mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-03-10 17:11:04 +08:00
feat: Add templates for epics, product brief, and requirements documentation
- Introduced a comprehensive template for generating epics and stories in Phase 5, including an index and individual epic files. - Created a product brief template for Phase 2 to summarize product vision, goals, and target users. - Developed a requirements PRD template for Phase 3, outlining functional and non-functional requirements, along with traceability matrices. feat: Implement tech debt roles for assessment, execution, planning, scanning, validation, and analysis - Added roles for tech debt assessment, executor, planner, scanner, validator, and analyst, each with defined phases and processes for managing technical debt. - Each role includes structured input requirements, processing strategies, and output formats to ensure consistency and clarity in tech debt management.
This commit is contained in:
78
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/analyst/role.md
Normal file
78
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/analyst/role.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
role: analyst
|
||||
prefix: RESEARCH
|
||||
inner_loop: false
|
||||
discuss_rounds: [DISCUSS-001]
|
||||
message_types:
|
||||
success: research_ready
|
||||
error: error
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Analyst
|
||||
|
||||
Research and codebase exploration for context gathering.
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity
|
||||
- Tag: [analyst] | Prefix: RESEARCH-*
|
||||
- Responsibility: Gather structured context from topic and codebase
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
### MUST
|
||||
- Extract structured seed information from task topic
|
||||
- Explore codebase if project detected
|
||||
- Package context for downstream roles
|
||||
### MUST NOT
|
||||
- Implement code or modify files
|
||||
- Make architectural decisions
|
||||
- Skip codebase exploration when project files exist
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Seed Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read upstream artifacts via team_msg(operation="get_state")
|
||||
2. Extract session folder from task description
|
||||
3. Parse topic from task description
|
||||
4. If topic references file (@path or .md/.txt) → read it
|
||||
5. CLI seed analysis:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Bash({ command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Analyze topic, extract structured seed info.
|
||||
TASK: • Extract problem statement • Identify target users • Determine domain
|
||||
• List constraints • Identify 3-5 exploration dimensions
|
||||
TOPIC: <topic-content>
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
EXPECTED: JSON with: problem_statement, target_users[], domain, constraints[], exploration_dimensions[]" --tool gemini --mode analysis`, run_in_background: false })
|
||||
```
|
||||
6. Parse result JSON
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Codebase Exploration
|
||||
|
||||
| Condition | Action |
|
||||
|-----------|--------|
|
||||
| package.json / Cargo.toml / pyproject.toml / go.mod exists | Explore |
|
||||
| No project files | Skip (codebase_context = null) |
|
||||
|
||||
When project detected:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Bash({ command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Explore codebase for context
|
||||
TASK: • Identify tech stack • Map architecture patterns • Document conventions • List integration points
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/*
|
||||
EXPECTED: JSON with: tech_stack[], architecture_patterns[], conventions[], integration_points[]" --tool gemini --mode analysis`, run_in_background: false })
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Context Packaging
|
||||
|
||||
1. Write spec-config.json → <session>/spec/
|
||||
2. Write discovery-context.json → <session>/spec/
|
||||
3. Inline Discuss (DISCUSS-001):
|
||||
- Artifact: <session>/spec/discovery-context.json
|
||||
- Perspectives: product, risk, coverage
|
||||
4. Handle verdict per consensus protocol
|
||||
5. Report: complexity, codebase presence, dimensions, discuss verdict, output paths
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
||||
|----------|------------|
|
||||
| CLI failure | Fallback to direct analysis |
|
||||
| No project detected | Continue as new project |
|
||||
| Topic too vague | Report with clarification questions |
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
# Analyze Task
|
||||
|
||||
Parse user task -> detect capabilities -> build dependency graph -> design roles.
