diff --git a/.codex/prompts/brainstorm-with-file.md b/.codex/prompts/brainstorm-with-file.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b7d4c2d7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.codex/prompts/brainstorm-with-file.md
@@ -0,0 +1,933 @@
+---
+description: Interactive brainstorming with multi-perspective analysis, idea expansion, and documented thought evolution
+argument-hint: TOPIC="<idea or topic to brainstorm>"
+---
+
+# Codex Brainstorm-With-File Prompt
+
+## Overview
+
+Interactive brainstorming workflow with **documented thought evolution**. Expands initial ideas through questioning, multi-perspective analysis, and iterative refinement.
+
+**Core workflow**: Seed Idea → Expand → Multi-Perspective Explore → Synthesize → Refine → Crystallize
+
+**Key features**:
+- **brainstorm.md**: Complete thought evolution timeline
+- **Multi-perspective analysis**: Creative, Pragmatic, Systematic viewpoints
+- **Idea expansion**: Progressive questioning and exploration
+- **Diverge-Converge cycles**: Generate options then focus on best paths
+- **Synthesis**: Merge multiple perspectives into coherent solutions
+
+## Target Topic
+
+**$TOPIC**
+
+## Execution Process
+
+```
+Session Detection:
+   ├─ Check if brainstorm session exists for topic
+   ├─ EXISTS + brainstorm.md exists → Continue mode
+   └─ NOT_FOUND → New session mode
+
+Phase 1: Seed Understanding
+   ├─ Parse initial idea/topic
+   ├─ Identify brainstorm dimensions (technical, UX, business, etc.)
+   ├─ Initial scoping with user
+   ├─ Expand seed into exploration vectors
+   └─ Document in brainstorm.md
+
+Phase 2: Divergent Exploration (Multi-Perspective)
+   ├─ Creative perspective: Innovative, unconventional ideas
+   ├─ Pragmatic perspective: Implementation-focused approaches
+   ├─ Systematic perspective: Architectural, structured solutions
+   └─ Aggregate diverse viewpoints
+
+Phase 3: Interactive Refinement (Multi-Round)
+   ├─ Present multi-perspective findings
+   ├─ User selects promising directions
+   ├─ Deep dive on selected paths
+   ├─ Challenge assumptions (devil's advocate)
+   ├─ Update brainstorm.md with evolution
+   └─ Repeat diverge-converge cycles
+
+Phase 4: Convergence & Crystallization
+   ├─ Synthesize best ideas
+   ├─ Resolve conflicts between perspectives
+   ├─ Formulate actionable conclusions
+   ├─ Generate next steps or implementation plan
+   └─ Final brainstorm.md update
+
+Output:
+   ├─ .workflow/.brainstorm/{slug}-{date}/brainstorm.md (thought evolution)
+   ├─ .workflow/.brainstorm/{slug}-{date}/perspectives.json (analysis findings)
+   ├─ .workflow/.brainstorm/{slug}-{date}/synthesis.json (final ideas)
+   └─ .workflow/.brainstorm/{slug}-{date}/ideas/ (individual idea deep-dives)
+```
+
+## Implementation Details
+
+### Session Setup & Mode Detection
+
+```javascript
+const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
+
+const topicSlug = "$TOPIC".toLowerCase().replace(/[^a-z0-9\u4e00-\u9fa5]+/g, '-').substring(0, 40)
+const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)
+
+const sessionId = `BS-${topicSlug}-${dateStr}`
+const sessionFolder = `.workflow/.brainstorm/${sessionId}`
+const brainstormPath = `${sessionFolder}/brainstorm.md`
+const perspectivesPath = `${sessionFolder}/perspectives.json`
+const synthesisPath = `${sessionFolder}/synthesis.json`
+const ideasFolder = `${sessionFolder}/ideas`
+
+// Auto-detect mode
+const sessionExists = fs.existsSync(sessionFolder)
+const hasBrainstorm = sessionExists && fs.existsSync(brainstormPath)
+
+const mode = hasBrainstorm ? 'continue' : 'new'
