catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git synced 2026-02-13 02:41:50 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor: optimize workflow templates and prompt structures

Browse Source 
- Streamlined analysis templates (architecture, pattern, performance, quality, security)
- Simplified development templates (component, debugging, feature, refactor, testing)
- Optimized documentation templates (api, folder-navigation, module-readme, project-architecture, project-examples, project-readme)
- Enhanced planning templates (concept-eval, migration, task-breakdown)
- Improved verification templates (codex-technical, cross-validation, gemini-strategic)
- Updated claude-module-unified memory template
- Refined workflow-architecture documentation

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2025-10-16 13:48:35 +08:00
parent e95be40c2b
commit 39a35c24b1
26 changed files with 693 additions and 1402 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/review/code-review.txt
View File

@@ -1,16 +1,28 @@
Conduct comprehensive code review and quality assessment:
Conduct comprehensive code review and quality assessment.
## Required Analysis:
## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
□ Review against established coding standards and conventions
□ Assess logic correctness, including potential edge cases
□ Evaluate security implications and vulnerability risks
□ Check for performance bottlenecks and optimization opportunities
## REQUIRED ANALYSIS
1. Review code against established coding standards and conventions
2. Assess logic correctness and potential edge cases
3. Evaluate security implications and vulnerability risks
4. Check performance characteristics and optimization opportunities
5. Validate test coverage and documentation completeness
## Output Requirements:
## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
- Standards compliance assessment with specific violations
- Logic review findings with potential issue identification
- Security assessment with vulnerability documentation
- Performance review with optimization recommendations
Focus on actionable feedback with clear improvement priorities and implementation guidance.
## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
□ Code is assessed against established standards
□ Logic, including edge cases, is thoroughly reviewed
□ Security and performance have been evaluated
□ Test coverage and documentation are validated
Focus: Actionable feedback with clear improvement priorities and implementation guidance.