|
||||
|
||||
**CONSTRAINT**: Text-level analysis only. NO source code reading, NO codebase exploration.
|
||||
|
||||
## Signal Detection
|
||||
|
||||
| Keywords | Capability | Prefix |
|
||||
|----------|------------|--------|
|
||||
| investigate, explore, research | analyst | RESEARCH |
|
||||
| write, draft, document | writer | DRAFT |
|
||||
| implement, build, code, fix | executor | IMPL |
|
||||
| design, architect, plan | planner | PLAN |
|
||||
| test, verify, validate | tester | TEST |
|
||||
| analyze, review, audit | reviewer | REVIEW |
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency Graph
|
||||
|
||||
Natural ordering tiers:
|
||||
- Tier 0: analyst, planner (knowledge gathering)
|
||||
- Tier 1: writer (creation requires context)
|
||||
- Tier 2: executor (implementation requires plan/design)
|
||||
- Tier 3: tester, reviewer (validation requires artifacts)
|
||||
|
||||
## Complexity Scoring
|
||||
|
||||
| Factor | Points |
|
||||
|--------|--------|
|
||||
| Per capability | +1 |
|
||||
| Cross-domain | +2 |
|
||||
| Parallel tracks | +1 per track |
|
||||
| Serial depth > 3 | +1 |
|
||||
|
||||
Results: 1-3 Low, 4-6 Medium, 7+ High
|
||||
|
||||
## Role Minimization
|
||||
|
||||
- Cap at 5 roles
|
||||
- Merge overlapping capabilities
|
||||
- Absorb trivial single-step roles
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
Write <session>/task-analysis.json:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"task_description": "<original>",
|
||||
"pipeline_type": "<spec-only|impl-only|full-lifecycle|...>",
|
||||
"capabilities": [{ "name": "<cap>", "prefix": "<PREFIX>", "keywords": ["..."] }],
|
||||
"dependency_graph": { "<TASK-ID>": { "role": "<role>", "blockedBy": ["..."], "priority": "P0|P1|P2" } },
|
||||
"roles": [{ "name": "<role>", "prefix": "<PREFIX>", "inner_loop": false }],
|
||||
"complexity": { "score": 0, "level": "Low|Medium|High" },
|
||||
"needs_research": true
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
# Dispatch Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
Create task chains from dependency graph with proper blockedBy relationships.
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read task-analysis.json -> extract dependency_graph
|
||||
2. Read specs/pipelines.md -> get task registry for selected pipeline
|
||||
3. Topological sort tasks (respect blockedBy)
|
||||
4. Validate all owners exist in role registry (SKILL.md)
|
||||
5. For each task (in order):
|
||||
- TaskCreate with structured description (see template below)
|
||||
- TaskUpdate with blockedBy + owner assignment
|
||||
6. Update team-session.json with pipeline.tasks_total
|
||||
7. Validate chain (no orphans, no cycles, all refs valid)
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Description Template
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
PURPOSE: <goal> | Success: <criteria>
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
- <step 1>
|
||||
- <step 2>
|
||||
CONTEXT:
|
||||
- Session: <session-folder>
|
||||
- Upstream artifacts: <list>
|
||||
- Key files: <list>
|
||||
EXPECTED: <artifact path> + <quality criteria>
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: <scope limits>
|
||||
---
|
||||
InnerLoop: <true|false>
|
||||
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/<role>/role.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## InnerLoop Flag Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- true: Role has 2+ serial same-prefix tasks (writer: DRAFT-001->004)
|
||||
- false: Role has 1 task, or tasks are parallel
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- No orphan tasks (all tasks have valid owner)
|
||||
- No circular dependencies
|
||||
- All blockedBy references exist
|
||||
- Session reference in every task description
|
||||
- RoleSpec reference in every task description
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
|
||||
# Monitor Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
Event-driven pipeline coordination. Beat model: coordinator wake -> process -> spawn -> STOP.
|
||||
|
||||
## Constants
|
||||
|
||||
- SPAWN_MODE: background
|
||||
- ONE_STEP_PER_INVOCATION: true
|
||||
- FAST_ADVANCE_AWARE: true
|
||||
- WORKER_AGENT: team-worker
|
||||
|
||||
## Handler Router
|
||||
|
||||
| Source | Handler |
|
||||
|--------|---------|
|
||||
| Message contains [role-name] | handleCallback |
|
||||
| "capability_gap" | handleAdapt |
|
||||
| "check" or "status" | handleCheck |
|
||||
| "resume" or "continue" | handleResume |
|
||||
| All tasks completed | handleComplete |
|
||||
| Default | handleSpawnNext |
|
||||
|
||||
## handleCallback
|
||||
|
||||
Worker completed. Process and advance.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Find matching worker by role in message
|
||||
2. Check if progress update (inner loop) or final completion
|
||||
3. Progress -> update session state, STOP
|
||||
4. Completion -> mark task done, remove from active_workers
|
||||
5. Check for checkpoints:
|
||||
- QUALITY-001 -> display quality gate, pause for user commands
|
||||
- PLAN-001 -> read plan.json complexity, create dynamic IMPL tasks per specs/pipelines.md routing
|
||||
6. -> handleSpawnNext
|
||||
|
||||
## handleCheck
|
||||
|
||||
Read-only status report, then STOP.