+
+if (!sessionExists) {
+  bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/ideas`)
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 1: Seed Understanding
+
+#### Step 1.1: Parse Seed & Identify Dimensions
+
+```javascript
+// Brainstorm dimensions for multi-perspective analysis
+const BRAINSTORM_DIMENSIONS = {
+  technical: ['技术', 'technical', 'implementation', 'code', '实现', 'architecture'],
+  ux: ['用户', 'user', 'experience', 'UX', 'UI', '体验', 'interaction'],
+  business: ['业务', 'business', 'value', 'ROI', '价值', 'market'],
+  innovation: ['创新', 'innovation', 'novel', 'creative', '新颖'],
+  feasibility: ['可行', 'feasible', 'practical', 'realistic', '实际'],
+  scalability: ['扩展', 'scale', 'growth', 'performance', '性能'],
+  security: ['安全', 'security', 'risk', 'protection', '风险']
+}
+
+function identifyDimensions(topic) {
+  const text = topic.toLowerCase()
+  const matched = []
+  
+  for (const [dimension, keywords] of Object.entries(BRAINSTORM_DIMENSIONS)) {
+    if (keywords.some(k => text.includes(k))) {
+      matched.push(dimension)
+    }
+  }
+  
+  return matched.length > 0 ? matched : ['technical', 'innovation', 'feasibility']
+}
+
+const dimensions = identifyDimensions("$TOPIC")
+```
+
+#### Step 1.2: Initial Scoping (New Session Only)
+
+Ask user to scope the brainstorm:
+
+- Focus areas: 技术方案 / 用户体验 / 创新突破 / 可行性评估
+- Brainstorm depth: Quick Divergence / Balanced Exploration / Deep Dive
+
+#### Step 1.3: Expand Seed into Exploration Vectors
+
+Generate exploration vectors from seed idea:
+
+1. Core question: What is the fundamental problem/opportunity?
+2. User perspective: Who benefits and how?
+3. Technical angle: What enables this technically?
+4. Alternative approaches: What other ways could this be solved?
+5. Challenges: What could go wrong or block success?
+6. Innovation angle: What would make this 10x better?
+7. Integration: How does this fit with existing systems/processes?
+
+#### Step 1.4: Create/Update brainstorm.md
+
+For new session:
+
+```markdown
+# Brainstorm Session
+
+**Session ID**: ${sessionId}
+**Topic**: $TOPIC
+**Started**: ${getUtc8ISOString()}
+**Dimensions**: ${dimensions.join(', ')}
+
+---
+
+## Initial Context
+
+**Focus Areas**: ${userFocusAreas.join(', ')}
+**Depth**: ${brainstormDepth}
+**Constraints**: ${constraints.join(', ') || 'None specified'}
+
+---
+
+## Seed Expansion
+
+### Original Idea
+> $TOPIC
+
+### Exploration Vectors
+
+${explorationVectors.map((v, i) => `
+#### Vector ${i+1}: ${v.title}
+**Question**: ${v.question}
+**Angle**: ${v.angle}
+**Potential**: ${v.potential}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+---
+
+## Thought Evolution Timeline
+
+### Round 1 - Seed Understanding (${timestamp})
+
+#### Initial Parsing
+- **Core concept**: ${coreConcept}
+- **Problem space**: ${problemSpace}
+- **Opportunity**: ${opportunity}
+
+#### Key Questions to Explore
+${keyQuestions.map((q, i) => `${i+1}. ${q}`).join('\n')}
+
+---
+
+## Current Ideas
+
+*To be populated after exploration phases*
+
+---
+
+## Idea Graveyard
+
+*Discarded ideas with reasons - kept for reference*
+```
+
+For continue session, append:
+
+```markdown
+### Round ${n} - Continuation (${timestamp})
+
+#### Previous Context
+
+Resuming brainstorm based on prior discussion.
+
+#### New Focus
+
+${newFocusFromUser}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 2: Divergent Exploration (Multi-Perspective)
+
+#### Step 2.1: Creative Perspective Analysis
+
+Explore from creative/innovative angle:
+
+- Think beyond obvious solutions - what would be surprising/delightful?
