
+// Step 3: Dispatch to phase
+if (mode === 'plan') {
+  // Read phases/01-lite-plan.md and execute
+} else {
+  // Read phases/02-lite-execute.md and execute
+}
+```
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Plan Mode (workflow:lite-plan)
+
+```
+1. Parse flags (-y/--yes, -e/--explore) and task description
+2. Enhance prompt with project context availability
+3. Read phases/01-lite-plan.md
+4. Execute lite-plan pipeline (Phase 1-5 within the phase doc)
+5. lite-plan Phase 5 internally calls workflow:lite-execute via Skill handoff
+```
+
+### Execute Mode (workflow:lite-execute)
+
+```
+1. Parse flags (--in-memory, -y/--yes) and input
+2. Enhance prompt with project context availability
+3. Read phases/02-lite-execute.md
+4. Execute lite-execute pipeline (input detection → execution → review)
+```
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+# Plan mode
+/workflow:lite-plan "实现JWT认证"                    # Interactive
+/workflow:lite-plan --yes "实现JWT认证"              # Auto mode
+/workflow:lite-plan -y -e "优化数据库查询性能"       # Auto + force exploration
+
+# Execute mode (standalone)
+/workflow:lite-execute "Add unit tests for auth"     # Prompt description
+/workflow:lite-execute plan.json                     # File input
+/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory                   # Called by lite-plan internally
+```
+
+## Phase Reference Documents
+
+| Phase | Document | Purpose |
+|-------|----------|---------|
+| 1 | [phases/01-lite-plan.md](phases/01-lite-plan.md) | Complete planning pipeline: exploration, clarification, planning, confirmation, handoff |
+| 2 | [phases/02-lite-execute.md](phases/02-lite-execute.md) | Complete execution engine: input modes, task grouping, batch execution, code review |
diff --git a/.claude/skills/workflow-lite-plan/phases/01-lite-plan.md b/.claude/skills/workflow-lite-plan/phases/01-lite-plan.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8b90c901
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/workflow-lite-plan/phases/01-lite-plan.md
@@ -0,0 +1,773 @@
+# Phase 1: Lite-Plan
+
+Complete planning pipeline: task analysis, multi-angle exploration, clarification, adaptive planning, confirmation, and execution handoff.
+
+**Source**: Converted from `.claude/commands/workflow/lite-plan.md` - all execution detail preserved verbatim.
+
+---
+
+## Overview
+
+Intelligent lightweight planning command with dynamic workflow adaptation based on task complexity. Focuses on planning phases (exploration, clarification, planning, confirmation) and delegates execution to Phase 2 (lite-execute).
+
+**Core capabilities:**
+- Intelligent task analysis with automatic exploration detection
+- Dynamic code exploration (cli-explore-agent) when codebase understanding needed
+- Interactive clarification after exploration to gather missing information
+- Adaptive planning: Low complexity → Direct Claude; Medium/High → cli-lite-planning-agent
+- Two-step confirmation: plan display → multi-dimensional input collection
+- Execution handoff with complete context to lite-execute
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+/workflow:lite-plan [FLAGS] <TASK_DESCRIPTION>
+
+# Flags
+-y, --yes                  Skip all confirmations (auto mode)
+-e, --explore              Force code exploration phase (overrides auto-detection)
+
+# Arguments
+<task-description>         Task description or path to .md file (required)
+
+# Examples
+/workflow:lite-plan "实现JWT认证"                    # Interactive mode
+/workflow:lite-plan --yes "实现JWT认证"              # Auto mode (no confirmations)
+/workflow:lite-plan -y -e "优化数据库查询性能"       # Auto mode + force exploration
+```
+
+## Output Artifacts
+
+| Artifact | Description |
+|----------|-------------|
+| `exploration-{angle}.json` | Per-angle exploration results (1-4 files based on complexity) |
+| `explorations-manifest.json` | Index of all exploration files |
+| `planning-context.md` | Evidence paths + synthesized understanding |
+| `plan.json` | Plan overview with task_ids[] (plan-overview-base-schema.json) |
+| `.task/TASK-*.json` | Independent task files (one per task) |
+
+**Output Directory**: `.workflow/.lite-plan/{task-slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/`
+
+**Agent Usage**:
+- Low complexity → Direct Claude planning (no agent)
+- Medium/High complexity → `cli-lite-planning-agent` generates `plan.json`
+
+**Schema Reference**: `~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-overview-base-schema.json`
+
+## Auto Mode Defaults
+
+When `--yes` or `-y` flag is used:
+- **Clarification Questions**: Skipped (no clarification phase)
+- **Plan Confirmation**: Auto-selected "Allow"
+- **Execution Method**: Auto-selected "Auto"
+- **Code Review**: Auto-selected "Skip"
+
+**Flag Parsing**:
+```javascript
+const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
+const forceExplore = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--explore') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-e')
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Phase 1: Task Analysis & Exploration
+   ├─ Parse input (description or .md file)
+   ├─ intelligent complexity assessment (Low/Medium/High)
+   ├─ Exploration decision (auto-detect or --explore flag)
+   ├─ Context protection: If file reading ≥50k chars → force cli-explore-agent
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ needsExploration=true → Launch parallel cli-explore-agents (1-4 based on complexity)
+      └─ needsExploration=false → Skip to Phase 2/3
+
+Phase 2: Clarification (optional, multi-round)
+   ├─ Aggregate clarification_needs from all exploration angles
+   ├─ Deduplicate similar questions
+   └─ Decision:
+      ├─ Has clarifications → AskUserQuestion (max 4 questions per round, multiple rounds allowed)
+      └─ No clarifications → Skip to Phase 3
+
+Phase 3: Planning (NO CODE EXECUTION - planning only)
+   └─ Decision (based on Phase 1 complexity):
+      ├─ Low → Load schema: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-overview-base-schema.json → Direct Claude planning (following schema) → plan.json
+      └─ Medium/High → cli-lite-planning-agent → plan.json (agent internally executes quality check)
+
+Phase 4: Confirmation & Selection
+   ├─ Display plan summary (tasks, complexity, estimated time)
+   └─ AskUserQuestion:
+      ├─ Confirm: Allow / Modify / Cancel
+      ├─ Execution: Agent / Codex / Auto
+      └─ Review: Gemini / Agent / Skip
+
+Phase 5: Execute
+   ├─ Build executionContext (plan + explorations + clarifications + selections)
+   └─ Skill(skill="workflow:lite-execute", args="--in-memory")
+```
+
+## Implementation
+
+### Phase 1: Intelligent Multi-Angle Exploration
+
+**Session Setup** (MANDATORY - follow exactly):
+```javascript
+// Helper: Get UTC+8 (China Standard Time) ISO string
+const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
+
+const taskSlug = task_description.toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-').substring(0, 40)
+const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)  // Format: 2025-11-29
+
+const sessionId = `${taskSlug}-${dateStr}`  // e.g., "implement-jwt-refresh-2025-11-29"
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.lite-plan/${sessionId}`
+
+bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder} && test -d ${sessionFolder} && echo "SUCCESS: ${sessionFolder}" || echo "FAILED: ${sessionFolder}"`)
+```
+
+**Exploration Decision Logic**:
+```javascript
+needsExploration = (
+  flags.includes('--explore') || flags.includes('-e') ||
+  task.mentions_specific_files ||
+  task.requires_codebase_context ||
+  task.needs_architecture_understanding ||
+  task.modifies_existing_code
+)
+
+if (!needsExploration) {
+  // Skip to Phase 2 (Clarification) or Phase 3 (Planning)
+  proceed_to_next_phase()
+}
+```
+
+**⚠️ Context Protection**: File reading ≥50k chars → force `needsExploration=true` (delegate to cli-explore-agent)
+
+**Complexity Assessment** (Intelligent Analysis):
+```javascript
+// analyzes task complexity based on:
+// - Scope: How many systems/modules are affected?
+// - Depth: Surface change vs architectural impact?
+// - Risk: Potential for breaking existing functionality?
+// - Dependencies: How interconnected is the change?
+
+const complexity = analyzeTaskComplexity(task_description)
+// Returns: 'Low' | 'Medium' | 'High'
+// Low: Single file, isolated change, minimal risk
+// Medium: Multiple files, some dependencies, moderate risk
+// High: Cross-module, architectural, high risk
+
+// Angle assignment based on task type (orchestrator decides, not agent)
+const ANGLE_PRESETS = {
+  architecture: ['architecture', 'dependencies', 'modularity', 'integration-points'],
+  security: ['security', 'auth-patterns', 'dataflow', 'validation'],
+  performance: ['performance', 'bottlenecks', 'caching', 'data-access'],
+  bugfix: ['error-handling', 'dataflow', 'state-management', 'edge-cases'],
+  feature: ['patterns', 'integration-points', 'testing', 'dependencies']
+}
+
+function selectAngles(taskDescription, count) {
+  const text = taskDescription.toLowerCase()
+  let preset = 'feature' // default
+
+  if (/refactor|architect|restructure|modular/.test(text)) preset = 'architecture'
+  else if (/security|auth|permission|access/.test(text)) preset = 'security'
+  else if (/performance|slow|optimi|cache/.test(text)) preset = 'performance'
+  else if (/fix|bug|error|issue|broken/.test(text)) preset = 'bugfix'
+
+  return ANGLE_PRESETS[preset].slice(0, count)
+}
+
+const selectedAngles = selectAngles(task_description, complexity === 'High' ? 4 : (complexity === 'Medium' ? 3 : 1))
+
+// Planning strategy determination
+const planningStrategy = complexity === 'Low'
+  ? 'Direct Claude Planning'
+  : 'cli-lite-planning-agent'
+
+console.log(`
+## Exploration Plan
+
+Task Complexity: ${complexity}
+Selected Angles: ${selectedAngles.join(', ')}
+Planning Strategy: ${planningStrategy}
+
+Launching ${selectedAngles.length} parallel explorations...
+`)
+```
+
+**Launch Parallel Explorations** - Orchestrator assigns angle to each agent:
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL - NO BACKGROUND EXECUTION**:
+- **MUST NOT use `run_in_background: true`** - exploration results are REQUIRED before planning
+
+
+```javascript
+// Launch agents with pre-assigned angles
+const explorationTasks = selectedAngles.map((angle, index) =>
+  Task(
+    subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
+    run_in_background=false,  // ⚠️ MANDATORY: Must wait for results
+    description=`Explore: ${angle}`,
+    prompt=`
+## Task Objective
+Execute **${angle}** exploration for task planning context. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover relevant structure, patterns, and constraints.
+
+## Output Location
+
+**Session Folder**: ${sessionFolder}
+**Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
+
+## Assigned Context
+- **Exploration Angle**: ${angle}
+- **Task Description**: ${task_description}
+- **Exploration Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length}
+
+## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
+**You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
+1. Run: ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}' (project structure)
+2. Run: rg -l "{keyword_from_task}" --type ts (locate relevant files)
+3. Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/explore-json-schema.json (get output schema reference)
+4. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (technology stack and architecture context)
+5. Read: .workflow/project-guidelines.json (user-defined constraints and conventions)
+
+## Exploration Strategy (${angle} focus)
+
+**Step 1: Structural Scan** (Bash)
+- get_modules_by_depth.sh → identify modules related to ${angle}
+- find/rg → locate files relevant to ${angle} aspect
+- Analyze imports/dependencies from ${angle} perspective
+
+**Step 2: Semantic Analysis** (Gemini CLI)
+- How does existing code handle ${angle} concerns?
+- What patterns are used for ${angle}?
+- Where would new code integrate from ${angle} viewpoint?
+
+**Step 3: Write Output**
+- Consolidate ${angle} findings into JSON
+- Identify ${angle}-specific clarification needs
+
+## Expected Output
+
+**Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 3, follow schema exactly
+
+**Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused):
+- project_structure: Modules/architecture relevant to ${angle}
+- relevant_files: Files affected from ${angle} perspective
+  **MANDATORY**: Every file MUST use structured object format with ALL required fields:
+  \`[{path: "src/file.ts", relevance: 0.85, rationale: "Contains AuthService.login() - entry point for JWT token generation", role: "modify_target", discovery_source: "bash-scan", key_symbols: ["AuthService", "login"]}]\`
+  - **rationale** (required): Specific selection basis tied to ${angle} topic (>10 chars, not generic)
+  - **role** (required): modify_target|dependency|pattern_reference|test_target|type_definition|integration_point|config|context_only
+  - **discovery_source** (recommended): bash-scan|cli-analysis|ace-search|dependency-trace|manual
+  - **key_symbols** (recommended): Key functions/classes/types in the file relevant to the task
+  - Scores: 0.7+ high priority, 0.5-0.7 medium, <0.5 low
+- patterns: ${angle}-related patterns to follow
+- dependencies: Dependencies relevant to ${angle}
+- integration_points: Where to integrate from ${angle} viewpoint (include file:line locations)
+- constraints: ${angle}-specific limitations/conventions
+- clarification_needs: ${angle}-related ambiguities (options array + recommended index)
+- _metadata.exploration_angle: "${angle}"
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] Schema obtained via cat explore-json-schema.json
+- [ ] get_modules_by_depth.sh executed
+- [ ] At least 3 relevant files identified with specific rationale + role
+- [ ] Every file has rationale >10 chars (not generic like "Related to ${angle}")
+- [ ] Every file has role classification (modify_target/dependency/etc.)