|
||||
|
||||
Output:
|
||||
```
|
||||
[coordinator] Pipeline Status
|
||||
[coordinator] Progress: <done>/<total> (<pct>%)
|
||||
[coordinator] Active: <workers with elapsed time>
|
||||
[coordinator] Ready: <pending tasks with resolved deps>
|
||||
[coordinator] Commands: 'resume' to advance | 'check' to refresh
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## handleResume
|
||||
|
||||
1. No active workers -> handleSpawnNext
|
||||
2. Has active -> check each status
|
||||
- completed -> mark done
|
||||
- in_progress -> still running
|
||||
3. Some completed -> handleSpawnNext
|
||||
4. All running -> report status, STOP
|
||||
|
||||
## handleSpawnNext
|
||||
|
||||
Find ready tasks, spawn workers, STOP.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Collect: completedSubjects, inProgressSubjects, readySubjects
|
||||
2. No ready + work in progress -> report waiting, STOP
|
||||
3. No ready + nothing in progress -> handleComplete
|
||||
4. Has ready -> for each:
|
||||
a. Check if inner loop role with active worker -> skip (worker picks up)
|
||||
b. TaskUpdate -> in_progress
|
||||
c. team_msg log -> task_unblocked
|
||||
d. Spawn team-worker (see SKILL.md Spawn Template)
|
||||
e. Add to active_workers
|
||||
5. Update session, output summary, STOP
|
||||
|
||||
## handleComplete
|
||||
|
||||
Pipeline done. Generate report and completion action.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Generate summary (deliverables, stats, discussions)
|
||||
2. Read session.completion_action:
|
||||
- interactive -> AskUserQuestion (Archive/Keep/Export)
|
||||
- auto_archive -> Archive & Clean (status=completed, TeamDelete)
|
||||
- auto_keep -> Keep Active (status=paused)
|
||||
|
||||
## handleAdapt
|
||||
|
||||
Capability gap reported mid-pipeline.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Parse gap description
|
||||
2. Check if existing role covers it -> redirect
|
||||
3. Role count < 5 -> generate dynamic role-spec in <session>/role-specs/
|
||||
4. Create new task, spawn worker
|
||||
5. Role count >= 5 -> merge or pause
|
||||
|
||||
## Fast-Advance Reconciliation
|
||||
|
||||
On every coordinator wake:
|
||||
1. Read team_msg entries with type="fast_advance"
|
||||
2. Sync active_workers with spawned successors
|
||||
3. No duplicate spawns
|
||||
116
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/coordinator/role.md
Normal file
116
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/coordinator/role.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
|
||||
# Coordinator Role
|
||||
|
||||
Orchestrate team-lifecycle-v4: analyze -> dispatch -> spawn -> monitor -> report.
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity
|
||||
- Name: coordinator | Tag: [coordinator]
|
||||
- Responsibility: Analyze task -> Create team -> Dispatch tasks -> Monitor progress -> Report results
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
### MUST
|
||||
- Parse task description (text-level only, no codebase reading)
|
||||
- Create team and spawn team-worker agents in background
|
||||
- Dispatch tasks with proper dependency chains
|
||||
- Monitor progress via callbacks and route messages
|
||||
- Maintain session state (team-session.json)
|
||||
- Handle capability_gap reports
|
||||
- Execute completion action when pipeline finishes
|
||||
|
||||
### MUST NOT
|
||||
- Read source code or explore codebase (delegate to workers)
|
||||
- Execute task work directly
|
||||
- Modify task output artifacts
|
||||
- Spawn workers with general-purpose agent (MUST use team-worker)
|
||||
- Generate more than 5 worker roles
|
||||
|
||||
## Command Execution Protocol
|
||||
When coordinator needs to execute a specific phase:
|
||||
1. Read `commands/<command>.md`
|
||||
2. Follow the workflow defined in the command
|
||||
3. Commands are inline execution guides, NOT separate agents
|
||||
4. Execute synchronously, complete before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## Entry Router
|
||||
|
||||
| Detection | Condition | Handler |
|
||||
|-----------|-----------|---------|
|
||||
| Worker callback | Message contains [role-name] | -> handleCallback (monitor.md) |
|
||||
| Status check | Args contain "check" or "status" | -> handleCheck (monitor.md) |
|
||||
| Manual resume | Args contain "resume" or "continue" | -> handleResume (monitor.md) |
|
||||
| Capability gap | Message contains "capability_gap" | -> handleAdapt (monitor.md) |
|
||||
| Pipeline complete | All tasks completed | -> handleComplete (monitor.md) |
|
||||
| Interrupted session | Active session in .workflow/.team/TLV4-* | -> Phase 0 |
|
