From 301ae3439a1af2d46a10907651a1dab7ffddb125 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: catlog22 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 16:37:16 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] fix: add technical solution recording to analyze-with-file workflow Add explicit mechanism to capture technical solutions during interactive discussion rounds, preventing them from being lost or only captured in Phase 4 synthesis. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 --- .claude/commands/workflow/analyze-with-file.md | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.claude/commands/workflow/analyze-with-file.md b/.claude/commands/workflow/analyze-with-file.md index 9d6b32b0..71e7cceb 100644 --- a/.claude/commands/workflow/analyze-with-file.md +++ b/.claude/commands/workflow/analyze-with-file.md @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ All `AskUserQuestion` calls MUST comply: | **User feedback** | Input, rationale for adoption/adjustment | `#### User Input` | | **Disagreement & trade-off** | Conflicting views, trade-off basis, final choice | `#### Decision Log` | | **Scope adjustment** | Before/after scope, trigger reason | `#### Decision Log` | +| **Technical solution proposed/validated/rejected** | Solution description, rationale, alternatives considered, status | `#### Technical Solutions` | **Decision Record Format**: ```markdown @@ -58,6 +59,17 @@ All `AskUserQuestion` calls MUST comply: > - **Scope**: [What areas this affects] ``` +**Technical Solution Record Format**: +```markdown +> **Solution**: [Description — what approach, pattern, or implementation] +> - **Status**: [Proposed / Validated / Rejected] +> - **Problem**: [What problem this solves] +> - **Rationale**: [Why this approach] +> - **Alternatives**: [Other options considered and why not chosen] +> - **Evidence**: [file:line or code anchor references] +> - **Next Action**: [Follow-up required or none] +``` + **Principles**: Immediacy (record as-it-happens), Completeness (context+options+chosen+reason+rejected), Traceability (later phases trace back), Depth (capture reasoning, not just outcomes) ### Output Artifacts @@ -237,6 +249,7 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Focus on ${dimensions.join(', ')} - `key_findings[]`, `code_anchors[]`: {file, lines, snippet, significance} - `call_chains[]`: {entry, chain, files} - `discussion_points[]`, `open_questions[]` +- `technical_solutions[]`: {round, solution, problem, rationale, alternatives, status: proposed|validated|rejected, evidence_refs[], next_action} **perspectives.json Schema** (multi — extends explorations.json): - `perspectives[]`: [{name, tool, findings, insights, questions}] @@ -288,6 +301,7 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Focus on ${dimensions.join(', ')} 5. **Update discussion.md**: - **Append** Round N: user input, direction adjustment, Q&A, corrections, new insights + - **Append Technical Solutions** — for every solution proposed, validated, or rejected this round, record immediately using Technical Solution Record Format in `#### Technical Solutions` - **Replace** `## Current Understanding` block with latest consolidated understanding (follow Consolidation Rules) - **Update** `## Table of Contents` with links to new Round N sections @@ -341,7 +355,7 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Focus on ${dimensions.join(', ')} 2. **Consolidate Insights**: - Compile Decision Trail from all phases - Key conclusions with evidence + confidence (high/medium/low) - - Recommendations with rationale + priority (high/medium/low) + - Recommendations with rationale + priority (high/medium/low) — **merge validated `technical_solutions[]` from explorations.json as high-priority recommendations** - Open questions, follow-up suggestions - Decision summary linking conclusions back to decisions - Write to conclusions.json