+- [ ] Patterns are actionable (code examples, not generic advice)
+- [ ] Integration points include file:line locations
+- [ ] Constraints are project-specific to ${angle}
+- [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
+- [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended
+
+## Execution
+**Write**: \`${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json\`
+**Return**: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} findings
+`
+  )
+)
+
+// Execute all exploration tasks in parallel
+```
+
+**Auto-discover Generated Exploration Files**:
+```javascript
+// After explorations complete, auto-discover all exploration-*.json files
+const explorationFiles = bash(`find ${sessionFolder} -name "exploration-*.json" -type f`)
+  .split('\n')
+  .filter(f => f.trim())
+
+// Read metadata to build manifest
+const explorationManifest = {
+  session_id: sessionId,
+  task_description: task_description,
+  timestamp: getUtc8ISOString(),
+  complexity: complexity,
+  exploration_count: explorationCount,
+  explorations: explorationFiles.map(file => {
+    const data = JSON.parse(Read(file))
+    const filename = path.basename(file)
+    return {
+      angle: data._metadata.exploration_angle,
+      file: filename,
+      path: file,
+      index: data._metadata.exploration_index
+    }
+  })
+}
+
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`, JSON.stringify(explorationManifest, null, 2))
+
+console.log(`
+## Exploration Complete
+
+Generated exploration files in ${sessionFolder}:
+${explorationManifest.explorations.map(e => `- exploration-${e.angle}.json (angle: ${e.angle})`).join('\n')}
+
+Manifest: explorations-manifest.json
+Angles explored: ${explorationManifest.explorations.map(e => e.angle).join(', ')}
+`)
+```
+
+**Output**:
+- `${sessionFolder}/exploration-{angle1}.json`
+- `${sessionFolder}/exploration-{angle2}.json`
+- ... (1-4 files based on complexity)
+- `${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Clarification (Optional, Multi-Round)
+
+**Skip if**: No exploration or `clarification_needs` is empty across all explorations
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: AskUserQuestion tool limits max 4 questions per call. **MUST execute multiple rounds** to exhaust all clarification needs - do NOT stop at round 1.
+
+**Aggregate clarification needs from all exploration angles**:
+```javascript
+// Load manifest and all exploration files
+const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`))
+const explorations = manifest.explorations.map(exp => ({
+  angle: exp.angle,
+  data: JSON.parse(Read(exp.path))
+}))
+
+// Aggregate clarification needs from all explorations
+const allClarifications = []
+explorations.forEach(exp => {
+  if (exp.data.clarification_needs?.length > 0) {
+    exp.data.clarification_needs.forEach(need => {
+      allClarifications.push({
+        ...need,
+        source_angle: exp.angle
+      })
+    })
+  }
+})
+
+// Intelligent deduplication: analyze allClarifications by intent
+// - Identify questions with similar intent across different angles
+// - Merge similar questions: combine options, consolidate context
+// - Produce dedupedClarifications with unique intents only
+const dedupedClarifications = intelligentMerge(allClarifications)
+
+// Parse --yes flag
+const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
+
+if (autoYes) {
+  // Auto mode: Skip clarification phase
+  console.log(`[--yes] Skipping ${dedupedClarifications.length} clarification questions`)
+  console.log(`Proceeding to planning with exploration results...`)
+  // Continue to Phase 3
+} else if (dedupedClarifications.length > 0) {
+  // Interactive mode: Multi-round clarification
+  const BATCH_SIZE = 4
+  const totalRounds = Math.ceil(dedupedClarifications.length / BATCH_SIZE)
+
+  for (let i = 0; i < dedupedClarifications.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
+    const batch = dedupedClarifications.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE)
+    const currentRound = Math.floor(i / BATCH_SIZE) + 1
+
+    console.log(`### Clarification Round ${currentRound}/${totalRounds}`)
+
+    AskUserQuestion({
+      questions: batch.map(need => ({
+        question: `[${need.source_angle}] ${need.question}\n\nContext: ${need.context}`,
+        header: need.source_angle.substring(0, 12),
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: need.options.map((opt, index) => ({
+          label: need.recommended === index ? `${opt} ★` : opt,
+          description: need.recommended === index ? `Recommended` : `Use ${opt}`
+        }))
+      }))
+    })
+
+    // Store batch responses in clarificationContext before next round
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Output**: `clarificationContext` (in-memory)
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Planning
+
+**Planning Strategy Selection** (based on Phase 1 complexity):
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Phase 3 is **planning only** - NO code execution. All execution happens in Phase 5 via lite-execute.
+
+**Executor Assignment** (Claude 智能分配，plan 生成后执行):
+
+```javascript
+// 分配规则（优先级从高到低）：
+// 1. 用户明确指定："用 gemini 分析..." → gemini, "codex 实现..." → codex
+// 2. 默认 → agent
+
+const executorAssignments = {}  // { taskId: { executor: 'gemini'|'codex'|'agent', reason: string } }
+
+// Load tasks from .task/ directory for executor assignment
+const taskFiles = Glob(`${sessionFolder}/.task/TASK-*.json`)
+taskFiles.forEach(taskPath => {
+  const task = JSON.parse(Read(taskPath))
+  // Claude 根据上述规则语义分析，为每个 task 分配 executor
+  executorAssignments[task.id] = { executor: '...', reason: '...' }
+})
+```
+
+**Low Complexity** - Direct planning by Claude:
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Read schema
+const schema = Bash(`cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-overview-base-schema.json`)
+
+// Step 2: ⚠️ MANDATORY - Read and review ALL exploration files
+const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`))
+manifest.explorations.forEach(exp => {
+  const explorationData = Read(exp.path)
+  console.log(`\n### Exploration: ${exp.angle}\n${explorationData}`)
+})
+
+// Step 3: Generate task objects (Claude directly, no agent)
+// ⚠️ Tasks MUST incorporate insights from exploration files read in Step 2
+// Task fields use NEW names: convergence.criteria (not acceptance), files[].change (not modification_points), test (not verification)
+const tasks = [
+  {
+    id: "TASK-001",
+    title: "...",
+    description: "...",
+    depends_on: [],
+    convergence: { criteria: ["..."] },
+    files: [{ path: "...", change: "..." }],
+    implementation: ["..."],
+    test: "..."
+  },
+  // ... more tasks
+]
+
+// Step 4: Write task files to .task/ directory
+const taskDir = `${sessionFolder}/.task`
+Bash(`mkdir -p "${taskDir}"`)
+tasks.forEach(task => {
+  Write(`${taskDir}/${task.id}.json`, JSON.stringify(task, null, 2))
+})
+
+// Step 5: Generate plan overview (NO embedded tasks[])
+const plan = {
+  summary: "...",
+  approach: "...",
+  task_ids: tasks.map(t => t.id),
+  task_count: tasks.length,
+  complexity: "Low",
+  estimated_time: "...",
+  recommended_execution: "Agent",
+  _metadata: {
+    timestamp: getUtc8ISOString(),
+    source: "direct-planning",
+    planning_mode: "direct",
+    plan_type: "feature"
+  }
+}
+
+// Step 6: Write plan overview to session folder
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/plan.json`, JSON.stringify(plan, null, 2))
+
+// Step 7: MUST continue to Phase 4 (Confirmation) - DO NOT execute code here
+```
+
+**Medium/High Complexity** - Invoke cli-lite-planning-agent:
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="cli-lite-planning-agent",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description="Generate detailed implementation plan",
+  prompt=`
+Generate implementation plan and write plan.json.
+
+## Output Location
+
+**Session Folder**: ${sessionFolder}
+**Output Files**:
+- ${sessionFolder}/planning-context.md (evidence + understanding)
+- ${sessionFolder}/plan.json (plan overview -- NO embedded tasks[])
+- ${sessionFolder}/.task/TASK-*.json (independent task files, one per task)
+
+## Output Schema Reference
+Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-overview-base-schema.json (get schema reference before generating plan)
+
+## Project Context (MANDATORY - Read Both Files)
+1. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (technology stack, architecture, key components)
+2. Read: .workflow/project-guidelines.json (user-defined constraints and conventions)
+
+**CRITICAL**: All generated tasks MUST comply with constraints in project-guidelines.json
+
+## Task Description
+${task_description}
+
+## Multi-Angle Exploration Context
+
+${manifest.explorations.map(exp => `### Exploration: ${exp.angle} (${exp.file})
+Path: ${exp.path}
+
+Read this file for detailed ${exp.angle} analysis.`).join('\n\n')}
+
+Total explorations: ${manifest.exploration_count}
+Angles covered: ${manifest.explorations.map(e => e.angle).join(', ')}
+
+Manifest: ${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json
+
+## User Clarifications
+${JSON.stringify(clarificationContext) || "None"}
+
+## Complexity Level
+${complexity}
+
+## Requirements
+Generate plan.json and .task/*.json following the schema obtained above. Key constraints:
+- _metadata.exploration_angles: ${JSON.stringify(manifest.explorations.map(e => e.angle))}
+
+**Output Format**: Two-layer structure:
+- plan.json: Overview with task_ids[] referencing .task/ files (NO tasks[] array)
+- .task/TASK-*.json: Independent task files following task-schema.json
+
+plan.json required fields: summary, approach, task_ids, task_count, _metadata (with plan_type: "feature")
+Each task file required fields: id, title, description, depends_on, convergence (with criteria[])
+Task fields use: files[].change (not modification_points), convergence.criteria (not acceptance), test (not verification)
+
+## Task Grouping Rules
+1. **Group by feature**: All changes for one feature = one task (even if 3-5 files)
+2. **Group by context**: Tasks with similar context or related functional changes can be grouped together
+3. **Minimize agent count**: Simple, unrelated tasks can also be grouped to reduce agent execution overhead
+4. **Avoid file-per-task**: Do NOT create separate tasks for each file
+5. **Substantial tasks**: Each task should represent 15-60 minutes of work
+6. **True dependencies only**: Only use depends_on when Task B cannot start without Task A's output
+7. **Prefer parallel**: Most tasks should be independent (no depends_on)
+
+## Execution
+1. Read schema file (cat command above)
+2. Execute CLI planning using Gemini (Qwen fallback)
+3. Read ALL exploration files for comprehensive context
+4. Synthesize findings and generate tasks + plan overview
+5. **Write**: \`${sessionFolder}/planning-context.md\` (evidence paths + understanding)
+6. **Create**: \`${sessionFolder}/.task/\` directory (mkdir -p)
+7. **Write**: \`${sessionFolder}/.task/TASK-001.json\`, \`TASK-002.json\`, etc. (one per task)
+8. **Write**: \`${sessionFolder}/plan.json\` (overview with task_ids[], NO tasks[])
+9. Return brief completion summary
+`
+)
+```
+
+**Output**: `${sessionFolder}/plan.json`
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Task Confirmation & Execution Selection
+
+**Step 4.1: Display Plan**
+```javascript
+const plan = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/plan.json`))
+
+// Load tasks from .task/ directory
+const tasks = (plan.task_ids || []).map(id => {
+  const taskPath = `${sessionFolder}/.task/${id}.json`
+  return JSON.parse(Read(taskPath))
+})
+const taskList = tasks
+
+console.log(`
+## Implementation Plan
+
+**Summary**: ${plan.summary}
+**Approach**: ${plan.approach}
+
+**Tasks** (${taskList.length}):
+${taskList.map((t, i) => `${i+1}. ${t.title} (${t.scope || t.files?.[0]?.path || ''})`).join('\n')}
+
+**Complexity**: ${plan.complexity}
+**Estimated Time**: ${plan.estimated_time}
+**Recommended**: ${plan.recommended_execution}
+`)
+```
+
+**Step 4.2: Collect Confirmation**
+```javascript
+// Parse --yes flag
+const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
+
+let userSelection
+
+if (autoYes) {
+  // Auto mode: Use defaults
+  console.log(`[--yes] Auto-confirming plan:`)
+  console.log(`  - Confirmation: Allow`)
+  console.log(`  - Execution: Auto`)
+  console.log(`  - Review: Skip`)
+
+  userSelection = {
+    confirmation: "Allow",
+    execution_method: "Auto",
+    code_review_tool: "Skip"
+  }
+} else {
+  // Interactive mode: Ask user
+  // Note: Execution "Other" option allows specifying CLI tools from ~/.claude/cli-tools.json
+  userSelection = AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [
+      {
+        question: `Confirm plan? (${taskList.length} tasks, ${plan.complexity})`,
+        header: "Confirm",
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: [
+          { label: "Allow", description: "Proceed as-is" },
+          { label: "Modify", description: "Adjust before execution" },
+          { label: "Cancel", description: "Abort workflow" }
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        question: "Execution method:",
+        header: "Execution",
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: [
+          { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
+          { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
+          { label: "Auto", description: `Auto: ${plan.complexity === 'Low' ? 'Agent' : 'Codex'}` }
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        question: "Code review after execution?",
+        header: "Review",
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: [
+          { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI review" },
+          { label: "Codex Review", description: "Git-aware review (prompt OR --uncommitted)" },
+          { label: "Agent Review", description: "@code-reviewer agent" },
+          { label: "Skip", description: "No review" }
+        ]
+      }
+    ]
+  })
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 5: Handoff to Execution
+
+**CRITICAL**: lite-plan NEVER executes code directly. ALL execution MUST go through lite-execute.
+
+**Step 5.1: Build executionContext**
+
+```javascript
+// Load manifest and all exploration files
+const manifest = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`))
+const explorations = {}
+
+manifest.explorations.forEach(exp => {
+  if (file_exists(exp.path)) {
+    explorations[exp.angle] = JSON.parse(Read(exp.path))
+  }
+})
+
+const plan = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/plan.json`))
+
+executionContext = {
+  planObject: plan,  // plan overview (no tasks[])
+  taskFiles: (plan.task_ids || []).map(id => ({
+    id,
+    path: `${sessionFolder}/.task/${id}.json`
+  })),
+  explorationsContext: explorations,
+  explorationAngles: manifest.explorations.map(e => e.angle),
+  explorationManifest: manifest,
+  clarificationContext: clarificationContext || null,
+  executionMethod: userSelection.execution_method,  // 全局默认，可被 executorAssignments 覆盖
+  codeReviewTool: userSelection.code_review_tool,
+  originalUserInput: task_description,
+
+  // 任务级 executor 分配（优先于全局 executionMethod）
+  executorAssignments: executorAssignments,  // { taskId: { executor, reason } }
+
+  session: {
+    id: sessionId,
+    folder: sessionFolder,
+    artifacts: {
+      explorations: manifest.explorations.map(exp => ({
+        angle: exp.angle,
+        path: exp.path
+      })),
+      explorations_manifest: `${sessionFolder}/explorations-manifest.json`,
+      plan: `${sessionFolder}/plan.json`,
+      task_dir: `${sessionFolder}/.task`
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Step 5.2: Handoff**
+
+```javascript
+Skill(skill="workflow:lite-execute", args="--in-memory")
+```
+
+## Session Folder Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/.lite-plan/{task-slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/
+├── exploration-{angle1}.json      # Exploration angle 1
+├── exploration-{angle2}.json      # Exploration angle 2
+├── exploration-{angle3}.json      # Exploration angle 3 (if applicable)
+├── exploration-{angle4}.json      # Exploration angle 4 (if applicable)
+├── explorations-manifest.json     # Exploration index
+├── planning-context.md            # Evidence paths + understanding
+├── plan.json                      # Plan overview (task_ids[])
+└── .task/                         # Task files directory
+    ├── TASK-001.json
+    ├── TASK-002.json
+    └── ...