||||
| New session | None of above | -> Phase 1 |
|
||||
|
||||
For callback/check/resume/adapt/complete: load commands/monitor.md, execute handler, STOP.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 0: Session Resume Check
|
||||
|
||||
1. Scan .workflow/.team/TLV4-*/team-session.json for active/paused sessions
|
||||
2. No sessions -> Phase 1
|
||||
3. Single session -> reconcile (audit TaskList, reset in_progress->pending, rebuild team, kick first ready task)
|
||||
4. Multiple -> AskUserQuestion for selection
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1: Requirement Clarification
|
||||
|
||||
TEXT-LEVEL ONLY. No source code reading.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Parse task description
|
||||
2. Clarify if ambiguous (AskUserQuestion: scope, deliverables, constraints)
|
||||
3. Delegate to commands/analyze.md
|
||||
4. Output: task-analysis.json
|
||||
5. CRITICAL: Always proceed to Phase 2, never skip team workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Create Team + Initialize Session
|
||||
|
||||
1. Generate session ID: TLV4-<slug>-<date>
|
||||
2. Create session folder structure
|
||||
3. TeamCreate with team name
|
||||
4. Read specs/pipelines.md -> select pipeline
|
||||
5. Register roles in team-session.json
|
||||
6. Initialize shared infrastructure (wisdom/*.md, explorations/cache-index.json)
|
||||
7. Initialize pipeline via team_msg state_update:
|
||||
```
|
||||
mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg({
|
||||
operation: "log", session_id: "<id>", from: "coordinator",
|
||||
type: "state_update", summary: "Session initialized",
|
||||
data: { pipeline_mode: "<mode>", pipeline_stages: [...], team_name: "<name>" }
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
8. Write team-session.json
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Create Task Chain
|
||||
|
||||
Delegate to commands/dispatch.md:
|
||||
1. Read dependency graph from task-analysis.json
|
||||
2. Read specs/pipelines.md for selected pipeline's task registry
|
||||
3. Topological sort tasks
|
||||
4. Create tasks via TaskCreate with blockedBy
|
||||
5. Update team-session.json
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Spawn-and-Stop
|
||||
|
||||
Delegate to commands/monitor.md#handleSpawnNext:
|
||||
1. Find ready tasks (pending + blockedBy resolved)
|
||||
2. Spawn team-worker agents (see SKILL.md Spawn Template)
|
||||
3. Output status summary
|
||||
4. STOP
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 5: Report + Completion Action
|
||||
|
||||
1. Generate summary (deliverables, pipeline stats, discussions)
|
||||
2. Execute completion action per session.completion_action:
|
||||
- interactive -> AskUserQuestion (Archive/Keep/Export)
|
||||
- auto_archive -> Archive & Clean
|
||||
- auto_keep -> Keep Active
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Error | Resolution |
|
||||
|-------|------------|
|
||||
| Task too vague | AskUserQuestion for clarification |
|
||||
| Session corruption | Attempt recovery, fallback to manual |
|
||||
| Worker crash | Reset task to pending, respawn |
|
||||
| Dependency cycle | Detect in analysis, halt |
|
||||
| Role limit exceeded | Merge overlapping roles |
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
# Fix
|
||||
|
||||
Revision workflow for bug fixes and feedback-driven changes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read original task + feedback/revision notes from task description
|
||||
2. Load original implementation context (files modified, approach taken)
|
||||
3. Analyze feedback to identify specific changes needed
|
||||
4. Apply fixes:
|
||||
- Agent mode: Edit tool for targeted changes
|
||||
- CLI mode: Resume previous session with fix prompt
|
||||
5. Re-validate convergence criteria
|
||||
6. Report: original task, changes applied, validation result
|
||||
|
||||
## Fix Prompt Template (CLI mode)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
PURPOSE: Fix issues in <task.title> based on feedback
|
||||
TASK:
|
||||
- Review original implementation
|
||||
- Apply feedback: <feedback text>
|
||||
- Verify fixes address all feedback points
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONTEXT: @<modified files>
|
||||
EXPECTED: All feedback points addressed, convergence criteria met
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Minimal changes | No scope creep
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Fix ONLY what feedback requests
|
||||
- No refactoring beyond fix scope
|
||||
- Verify original convergence criteria still pass
|
||||
- Report partial_completion if some feedback unclear
