mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-03-10 17:11:04 +08:00
feat: Add templates for epics, product brief, and requirements documentation
- Introduced a comprehensive template for generating epics and stories in Phase 5, including an index and individual epic files. - Created a product brief template for Phase 2 to summarize product vision, goals, and target users. - Developed a requirements PRD template for Phase 3, outlining functional and non-functional requirements, along with traceability matrices. feat: Implement tech debt roles for assessment, execution, planning, scanning, validation, and analysis - Added roles for tech debt assessment, executor, planner, scanner, validator, and analyst, each with defined phases and processes for managing technical debt. - Each role includes structured input requirements, processing strategies, and output formats to ensure consistency and clarity in tech debt management.
This commit is contained in:
78
.claude/skills/team-tech-debt/roles/validator/role.md
Normal file
78
.claude/skills/team-tech-debt/roles/validator/role.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
role: validator
|
||||
prefix: TDVAL
|
||||
inner_loop: false
|
||||
message_types: [state_update]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Tech Debt Validator
|
||||
|
||||
Cleanup result validator. Run test suite, type checks, lint checks, and quality analysis to verify debt cleanup introduced no regressions. Compare before/after debt scores, produce validation-report.json.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Load Context
|
||||
|
||||
| Input | Source | Required |
|
||||
|-------|--------|----------|
|
||||
| Session path | task description (regex: `session:\s*(.+)`) | Yes |
|
||||
| .msg/meta.json | <session>/.msg/meta.json | Yes |
|
||||
| Fix log | <session>/fixes/fix-log.json | No |
|
||||
|
||||
1. Extract session path from task description
|
||||
2. Read .msg/meta.json for: worktree.path, debt_inventory, fix_results, debt_score_before
|
||||
3. Determine command prefix: `cd "<worktree-path>" && ` if worktree exists
|
||||
4. Read fix-log.json for modified files list
|
||||
5. Detect available validation tools in worktree:
|
||||
|
||||
| Signal | Tool | Method |
|
||||
|--------|------|--------|
|
||||
| package.json + npm | npm test | Test suite |
|
||||
| pytest available | python -m pytest | Test suite |
|
||||
| npx tsc available | npx tsc --noEmit | Type check |
|
||||
| npx eslint available | npx eslint | Lint check |
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Run Validation Checks
|
||||
|
||||
Execute 4-layer validation (all commands in worktree):
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Test Suite**:
|
||||
- Run `npm test` or `python -m pytest` in worktree
|
||||
- PASS if no FAIL/error/failed keywords; FAIL with regression count otherwise
|
||||
- Skip with "no-tests" if no test runner available
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Type Check**:
|
||||
- Run `npx tsc --noEmit` in worktree
|
||||
- Count `error TS` occurrences for error count
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Lint Check**:
|
||||
- Run `npx eslint --no-error-on-unmatched-pattern <modified-files>` in worktree
|
||||
- Count error occurrences
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Quality Analysis** (optional, when > 5 modified files):
|
||||
- Use gemini CLI to compare code quality before/after
|
||||
- Assess complexity, duplication, naming quality improvements
|
||||
|
||||
**Debt Score Calculation**:
|
||||
- debt_score_after = debt items NOT in modified files (remaining unfixed items)
|
||||
- improvement_percentage = ((before - after) / before) * 100
|
||||
|
||||
**Auto-fix attempt** (when total_regressions <= 3):
|
||||
- Use CLI tool to fix regressions in worktree:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Bash({
|
||||
command: `cd "${worktreePath}" && ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Fix regressions found in validation
|
||||
TASK: ${regressionDetails}
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONTEXT: @${modifiedFiles.join(' @')}
|
||||
EXPECTED: Fixed regressions
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Fix only regressions | Preserve debt cleanup changes | No suppressions" --tool gemini --mode write`,
|
||||
run_in_background: false
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
- Re-run validation checks after fix attempt
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Compare & Report
|
||||
|
||||
1. Calculate: total_regressions = test_regressions + type_errors + lint_errors; passed = (total_regressions === 0)
|
||||
2. Write `<session>/validation/validation-report.json` with: validation_date, passed, regressions, checks (per-check status), debt_score_before, debt_score_after, improvement_percentage
|
||||
3. Update .msg/meta.json with `validation_results` and `debt_score_after`
|
||||
4. Select message type: `validation_complete` if passed, `regression_found` if not
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user