+```
+
+**Example**:
+```
+.workflow/.lite-plan/implement-jwt-refresh-2025-11-25-14-30-25/
+├── exploration-architecture.json
+├── exploration-auth-patterns.json
+├── exploration-security.json
+├── explorations-manifest.json
+├── planning-context.md
+├── plan.json
+└── .task/
+    ├── TASK-001.json
+    ├── TASK-002.json
+    └── TASK-003.json
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| Exploration agent failure | Skip exploration, continue with task description only |
+| Planning agent failure | Fallback to direct planning by Claude |
+| Clarification timeout | Use exploration findings as-is |
+| Confirmation timeout | Save context, display resume instructions |
+| Modify loop > 3 times | Suggest breaking task or using /workflow:plan |
+
+## Next Phase
+
+After Phase 5 handoff, execution continues in [Phase 2: Lite-Execute](02-lite-execute.md).
diff --git a/.claude/skills/workflow-lite-plan/phases/02-lite-execute.md b/.claude/skills/workflow-lite-plan/phases/02-lite-execute.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9b7447da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/workflow-lite-plan/phases/02-lite-execute.md
@@ -0,0 +1,767 @@
+# Phase 2: Lite-Execute
+
+Complete execution engine: multi-mode input, task grouping, batch execution, code review, and development index update.
+
+**Source**: Converted from `.claude/commands/workflow/lite-execute.md` - all execution detail preserved verbatim.
+
+---
+
+## Overview
+
+Flexible task execution command supporting three input modes: in-memory plan (from lite-plan), direct prompt description, or file content. Handles execution orchestration, progress tracking, and optional code review.
+
+**Core capabilities:**
+- Multi-mode input (in-memory plan, prompt description, or file path)
+- Execution orchestration (Agent or Codex) with full context
+- Live progress tracking via TodoWrite at execution call level
+- Optional code review with selected tool (Gemini, Agent, or custom)
+- Context continuity across multiple executions
+- Intelligent format detection (Enhanced Task JSON vs plain text)
+
+## Usage
+
+### Command Syntax
+```bash
+/workflow:lite-execute [FLAGS] <INPUT>
+
+# Flags
+--in-memory                Use plan from memory (called by lite-plan)
+
+# Arguments
+<input>                    Task description string, or path to file (required)
+```
+
+## Input Modes
+
+### Mode 1: In-Memory Plan
+
+**Trigger**: Called by lite-plan after Phase 4 approval with `--in-memory` flag
+
+**Input Source**: `executionContext` global variable set by lite-plan
+
+**Content**: Complete execution context (see Data Structures section)
+
+**Behavior**:
+- Skip execution method selection (already set by lite-plan)
+- Directly proceed to execution with full context
+- All planning artifacts available (exploration, clarifications, plan)
+
+### Mode 2: Prompt Description
+
+**Trigger**: User calls with task description string
+
+**Input**: Simple task description (e.g., "Add unit tests for auth module")
+
+**Behavior**:
+- Store prompt as `originalUserInput`
+- Create simple execution plan from prompt
+- AskUserQuestion: Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto)
+- AskUserQuestion: Select code review tool (Skip/Gemini/Agent/Other)
+- Proceed to execution with `originalUserInput` included
+
+**User Interaction**:
+```javascript
+// Parse --yes flag
+const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
+
+let userSelection
+
+if (autoYes) {
+  // Auto mode: Use defaults
+  console.log(`[--yes] Auto-confirming execution:`)
+  console.log(`  - Execution method: Auto`)
+  console.log(`  - Code review: Skip`)
+
+  userSelection = {
+    execution_method: "Auto",
+    code_review_tool: "Skip"
+  }
+} else {
+  // Interactive mode: Ask user
+  userSelection = AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [
+      {
+        question: "Select execution method:",
+        header: "Execution",
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: [
+          { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
+          { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
+          { label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" }
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        question: "Enable code review after execution?",
+        header: "Code Review",
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: [
+          { label: "Skip", description: "No review" },
+          { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI tool" },
+          { label: "Codex Review", description: "Git-aware review (prompt OR --uncommitted)" },
+          { label: "Agent Review", description: "Current agent review" }
+        ]
+      }
+    ]
+  })
+}
+```
+
+### Mode 3: File Content
+
+**Trigger**: User calls with file path
+
+**Input**: Path to file containing task description or plan.json
+
+**Step 1: Read and Detect Format**
+
+```javascript
+fileContent = Read(filePath)
+
+// Attempt JSON parsing
+try {
+  jsonData = JSON.parse(fileContent)
+
+  // Check if plan.json from lite-plan session (two-layer format: task_ids[])
+  if (jsonData.summary && jsonData.approach && jsonData.task_ids) {
+    planObject = jsonData
+    originalUserInput = jsonData.summary
+    isPlanJson = true
+
+    // Load tasks from .task/*.json files
+    const planDir = filePath.replace(/[/\\][^/\\]+$/, '')  // parent directory
+    planObject._loadedTasks = loadTaskFiles(planDir, jsonData.task_ids)
+  } else {
+    // Valid JSON but not plan.json - treat as plain text
+    originalUserInput = fileContent
+    isPlanJson = false
+  }
+} catch {
+  // Not valid JSON - treat as plain text prompt
+  originalUserInput = fileContent
+  isPlanJson = false
+}
+```
+
+**Step 2: Create Execution Plan**
+
+If `isPlanJson === true`:
+- Use `planObject` directly
+- User selects execution method and code review
+
+If `isPlanJson === false`:
+- Treat file content as prompt (same behavior as Mode 2)
+- Create simple execution plan from content
+
+**Step 3: User Interaction**
+
+- AskUserQuestion: Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto)
+- AskUserQuestion: Select code review tool
+- Proceed to execution with full context
+
+## Helper Functions
+
+```javascript
+// Load task files from .task/ directory (two-layer format)
+function loadTaskFiles(planDir, taskIds) {
+  return taskIds.map(id => {
+    const taskPath = `${planDir}/.task/${id}.json`
+    return JSON.parse(Read(taskPath))
+  })
+}
+
+// Get tasks array from loaded .task/*.json files
+function getTasks(planObject) {
+  return planObject._loadedTasks || []
+}
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   └─ Decision (mode detection):
+      ├─ --in-memory flag → Mode 1: Load executionContext → Skip user selection
+      ├─ Ends with .md/.json/.txt → Mode 3: Read file → Detect format
+      │   ├─ Valid plan.json → Use planObject → User selects method + review
+      │   └─ Not plan.json → Treat as prompt → User selects method + review
+      └─ Other → Mode 2: Prompt description → User selects method + review
+
+Execution:
+   ├─ Step 1: Initialize result tracking (previousExecutionResults = [])
+   ├─ Step 2: Task grouping & batch creation
+   │   ├─ Extract explicit depends_on (no file/keyword inference)
+   │   ├─ Group: independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
+   │   ├─ Group: dependent tasks → sequential phases (respect dependencies)
+   │   └─ Create TodoWrite list for batches
+   ├─ Step 3: Launch execution
+   │   ├─ Phase 1: All independent tasks (⚡ single batch, concurrent)
+   │   └─ Phase 2+: Dependent tasks by dependency order
+   ├─ Step 4: Track progress (TodoWrite updates per batch)
+   └─ Step 5: Code review (if codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip")
+
+Output:
+   └─ Execution complete with results in previousExecutionResults[]
+```
+
+## Detailed Execution Steps
+
+### Step 1: Initialize Execution Tracking
+
+**Operations**:
+- Initialize result tracking for multi-execution scenarios
+- Set up `previousExecutionResults` array for context continuity
+- **In-Memory Mode**: Echo execution strategy from lite-plan for transparency
+
+```javascript
+// Initialize result tracking
+previousExecutionResults = []
+
+// In-Memory Mode: Echo execution strategy (transparency before execution)
+if (executionContext) {
+  console.log(`
+📋 Execution Strategy (from lite-plan):
+   Method: ${executionContext.executionMethod}
+   Review: ${executionContext.codeReviewTool}
+   Tasks: ${getTasks(executionContext.planObject).length}
+   Complexity: ${executionContext.planObject.complexity}
+${executionContext.executorAssignments ? `   Assignments: ${JSON.stringify(executionContext.executorAssignments)}` : ''}
+  `)
+}
+```
+
+### Step 2: Task Grouping & Batch Creation
+
+**Dependency Analysis & Grouping Algorithm**:
+```javascript
+// Use explicit depends_on from plan.json (no inference from file/keywords)
+function extractDependencies(tasks) {
+  const taskIdToIndex = {}
+  tasks.forEach((t, i) => { taskIdToIndex[t.id] = i })
+
+  return tasks.map((task, i) => {
+    // Only use explicit depends_on from plan.json
+    const deps = (task.depends_on || [])
+      .map(depId => taskIdToIndex[depId])
+      .filter(idx => idx !== undefined && idx < i)
+    return { ...task, taskIndex: i, dependencies: deps }
+  })
+}
+
+// Group into batches: maximize parallel execution
+function createExecutionCalls(tasks, executionMethod) {
+  const tasksWithDeps = extractDependencies(tasks)
+  const processed = new Set()
+  const calls = []
+
+  // Phase 1: All independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
+  const independentTasks = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => t.dependencies.length === 0)
+  if (independentTasks.length > 0) {
+    independentTasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
+    calls.push({
+      method: executionMethod,
+      executionType: "parallel",
+      groupId: "P1",
+      taskSummary: independentTasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '),
+      tasks: independentTasks
+    })
+  }
+
+  // Phase 2: Dependent tasks → sequential batches (respect dependencies)
+  let sequentialIndex = 1
+  let remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
+
+  while (remaining.length > 0) {
+    // Find tasks whose dependencies are all satisfied
+    const ready = remaining.filter(t =>
+      t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d))
+    )
+
+    if (ready.length === 0) {
+      console.warn('Circular dependency detected, forcing remaining tasks')
+      ready.push(...remaining)
+    }
+
+    // Group ready tasks (can run in parallel within this phase)
+    ready.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
+    calls.push({
+      method: executionMethod,
+      executionType: ready.length > 1 ? "parallel" : "sequential",
+      groupId: ready.length > 1 ? `P${calls.length + 1}` : `S${sequentialIndex++}`,
+      taskSummary: ready.map(t => t.title).join(ready.length > 1 ? ' | ' : ' → '),
+      tasks: ready
+    })
+
+    remaining = remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
+  }
+
+  return calls
+}
+
+executionCalls = createExecutionCalls(getTasks(planObject), executionMethod).map(c => ({ ...c, id: `[${c.groupId}]` }))
+
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
+    content: `${c.executionType === "parallel" ? "⚡" : "→"} ${c.id} (${c.tasks.length} tasks)`,
+    status: "pending",
+    activeForm: `Executing ${c.id}`
+  }))
+})
+```
+
+### Step 3: Launch Execution
+
+**Executor Resolution** (任务级 executor 优先于全局设置):
+```javascript
+// 获取任务的 executor（优先使用 executorAssignments，fallback 到全局 executionMethod）
+function getTaskExecutor(task) {
+  const assignments = executionContext?.executorAssignments || {}
+  if (assignments[task.id]) {
+    return assignments[task.id].executor  // 'gemini' | 'codex' | 'agent'
+  }
+  // Fallback: 全局 executionMethod 映射
+  const method = executionContext?.executionMethod || 'Auto'
+  if (method === 'Agent') return 'agent'
+  if (method === 'Codex') return 'codex'
+  // Auto: 根据复杂度
+  return planObject.complexity === 'Low' ? 'agent' : 'codex'
+}
+
+// 按 executor 分组任务
+function groupTasksByExecutor(tasks) {
+  const groups = { gemini: [], codex: [], agent: [] }
+  tasks.forEach(task => {
+    const executor = getTaskExecutor(task)
+    groups[executor].push(task)
+  })
+  return groups
+}
+```
+
+**Execution Flow**: Parallel batches concurrently → Sequential batches in order
+```javascript
+const parallel = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "parallel")
+const sequential = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "sequential")
+
+// Phase 1: Launch all parallel batches (single message with multiple tool calls)
+if (parallel.length > 0) {
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: c.executionType === "parallel" ? "in_progress" : "pending" })) })
+  parallelResults = await Promise.all(parallel.map(c => executeBatch(c)))
+  previousExecutionResults.push(...parallelResults)
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: parallel.includes(c) ? "completed" : "pending" })) })
+}
+
+// Phase 2: Execute sequential batches one by one
+for (const call of sequential) {
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: c === call ? "in_progress" : "..." })) })
+  result = await executeBatch(call)
+  previousExecutionResults.push(result)
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: "completed" or "pending" })) })
+}
+```
+
+### Unified Task Prompt Builder
+
+**Task Formatting Principle**: Each task is a self-contained checklist. The executor only needs to know what THIS task requires. Same template for Agent and CLI.