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
||||
# Implement
|
||||
|
||||
Execute implementation from task JSON via agent or CLI delegation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Mode
|
||||
|
||||
Direct implementation using Edit/Write/Bash tools:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read task.files[] as target files
|
||||
2. Read task.implementation[] as step-by-step instructions
|
||||
3. For each step:
|
||||
- Substitute [variable] placeholders with pre_analysis results
|
||||
- New file → Write tool; Modify file → Edit tool
|
||||
- Follow task.reference patterns
|
||||
4. Apply task.rationale.chosen_approach
|
||||
5. Mitigate task.risks[] during implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Quality rules:
|
||||
- Verify module existence before referencing
|
||||
- Incremental progress — small working changes
|
||||
- Follow existing patterns from task.reference
|
||||
- ASCII-only, no premature abstractions
|
||||
|
||||
## CLI Delegation Mode
|
||||
|
||||
Build prompt from task JSON, delegate to CLI:
|
||||
|
||||
Prompt structure:
|
||||
```
|
||||
PURPOSE: <task.title>
|
||||
<task.description>
|
||||
|
||||
TARGET FILES:
|
||||
<task.files[] with paths and changes>
|
||||
|
||||
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS:
|
||||
<task.implementation[] numbered>
|
||||
|
||||
PRE-ANALYSIS CONTEXT:
|
||||
<pre_analysis results>
|
||||
|
||||
REFERENCE:
|
||||
<task.reference pattern and files>
|
||||
|
||||
DONE WHEN:
|
||||
<task.convergence.criteria[]>
|
||||
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Only modify listed files | Follow existing patterns
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
CLI call:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Bash({ command: `ccw cli -p "<prompt>" --tool <tool> --mode write --rule development-implement-feature`,
|
||||
run_in_background: false, timeout: 3600000 })
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Resume strategy:
|
||||
| Strategy | Command |
|
||||
|----------|---------|
|
||||
| new | --id <session>-<task_id> |
|
||||
| resume | --resume <parent_id> |
|
||||
67
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/executor/role.md
Normal file
67
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/executor/role.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
role: executor
|
||||
prefix: IMPL
|
||||
inner_loop: true
|
||||
message_types:
|
||||
success: impl_complete
|
||||
progress: impl_progress
|
||||
error: error
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Executor
|
||||
|
||||
Code implementation worker with dual execution modes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity
|
||||
- Tag: [executor] | Prefix: IMPL-*
|
||||
- Responsibility: Implement code from plan tasks via agent or CLI delegation
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
### MUST
|
||||
- Parse task JSON before implementation
|
||||
- Execute pre_analysis steps if defined
|
||||
- Follow existing code patterns (task.reference)
|
||||
- Run convergence check after implementation
|
||||
### MUST NOT
|
||||
- Skip convergence validation
|
||||
- Implement without reading task JSON
|
||||
- Introduce breaking changes not in plan
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Parse Task + Resolve Mode
|
||||
|
||||
1. Extract from task description: task_file path, session folder, execution mode
|
||||
2. Read task JSON (id, title, files[], implementation[], convergence.criteria[])
|
||||
3. Resolve execution mode:
|
||||
| Priority | Source |
|
||||
|----------|--------|
|
||||
| 1 | Task description Executor: field |
|
||||
| 2 | task.meta.execution_config.method |
|
||||
| 3 | plan.json recommended_execution |
|
||||
| 4 | Auto: Low → agent, Medium/High → codex |
|
||||
4. Execute pre_analysis[] if exists (Read, Bash, Grep, Glob tools)
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Execute Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Route by mode → read commands/<command>.md:
|
||||
- agent / gemini / codex / qwen → commands/implement.md
|
||||
- Revision task → commands/fix.md
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Self-Validation
|
||||
|
||||
| Step | Method | Pass Criteria |
|
||||
|------|--------|--------------|
|
||||
| Convergence check | Match criteria vs output | All criteria addressed |
|
||||
| Syntax check | tsc --noEmit or equivalent | Exit code 0 |
|
||||
| Test detection | Find test files for modified files | Tests identified |
|
||||
|
||||
Report: task ID, status, mode used, files modified, convergence results.