+- Cross-domain inspiration (what can we learn from other industries?)
+- Challenge assumptions - what if the opposite were true?
+- Generate 'moonshot' ideas alongside practical ones
+- Consider future trends and emerging technologies
+
+Output:
+- 5+ creative ideas with brief descriptions
+- Each idea rated: novelty (1-5), potential impact (1-5)
+- Key assumptions challenged
+- Cross-domain inspirations
+- One 'crazy' idea that might just work
+
+#### Step 2.2: Pragmatic Perspective Analysis
+
+Evaluate from implementation reality:
+
+- Technical feasibility of core concept
+- Existing patterns/libraries that could help
+- Integration with current codebase
+- Implementation complexity estimates
+- Potential technical blockers
+- Incremental implementation approach
+
+Output:
+- 3-5 practical implementation approaches
+- Each rated: effort (1-5), risk (1-5), reuse potential (1-5)
+- Technical dependencies identified
+- Quick wins vs long-term solutions
+- Recommended starting point
+
+#### Step 2.3: Systematic Perspective Analysis
+
+Analyze from architectural standpoint:
+
+- Decompose the problem into sub-problems
+- Identify architectural patterns that apply
+- Map dependencies and interactions
+- Consider scalability implications
+- Evaluate long-term maintainability
+- Propose systematic solution structure
+
+Output:
+- Problem decomposition diagram (text)
+- 2-3 architectural approaches with tradeoffs
+- Dependency mapping
+- Scalability assessment
+- Recommended architecture pattern
+- Risk matrix
+
+#### Step 2.4: Aggregate Multi-Perspective Findings
+
+```javascript
+const perspectives = {
+  session_id: sessionId,
+  timestamp: getUtc8ISOString(),
+  topic: "$TOPIC",
+  
+  creative: {
+    ideas: [...],
+    insights: [...],
+    challenges: [...]
+  },
+  
+  pragmatic: {
+    approaches: [...],
+    blockers: [...],
+    recommendations: [...]
+  },
+  
+  systematic: {
+    decomposition: [...],
+    patterns: [...],
+    tradeoffs: [...]
+  },
+  
+  synthesis: {
+    convergent_themes: [],
+    conflicting_views: [],
+    unique_contributions: []
+  }
+}
+
+Write(perspectivesPath, JSON.stringify(perspectives, null, 2))
+```
+
+#### Step 2.5: Update brainstorm.md with Perspectives
+
+```markdown
+### Round 2 - Multi-Perspective Exploration (${timestamp})
+
+#### Creative Perspective
+
+**Top Creative Ideas**:
+${creativeIdeas.map((idea, i) => `
+${i+1}. **${idea.title}** ⭐ Novelty: ${idea.novelty}/5 | Impact: ${idea.impact}/5
+   ${idea.description}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+**Challenged Assumptions**:
+${challengedAssumptions.map(a => `- ~~${a.assumption}~~ → Consider: ${a.alternative}`).join('\n')}
+
+**Cross-Domain Inspirations**:
+${inspirations.map(i => `- ${i}`).join('\n')}
+
+---
+
+#### Pragmatic Perspective
+
+**Implementation Approaches**:
+${pragmaticApproaches.map((a, i) => `
+${i+1}. **${a.title}** | Effort: ${a.effort}/5 | Risk: ${a.risk}/5
+   ${a.description}
+   - Quick win: ${a.quickWin}
+   - Dependencies: ${a.dependencies.join(', ')}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+**Technical Blockers**:
+${blockers.map(b => `- ⚠️ ${b}`).join('\n')}
+
+---
+
+#### Systematic Perspective
+
+**Problem Decomposition**:
+${decomposition}
+
+**Architectural Options**:
+${architecturalOptions.map((opt, i) => `
+${i+1}. **${opt.pattern}**