+
+```javascript
+function buildExecutionPrompt(batch) {
+  // Task template (6 parts: Files → Why → How → Reference → Risks → Done)
+  const formatTask = (t) => `
+## ${t.title}
+
+**Scope**: \`${t.scope}\`  |  **Action**: ${t.action}
+
+### Files
+${(t.files || []).map(f => `- **${f.path}** → \`${f.target || ''}\`: ${f.change || (f.changes || []).join(', ') || ''}`).join('\n')}
+
+${t.rationale ? `
+### Why this approach (Medium/High)
+${t.rationale.chosen_approach}
+${t.rationale.decision_factors?.length > 0 ? `\nKey factors: ${t.rationale.decision_factors.join(', ')}` : ''}
+${t.rationale.tradeoffs ? `\nTradeoffs: ${t.rationale.tradeoffs}` : ''}
+` : ''}
+
+### How to do it
+${t.description}
+
+${t.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}
+
+${t.code_skeleton ? `
+### Code skeleton (High)
+${t.code_skeleton.interfaces?.length > 0 ? `**Interfaces**: ${t.code_skeleton.interfaces.map(i => `\`${i.name}\` - ${i.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
+${t.code_skeleton.key_functions?.length > 0 ? `\n**Functions**: ${t.code_skeleton.key_functions.map(f => `\`${f.signature}\` - ${f.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
+${t.code_skeleton.classes?.length > 0 ? `\n**Classes**: ${t.code_skeleton.classes.map(c => `\`${c.name}\` - ${c.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
+` : ''}
+
+### Reference
+- Pattern: ${t.reference?.pattern || 'N/A'}
+- Files: ${t.reference?.files?.join(', ') || 'N/A'}
+${t.reference?.examples ? `- Notes: ${t.reference.examples}` : ''}
+
+${t.risks?.length > 0 ? `
+### Risk mitigations (High)
+${t.risks.map(r => `- ${r.description} → **${r.mitigation}**`).join('\n')}
+` : ''}
+
+### Done when
+${(t.convergence?.criteria || []).map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}
+${(t.test?.success_metrics || []).length > 0 ? `\n**Success metrics**: ${t.test.success_metrics.join(', ')}` : ''}`
+
+  // Build prompt
+  const sections = []
+
+  if (originalUserInput) sections.push(`## Goal\n${originalUserInput}`)
+
+  sections.push(`## Tasks\n${batch.tasks.map(formatTask).join('\n\n---\n')}`)
+
+  // Context (reference only)
+  const context = []
+  if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0) {
+    context.push(`### Previous Work\n${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `- ${r.tasksSummary}: ${r.status}`).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+  if (clarificationContext) {
+    context.push(`### Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- ${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+  if (executionContext?.planObject?.data_flow?.diagram) {
+    context.push(`### Data Flow\n${executionContext.planObject.data_flow.diagram}`)
+  }
+  if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan) {
+    context.push(`### Artifacts\nPlan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
+  }
+  // Project guidelines (user-defined constraints from /workflow:session:solidify)
+  context.push(`### Project Guidelines\n@.workflow/project-guidelines.json`)
+  if (context.length > 0) sections.push(`## Context\n${context.join('\n\n')}`)
+
+  sections.push(`Complete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.`)
+
+  return sections.join('\n\n')
+}
+```
+
+**Option A: Agent Execution**
+
+When to use:
+- `getTaskExecutor(task) === "agent"`
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Agent"` (全局 fallback)
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Low"` (全局 fallback)
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="code-developer",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=batch.taskSummary,
+  prompt=buildExecutionPrompt(batch)
+)
+```
+
+**Result Collection**: After completion, collect result following `executionResult` structure (see Data Structures section)
+
+**Option B: CLI Execution (Codex)**
+
+When to use:
+- `getTaskExecutor(task) === "codex"`
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Codex"` (全局 fallback)
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Medium/High"` (全局 fallback)
+
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write
+```
+
+**Execution with fixed IDs** (predictable ID pattern):
+```javascript
+// Launch CLI in background, wait for task hook callback
+// Generate fixed execution ID: ${sessionId}-${groupId}
+const sessionId = executionContext?.session?.id || 'standalone'
+const fixedExecutionId = `${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}`  // e.g., "implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1"
+
+// Check if resuming from previous failed execution
+const previousCliId = batch.resumeFromCliId || null
+
+// Build command with fixed ID (and optional resume for continuation)
+const cli_command = previousCliId
+  ? `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId} --resume ${previousCliId}`
+  : `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId}`
+
+// Execute in background, stop output and wait for task hook callback
+Bash(
+  command=cli_command,
+  run_in_background=true
+)
+// STOP HERE - CLI executes in background, task hook will notify on completion
+```
+
+**Resume on Failure** (with fixed ID):
+```javascript
+// If execution failed or timed out, offer resume option
+if (bash_result.status === 'failed' || bash_result.status === 'timeout') {
+  console.log(`
+⚠️ Execution incomplete. Resume available:
+   Fixed ID: ${fixedExecutionId}
+   Lookup: ccw cli detail ${fixedExecutionId}
+   Resume: ccw cli -p "Continue tasks" --resume ${fixedExecutionId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId}-retry
+`)
+
+  // Store for potential retry in same session
+  batch.resumeFromCliId = fixedExecutionId
+}
+```
+
+**Result Collection**: After completion, analyze output and collect result following `executionResult` structure (include `cliExecutionId` for resume capability)
+
+**Option C: CLI Execution (Gemini)**
+
+When to use: `getTaskExecutor(task) === "gemini"` (分析类任务)
+
+```bash
+# 使用统一的 buildExecutionPrompt，切换 tool 和 mode
+ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}
+```
+
+### Step 4: Progress Tracking
+
+Progress tracked at batch level (not individual task level). Icons: ⚡ (parallel, concurrent), → (sequential, one-by-one)
+
+### Step 5: Code Review (Optional)
+
+**Skip Condition**: Only run if `codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip"`
+
+**Review Focus**: Verify implementation against plan convergence criteria and test requirements
+- Read plan.json + .task/*.json for task convergence criteria and test checklist
+- Check each convergence criterion is fulfilled
+- Verify success metrics from test field (Medium/High complexity)
+- Run unit/integration tests specified in test field
+- Validate code quality and identify issues
+- Ensure alignment with planned approach and risk mitigations
+
+**Operations**:
+- Agent Review: Current agent performs direct review
+- Gemini Review: Execute gemini CLI with review prompt
+- Codex Review: Two options - (A) with prompt for complex reviews, (B) `--uncommitted` flag only for quick reviews
+- Custom tool: Execute specified CLI tool (qwen, etc.)
+
+**Unified Review Template** (All tools use same standard):
+
+**Review Criteria**:
+- **Convergence Criteria**: Verify each criterion from task convergence.criteria
+- **Test Checklist** (Medium/High): Check unit, integration, success_metrics from task test
+- **Code Quality**: Analyze quality, identify issues, suggest improvements
+- **Plan Alignment**: Validate implementation matches planned approach and risk mitigations
+
+**Shared Prompt Template** (used by all CLI tools):
+```
+PURPOSE: Code review for implemented changes against plan convergence criteria and test requirements
+TASK: • Verify plan convergence criteria fulfillment • Check test requirements (unit, integration, success_metrics) • Analyze code quality • Identify issues • Suggest improvements • Validate plan adherence and risk mitigations
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/* @{plan.json} @{.task/*.json} [@{exploration.json}] | Memory: Review lite-execute changes against plan requirements including test checklist
+EXPECTED: Quality assessment with:
+  - Convergence criteria verification (all tasks from .task/*.json)
+  - Test checklist validation (Medium/High: unit, integration, success_metrics)
+  - Issue identification
+  - Recommendations
+  Explicitly check each convergence criterion and test item from .task/*.json files.
+CONSTRAINTS: Focus on plan convergence criteria, test requirements, and plan adherence | analysis=READ-ONLY
+```
+
+**Tool-Specific Execution** (Apply shared prompt template above):
+
+```bash
+# Method 1: Agent Review (current agent)
+# - Read plan.json: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}
+# - Apply unified review criteria (see Shared Prompt Template)
+# - Report findings directly
+
+# Method 2: Gemini Review (recommended)
+ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool gemini --mode analysis
+# CONTEXT includes: @**/* @${plan.json} [@${exploration.json}]
+
+# Method 3: Qwen Review (alternative)
+ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool qwen --mode analysis
+# Same prompt as Gemini, different execution engine
+
+# Method 4: Codex Review (git-aware) - Two mutually exclusive options:
+
+# Option A: With custom prompt (reviews uncommitted by default)
+ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool codex --mode review
+# Use for complex reviews with specific focus areas
+
+# Option B: Target flag only (no prompt allowed)
+ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --uncommitted
+# Quick review of uncommitted changes without custom instructions
+
+# ⚠️ IMPORTANT: -p prompt and target flags (--uncommitted/--base/--commit) are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE
+```
+
+**Multi-Round Review with Fixed IDs**:
+```javascript
+// Generate fixed review ID
+const reviewId = `${sessionId}-review`
+
+// First review pass with fixed ID
+const reviewResult = Bash(`ccw cli -p "[Review prompt]" --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${reviewId}`)
+
+// If issues found, continue review dialog with fixed ID chain
+if (hasUnresolvedIssues(reviewResult)) {
+  // Resume with follow-up questions
+  Bash(`ccw cli -p "Clarify the security concerns you mentioned" --resume ${reviewId} --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${reviewId}-followup`)
+}
+```
+
+**Implementation Note**: Replace `[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]` placeholder with actual template content, substituting:
+- `@{plan.json}` → `@${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`
+- `[@{exploration.json}]` → exploration files from artifacts (if exists)
+
+### Step 6: Update Development Index
+
+**Trigger**: After all executions complete (regardless of code review)
+
+**Skip Condition**: Skip if `.workflow/project-tech.json` does not exist
+
+**Operations**:
+```javascript
+const projectJsonPath = '.workflow/project-tech.json'
+if (!fileExists(projectJsonPath)) return  // Silent skip
+
+const projectJson = JSON.parse(Read(projectJsonPath))
+
+// Initialize if needed
+if (!projectJson.development_index) {
+  projectJson.development_index = { feature: [], enhancement: [], bugfix: [], refactor: [], docs: [] }
+}
+
+// Detect category from keywords
+function detectCategory(text) {
+  text = text.toLowerCase()
+  if (/\b(fix|bug|error|issue|crash)\b/.test(text)) return 'bugfix'
+  if (/\b(refactor|cleanup|reorganize)\b/.test(text)) return 'refactor'
+  if (/\b(doc|readme|comment)\b/.test(text)) return 'docs'
+  if (/\b(add|new|create|implement)\b/.test(text)) return 'feature'
+  return 'enhancement'
+}
+
+// Detect sub_feature from task file paths
+function detectSubFeature(tasks) {
+  const dirs = tasks.map(t => t.file?.split('/').slice(-2, -1)[0]).filter(Boolean)
+  const counts = dirs.reduce((a, d) => { a[d] = (a[d] || 0) + 1; return a }, {})
+  return Object.entries(counts).sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1])[0]?.[0] || 'general'
+}
+
+const category = detectCategory(`${planObject.summary} ${planObject.approach}`)
+const entry = {
+  title: planObject.summary.slice(0, 60),
+  sub_feature: detectSubFeature(getTasks(planObject)),
+  date: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0],
+  description: planObject.approach.slice(0, 100),
+  status: previousExecutionResults.every(r => r.status === 'completed') ? 'completed' : 'partial',
+  session_id: executionContext?.session?.id || null
+}
+
+projectJson.development_index[category].push(entry)
+projectJson.statistics.last_updated = new Date().toISOString()
+Write(projectJsonPath, JSON.stringify(projectJson, null, 2))
+
+console.log(`✓ Development index: [${category}] ${entry.title}`)
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+**Input Modes**: In-memory (lite-plan), prompt (standalone), file (JSON/text)
+**Task Grouping**: Based on explicit depends_on only; independent tasks run in single parallel batch
+**Execution**: All independent tasks launch concurrently via single Claude message with multiple tool calls
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Missing executionContext | --in-memory without context | Error: "No execution context found. Only available when called by lite-plan." |
+| File not found | File path doesn't exist | Error: "File not found: {path}. Check file path." |
+| Empty file | File exists but no content | Error: "File is empty: {path}. Provide task description." |
+| Invalid Enhanced Task JSON | JSON missing required fields | Warning: "Missing required fields. Treating as plain text." |
+| Malformed JSON | JSON parsing fails | Treat as plain text (expected for non-JSON files) |
+| Execution failure | Agent/Codex crashes | Display error, use fixed ID `${sessionId}-${groupId}` for resume: `ccw cli -p "Continue" --resume <fixed-id> --id <fixed-id>-retry` |
+| Execution timeout | CLI exceeded timeout | Use fixed ID for resume with extended timeout |
+| Codex unavailable | Codex not installed | Show installation instructions, offer Agent execution |
+| Fixed ID not found | Custom ID lookup failed | Check `ccw cli history`, verify date directories |
+
+## Data Structures
+
+### executionContext (Input - Mode 1)
+
+Passed from lite-plan via global variable:
+
+```javascript
+{
+  planObject: {
+    summary: string,
+    approach: string,
+    task_ids: string[],                          // Task IDs referencing .task/*.json files
+    task_count: number,                          // Number of tasks
+    _loadedTasks: [...],                         // Populated at runtime from .task/*.json files
+    estimated_time: string,
+    recommended_execution: string,
+    complexity: string
+  },
+  // Task file paths (populated for two-layer format)
+  taskFiles: [{id: string, path: string}] | null,
+  explorationsContext: {...} | null,       // Multi-angle explorations
+  explorationAngles: string[],             // List of exploration angles
+  explorationManifest: {...} | null,       // Exploration manifest
+  clarificationContext: {...} | null,
+  executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto",  // 全局默认
+  codeReviewTool: "Skip" | "Gemini Review" | "Agent Review" | string,
+  originalUserInput: string,
+
+  // 任务级 executor 分配（优先于 executionMethod）
+  executorAssignments: {
+    [taskId]: { executor: "gemini" | "codex" | "agent", reason: string }
+  },
+
+  // Session artifacts location (saved by lite-plan)
+  session: {
+    id: string,                        // Session identifier: {taskSlug}-{shortTimestamp}
+    folder: string,                    // Session folder path: .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id}
+    artifacts: {
+      explorations: [{angle, path}],   // exploration-{angle}.json paths
+      explorations_manifest: string,   // explorations-manifest.json path
+      plan: string                     // plan.json path (always present)
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Artifact Usage**:
+- Artifact files contain detailed planning context
+- Pass artifact paths to CLI tools and agents for enhanced context
+- See execution options below for usage examples
+
+### executionResult (Output)
+
+Collected after each execution call completes:
+
+```javascript
+{
+  executionId: string,                 // e.g., "[Agent-1]", "[Codex-1]"
+  status: "completed" | "partial" | "failed",
+  tasksSummary: string,                // Brief description of tasks handled
+  completionSummary: string,           // What was completed
+  keyOutputs: string,                  // Files created/modified, key changes
+  notes: string,                       // Important context for next execution
+  fixedCliId: string | null            // Fixed CLI execution ID (e.g., "implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1")
+}
+```
+
+Appended to `previousExecutionResults` array for context continuity in multi-execution scenarios.
