refactor: replace replan commands with direct agent-based fixes

Replace batch replan workflow with TodoWrite tracking and direct agent calls:
- concept-clarify.md: Call conceptual-planning-agent for concept gaps
- action-plan-verify.md: Call action-planning-agent for task/plan issues

Both commands now require explicit user confirmation before fixes.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2025-10-18 19:03:31 +08:00
parent 199585b29c
commit 3a6e88c0df
2 changed files with 11 additions and 77 deletions

View File

@@ -362,81 +362,8 @@ At end of report, provide batch remediation guidance:
### 🔧 Remediation Options
**Recommended Workflow**:
1. **Batch Mode** (Fastest): Apply all task improvements automatically
```bash
/task:replan --batch .workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md
```
1. **TodoWrite Tracking**: Create task list for all fixes
2. **Agent-Based Fixes**: Call action-planning-agent to regenerate task files
3. **User Confirmation**: Wait for approval before executing fixes
2. **Manual Review**: Examine each issue before applying
- Review findings in this report
- Execute specific `/task:create` or `/task:replan` commands individually
3. **Architecture Changes**: Update IMPL_PLAN.md manually if architecture drift detected
**Note**: This is read-only analysis. All fixes require explicit execution.
```
### 8. Update Session Metadata
```json
{
"phases": {
"PLAN": {
"status": "completed",
"action_plan_verification": {
"completed": true,
"completed_at": "timestamp",
"overall_risk_level": "HIGH",
"recommendation": "PROCEED_WITH_FIXES",
"issues": {
"critical": 2,
"high": 5,
"medium": 8,
"low": 3
},
"coverage": {
"functional_requirements": 0.85,
"non_functional_requirements": 0.40,
"business_requirements": 1.00
},
"report_path": ".workflow/WFS-{session}/.process/ACTION_PLAN_VERIFICATION.md"
}
}
}
}
```
## Operating Principles
### Context Efficiency
- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable findings
- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally
- **Token-efficient output**: Limit findings table to 50 rows; summarize overflow
- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes produces consistent IDs and counts
### Analysis Guidelines
- **NEVER modify files** (this is read-only analysis)
- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections** (if absent, report them accurately)
- **Prioritize synthesis violations** (these are always CRITICAL)
- **Use examples over exhaustive rules** (cite specific instances)
- **Report zero issues gracefully** (emit success report with coverage statistics)
### Verification Taxonomy
- **Coverage**: Requirements → Tasks mapping
- **Consistency**: Cross-artifact alignment
- **Dependencies**: Task ordering and relationships
- **Synthesis Alignment**: Adherence to authoritative requirements
- **Task Quality**: Specification completeness
- **Feasibility**: Implementation risks
## Behavior Rules
- **If no issues found**: Report "✅ Action plan verification passed. No issues detected." and suggest proceeding to `/workflow:execute`.
- **If CRITICAL issues exist**: Recommend blocking execution until resolved.
- **If only HIGH/MEDIUM issues**: User may proceed with caution, but provide improvement suggestions.
- **If IMPL_PLAN.md or task files missing**: Instruct user to run `/workflow:plan` first.
- **Always provide actionable remediation suggestions**: Don't just identify problems—suggest solutions.
## Context
{ARGS}
**Note**: All fixes require explicit user confirmation.

View File

@@ -271,6 +271,13 @@ This serves as a quality gate to ensure conceptual clarity before detailed task
- OR 🔄 **Run /workflow:concept-clarify Again**: If new information available
### Next Steps
**If Outstanding Items Exist**:
1. TodoWrite tracking for outstanding issues
2. Call conceptual-planning-agent to fix conceptual gaps
3. Wait for user confirmation before proceeding
**If No Issues**:
```bash
/workflow:plan # Generate IMPL_PLAN.md and task.json
```