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
||||
|----------|------------|
|
||||
| Agent mode syntax errors | Retry with error context (max 3) |
|
||||
| CLI mode failure | Retry or resume with --resume |
|
||||
| pre_analysis failure | Follow on_error (fail/continue/skip) |
|
||||
| CLI tool unavailable | Fallback: gemini → qwen → codex |
|
||||
| Max retries exceeded | Report failure to coordinator |
|
||||
76
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/planner/role.md
Normal file
76
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/planner/role.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
role: planner
|
||||
prefix: PLAN
|
||||
inner_loop: true
|
||||
message_types:
|
||||
success: plan_ready
|
||||
revision: plan_revision
|
||||
error: error
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Planner
|
||||
|
||||
Codebase-informed implementation planning with complexity assessment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity
|
||||
- Tag: [planner] | Prefix: PLAN-*
|
||||
- Responsibility: Explore codebase → generate structured plan → assess complexity
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
### MUST
|
||||
- Check shared exploration cache before re-exploring
|
||||
- Generate plan.json + TASK-*.json files
|
||||
- Assess complexity (Low/Medium/High) for routing
|
||||
- Load spec context if available (full-lifecycle)
|
||||
### MUST NOT
|
||||
- Implement code
|
||||
- Skip codebase exploration
|
||||
- Create more than 7 tasks
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Context + Exploration
|
||||
|
||||
1. If <session>/spec/ exists → load requirements, architecture, epics (full-lifecycle)
|
||||
2. Check <session>/explorations/cache-index.json for cached explorations
|
||||
3. Explore codebase (cache-aware):
|
||||
```
|
||||
Bash({ command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Explore codebase to inform planning
|
||||
TASK: • Search for relevant patterns • Identify files to modify • Document integration points
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/*
|
||||
EXPECTED: JSON with: relevant_files[], patterns[], integration_points[], recommendations[]" --tool gemini --mode analysis`, run_in_background: false })
|
||||
```
|
||||
4. Store results in <session>/explorations/
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Plan Generation
|
||||
|
||||
Generate plan.json + .task/TASK-*.json:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Bash({ command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate implementation plan from exploration results
|
||||
TASK: • Create plan.json overview • Generate TASK-*.json files (2-7 tasks) • Define dependencies • Set convergence criteria
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONTEXT: @<session>/explorations/*.json
|
||||
EXPECTED: Files: plan.json + .task/TASK-*.json
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: 2-7 tasks, include id/title/files[]/convergence.criteria/depends_on" --tool gemini --mode write`, run_in_background: false })
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Output files:
|
||||
```
|
||||
<session>/plan/
|
||||
├── plan.json # Overview + complexity assessment
|
||||
└── .task/TASK-*.json # Individual task definitions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Submit for Approval
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read plan.json and TASK-*.json
|
||||
2. Report to coordinator: complexity, task count, approach, plan location
|
||||
3. Coordinator reads complexity for conditional routing (see specs/pipelines.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
||||
|----------|------------|
|
||||
| CLI exploration failure | Plan from description only |
|
||||
| CLI planning failure | Fallback to direct planning |
|
||||
| Plan rejected 3+ times | Notify coordinator |
|
||||
| Cache index corrupt | Clear cache, re-explore |
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
# Code Review
|
||||
|
||||
4-dimension code review for implementation quality.
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- Plan file (plan.json)
|
||||
- Git diff or modified files list
|
||||
- Test results (if available)
|
||||
|
||||
## Dimensions
|
||||
|
||||
| Dimension | Critical Issues |
|
||||
|-----------|----------------|
|
||||
| Quality | Empty catch, any casts, @ts-ignore, console.log |
|
||||
| Security | Hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, eval/exec, innerHTML |
|
||||
| Architecture | Circular deps, imports >2 levels deep, files >500 lines |
|
||||
| Requirements | Missing core functionality, incomplete acceptance criteria |
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. Gather modified files from executor's state (team_msg get_state)
|
||||
2. Read each modified file
|
||||
3. Score per dimension (0-100%)
|
||||
4. Classify issues by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
|
||||
5. Generate verdict (BLOCK/CONDITIONAL/APPROVE)
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
Write review report to <session>/artifacts/review-report.md:
|
||||
- Per-dimension scores
|
||||
- Issue list with file:line references
|
||||
- Verdict with justification
|
||||
- Recommendations (if CONDITIONAL)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
# Spec Quality Review
|
||||
|
||||
5-dimension spec quality gate with discuss protocol.
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- All spec docs in <session>/spec/
|
||||
- Quality gate config from specs/quality-gates.md
|
||||
|
||||
## Dimensions
|
||||
|
||||
| Dimension | Weight | Focus |
|
||||
|-----------|--------|-------|
|
||||
| Completeness | 25% | All sections present with substance |
|
||||
| Consistency | 25% | Terminology, format, references uniform |
|
||||
| Traceability | 25% | Goals→Reqs→Arch→Stories chain |
|
||||
| Depth | 25% | AC testable, ADRs justified, stories estimable |
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read all spec documents from <session>/spec/
|
||||
2. Load quality gate thresholds from specs/quality-gates.md
|
||||
3. Score each dimension
|
||||
4. Run cross-document validation
|
||||
5. Generate readiness-report.md + spec-summary.md
|
||||
6. Run DISCUSS-003:
|
||||
- Artifact: <session>/spec/readiness-report.md
|
||||
- Perspectives: product, technical, quality, risk, coverage
|
||||
- Handle verdict per consensus protocol
|
||||
- DISCUSS-003 HIGH always triggers user pause
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Gate
|
||||
|
||||
| Gate | Score |
|
||||
|------|-------|
|
||||
| PASS | >= 80% |
|
||||
| REVIEW | 60-79% |
|
||||
| FAIL | < 60% |
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
Write to <session>/artifacts/:
|
||||
- readiness-report.md: Dimension scores, issue list, traceability matrix
|
||||
- spec-summary.md: Executive summary of all spec docs
|
||||
69
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/reviewer/role.md
Normal file
69
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/reviewer/role.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
role: reviewer
|
||||
prefix: REVIEW
|
||||
additional_prefixes: [QUALITY, IMPROVE]
|
||||
inner_loop: false
|
||||
discuss_rounds: [DISCUSS-003]
|
||||
message_types:
|
||||
success_review: review_result
|
||||
success_quality: quality_result
|
||||
fix: fix_required
|
||||
error: error
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
Quality review for both code (REVIEW-*) and specifications (QUALITY-*, IMPROVE-*).