+
+## Post-Completion Expansion
+
+完成后询问用户是否扩展为issue(test/enhance/refactor/doc)，选中项调用 `/issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}"`
+
+**Fixed ID Pattern**: `${sessionId}-${groupId}` enables predictable lookup without auto-generated timestamps.
+
+**Resume Usage**: If `status` is "partial" or "failed", use `fixedCliId` to resume:
+```bash
+# Lookup previous execution
+ccw cli detail ${fixedCliId}
+
+# Resume with new fixed ID for retry
+ccw cli -p "Continue from where we left off" --resume ${fixedCliId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedCliId}-retry
+```
diff --git a/.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..23c32677
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+---
+name: workflow-multi-cli-plan
+description: Multi-CLI collaborative planning and execution skill - route to multi-cli-plan or lite-execute with prompt enhancement. Triggers on "workflow:multi-cli-plan", "workflow:lite-execute".
+allowed-tools: Skill, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, mcp__ace-tool__search_context
+---
+
+# Workflow Multi-CLI Plan
+
+Unified multi-CLI collaborative planning and execution skill. Routes to multi-cli-plan (ACE context + multi-CLI discussion + plan generation) or lite-execute (execution engine) based on trigger, with prompt enhancement for both modes.
+
+## Architecture Overview
+
+```
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│  SKILL.md (Router + Prompt Enhancement)                  │
+│  → Detect mode → Enhance prompt → Dispatch to phase     │
+└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┘
+                       │
+           ┌───────────┼───────────┐
+           ↓                       ↓
+     ┌──────────────┐        ┌───────────┐
+     │multi-cli-plan│        │lite-execute│
+     │   Phase 1    │        │  Phase 2   │
+     │  Plan+Exec   │─handoff→│ Standalone │
+     └──────────────┘        └───────────┘
+```
+
+## Mode Detection & Routing
+
+```javascript
+const args = $ARGUMENTS
+const mode = detectMode()
+
+function detectMode() {
+  if (skillName === 'workflow:lite-execute') return 'execute'
+  return 'plan'  // default: workflow:multi-cli-plan
+}
+```
+
+**Routing Table**:
+
+| Trigger | Mode | Phase Document | Description |
+|---------|------|----------------|-------------|
+| `workflow:multi-cli-plan` | plan | [phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md](phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md) | Multi-CLI collaborative planning (ACE context → discussion → plan → execute) |
+| `workflow:lite-execute` | execute | [phases/02-lite-execute.md](phases/02-lite-execute.md) | Standalone execution (in-memory / prompt / file) |
+
+## Prompt Enhancement
+
+Before dispatching to the target phase, enhance context:
+
+```javascript
+// Step 1: Check for project context files
+const hasProjectTech = fileExists('.workflow/project-tech.json')
+const hasProjectGuidelines = fileExists('.workflow/project-guidelines.json')
+
+// Step 2: Log available context
+if (hasProjectTech) {
+  console.log('Project tech context available: .workflow/project-tech.json')
+}
+if (hasProjectGuidelines) {
+  console.log('Project guidelines available: .workflow/project-guidelines.json')
+}
+
+// Step 3: Dispatch to phase
+if (mode === 'plan') {
+  // Read phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md and execute
+} else {
+  // Read phases/02-lite-execute.md and execute
+}
+```
+
+## Execution Flow
+
+### Plan Mode (workflow:multi-cli-plan)
+
+```
+1. Parse flags (-y/--yes, --max-rounds, --tools, --mode) and task description
+2. Enhance prompt with project context availability
+3. Read phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md
+4. Execute multi-cli-plan pipeline (Phase 1-5 within the phase doc)
+5. Phase 5 internally calls workflow:lite-execute via Skill handoff
+```
+
+### Execute Mode (workflow:lite-execute)
+
+```
+1. Parse flags (--in-memory, -y/--yes) and input
+2. Enhance prompt with project context availability
+3. Read phases/02-lite-execute.md
+4. Execute lite-execute pipeline (input detection → execution → review)
+```
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+# Multi-CLI plan mode
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Implement user authentication"
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan --yes "Add dark mode support"
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Refactor payment module" --max-rounds=3 --tools=gemini,codex
+
+# Execute mode (standalone)
+/workflow:lite-execute "Add unit tests for auth"     # Prompt description
+/workflow:lite-execute plan.json                     # File input
+/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory                   # Called by multi-cli-plan internally
+```
+
+## Phase Reference Documents
+
+| Phase | Document | Purpose |
+|-------|----------|---------|
+| 1 | [phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md](phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md) | Complete multi-CLI planning pipeline: ACE context, iterative discussion, options, user decision, plan generation, handoff |
+| 2 | [phases/02-lite-execute.md](phases/02-lite-execute.md) | Complete execution engine: input modes, task grouping, batch execution, code review |
diff --git a/.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md b/.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..06a1a8ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md
@@ -0,0 +1,605 @@
+# Phase 1: Multi-CLI Collaborative Planning
+
+Complete multi-CLI collaborative planning pipeline with ACE context gathering and iterative cross-verification. This phase document preserves the full content of the original `workflow:multi-cli-plan` command.
+
+> **Source**: Converted from `.claude/commands/workflow/multi-cli-plan.md`. Frontmatter moved to SKILL.md.
+
+## Auto Mode
+
+When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-approve plan, use recommended solution and execution method (Agent, Skip review).
+
+# Multi-CLI Collaborative Planning Command
+
+## Quick Start
+
+```bash
+# Basic usage
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Implement user authentication"
+
+# With options
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Add dark mode support" --max-rounds=3
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Refactor payment module" --tools=gemini,codex,claude
+/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Fix memory leak" --mode=serial
+```
+
+**Context Source**: ACE semantic search + Multi-CLI analysis
+**Output Directory**: `.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{session-id}/`
+**Default Max Rounds**: 3 (convergence may complete earlier)
+**CLI Tools**: @cli-discuss-agent (analysis), @cli-lite-planning-agent (plan generation)
+**Execution**: Auto-hands off to `/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory` after plan approval
+
+## What & Why
+
+### Core Concept
+
+Multi-CLI collaborative planning with **three-phase architecture**: ACE context gathering → Iterative multi-CLI discussion → Plan generation. Orchestrator delegates analysis to agents, only handles user decisions and session management.
+
+**Process**:
+- **Phase 1**: ACE semantic search gathers codebase context
+- **Phase 2**: cli-discuss-agent orchestrates Gemini/Codex/Claude for cross-verified analysis
+- **Phase 3-5**: User decision → Plan generation → Execution handoff
+
+**vs Single-CLI Planning**:
+- **Single**: One model perspective, potential blind spots
+- **Multi-CLI**: Cross-verification catches inconsistencies, builds consensus on solutions
+
+### Value Proposition
+
+1. **Multi-Perspective Analysis**: Gemini + Codex + Claude analyze from different angles
+2. **Cross-Verification**: Identify agreements/disagreements, build confidence
+3. **User-Driven Decisions**: Every round ends with user decision point
+4. **Iterative Convergence**: Progressive refinement until consensus reached
+
+### Orchestrator Boundary (CRITICAL)
+
+- **ONLY command** for multi-CLI collaborative planning
+- Manages: Session state, user decisions, agent delegation, phase transitions
+- Delegates: CLI execution to @cli-discuss-agent, plan generation to @cli-lite-planning-agent
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+```
+Phase 1: Context Gathering
+   └─ ACE semantic search, extract keywords, build context package
+
+Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion (Iterative, via @cli-discuss-agent)
+   ├─ Round N: Agent executes Gemini + Codex + Claude
+   ├─ Cross-verify findings, synthesize solutions
+   ├─ Write synthesis.json to rounds/{N}/
+   └─ Loop until convergence or max rounds
+
+Phase 3: Present Options
+   └─ Display solutions with trade-offs from agent output
+
+Phase 4: User Decision
+   ├─ Select solution approach
+   ├─ Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto)
+   ├─ Select code review tool (Skip/Gemini/Codex/Agent)
+   └─ Route:
+      ├─ Approve → Phase 5
+      ├─ Need More Analysis → Return to Phase 2
+      └─ Cancel → Save session
+
+Phase 5: Plan Generation & Execution Handoff
+   ├─ Generate plan.json + .task/*.json (via @cli-lite-planning-agent, two-layer output)
+   ├─ Build executionContext with user selections and taskFiles
+   └─ Execute to /workflow:lite-execute --in-memory
+```
+
+### Agent Roles
+
+| Agent | Responsibility |
+|-------|---------------|
+| **Orchestrator** | Session management, ACE context, user decisions, phase transitions, executionContext assembly |
+| **@cli-discuss-agent** | Multi-CLI execution (Gemini/Codex/Claude), cross-verification, solution synthesis, synthesis.json output |
+| **@cli-lite-planning-agent** | Task decomposition, two-layer output: plan.json (overview with task_ids[]) + .task/*.json (task files) |
+
+## Core Responsibilities
+
+### Phase 1: Context Gathering
+
+**Session Initialization**:
+```javascript
+const sessionId = `MCP-${taskSlug}-${date}`
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/${sessionId}`
+Bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/rounds`)
+```
+
+**ACE Context Queries**:
+```javascript
+const aceQueries = [
+  `Project architecture related to ${keywords}`,
+  `Existing implementations of ${keywords[0]}`,
+  `Code patterns for ${keywords} features`,
+  `Integration points for ${keywords[0]}`
+]
+// Execute via mcp__ace-tool__search_context
+```
+
+**Context Package** (passed to agent):
+- `relevant_files[]` - Files identified by ACE
+- `detected_patterns[]` - Code patterns found
+- `architecture_insights` - Structure understanding
+
+### Phase 2: Agent Delegation
+
+**Core Principle**: Orchestrator only delegates and reads output - NO direct CLI execution.
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL - CLI EXECUTION REQUIREMENT**:
+- **MUST** execute CLI calls via `Bash` with `run_in_background: true`
+- **MUST** wait for hook callback to receive complete results
+- **MUST NOT** proceed with next phase until CLI execution fully completes
+- Do NOT use `TaskOutput` polling during CLI execution - wait passively for results
+- Minimize scope: Proceed only when 100% result available
+
+**Agent Invocation**:
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "cli-discuss-agent",
+  run_in_background: false,
+  description: `Discussion round ${currentRound}`,
+  prompt: `
+## Input Context
+- task_description: ${taskDescription}
+- round_number: ${currentRound}
+- session: { id: "${sessionId}", folder: "${sessionFolder}" }
+- ace_context: ${JSON.stringify(contextPackageage)}
+- previous_rounds: ${JSON.stringify(analysisResults)}
+- user_feedback: ${userFeedback || 'None'}
+- cli_config: { tools: ["gemini", "codex"], mode: "parallel", fallback_chain: ["gemini", "codex", "claude"] }
+
+## Execution Process
+1. Parse input context (handle JSON strings)
+2. Check if ACE supplementary search needed
+3. Build CLI prompts with context
+4. Execute CLIs (parallel or serial per cli_config.mode)
+5. Parse CLI outputs, handle failures with fallback
+6. Perform cross-verification between CLI results
+7. Synthesize solutions, calculate scores
+8. Calculate convergence, generate clarification questions
+9. Write synthesis.json
+
+## Output
+Write: ${sessionFolder}/rounds/${currentRound}/synthesis.json
+
+## Completion Checklist
+- [ ] All configured CLI tools executed (or fallback triggered)
+- [ ] Cross-verification completed with agreements/disagreements
+- [ ] 2-3 solutions generated with file:line references
+- [ ] Convergence score calculated (0.0-1.0)
+- [ ] synthesis.json written with all Primary Fields
+`
+})
+```
+
+**Read Agent Output**:
+```javascript
+const synthesis = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/rounds/${round}/synthesis.json`))
+// Access top-level fields: solutions, convergence, cross_verification, clarification_questions
+```
+
+**Convergence Decision**:
+```javascript
+if (synthesis.convergence.recommendation === 'converged') {
+  // Proceed to Phase 3
+} else if (synthesis.convergence.recommendation === 'user_input_needed') {
+  // Collect user feedback, return to Phase 2
+} else {
+  // Continue to next round if new_insights && round < maxRounds
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Present Options
+
+**Display from Agent Output** (no processing):
+```javascript
+console.log(`
+## Solution Options
+
+${synthesis.solutions.map((s, i) => `
+**Option ${i+1}: ${s.name}**
+Source: ${s.source_cli.join(' + ')}
+Effort: ${s.effort} | Risk: ${s.risk}
+
+Pros: ${s.pros.join(', ')}
+Cons: ${s.cons.join(', ')}
+
+Files: ${s.affected_files.slice(0,3).map(f => `${f.file}:${f.line}`).join(', ')}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+## Cross-Verification
+Agreements: ${synthesis.cross_verification.agreements.length}
+Disagreements: ${synthesis.cross_verification.disagreements.length}
+`)
+```
+
+### Phase 4: User Decision
+
+**Decision Options**:
+```javascript
+AskUserQuestion({
+  questions: [
+    {
+      question: "Which solution approach?",
+      header: "Solution",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: solutions.map((s, i) => ({
+        label: `Option ${i+1}: ${s.name}`,
+        description: `${s.effort} effort, ${s.risk} risk`
+      })).concat([
+        { label: "Need More Analysis", description: "Return to Phase 2" }
+      ])
+    },
+    {
+      question: "Execution method:",
+      header: "Execution",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
+        { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
+        { label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      question: "Code review after execution?",
+      header: "Review",
+      multiSelect: false,
+      options: [
+        { label: "Skip", description: "No review" },
+        { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI tool" },
+        { label: "Codex Review", description: "codex review --uncommitted" },
+        { label: "Agent Review", description: "Current agent review" }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+})