+   - Pros: ${opt.pros.join(', ')}
+   - Cons: ${opt.cons.join(', ')}
+   - Best for: ${opt.bestFor}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+---
+
+#### Perspective Synthesis
+
+**Convergent Themes** (all perspectives agree):
+${convergentThemes.map(t => `- ✅ ${t}`).join('\n')}
+
+**Conflicting Views** (need resolution):
+${conflictingViews.map(v => `
+- 🔄 ${v.topic}
+  - Creative: ${v.creative}
+  - Pragmatic: ${v.pragmatic}
+  - Systematic: ${v.systematic}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+**Unique Contributions**:
+${uniqueContributions.map(c => `- 💡 [${c.source}] ${c.insight}`).join('\n')}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 3: Interactive Refinement (Multi-Round)
+
+#### Step 3.1: Present & Select Directions
+
+```javascript
+const MAX_ROUNDS = 6
+let roundNumber = 3  // After initial exploration
+let brainstormComplete = false
+
+while (!brainstormComplete && roundNumber <= MAX_ROUNDS) {
+  
+  // Present current state
+  console.log(`
+## Brainstorm Round ${roundNumber}
+
+### Top Ideas So Far
+
+${topIdeas.map((idea, i) => `
+${i+1}. **${idea.title}** (${idea.source})
+   ${idea.brief}
+   - Novelty: ${'⭐'.repeat(idea.novelty)} | Feasibility: ${'✅'.repeat(idea.feasibility)}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+### Open Questions
+${openQuestions.map((q, i) => `${i+1}. ${q}`).join('\n')}
+`)
+
+  // Gather user direction - options:
+  // - 深入探索: Deep dive on selected ideas
+  // - 继续发散: Generate more ideas
+  // - 挑战验证: Devil's advocate challenge
+  // - 合并综合: Merge multiple ideas
+  // - 准备收敛: Start concluding
+  
+  // Process based on direction and update brainstorm.md
+  roundNumber++
+}
+```
+
+#### Step 3.2: Deep Dive on Selected Ideas
+
+For each selected idea, create dedicated idea file:
+
+```javascript
+async function deepDiveIdea(idea) {
+  const ideaPath = `${ideasFolder}/${idea.slug}.md`
+  
+  // Deep dive analysis:
+  // - Elaborate the core concept in detail
+  // - Identify implementation requirements
+  // - List potential challenges and mitigations
+  // - Suggest proof-of-concept approach
+  // - Define success metrics
+  // - Map related/dependent features
+  
+  // Output:
+  // - Detailed concept description
+  // - Technical requirements list
+  // - Risk/challenge matrix
+  // - MVP definition
+  // - Success criteria
+  // - Recommendation: pursue/pivot/park
+  
+  Write(ideaPath, deepDiveContent)
+}
+```
+
+#### Step 3.3: Devil's Advocate Challenge
+
+For each idea, identify:
+- 3 strongest objections
+- Challenge core assumptions
+- Scenarios where this fails
+- Competitive/alternative solutions
+- Whether this solves the right problem
+- Survivability rating after challenge (1-5)
+
+Output:
+- Per-idea challenge report
+- Critical weaknesses exposed
+- Counter-arguments to objections (if any)
+- Ideas that survive the challenge
+- Modified/strengthened versions
+
+#### Step 3.4: Merge & Synthesize Ideas
+
+When merging selected ideas:
+- Identify complementary elements
+- Resolve contradictions
+- Create unified concept
+- Preserve key strengths from each
+- Describe the merged solution
+- Assess viability of merged idea
+
+Output:
+- Merged concept description
+- Elements taken from each source idea
+- Contradictions resolved (or noted as tradeoffs)
+- New combined strengths
+- Implementation considerations
+
