mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-13 02:41:50 +08:00
refactor: optimize workflow templates and prompt structures
- Streamlined analysis templates (architecture, pattern, performance, quality, security) - Simplified development templates (component, debugging, feature, refactor, testing) - Optimized documentation templates (api, folder-navigation, module-readme, project-architecture, project-examples, project-readme) - Enhanced planning templates (concept-eval, migration, task-breakdown) - Improved verification templates (codex-technical, cross-validation, gemini-strategic) - Updated claude-module-unified memory template - Refined workflow-architecture documentation 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,16 +1,29 @@
|
||||
Analyze code quality and maintainability aspects:
|
||||
Analyze code quality and maintainability aspects.
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Analysis:
|
||||
## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
|
||||
□ Analyze against the project's established coding standards
|
||||
□ Provide file:line references for all quality issues
|
||||
□ Assess both implementation code and test coverage
|
||||
□ Apply RULES template requirements exactly as specified
|
||||
|
||||
## REQUIRED ANALYSIS
|
||||
1. Assess code organization and structural quality
|
||||
2. Evaluate naming conventions and readability standards
|
||||
3. Review error handling and logging practices
|
||||
4. Analyze test coverage and testing strategies
|
||||
5. Document technical debt and improvement priorities
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Requirements:
|
||||
## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
|
||||
- Code quality metrics and specific improvement areas
|
||||
- Naming convention consistency analysis
|
||||
- Error handling pattern documentation
|
||||
- Error handling and logging pattern documentation
|
||||
- Test coverage assessment with gap identification
|
||||
- Prioritized list of technical debt to address
|
||||
|
||||
Focus on maintainability improvements and long-term code health.
|
||||
## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
|
||||
□ All CONTEXT files analyzed for code quality
|
||||
□ Every finding is backed by a code reference (file:line)
|
||||
□ Both code and test quality have been evaluated
|
||||
□ Recommendations are prioritized by impact on maintainability
|
||||
|
||||
Focus: Maintainability improvements and long-term code health.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user