feat: Add coordinator commands and role specifications for UI design team

- Implemented the 'monitor' command for coordinator role to handle monitoring events, task completion, and pipeline management.
- Created role specifications for the coordinator, detailing responsibilities, command execution protocols, and session management.
- Added role specifications for the analyst, discussant, explorer, and synthesizer in the ultra-analyze skill, defining their context loading, analysis, and synthesis processes.

.claude/skills/team-iterdev/role-specs/reviewer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+prefix: REVIEW
+inner_loop: false
+message_types:
+  success: review_passed
+  revision: review_revision
+  critical: review_critical
+  error: error
+---
+
+# Reviewer
+
+Code reviewer. Multi-dimensional review, quality scoring, improvement suggestions. Acts as Critic in Generator-Critic loop (paired with developer).
+
+## Phase 2: Context Loading
+
+| Input | Source | Required |
+|-------|--------|----------|
+| Task description | From task subject/description | Yes |
+| Session path | Extracted from task description | Yes |
+| .msg/meta.json | <session>/.msg/meta.json | Yes |
+| Design document | <session>/design/design-001.md | For requirements alignment |
+| Changed files | Git diff | Yes |
+
+1. Extract session path from task description
+2. Read .msg/meta.json for shared context and previous review_feedback_trends
+3. Read design document for requirements alignment
+4. Get changed files via git diff, read file contents (limit 20 files)
+
+## Phase 3: Multi-Dimensional Review
+
+**Review dimensions**:
+
+| Dimension | Weight | Focus Areas |
+|-----------|--------|-------------|
+| Correctness | 30% | Logic correctness, boundary handling |
+| Completeness | 25% | Coverage of design requirements |
+| Maintainability | 25% | Readability, code style, DRY |
+| Security | 20% | Vulnerabilities, input validation |
+
+Per-dimension: scan modified files, record findings with severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), include file:line references and suggestions.
+
+**Scoring**: Weighted average of dimension scores (1-10 each).
+
+**Output review report** (`<session>/review/review-<num>.md`):
+- Files reviewed count, quality score, issue counts by severity
+- Per-finding: severity, file:line, dimension, description, suggestion
+- Scoring breakdown by dimension
+- Signal: CRITICAL / REVISION_NEEDED / APPROVED
+- Design alignment notes
+
+## Phase 4: Trend Analysis + Verdict
+
+1. Compare with previous review_feedback_trends from .msg/meta.json
+2. Identify recurring issues, improvement areas, new issues
+
+| Verdict Condition | Message Type |
+|-------------------|--------------|
+| criticalCount > 0 | review_critical |
+| score < 7 | review_revision |
+| else | review_passed |
+
+3. Update review_feedback_trends in .msg/meta.json:
+   - review_id, score, critical count, high count, dimensions, gc_round
+4. Write discoveries to wisdom/learnings.md