+#### Step 3.5: Document Each Round
+
+Append to brainstorm.md:
+
+```markdown
+### Round ${n} - ${roundType} (${timestamp})
+
+#### User Direction
+- **Selected ideas**: ${selectedIdeas.join(', ')}
+- **Action**: ${action}
+- **Reasoning**: ${userReasoning || 'Not specified'}
+
+${roundType === 'deep-dive' ? `
+#### Deep Dive: ${ideaTitle}
+
+**Elaborated Concept**:
+${elaboratedConcept}
+
+**Implementation Requirements**:
+${requirements.map(r => `- ${r}`).join('\n')}
+
+**Challenges & Mitigations**:
+${challenges.map(c => `- ⚠️ ${c.challenge} → ✅ ${c.mitigation}`).join('\n')}
+
+**MVP Definition**:
+${mvpDefinition}
+
+**Recommendation**: ${recommendation}
+` : ''}
+
+${roundType === 'challenge' ? `
+#### Devil's Advocate Results
+
+**Challenges Raised**:
+${challenges.map(c => `
+- 🔴 **${c.idea}**: ${c.objection}
+  - Counter: ${c.counter || 'No strong counter-argument'}
+  - Survivability: ${c.survivability}/5
+`).join('\n')}
+
+**Ideas That Survived**:
+${survivedIdeas.map(i => `- ✅ ${i}`).join('\n')}
+
+**Eliminated/Parked**:
+${eliminatedIdeas.map(i => `- ❌ ${i.title}: ${i.reason}`).join('\n')}
+` : ''}
+
+${roundType === 'merge' ? `
+#### Merged Idea: ${mergedIdea.title}
+
+**Source Ideas Combined**:
+${sourceIdeas.map(i => `- ${i}`).join('\n')}
+
+**Unified Concept**:
+${mergedIdea.description}
+
+**Key Elements Preserved**:
+${preservedElements.map(e => `- ✅ ${e}`).join('\n')}
+
+**Tradeoffs Accepted**:
+${tradeoffs.map(t => `- ⚖️ ${t}`).join('\n')}
+` : ''}
+
+#### Updated Idea Ranking
+
+${updatedRanking.map((idea, i) => `
+${i+1}. **${idea.title}** ${idea.status}
+   - Score: ${idea.score}/10
+   - Source: ${idea.source}
+`).join('\n')}
+```
+
+---
+
+### Phase 4: Convergence & Crystallization
+
+#### Step 4.1: Final Synthesis
+
+```javascript
+const synthesis = {
+  session_id: sessionId,
+  topic: "$TOPIC",
+  completed: getUtc8ISOString(),
+  total_rounds: roundNumber,
+  
+  // Top ideas with full details
+  top_ideas: ideas.filter(i => i.status === 'active').sort((a,b) => b.score - a.score).slice(0, 5).map(idea => ({
+    title: idea.title,
+    description: idea.description,
+    source_perspective: idea.source,
+    score: idea.score,
+    novelty: idea.novelty,
+    feasibility: idea.feasibility,
+    key_strengths: idea.strengths,
+    main_challenges: idea.challenges,
+    next_steps: idea.nextSteps
+  })),
+  
+  // Parked ideas for future reference
+  parked_ideas: ideas.filter(i => i.status === 'parked').map(idea => ({
+    title: idea.title,
+    reason_parked: idea.parkReason,
+    potential_future_trigger: idea.futureTrigger
+  })),
+  
+  // Key insights from the process
+  key_insights: keyInsights,
+  
+  // Recommendations
+  recommendations: {
+    primary: primaryRecommendation,
+    alternatives: alternativeApproaches,
+    not_recommended: notRecommended
+  },
+  
+  // Follow-up suggestions
+  follow_up: [
+    { type: 'implementation', summary: '...' },
+    { type: 'research', summary: '...' },
+    { type: 'validation', summary: '...' }
+  ]
+}
+
+Write(synthesisPath, JSON.stringify(synthesis, null, 2))
+```
+
+#### Step 4.2: Final brainstorm.md Update
+
+```markdown
+---
+
+## Synthesis & Conclusions (${timestamp})
+
+### Executive Summary
+
+${executiveSummary}
+
+### Top Ideas (Final Ranking)
+
+${topIdeas.map((idea, i) => `
+#### ${i+1}. ${idea.title} ⭐ Score: ${idea.score}/10
+