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity
|
||||
- Tag: [reviewer] | Prefix: REVIEW-*, QUALITY-*, IMPROVE-*
|
||||
- Responsibility: Multi-dimensional review with verdict routing
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
### MUST
|
||||
- Detect review mode from task prefix
|
||||
- Apply correct dimensions per mode
|
||||
- Run DISCUSS-003 for spec quality (QUALITY-*/IMPROVE-*)
|
||||
- Generate actionable verdict
|
||||
### MUST NOT
|
||||
- Mix code review with spec quality dimensions
|
||||
- Skip discuss for QUALITY-* tasks
|
||||
- Implement fixes (only recommend)
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Mode Detection
|
||||
|
||||
| Task Prefix | Mode | Command |
|
||||
|-------------|------|---------|
|
||||
| REVIEW-* | Code Review | commands/review-code.md |
|
||||
| QUALITY-* | Spec Quality | commands/review-spec.md |
|
||||
| IMPROVE-* | Spec Quality (recheck) | commands/review-spec.md |
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Review Execution
|
||||
|
||||
Route to command based on detected mode.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Verdict
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Review Verdict
|
||||
| Verdict | Criteria |
|
||||
|---------|----------|
|
||||
| BLOCK | Critical issues present |
|
||||
| CONDITIONAL | High/medium only |
|
||||
| APPROVE | Low or none |
|
||||
|
||||
### Spec Quality Gate
|
||||
| Gate | Criteria |
|
||||
|------|----------|
|
||||
| PASS | Score >= 80% |
|
||||
| REVIEW | Score 60-79% |
|
||||
| FAIL | Score < 60% |
|
||||
|
||||
Report: mode, verdict/gate, dimension scores, discuss verdict (quality only), output paths.
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
||||
|----------|------------|
|
||||
| Missing context | Request from coordinator |
|
||||
| Invalid mode | Abort with error |
|
||||
| Discuss fails | Proceed without discuss, log warning |
|
||||
87
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/tester/role.md
Normal file
87
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/tester/role.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
role: tester
|
||||
prefix: TEST
|
||||
inner_loop: false
|
||||
message_types:
|
||||
success: test_result
|
||||
fix: fix_required
|
||||
error: error
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Tester
|
||||
|
||||
Test execution with iterative fix cycle.
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity
|
||||
- Tag: [tester] | Prefix: TEST-*
|
||||
- Responsibility: Detect framework → run tests → fix failures → report results
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
### MUST
|
||||
- Auto-detect test framework before running
|
||||
- Run affected tests first, then full suite
|
||||
- Classify failures by severity
|
||||
- Iterate fix cycle up to MAX_ITERATIONS
|
||||
### MUST NOT
|
||||
- Skip framework detection
|
||||
- Run full suite before affected tests
|
||||
- Exceed MAX_ITERATIONS without reporting
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Framework Detection + Test Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
Framework detection (priority order):
|
||||
| Priority | Method | Frameworks |
|
||||
|----------|--------|-----------|
|
||||
| 1 | package.json devDependencies | vitest, jest, mocha, pytest |
|
||||
| 2 | package.json scripts.test | vitest, jest, mocha, pytest |
|
||||
| 3 | Config files | vitest.config.*, jest.config.*, pytest.ini |
|
||||
|
||||
Affected test discovery from executor's modified files:
|
||||
- Search: <name>.test.ts, <name>.spec.ts, tests/<name>.test.ts, __tests__/<name>.test.ts
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Test Execution + Fix Cycle
|
||||
|
||||
Config: MAX_ITERATIONS=10, PASS_RATE_TARGET=95%, AFFECTED_TESTS_FIRST=true
|
||||
|
||||
Loop:
|
||||
1. Run affected tests → parse results
|
||||
2. Pass rate met → run full suite
|
||||
3. Failures → select strategy → fix → re-run
|
||||
|
||||
Strategy selection:
|
||||
| Condition | Strategy |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| Iteration <= 3 or pass >= 80% | Conservative: fix one critical failure |
|
||||
| Critical failures < 5 | Surgical: fix specific pattern everywhere |
|
||||
| Pass < 50% or iteration > 7 | Aggressive: fix all in batch |
|
||||
|
||||
Test commands:
|
||||
| Framework | Affected | Full Suite |
|
||||
|-----------|---------|------------|
|
||||
| vitest | vitest run <files> | vitest run |
|
||||
| jest | jest <files> --no-coverage | jest --no-coverage |
|
||||
| pytest | pytest <files> -v | pytest -v |
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Result Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Failure classification:
|
||||
| Severity | Patterns |
|
||||
|----------|----------|