+```
+
+**Routing**:
+- Approve + execution method → Phase 5
+- Need More Analysis → Phase 2 with feedback
+- Cancel → Save session for resumption
+
+### Phase 5: Plan Generation & Execution Handoff
+
+**Step 1: Build Context-Package** (Orchestrator responsibility):
+```javascript
+// Extract key information from user decision and synthesis
+const contextPackage = {
+  // Core solution details
+  solution: {
+    name: selectedSolution.name,
+    source_cli: selectedSolution.source_cli,
+    feasibility: selectedSolution.feasibility,
+    effort: selectedSolution.effort,
+    risk: selectedSolution.risk,
+    summary: selectedSolution.summary
+  },
+  // Implementation plan (tasks, flow, milestones)
+  implementation_plan: selectedSolution.implementation_plan,
+  // Dependencies
+  dependencies: selectedSolution.dependencies || { internal: [], external: [] },
+  // Technical concerns
+  technical_concerns: selectedSolution.technical_concerns || [],
+  // Consensus from cross-verification
+  consensus: {
+    agreements: synthesis.cross_verification.agreements,
+    resolved_conflicts: synthesis.cross_verification.resolution
+  },
+  // User constraints (from Phase 4 feedback)
+  constraints: userConstraints || [],
+  // Task context
+  task_description: taskDescription,
+  session_id: sessionId
+}
+
+// Write context-package for traceability
+Write(`${sessionFolder}/context-package.json`, JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2))
+```
+
+**Context-Package Schema**:
+
+| Field | Type | Description |
+|-------|------|-------------|
+| `solution` | object | User-selected solution from synthesis |
+| `solution.name` | string | Solution identifier |
+| `solution.feasibility` | number | Viability score (0-1) |
+| `solution.summary` | string | Brief analysis summary |
+| `implementation_plan` | object | Task breakdown with flow and dependencies |
+| `implementation_plan.approach` | string | High-level technical strategy |
+| `implementation_plan.tasks[]` | array | Discrete tasks with id, name, depends_on, files |
+| `implementation_plan.execution_flow` | string | Task sequence (e.g., "T1 → T2 → T3") |
+| `implementation_plan.milestones` | string[] | Key checkpoints |
+| `dependencies` | object | Module and package dependencies |
+| `technical_concerns` | string[] | Risks and blockers |
+| `consensus` | object | Cross-verified agreements from multi-CLI |
+| `constraints` | string[] | User-specified constraints from Phase 4 |
+
+```json
+{
+  "solution": {
+    "name": "Strategy Pattern Refactoring",
+    "source_cli": ["gemini", "codex"],
+    "feasibility": 0.88,
+    "effort": "medium",
+    "risk": "low",
+    "summary": "Extract payment gateway interface, implement strategy pattern for multi-gateway support"
+  },
+  "implementation_plan": {
+    "approach": "Define interface → Create concrete strategies → Implement factory → Migrate existing code",
+    "tasks": [
+      {"id": "T1", "name": "Define PaymentGateway interface", "depends_on": [], "files": [{"file": "src/types/payment.ts", "line": 1, "action": "create"}], "key_point": "Include all existing Stripe methods"},
+      {"id": "T2", "name": "Implement StripeGateway", "depends_on": ["T1"], "files": [{"file": "src/payment/stripe.ts", "line": 1, "action": "create"}], "key_point": "Wrap existing logic"},
+      {"id": "T3", "name": "Create GatewayFactory", "depends_on": ["T1"], "files": [{"file": "src/payment/factory.ts", "line": 1, "action": "create"}], "key_point": null},
+      {"id": "T4", "name": "Migrate processor to use factory", "depends_on": ["T2", "T3"], "files": [{"file": "src/payment/processor.ts", "line": 45, "action": "modify"}], "key_point": "Backward compatible"}
+    ],
+    "execution_flow": "T1 → (T2 | T3) → T4",
+    "milestones": ["Interface defined", "Gateway implementations complete", "Migration done"]
+  },
+  "dependencies": {
+    "internal": ["@/lib/payment-gateway", "@/types/payment"],
+    "external": ["stripe@^14.0.0"]
+  },
+  "technical_concerns": ["Existing tests must pass", "No breaking API changes"],
+  "consensus": {
+    "agreements": ["Use strategy pattern", "Keep existing API"],
+    "resolved_conflicts": "Factory over DI for simpler integration"
+  },
+  "constraints": ["backward compatible", "no breaking changes to PaymentResult type"],
+  "task_description": "Refactor payment processing for multi-gateway support",
+  "session_id": "MCP-payment-refactor-2026-01-14"
+}
+```
+
+**Step 2: Invoke Planning Agent**:
+```javascript
+Task({
+  subagent_type: "cli-lite-planning-agent",
+  run_in_background: false,
+  description: "Generate implementation plan",
+  prompt: `
+## Schema Reference
+Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-overview-base-schema.json
+Execute: cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/task-schema.json
+
+## Output Format: Two-Layer Structure
+- plan.json: Overview with task_ids[] referencing .task/ files (NO tasks[] array)
+- .task/TASK-*.json: Independent task files following task-schema.json
+
+plan.json required: summary, approach, task_ids, task_count, _metadata (with plan_type)
+Task files required: id, title, description, depends_on, convergence (with criteria[])
+Task fields: files[].change (not modification_points), convergence.criteria (not acceptance), test (not verification)
+
+## Context-Package (from orchestrator)
+${JSON.stringify(contextPackage, null, 2)}
+
+## Execution Process
+1. Read plan-overview-base-schema.json + task-schema.json for output structure
+2. Read project-tech.json and project-guidelines.json
+3. Parse context-package fields:
+   - solution: name, feasibility, summary
+   - implementation_plan: tasks[], execution_flow, milestones
+   - dependencies: internal[], external[]
+   - technical_concerns: risks/blockers
+   - consensus: agreements, resolved_conflicts
+   - constraints: user requirements
+4. Use implementation_plan.tasks[] as task foundation
+5. Preserve task dependencies (depends_on) and execution_flow
+6. Expand tasks with convergence.criteria (testable completion conditions)
+7. Create .task/ directory and write individual TASK-*.json files
+8. Generate plan.json with task_ids[] referencing .task/ files
+
+## Output
+- ${sessionFolder}/plan.json (overview with task_ids[])
+- ${sessionFolder}/.task/TASK-*.json (independent task files)
+
+## Completion Checklist
+- [ ] plan.json has task_ids[] and task_count (NO embedded tasks[])
+- [ ] .task/*.json files preserve task dependencies from implementation_plan
+- [ ] Task execution order follows execution_flow
+- [ ] Key_points reflected in task descriptions
+- [ ] User constraints applied to implementation
+- [ ] convergence.criteria are testable
+- [ ] plan.json follows plan-overview-base-schema.json
+- [ ] Task files follow task-schema.json
+`
+})
+```
+
+**Step 3: Build executionContext**:
+```javascript
+// After plan.json is generated by cli-lite-planning-agent
+const plan = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/plan.json`))
+
+// Load task files from .task/ directory (two-layer format)
+const taskFiles = plan.task_ids.map(id => `${sessionFolder}/.task/${id}.json`)
+
+// Build executionContext (same structure as lite-plan)
+executionContext = {
+  planObject: plan,
+  taskFiles: taskFiles,  // Paths to .task/*.json files (two-layer format)
+  explorationsContext: null,  // Multi-CLI doesn't use exploration files
+  explorationAngles: [],      // No exploration angles
+  explorationManifest: null,  // No manifest
+  clarificationContext: null,  // Store user feedback from Phase 2 if exists
+  executionMethod: userSelection.execution_method,  // From Phase 4
+  codeReviewTool: userSelection.code_review_tool,   // From Phase 4
+  originalUserInput: taskDescription,
+
+  // Optional: Task-level executor assignments
+  executorAssignments: null,  // Could be enhanced in future
+
+  session: {
+    id: sessionId,
+    folder: sessionFolder,
+    artifacts: {
+      explorations: [],  // No explorations in multi-CLI workflow
+      explorations_manifest: null,
+      plan: `${sessionFolder}/plan.json`,
+      task_dir: plan.task_ids ? `${sessionFolder}/.task/` : null,
+      synthesis_rounds: Array.from({length: currentRound}, (_, i) =>
+        `${sessionFolder}/rounds/${i+1}/synthesis.json`
+      ),
+      context_package: `${sessionFolder}/context-package.json`
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Step 4: Hand off to Execution**:
+```javascript
+// Execute to lite-execute with in-memory context
+Skill(skill="workflow:lite-execute", args="--in-memory")
+```
+
+## Output File Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{MCP-task-slug-YYYY-MM-DD}/
+├── session-state.json          # Session tracking (orchestrator)
+├── rounds/
+│   ├── 1/synthesis.json        # Round 1 analysis (cli-discuss-agent)
+│   ├── 2/synthesis.json        # Round 2 analysis (cli-discuss-agent)
+│   └── .../
+├── context-package.json        # Extracted context for planning (orchestrator)
+├── plan.json                   # Plan overview with task_ids[] (NO embedded tasks[])
+└── .task/                      # Independent task files
+    ├── TASK-001.json            # Task file following task-schema.json
+    ├── TASK-002.json
+    └── ...
+```
+
+**File Producers**:
+
+| File | Producer | Content |
+|------|----------|---------|
+| `session-state.json` | Orchestrator | Session metadata, rounds, decisions |
+| `rounds/*/synthesis.json` | cli-discuss-agent | Solutions, convergence, cross-verification |
+| `context-package.json` | Orchestrator | Extracted solution, dependencies, consensus for planning |
+| `plan.json` | cli-lite-planning-agent | Plan overview with task_ids[] referencing .task/ files |
+| `.task/*.json` | cli-lite-planning-agent | Independent task files following task-schema.json |
+
+## synthesis.json Schema
+
+```json
+{
+  "round": 1,
+  "solutions": [{
+    "name": "Solution Name",
+    "source_cli": ["gemini", "codex"],
+    "feasibility": 0.85,
+    "effort": "low|medium|high",
+    "risk": "low|medium|high",
+    "summary": "Brief analysis summary",
+    "implementation_plan": {
+      "approach": "High-level technical approach",
+      "tasks": [
+        {"id": "T1", "name": "Task", "depends_on": [], "files": [], "key_point": "..."}
+      ],
+      "execution_flow": "T1 → T2 → T3",
+      "milestones": ["Checkpoint 1", "Checkpoint 2"]
+    },
+    "dependencies": {"internal": [], "external": []},
+    "technical_concerns": ["Risk 1", "Blocker 2"]
+  }],
+  "convergence": {
+    "score": 0.85,
+    "new_insights": false,
+    "recommendation": "converged|continue|user_input_needed"
+  },
+  "cross_verification": {
+    "agreements": [],
+    "disagreements": [],
+    "resolution": "..."
+  },
+  "clarification_questions": []
+}
+```
+
+**Key Planning Fields**:
+
+| Field | Purpose |
+|-------|---------|
+| `feasibility` | Viability score (0-1) |
+| `implementation_plan.tasks[]` | Discrete tasks with dependencies |
+| `implementation_plan.execution_flow` | Task sequence visualization |
+| `implementation_plan.milestones` | Key checkpoints |
+| `technical_concerns` | Risks and blockers |
+
+**Note**: Solutions ranked by internal scoring (array order = priority)
+
+## TodoWrite Structure
+
+**Initialization**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({ todos: [
+  { content: "Phase 1: Context Gathering", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Gathering context" },
+  { content: "Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion", status: "pending", activeForm: "Running discussion" },
+  { content: "Phase 3: Present Options", status: "pending", activeForm: "Presenting options" },
+  { content: "Phase 4: User Decision", status: "pending", activeForm: "Awaiting decision" },
+  { content: "Phase 5: Plan Generation", status: "pending", activeForm: "Generating plan" }
+]})
+```
+
+**During Discussion Rounds**:
+```javascript
+TodoWrite({ todos: [
+  { content: "Phase 1: Context Gathering", status: "completed", activeForm: "Gathering context" },
+  { content: "Phase 2: Multi-CLI Discussion", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Running discussion" },
+  { content: "  → Round 1: Initial analysis", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing" },
+  { content: "  → Round 2: Deep verification", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Verifying" },
+  { content: "Phase 3: Present Options", status: "pending", activeForm: "Presenting options" },
+  // ...
+]})
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Resolution |
+|-------|------------|
+| ACE search fails | Fall back to Glob/Grep for file discovery |
+| Agent fails | Retry once, then present partial results |
+| CLI timeout (in agent) | Agent uses fallback: gemini → codex → claude |
+| No convergence | Present best options, flag uncertainty |
+| synthesis.json parse error | Request agent retry |
+| User cancels | Save session for later resumption |
+
+## Configuration
+
+| Flag | Default | Description |
+|------|---------|-------------|
+| `--max-rounds` | 3 | Maximum discussion rounds |
+| `--tools` | gemini,codex | CLI tools for analysis |
+| `--mode` | parallel | Execution mode: parallel or serial |
+| `--auto-execute` | false | Auto-execute after approval |
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Be Specific**: Detailed task descriptions improve ACE context quality
+2. **Provide Feedback**: Use clarification rounds to refine requirements
+3. **Trust Cross-Verification**: Multi-CLI consensus indicates high confidence
+4. **Review Trade-offs**: Consider pros/cons before selecting solution
+5. **Check synthesis.json**: Review agent output for detailed analysis
+6. **Iterate When Needed**: Don't hesitate to request more analysis
+
+## Related Commands
+
+```bash
+# Simpler single-round planning
+/workflow:lite-plan "task description"
+
+# Issue-driven discovery
+/issue:discover-by-prompt "find issues"
+
+# View session files
+cat .workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{session-id}/plan.json
+cat .workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{session-id}/rounds/1/synthesis.json
+cat .workflow/.multi-cli-plan/{session-id}/context-package.json
+
+# Direct execution (if you have plan.json)
+/workflow:lite-execute plan.json
+```
+
+## Next Phase
+
+Return to orchestrator, then auto-continue to [Phase 2: Lite Execute](02-lite-execute.md) via Skill handoff.
diff --git a/.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/phases/02-lite-execute.md b/.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/phases/02-lite-execute.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..35202707
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/workflow-multi-cli-plan/phases/02-lite-execute.md
@@ -0,0 +1,767 @@
+# Phase 2: Lite Execute
+
+Complete execution engine supporting multiple input modes: in-memory plan, prompt description, or file content. This phase document preserves the full content of the original `workflow:lite-execute` command.