+**Description**: ${idea.description}
+
+**Why This Idea**:
+${idea.strengths.map(s => `- ✅ ${s}`).join('\n')}
+
+**Main Challenges**:
+${idea.challenges.map(c => `- ⚠️ ${c}`).join('\n')}
+
+**Recommended Next Steps**:
+${idea.nextSteps.map((s, j) => `${j+1}. ${s}`).join('\n')}
+
+---
+`).join('\n')}
+
+### Primary Recommendation
+
+> ${primaryRecommendation}
+
+**Rationale**: ${primaryRationale}
+
+**Quick Start Path**:
+1. ${step1}
+2. ${step2}
+3. ${step3}
+
+### Alternative Approaches
+
+${alternatives.map((alt, i) => `
+${i+1}. **${alt.title}**
+   - When to consider: ${alt.whenToConsider}
+   - Tradeoff: ${alt.tradeoff}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+### Ideas Parked for Future
+
+${parkedIdeas.map(idea => `
+- **${idea.title}** (Parked: ${idea.reason})
+  - Revisit when: ${idea.futureTrigger}
+`).join('\n')}
+
+---
+
+## Key Insights
+
+### Process Discoveries
+
+${processDiscoveries.map(d => `- 💡 ${d}`).join('\n')}
+
+### Assumptions Challenged
+
+${challengedAssumptions.map(a => `- ~~${a.original}~~ → ${a.updated}`).join('\n')}
+
+### Unexpected Connections
+
+${unexpectedConnections.map(c => `- 🔗 ${c}`).join('\n')}
+
+---
+
+## Current Understanding (Final)
+
+### Problem Reframed
+
+${reframedProblem}
+
+### Solution Space Mapped
+
+${solutionSpaceMap}
+
+### Decision Framework
+
+When to choose each approach:
+${decisionFramework}
+
+---
+
+## Session Statistics
+
+- **Total Rounds**: ${totalRounds}
+- **Ideas Generated**: ${totalIdeas}
+- **Ideas Survived**: ${survivedIdeas}
+- **Perspectives Used**: Creative, Pragmatic, Systematic
+- **Duration**: ${duration}
+- **Artifacts**: brainstorm.md, perspectives.json, synthesis.json, ${ideaFiles.length} idea deep-dives
+```
+
+#### Step 4.3: Post-Completion Options
+
+Offer follow-up options:
+- Create Implementation Plan: Convert best idea to implementation plan
+- Create Issue: Turn ideas into trackable issues
+- Deep Analysis: Run detailed technical analysis on an idea
+- Export Report: Generate shareable report
+- Complete: No further action needed
+
+---
+
+## Session Folder Structure
+
+```
+.workflow/.brainstorm/BS-{slug}-{date}/
+├── brainstorm.md        # Complete thought evolution
+├── perspectives.json    # Multi-perspective analysis findings
+├── synthesis.json       # Final synthesis
+└── ideas/               # Individual idea deep-dives
+    ├── idea-1.md
+    ├── idea-2.md
+    └── merged-idea-1.md
+```
+
+## Brainstorm Document Template
+
+```markdown
+# Brainstorm Session
+
+**Session ID**: BS-xxx-2025-01-28
+**Topic**: [idea or topic]
+**Started**: 2025-01-28T10:00:00+08:00
+**Dimensions**: [technical, ux, innovation, ...]
+
+---
+
+## Initial Context
+
+**Focus Areas**: [selected focus areas]
+**Depth**: [quick|balanced|deep]
+**Constraints**: [if any]
+
+---
+
+## Seed Expansion
+
+### Original Idea
+> [the initial idea]
+
+### Exploration Vectors
+[generated questions and directions]
+
+---
+
+## Thought Evolution Timeline
+
+### Round 1 - Seed Understanding
+...
+
+### Round 2 - Multi-Perspective Exploration
+
+#### Creative Perspective
+...
+
+#### Pragmatic Perspective
+...
+
+#### Systematic Perspective
+...
+
+#### Perspective Synthesis
+...
+
+### Round 3 - Deep Dive
+...
+
+### Round 4 - Challenge
+...
+
+---
+
+## Synthesis & Conclusions
+
+### Executive Summary
+...
+
+### Top Ideas (Final Ranking)
+...