|
||||
| Critical | SyntaxError, cannot find module, undefined |
|
||||
| High | Assertion failures, toBe/toEqual |
|
||||
| Medium | Timeout, async errors |
|
||||
| Low | Warnings, deprecations |
|
||||
|
||||
Report routing:
|
||||
| Condition | Type |
|
||||
|-----------|------|
|
||||
| Pass rate >= target | test_result (success) |
|
||||
| Pass rate < target after max iterations | fix_required |
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
||||
|----------|------------|
|
||||
| Framework not detected | Prompt coordinator |
|
||||
| No tests found | Report to coordinator |
|
||||
| Infinite fix loop | Abort after MAX_ITERATIONS |
|
||||
95
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/writer/role.md
Normal file
95
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/writer/role.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
role: writer
|
||||
prefix: DRAFT
|
||||
inner_loop: true
|
||||
discuss_rounds: [DISCUSS-002]
|
||||
message_types:
|
||||
success: draft_ready
|
||||
revision: draft_revision
|
||||
error: error
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Writer
|
||||
|
||||
Template-driven document generation with progressive dependency loading.
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity
|
||||
- Tag: [writer] | Prefix: DRAFT-*
|
||||
- Responsibility: Generate spec documents (product brief, requirements, architecture, epics)
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
### MUST
|
||||
- Load upstream context progressively (each doc builds on previous)
|
||||
- Use templates from templates/ directory
|
||||
- Self-validate every document
|
||||
- Run DISCUSS-002 for Requirements PRD
|
||||
### MUST NOT
|
||||
- Generate code
|
||||
- Skip validation
|
||||
- Modify upstream artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Context Loading
|
||||
|
||||
### Document Type Routing
|
||||
|
||||
| Task Contains | Doc Type | Template | Validation |
|
||||
|---------------|----------|----------|------------|
|
||||
| Product Brief | product-brief | templates/product-brief.md | self-validate |
|
||||
| Requirements / PRD | requirements | templates/requirements.md | DISCUSS-002 |
|
||||
| Architecture | architecture | templates/architecture.md | self-validate |
|
||||
| Epics | epics | templates/epics.md | self-validate |
|
||||
|
||||
### Progressive Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
| Doc Type | Requires |
|
||||
|----------|----------|
|
||||
| product-brief | discovery-context.json |
|
||||
| requirements | + product-brief.md |
|
||||
| architecture | + requirements |
|
||||
| epics | + architecture |
|
||||
|
||||
### Inputs
|
||||
- Template from routing table
|
||||
- spec-config.json from <session>/spec/
|
||||
- discovery-context.json from <session>/spec/
|
||||
- Prior decisions from context_accumulator (inner loop)
|
||||
- Discussion feedback from <session>/discussions/ (if exists)
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Document Generation
|
||||
|
||||
CLI generation:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Bash({ command: `ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate <doc-type> document following template
|
||||
TASK: • Load template • Apply spec config and discovery context • Integrate prior feedback • Generate all sections
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONTEXT: @<session>/spec/*.json @<template-path>
|
||||
EXPECTED: Document at <output-path> with YAML frontmatter, all sections, cross-references
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Follow document standards" --tool gemini --mode write --cd <session>`, run_in_background: false })
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Validation
|
||||
|
||||
### Self-Validation (all doc types)
|
||||
| Check | Verify |
|
||||
|-------|--------|
|
||||
| has_frontmatter | YAML frontmatter present |
|
||||
| sections_complete | All template sections filled |
|
||||
| cross_references | Valid references to upstream docs |
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation Routing
|
||||
| Doc Type | Method |
|
||||
|----------|--------|
|
||||
| product-brief | Self-validate → report |
|
||||
| requirements | Self-validate + DISCUSS-002 |
|
||||
| architecture | Self-validate → report |
|
||||
| epics | Self-validate → report |
|
||||
|
||||
Report: doc type, validation status, discuss verdict (PRD only), output path.
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
||||
|----------|------------|
|
||||
| CLI failure | Retry once with alternative tool |
|
||||
| Prior doc missing | Notify coordinator |
|
||||
| Discussion contradicts prior | Note conflict, flag for coordinator |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user