+
+> **Source**: Converted from `.claude/commands/workflow/lite-execute.md`. Frontmatter moved to SKILL.md.
+
+# Workflow Lite-Execute Command (/workflow:lite-execute)
+
+## Overview
+
+Flexible task execution command supporting three input modes: in-memory plan (from lite-plan), direct prompt description, or file content. Handles execution orchestration, progress tracking, and optional code review.
+
+**Core capabilities:**
+- Multi-mode input (in-memory plan, prompt description, or file path)
+- Execution orchestration (Agent or Codex) with full context
+- Live progress tracking via TodoWrite at execution call level
+- Optional code review with selected tool (Gemini, Agent, or custom)
+- Context continuity across multiple executions
+- Intelligent format detection (Enhanced Task JSON vs plain text)
+
+## Usage
+
+### Command Syntax
+```bash
+/workflow:lite-execute [FLAGS] <INPUT>
+
+# Flags
+--in-memory                Use plan from memory (called by lite-plan)
+
+# Arguments
+<input>                    Task description string, or path to file (required)
+```
+
+## Input Modes
+
+### Mode 1: In-Memory Plan
+
+**Trigger**: Called by lite-plan after Phase 4 approval with `--in-memory` flag
+
+**Input Source**: `executionContext` global variable set by lite-plan
+
+**Content**: Complete execution context (see Data Structures section)
+
+**Behavior**:
+- Skip execution method selection (already set by lite-plan)
+- Directly proceed to execution with full context
+- All planning artifacts available (exploration, clarifications, plan)
+
+### Mode 2: Prompt Description
+
+**Trigger**: User calls with task description string
+
+**Input**: Simple task description (e.g., "Add unit tests for auth module")
+
+**Behavior**:
+- Store prompt as `originalUserInput`
+- Create simple execution plan from prompt
+- AskUserQuestion: Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto)
+- AskUserQuestion: Select code review tool (Skip/Gemini/Agent/Other)
+- Proceed to execution with `originalUserInput` included
+
+**User Interaction**:
+```javascript
+// Parse --yes flag
+const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
+
+let userSelection
+
+if (autoYes) {
+  // Auto mode: Use defaults
+  console.log(`[--yes] Auto-confirming execution:`)
+  console.log(`  - Execution method: Auto`)
+  console.log(`  - Code review: Skip`)
+
+  userSelection = {
+    execution_method: "Auto",
+    code_review_tool: "Skip"
+  }
+} else {
+  // Interactive mode: Ask user
+  userSelection = AskUserQuestion({
+    questions: [
+      {
+        question: "Select execution method:",
+        header: "Execution",
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: [
+          { label: "Agent", description: "@code-developer agent" },
+          { label: "Codex", description: "codex CLI tool" },
+          { label: "Auto", description: "Auto-select based on complexity" }
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        question: "Enable code review after execution?",
+        header: "Code Review",
+        multiSelect: false,
+        options: [
+          { label: "Skip", description: "No review" },
+          { label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI tool" },
+          { label: "Codex Review", description: "Git-aware review (prompt OR --uncommitted)" },
+          { label: "Agent Review", description: "Current agent review" }
+        ]
+      }
+    ]
+  })
+}
+```
+
+### Mode 3: File Content
+
+**Trigger**: User calls with file path
+
+**Input**: Path to file containing task description or plan.json
+
+**Step 1: Read and Detect Format**
+
+```javascript
+fileContent = Read(filePath)
+
+// Attempt JSON parsing
+try {
+  jsonData = JSON.parse(fileContent)
+
+  // Check if plan.json from lite-plan session (two-layer format: task_ids[])
+  if (jsonData.summary && jsonData.approach && jsonData.task_ids) {
+    planObject = jsonData
+    originalUserInput = jsonData.summary
+    isPlanJson = true
+
+    // Load tasks from .task/*.json files
+    const planDir = filePath.replace(/[/\\][^/\\]+$/, '')  // parent directory
+    planObject._loadedTasks = loadTaskFiles(planDir, jsonData.task_ids)
+  } else {
+    // Valid JSON but not plan.json - treat as plain text
+    originalUserInput = fileContent
+    isPlanJson = false
+  }
+} catch {
+  // Not valid JSON - treat as plain text prompt
+  originalUserInput = fileContent
+  isPlanJson = false
+}
+```
+
+**Step 2: Create Execution Plan**
+
+If `isPlanJson === true`:
+- Use `planObject` directly
+- User selects execution method and code review
+
+If `isPlanJson === false`:
+- Treat file content as prompt (same behavior as Mode 2)
+- Create simple execution plan from content
+
+**Step 3: User Interaction**
+
+- AskUserQuestion: Select execution method (Agent/Codex/Auto)
+- AskUserQuestion: Select code review tool
+- Proceed to execution with full context
+
+## Helper Functions
+
+```javascript
+// Load task files from .task/ directory (two-layer format)
+function loadTaskFiles(planDir, taskIds) {
+  return taskIds.map(id => {
+    const taskPath = `${planDir}/.task/${id}.json`
+    return JSON.parse(Read(taskPath))
+  })
+}
+
+// Get tasks array from loaded .task/*.json files
+function getTasks(planObject) {
+  return planObject._loadedTasks || []
+}
+```
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Input Parsing:
+   └─ Decision (mode detection):
+      ├─ --in-memory flag → Mode 1: Load executionContext → Skip user selection
+      ├─ Ends with .md/.json/.txt → Mode 3: Read file → Detect format
+      │   ├─ Valid plan.json → Use planObject → User selects method + review
+      │   └─ Not plan.json → Treat as prompt → User selects method + review
+      └─ Other → Mode 2: Prompt description → User selects method + review
+
+Execution:
+   ├─ Step 1: Initialize result tracking (previousExecutionResults = [])
+   ├─ Step 2: Task grouping & batch creation
+   │   ├─ Extract explicit depends_on (no file/keyword inference)
+   │   ├─ Group: independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
+   │   ├─ Group: dependent tasks → sequential phases (respect dependencies)
+   │   └─ Create TodoWrite list for batches
+   ├─ Step 3: Launch execution
+   │   ├─ Phase 1: All independent tasks (⚡ single batch, concurrent)
+   │   └─ Phase 2+: Dependent tasks by dependency order
+   ├─ Step 4: Track progress (TodoWrite updates per batch)
+   └─ Step 5: Code review (if codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip")
+
+Output:
+   └─ Execution complete with results in previousExecutionResults[]
+```
+
+## Detailed Execution Steps
+
+### Step 1: Initialize Execution Tracking
+
+**Operations**:
+- Initialize result tracking for multi-execution scenarios
+- Set up `previousExecutionResults` array for context continuity
+- **In-Memory Mode**: Echo execution strategy from lite-plan for transparency
+
+```javascript
+// Initialize result tracking
+previousExecutionResults = []
+
+// In-Memory Mode: Echo execution strategy (transparency before execution)
+if (executionContext) {
+  console.log(`
+📋 Execution Strategy (from lite-plan):
+   Method: ${executionContext.executionMethod}
+   Review: ${executionContext.codeReviewTool}
+   Tasks: ${getTasks(executionContext.planObject).length}
+   Complexity: ${executionContext.planObject.complexity}
+${executionContext.executorAssignments ? `   Assignments: ${JSON.stringify(executionContext.executorAssignments)}` : ''}
+  `)
+}
+```
+
+### Step 2: Task Grouping & Batch Creation
+
+**Dependency Analysis & Grouping Algorithm**:
+```javascript
+// Use explicit depends_on from plan.json (no inference from file/keywords)
+function extractDependencies(tasks) {
+  const taskIdToIndex = {}
+  tasks.forEach((t, i) => { taskIdToIndex[t.id] = i })
+
+  return tasks.map((task, i) => {
+    // Only use explicit depends_on from plan.json
+    const deps = (task.depends_on || [])
+      .map(depId => taskIdToIndex[depId])
+      .filter(idx => idx !== undefined && idx < i)
+    return { ...task, taskIndex: i, dependencies: deps }
+  })
+}
+
+// Group into batches: maximize parallel execution
+function createExecutionCalls(tasks, executionMethod) {
+  const tasksWithDeps = extractDependencies(tasks)
+  const processed = new Set()
+  const calls = []
+
+  // Phase 1: All independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
+  const independentTasks = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => t.dependencies.length === 0)
+  if (independentTasks.length > 0) {
+    independentTasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
+    calls.push({
+      method: executionMethod,
+      executionType: "parallel",
+      groupId: "P1",
+      taskSummary: independentTasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '),
+      tasks: independentTasks
+    })
+  }
+
+  // Phase 2: Dependent tasks → sequential batches (respect dependencies)
+  let sequentialIndex = 1
+  let remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
+
+  while (remaining.length > 0) {
+    // Find tasks whose dependencies are all satisfied
+    const ready = remaining.filter(t =>
+      t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d))
+    )
+
+    if (ready.length === 0) {
+      console.warn('Circular dependency detected, forcing remaining tasks')
+      ready.push(...remaining)
+    }
+
+    // Group ready tasks (can run in parallel within this phase)
+    ready.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
+    calls.push({
+      method: executionMethod,
+      executionType: ready.length > 1 ? "parallel" : "sequential",
+      groupId: ready.length > 1 ? `P${calls.length + 1}` : `S${sequentialIndex++}`,
+      taskSummary: ready.map(t => t.title).join(ready.length > 1 ? ' | ' : ' → '),
+      tasks: ready
+    })
+
+    remaining = remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
+  }
+
+  return calls
+}
+
+executionCalls = createExecutionCalls(getTasks(planObject), executionMethod).map(c => ({ ...c, id: `[${c.groupId}]` }))
+
+TodoWrite({
+  todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({
+    content: `${c.executionType === "parallel" ? "⚡" : "→"} ${c.id} (${c.tasks.length} tasks)`,
+    status: "pending",
+    activeForm: `Executing ${c.id}`
+  }))
+})
+```
+
+### Step 3: Launch Execution
+
+**Executor Resolution** (任务级 executor 优先于全局设置):
+```javascript
+// 获取任务的 executor（优先使用 executorAssignments，fallback 到全局 executionMethod）
+function getTaskExecutor(task) {
+  const assignments = executionContext?.executorAssignments || {}
+  if (assignments[task.id]) {
+    return assignments[task.id].executor  // 'gemini' | 'codex' | 'agent'
+  }
+  // Fallback: 全局 executionMethod 映射
+  const method = executionContext?.executionMethod || 'Auto'
+  if (method === 'Agent') return 'agent'
+  if (method === 'Codex') return 'codex'
+  // Auto: 根据复杂度
+  return planObject.complexity === 'Low' ? 'agent' : 'codex'
+}
+
+// 按 executor 分组任务
+function groupTasksByExecutor(tasks) {
+  const groups = { gemini: [], codex: [], agent: [] }
+  tasks.forEach(task => {
+    const executor = getTaskExecutor(task)
+    groups[executor].push(task)
+  })
+  return groups
+}
+```
+
+**Execution Flow**: Parallel batches concurrently → Sequential batches in order
+```javascript
+const parallel = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "parallel")
+const sequential = executionCalls.filter(c => c.executionType === "sequential")
+
+// Phase 1: Launch all parallel batches (single message with multiple tool calls)
+if (parallel.length > 0) {
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: c.executionType === "parallel" ? "in_progress" : "pending" })) })
+  parallelResults = await Promise.all(parallel.map(c => executeBatch(c)))
+  previousExecutionResults.push(...parallelResults)
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: parallel.includes(c) ? "completed" : "pending" })) })
+}
+
+// Phase 2: Execute sequential batches one by one
+for (const call of sequential) {
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: c === call ? "in_progress" : "..." })) })
+  result = await executeBatch(call)
+  previousExecutionResults.push(result)
+  TodoWrite({ todos: executionCalls.map(c => ({ status: "completed" or "pending" })) })
+}
+```
+
+### Unified Task Prompt Builder
+
+**Task Formatting Principle**: Each task is a self-contained checklist. The executor only needs to know what THIS task requires. Same template for Agent and CLI.