+
+### Primary Recommendation
+...
+
+---
+
+## Key Insights
+...
+
+---
+
+## Current Understanding (Final)
+...
+
+---
+
+## Session Statistics
+...
+```
+
+## Multi-Perspective Analysis Strategy
+
+### Perspective Roles
+
+| Perspective | Focus | Best For |
+|-------------|-------|----------|
+| Creative | Innovation, cross-domain | Generating novel ideas |
+| Pragmatic | Implementation, feasibility | Reality-checking ideas |
+| Systematic | Architecture, structure | Organizing solutions |
+
+### Analysis Patterns
+
+1. **Parallel Divergence**: All perspectives explore simultaneously from different angles
+2. **Sequential Deep-Dive**: One perspective expands, others critique/refine
+3. **Debate Mode**: Perspectives argue for/against specific approaches
+4. **Synthesis Mode**: Combine insights from all perspectives
+
+### When to Use Each Pattern
+
+- **New topic**: Parallel Divergence → get diverse initial ideas
+- **Promising idea**: Sequential Deep-Dive → thorough exploration
+- **Controversial approach**: Debate Mode → uncover hidden issues
+- **Ready to decide**: Synthesis Mode → create actionable conclusion
+
+## Consolidation Rules
+
+When updating "Current Understanding":
+
+1. **Promote confirmed insights**: Move validated findings to "What We Established"
+2. **Track corrections**: Keep important wrong→right transformations
+3. **Focus on current state**: What do we know NOW
+4. **Avoid timeline repetition**: Don't copy discussion details
+5. **Preserve key learnings**: Keep insights valuable for future reference
+
+**Bad (cluttered)**:
+```markdown
+## Current Understanding
+
+In round 1 we discussed X, then in round 2 user said Y, and we explored Z...
+```
+
+**Good (consolidated)**:
+```markdown
+## Current Understanding
+
+### Problem Reframed
+The core challenge is not X but actually Y because...
+
+### Solution Space Mapped
+Three viable approaches emerged: A (creative), B (pragmatic), C (hybrid)
+
+### Decision Framework
+- Choose A when: innovation is priority
+- Choose B when: time-to-market matters
+- Choose C when: balanced approach needed
+```
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Situation | Action |
+|-----------|--------|
+| Analysis timeout | Retry with focused scope, or continue without that perspective |
+| No good ideas | Reframe the problem, adjust constraints, try different angles |
+| User disengaged | Summarize progress, offer break point with resume option |
+| Perspectives conflict | Present as tradeoff, let user decide direction |
+| Max rounds reached | Force synthesis, highlight unresolved questions |
+| All ideas fail challenge | Return to divergent phase with new constraints |
+| Session folder conflict | Append timestamp suffix |
+
+## Iteration Flow
+
+```
+First Call (TOPIC="topic"):
+   ├─ No session exists → New mode
+   ├─ Identify brainstorm dimensions
+   ├─ Scope with user
+   ├─ Create brainstorm.md with initial understanding
+   ├─ Expand seed into exploration vectors
+   ├─ Launch multi-perspective exploration
+   └─ Enter refinement loop
+
+Continue Call (TOPIC="topic"):
+   ├─ Session exists → Continue mode
+   ├─ Load brainstorm.md
+   ├─ Resume from last round
+   └─ Continue refinement loop
+
+Refinement Loop:
+   ├─ Present current findings and top ideas
+   ├─ Gather user feedback
+   ├─ Process response:
+   │   ├─ Deep dive → Explore selected ideas in depth
+   │   ├─ Diverge → Generate more ideas
+   │   ├─ Challenge → Devil's advocate testing
+   │   ├─ Merge → Combine multiple ideas
+   │   └─ Converge → Exit loop for synthesis
+   ├─ Update brainstorm.md
+   └─ Repeat until complete or max rounds
+
+Completion:
+   ├─ Generate synthesis.json
+   ├─ Update brainstorm.md with final synthesis
+   └─ Offer follow-up options
+```
+
+---
+
+**Now execute the brainstorm-with-file workflow for topic**: $TOPIC