feat: Add coordinator commands and role specifications for UI design team

- Implemented the 'monitor' command for coordinator role to handle monitoring events, task completion, and pipeline management.
- Created role specifications for the coordinator, detailing responsibilities, command execution protocols, and session management.
- Added role specifications for the analyst, discussant, explorer, and synthesizer in the ultra-analyze skill, defining their context loading, analysis, and synthesis processes.

.claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/role-specs/scout.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+---
+prefix: SCOUT
+inner_loop: false
+subagents: []
+message_types:
+  success: scan_ready
+  error: error
+  issues: issues_found
+---
+
+# Multi-Perspective Scout
+
+Scan codebase from multiple perspectives (bug, security, test-coverage, code-quality, UX) to discover potential issues. Produce structured scan results with severity-ranked findings.
+
+## Phase 2: Context & Scope Assessment
+
+| Input | Source | Required |
+|-------|--------|----------|
+| Task description | From task subject/description | Yes |
+| Session path | Extracted from task description | Yes |
+| .msg/meta.json | <session>/wisdom/.msg/meta.json | No |
+
+1. Extract session path and target scope from task description
+2. Determine scan scope: explicit scope from task or `**/*` default
+3. Get recent changed files: `git diff --name-only HEAD~5 2>/dev/null || echo ""`
+4. Read .msg/meta.json for historical defect patterns (`defect_patterns`)
+5. Select scan perspectives based on task description:
+   - Default: `["bug", "security", "test-coverage", "code-quality"]`
+   - Add `"ux"` if task mentions UX/UI
+6. Assess complexity to determine scan strategy:
+
+| Complexity | Condition | Strategy |
+|------------|-----------|----------|
+| Low | < 5 changed files, no specific keywords | ACE search + Grep inline |
+| Medium | 5-15 files or specific perspective requested | CLI fan-out (3 core perspectives) |
+| High | > 15 files or full-project scan | CLI fan-out (all perspectives) |
+
+## Phase 3: Multi-Perspective Scan
+
+**Low complexity**: Use `mcp__ace-tool__search_context` for quick pattern-based scan.
+
+**Medium/High complexity**: CLI fan-out -- one `ccw cli --mode analysis` per perspective:
+
+For each active perspective, build prompt:
+```
+PURPOSE: Scan code from <perspective> perspective to discover potential issues
+TASK: Analyze code patterns for <perspective> problems, identify anti-patterns, check for common issues
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @<scan-scope>
+EXPECTED: List of findings with severity (critical/high/medium/low), file:line references, description
+CONSTRAINTS: Focus on actionable findings only
+```
+Execute via: `ccw cli -p "<prompt>" --tool gemini --mode analysis`
+
+After all perspectives complete:
+- Parse CLI outputs into structured findings
+- Deduplicate by file:line (merge perspectives for same location)
+- Compare against known defect patterns from .msg/meta.json
+- Rank by severity: critical > high > medium > low
+
+## Phase 4: Result Aggregation
+
+1. Build `discoveredIssues` array from critical + high findings (with id, severity, perspective, file, line, description)
+2. Write scan results to `<session>/scan/scan-results.json`:
+   - scan_date, perspectives scanned, total findings, by_severity counts, findings detail, issues_created count
+3. Update `<session>/wisdom/.msg/meta.json`: merge `discovered_issues` field
+4. Contribute to wisdom/issues.md if new patterns found