+
+```javascript
+function buildExecutionPrompt(batch) {
+  // Task template (6 parts: Files → Why → How → Reference → Risks → Done)
+  const formatTask = (t) => `
+## ${t.title}
+
+**Scope**: \`${t.scope}\`  |  **Action**: ${t.action}
+
+### Files
+${(t.files || []).map(f => `- **${f.path}** → \`${f.target || ''}\`: ${f.change || (f.changes || []).join(', ') || ''}`).join('\n')}
+
+${t.rationale ? `
+### Why this approach (Medium/High)
+${t.rationale.chosen_approach}
+${t.rationale.decision_factors?.length > 0 ? `\nKey factors: ${t.rationale.decision_factors.join(', ')}` : ''}
+${t.rationale.tradeoffs ? `\nTradeoffs: ${t.rationale.tradeoffs}` : ''}
+` : ''}
+
+### How to do it
+${t.description}
+
+${t.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}
+
+${t.code_skeleton ? `
+### Code skeleton (High)
+${t.code_skeleton.interfaces?.length > 0 ? `**Interfaces**: ${t.code_skeleton.interfaces.map(i => `\`${i.name}\` - ${i.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
+${t.code_skeleton.key_functions?.length > 0 ? `\n**Functions**: ${t.code_skeleton.key_functions.map(f => `\`${f.signature}\` - ${f.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
+${t.code_skeleton.classes?.length > 0 ? `\n**Classes**: ${t.code_skeleton.classes.map(c => `\`${c.name}\` - ${c.purpose}`).join(', ')}` : ''}
+` : ''}
+
+### Reference
+- Pattern: ${t.reference?.pattern || 'N/A'}
+- Files: ${t.reference?.files?.join(', ') || 'N/A'}
+${t.reference?.examples ? `- Notes: ${t.reference.examples}` : ''}
+
+${t.risks?.length > 0 ? `
+### Risk mitigations (High)
+${t.risks.map(r => `- ${r.description} → **${r.mitigation}**`).join('\n')}
+` : ''}
+
+### Done when
+${(t.convergence?.criteria || []).map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}
+${(t.test?.success_metrics || []).length > 0 ? `\n**Success metrics**: ${t.test.success_metrics.join(', ')}` : ''}`
+
+  // Build prompt
+  const sections = []
+
+  if (originalUserInput) sections.push(`## Goal\n${originalUserInput}`)
+
+  sections.push(`## Tasks\n${batch.tasks.map(formatTask).join('\n\n---\n')}`)
+
+  // Context (reference only)
+  const context = []
+  if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0) {
+    context.push(`### Previous Work\n${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `- ${r.tasksSummary}: ${r.status}`).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+  if (clarificationContext) {
+    context.push(`### Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- ${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
+  }
+  if (executionContext?.planObject?.data_flow?.diagram) {
+    context.push(`### Data Flow\n${executionContext.planObject.data_flow.diagram}`)
+  }
+  if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan) {
+    context.push(`### Artifacts\nPlan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
+  }
+  // Project guidelines (user-defined constraints from /workflow:session:solidify)
+  context.push(`### Project Guidelines\n@.workflow/project-guidelines.json`)
+  if (context.length > 0) sections.push(`## Context\n${context.join('\n\n')}`)
+
+  sections.push(`Complete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.`)
+
+  return sections.join('\n\n')
+}
+```
+
+**Option A: Agent Execution**
+
+When to use:
+- `getTaskExecutor(task) === "agent"`
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Agent"` (全局 fallback)
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Low"` (全局 fallback)
+
+```javascript
+Task(
+  subagent_type="code-developer",
+  run_in_background=false,
+  description=batch.taskSummary,
+  prompt=buildExecutionPrompt(batch)
+)
+```
+
+**Result Collection**: After completion, collect result following `executionResult` structure (see Data Structures section)
+
+**Option B: CLI Execution (Codex)**
+
+When to use:
+- `getTaskExecutor(task) === "codex"`
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Codex"` (全局 fallback)
+- 或 `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Medium/High"` (全局 fallback)
+
+```bash
+ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write
+```
+
+**Execution with fixed IDs** (predictable ID pattern):
+```javascript
+// Launch CLI in background, wait for task hook callback
+// Generate fixed execution ID: ${sessionId}-${groupId}
+const sessionId = executionContext?.session?.id || 'standalone'
+const fixedExecutionId = `${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}`  // e.g., "implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1"
+
+// Check if resuming from previous failed execution
+const previousCliId = batch.resumeFromCliId || null
+
+// Build command with fixed ID (and optional resume for continuation)
+const cli_command = previousCliId
+  ? `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId} --resume ${previousCliId}`
+  : `ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId}`
+
+// Execute in background, stop output and wait for task hook callback
+Bash(
+  command=cli_command,
+  run_in_background=true
+)
+// STOP HERE - CLI executes in background, task hook will notify on completion
+```
+
+**Resume on Failure** (with fixed ID):
+```javascript
+// If execution failed or timed out, offer resume option
+if (bash_result.status === 'failed' || bash_result.status === 'timeout') {
+  console.log(`
+⚠️ Execution incomplete. Resume available:
+   Fixed ID: ${fixedExecutionId}
+   Lookup: ccw cli detail ${fixedExecutionId}
+   Resume: ccw cli -p "Continue tasks" --resume ${fixedExecutionId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedExecutionId}-retry
+`)
+
+  // Store for potential retry in same session
+  batch.resumeFromCliId = fixedExecutionId
+}
+```
+
+**Result Collection**: After completion, analyze output and collect result following `executionResult` structure (include `cliExecutionId` for resume capability)
+
+**Option C: CLI Execution (Gemini)**
+
+When to use: `getTaskExecutor(task) === "gemini"` (分析类任务)
+
+```bash
+# 使用统一的 buildExecutionPrompt，切换 tool 和 mode
+ccw cli -p "${buildExecutionPrompt(batch)}" --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${sessionId}-${batch.groupId}
+```
+
+### Step 4: Progress Tracking
+
+Progress tracked at batch level (not individual task level). Icons: ⚡ (parallel, concurrent), → (sequential, one-by-one)
+
+### Step 5: Code Review (Optional)
+
+**Skip Condition**: Only run if `codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip"`
+
+**Review Focus**: Verify implementation against plan convergence criteria and test requirements
+- Read plan.json + .task/*.json for task convergence criteria and test checklist
+- Check each convergence criterion is fulfilled
+- Verify success metrics from test field (Medium/High complexity)
+- Run unit/integration tests specified in test field
+- Validate code quality and identify issues
+- Ensure alignment with planned approach and risk mitigations
+
+**Operations**:
+- Agent Review: Current agent performs direct review
+- Gemini Review: Execute gemini CLI with review prompt
+- Codex Review: Two options - (A) with prompt for complex reviews, (B) `--uncommitted` flag only for quick reviews
+- Custom tool: Execute specified CLI tool (qwen, etc.)
+
+**Unified Review Template** (All tools use same standard):
+
+**Review Criteria**:
+- **Convergence Criteria**: Verify each criterion from task convergence.criteria
+- **Test Checklist** (Medium/High): Check unit, integration, success_metrics from task test
+- **Code Quality**: Analyze quality, identify issues, suggest improvements
+- **Plan Alignment**: Validate implementation matches planned approach and risk mitigations
+
+**Shared Prompt Template** (used by all CLI tools):
+```
+PURPOSE: Code review for implemented changes against plan convergence criteria and test requirements
+TASK: • Verify plan convergence criteria fulfillment • Check test requirements (unit, integration, success_metrics) • Analyze code quality • Identify issues • Suggest improvements • Validate plan adherence and risk mitigations
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @**/* @{plan.json} @{.task/*.json} [@{exploration.json}] | Memory: Review lite-execute changes against plan requirements including test checklist
+EXPECTED: Quality assessment with:
+  - Convergence criteria verification (all tasks from .task/*.json)
+  - Test checklist validation (Medium/High: unit, integration, success_metrics)
+  - Issue identification
+  - Recommendations
+  Explicitly check each convergence criterion and test item from .task/*.json files.
+CONSTRAINTS: Focus on plan convergence criteria, test requirements, and plan adherence | analysis=READ-ONLY
+```
+
+**Tool-Specific Execution** (Apply shared prompt template above):
+
+```bash
+# Method 1: Agent Review (current agent)
+# - Read plan.json: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}
+# - Apply unified review criteria (see Shared Prompt Template)
+# - Report findings directly
+
+# Method 2: Gemini Review (recommended)
+ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool gemini --mode analysis
+# CONTEXT includes: @**/* @${plan.json} [@${exploration.json}]
+
+# Method 3: Qwen Review (alternative)
+ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool qwen --mode analysis
+# Same prompt as Gemini, different execution engine
+
+# Method 4: Codex Review (git-aware) - Two mutually exclusive options:
+
+# Option A: With custom prompt (reviews uncommitted by default)
+ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool codex --mode review
+# Use for complex reviews with specific focus areas
+
+# Option B: Target flag only (no prompt allowed)
+ccw cli --tool codex --mode review --uncommitted
+# Quick review of uncommitted changes without custom instructions
+
+# ⚠️ IMPORTANT: -p prompt and target flags (--uncommitted/--base/--commit) are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE
+```
+
+**Multi-Round Review with Fixed IDs**:
+```javascript
+// Generate fixed review ID
+const reviewId = `${sessionId}-review`
+
+// First review pass with fixed ID
+const reviewResult = Bash(`ccw cli -p "[Review prompt]" --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${reviewId}`)
+
+// If issues found, continue review dialog with fixed ID chain
+if (hasUnresolvedIssues(reviewResult)) {
+  // Resume with follow-up questions
+  Bash(`ccw cli -p "Clarify the security concerns you mentioned" --resume ${reviewId} --tool gemini --mode analysis --id ${reviewId}-followup`)
+}
+```
+
+**Implementation Note**: Replace `[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]` placeholder with actual template content, substituting:
+- `@{plan.json}` → `@${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`
+- `[@{exploration.json}]` → exploration files from artifacts (if exists)
+
+### Step 6: Update Development Index
+
+**Trigger**: After all executions complete (regardless of code review)
+
+**Skip Condition**: Skip if `.workflow/project-tech.json` does not exist
+
+**Operations**:
+```javascript
+const projectJsonPath = '.workflow/project-tech.json'
+if (!fileExists(projectJsonPath)) return  // Silent skip
+
+const projectJson = JSON.parse(Read(projectJsonPath))
+
+// Initialize if needed
+if (!projectJson.development_index) {
+  projectJson.development_index = { feature: [], enhancement: [], bugfix: [], refactor: [], docs: [] }
+}
+
+// Detect category from keywords
+function detectCategory(text) {
+  text = text.toLowerCase()
+  if (/\b(fix|bug|error|issue|crash)\b/.test(text)) return 'bugfix'
+  if (/\b(refactor|cleanup|reorganize)\b/.test(text)) return 'refactor'
+  if (/\b(doc|readme|comment)\b/.test(text)) return 'docs'
+  if (/\b(add|new|create|implement)\b/.test(text)) return 'feature'
+  return 'enhancement'
+}
+
+// Detect sub_feature from task file paths
+function detectSubFeature(tasks) {
+  const dirs = tasks.map(t => t.file?.split('/').slice(-2, -1)[0]).filter(Boolean)
+  const counts = dirs.reduce((a, d) => { a[d] = (a[d] || 0) + 1; return a }, {})
+  return Object.entries(counts).sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1])[0]?.[0] || 'general'
+}
+
+const category = detectCategory(`${planObject.summary} ${planObject.approach}`)
+const entry = {
+  title: planObject.summary.slice(0, 60),
+  sub_feature: detectSubFeature(getTasks(planObject)),
+  date: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0],
+  description: planObject.approach.slice(0, 100),
+  status: previousExecutionResults.every(r => r.status === 'completed') ? 'completed' : 'partial',
+  session_id: executionContext?.session?.id || null
+}
+
+projectJson.development_index[category].push(entry)
+projectJson.statistics.last_updated = new Date().toISOString()
+Write(projectJsonPath, JSON.stringify(projectJson, null, 2))
+
+console.log(`✓ Development index: [${category}] ${entry.title}`)
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+**Input Modes**: In-memory (lite-plan), prompt (standalone), file (JSON/text)
+**Task Grouping**: Based on explicit depends_on only; independent tasks run in single parallel batch
+**Execution**: All independent tasks launch concurrently via single Claude message with multiple tool calls
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Cause | Resolution |
+|-------|-------|------------|
+| Missing executionContext | --in-memory without context | Error: "No execution context found. Only available when called by lite-plan." |
+| File not found | File path doesn't exist | Error: "File not found: {path}. Check file path." |
+| Empty file | File exists but no content | Error: "File is empty: {path}. Provide task description." |
+| Invalid Enhanced Task JSON | JSON missing required fields | Warning: "Missing required fields. Treating as plain text." |
+| Malformed JSON | JSON parsing fails | Treat as plain text (expected for non-JSON files) |
+| Execution failure | Agent/Codex crashes | Display error, use fixed ID `${sessionId}-${groupId}` for resume: `ccw cli -p "Continue" --resume <fixed-id> --id <fixed-id>-retry` |
+| Execution timeout | CLI exceeded timeout | Use fixed ID for resume with extended timeout |
+| Codex unavailable | Codex not installed | Show installation instructions, offer Agent execution |
+| Fixed ID not found | Custom ID lookup failed | Check `ccw cli history`, verify date directories |
+
+## Data Structures
+
+### executionContext (Input - Mode 1)
+
+Passed from lite-plan via global variable:
+
+```javascript
+{
+  planObject: {
+    summary: string,
+    approach: string,
+    task_ids: string[],                          // Task IDs referencing .task/*.json files
+    task_count: number,                          // Number of tasks
+    _loadedTasks: [...],                         // Populated at runtime from .task/*.json files
+    estimated_time: string,
+    recommended_execution: string,
+    complexity: string
+  },
+  // Task file paths (populated for two-layer format)
+  taskFiles: [{id: string, path: string}] | null,
+  explorationsContext: {...} | null,       // Multi-angle explorations
+  explorationAngles: string[],             // List of exploration angles
+  explorationManifest: {...} | null,       // Exploration manifest
+  clarificationContext: {...} | null,
+  executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto",  // 全局默认
+  codeReviewTool: "Skip" | "Gemini Review" | "Agent Review" | string,
+  originalUserInput: string,
+
+  // 任务级 executor 分配（优先于 executionMethod）
+  executorAssignments: {
+    [taskId]: { executor: "gemini" | "codex" | "agent", reason: string }
+  },
+
+  // Session artifacts location (saved by lite-plan)
+  session: {
+    id: string,                        // Session identifier: {taskSlug}-{shortTimestamp}
+    folder: string,                    // Session folder path: .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id}
+    artifacts: {
+      explorations: [{angle, path}],   // exploration-{angle}.json paths
+      explorations_manifest: string,   // explorations-manifest.json path
+      plan: string                     // plan.json path (always present)
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Artifact Usage**:
+- Artifact files contain detailed planning context
+- Pass artifact paths to CLI tools and agents for enhanced context
+- See execution options below for usage examples
+
+### executionResult (Output)
+
+Collected after each execution call completes:
+
+```javascript
+{
+  executionId: string,                 // e.g., "[Agent-1]", "[Codex-1]"
+  status: "completed" | "partial" | "failed",
+  tasksSummary: string,                // Brief description of tasks handled
+  completionSummary: string,           // What was completed
+  keyOutputs: string,                  // Files created/modified, key changes
+  notes: string,                       // Important context for next execution
+  fixedCliId: string | null            // Fixed CLI execution ID (e.g., "implement-auth-2025-12-13-P1")
+}
+```
+
+Appended to `previousExecutionResults` array for context continuity in multi-execution scenarios.
+
+## Post-Completion Expansion
+
+完成后询问用户是否扩展为issue(test/enhance/refactor/doc)，选中项调用 `/issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}"`
+
+**Fixed ID Pattern**: `${sessionId}-${groupId}` enables predictable lookup without auto-generated timestamps.
+
+**Resume Usage**: If `status` is "partial" or "failed", use `fixedCliId` to resume:
+```bash
+# Lookup previous execution
+ccw cli detail ${fixedCliId}
+
+# Resume with new fixed ID for retry
+ccw cli -p "Continue from where we left off" --resume ${fixedCliId} --tool codex --mode write --id ${fixedCliId}-retry
+```