mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-03-01 15:03:57 +08:00
feat(workflow): add lightweight interactive planning workflow with in-memory execution and code exploration
- Introduced `lite-plan` command for intelligent task analysis and planning. - Implemented dynamic exploration and clarification phases based on task complexity. - Added support for auto mode and forced exploration flags. - Defined output artifacts and session structure for planning results. - Enhanced execution process with context handoff to `lite-execute`. chore(temp): create temporary memory content and import script - Added `.temp-memory-content.txt` to store session details and execution plan. - Implemented `temp-import-memory.cjs` to handle memory import using core-memory command. - Ensured cleanup of temporary files after execution.
This commit is contained in:
134
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/subagents/discuss-subagent.md
Normal file
134
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/subagents/discuss-subagent.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
|
||||
# Discuss Subagent
|
||||
|
||||
Lightweight multi-perspective critique engine. Called inline by produce roles (analyst, writer, reviewer) instead of as a separate team member. Eliminates spawn overhead while preserving multi-CLI analysis quality.
|
||||
|
||||
## Design Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
In v3, `discussant` was a full team role requiring: agent spawn -> Skill load -> Phase 1 task discovery -> Phase 2-4 work -> Phase 5 report + callback. For what is essentially "run CLI analyses + synthesize", the framework overhead exceeded actual work time.
|
||||
|
||||
In v4, discuss is a **subagent call** from within the producing role, reducing each discuss round from ~60-90s overhead to ~5s overhead.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
Called by produce roles after artifact creation:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Task({
|
||||
subagent_type: "cli-discuss-agent",
|
||||
run_in_background: false,
|
||||
description: "Discuss <round-id>",
|
||||
prompt: `## Multi-Perspective Critique: <round-id>
|
||||
|
||||
### Input
|
||||
- Artifact: <artifact-path>
|
||||
- Round: <round-id>
|
||||
- Perspectives: <perspective-list>
|
||||
- Session: <session-folder>
|
||||
- Discovery Context: <session-folder>/spec/discovery-context.json (for coverage perspective)
|
||||
|
||||
### Perspective Routing
|
||||
|
||||
| Perspective | CLI Tool | Role | Focus Areas |
|
||||
|-------------|----------|------|-------------|
|
||||
| Product | gemini | Product Manager | Market fit, user value, business viability |
|
||||
| Technical | codex | Tech Lead | Feasibility, tech debt, performance, security |
|
||||
| Quality | claude | QA Lead | Completeness, testability, consistency |
|
||||
| Risk | gemini | Risk Analyst | Risk identification, dependencies, failure modes |
|
||||
| Coverage | gemini | Requirements Analyst | Requirement completeness vs discovery-context |
|
||||
|
||||
### Execution Steps
|
||||
1. Read artifact from <artifact-path>
|
||||
2. For each perspective, launch CLI analysis in background:
|
||||
Bash(command="ccw cli -p 'PURPOSE: Analyze from <role> perspective for <round-id>
|
||||
TASK: <focus-areas>
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: Artifact content below
|
||||
EXPECTED: JSON with strengths[], weaknesses[], suggestions[], rating (1-5)
|
||||
CONSTRAINTS: Output valid JSON only
|
||||
|
||||
Artifact:
|
||||
<artifact-content>' --tool <cli-tool> --mode analysis", run_in_background=true)
|
||||
3. Wait for all CLI results
|
||||
4. Divergence detection:
|
||||
- Coverage gap: missing_requirements non-empty -> High severity
|
||||
- High risk: risk_level is high or critical -> High severity
|
||||
- Low rating: any perspective rating <= 2 -> Medium severity
|
||||
- Rating spread: max - min >= 3 -> Medium severity
|
||||
5. Consensus determination:
|
||||
- No high-severity divergences AND average rating >= 3.0 -> consensus_reached
|
||||
- Otherwise -> consensus_blocked
|
||||
6. Synthesize:
|
||||
- Convergent themes (agreed by 2+ perspectives)
|
||||
- Divergent views (conflicting assessments)
|
||||
- Coverage gaps
|
||||
- Action items from suggestions
|
||||
7. Write discussion record to: <session-folder>/discussions/<round-id>-discussion.md
|
||||
|
||||
### Discussion Record Format
|
||||
# Discussion Record: <round-id>
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifact**: <artifact-path>
|
||||
**Perspectives**: <list>
|
||||
**Consensus**: reached / blocked
|
||||
**Average Rating**: <avg>/5
|
||||
|
||||
## Convergent Themes
|
||||
- <theme>
|
||||
|
||||
## Divergent Views
|
||||
- **<topic>** (<severity>): <description>
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
1. <item>
|
||||
|
||||
## Ratings
|
||||
| Perspective | Rating |
|
||||
|-------------|--------|
|
||||
| <name> | <n>/5 |
|
||||
|
||||
### Return Value
|
||||
Return a summary string with:
|
||||
- Verdict: consensus_reached or consensus_blocked
|
||||
- Average rating
|
||||
- Key action items (top 3)
|
||||
- Discussion record path
|
||||
|
||||
### Error Handling
|
||||
- Single CLI fails -> fallback to direct Claude analysis for that perspective
|
||||
- All CLI fail -> generate basic discussion from direct artifact reading
|
||||
- Artifact not found -> return error immediately`
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Round Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
| Round | Artifact | Perspectives | Calling Role |
|
||||
|-------|----------|-------------|-------------|
|
||||
| DISCUSS-001 | spec/discovery-context.json | product, risk, coverage | analyst |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-002 | spec/product-brief.md | product, technical, quality, coverage | writer |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-003 | spec/requirements/_index.md | quality, product, coverage | writer |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-004 | spec/architecture/_index.md | technical, risk | writer |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-005 | spec/epics/_index.md | product, technical, quality, coverage | writer |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-006 | spec/readiness-report.md | all 5 | reviewer |
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Calling Role
|
||||
|
||||
The calling role is responsible for:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Before calling**: Complete primary artifact output
|
||||
2. **Calling**: Invoke discuss subagent with correct round config
|
||||
3. **After calling**:
|
||||
- Include discuss verdict in Phase 5 report
|
||||
- If `consensus_blocked` with high-severity divergences -> flag in SendMessage to coordinator
|
||||
- Discussion record is written by the subagent, no further action needed
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison with v3
|
||||
|
||||
| Aspect | v3 (discussant role) | v4 (discuss subagent) |
|
||||
|--------|---------------------|----------------------|
|
||||
| Spawn | Full general-purpose agent | Inline subagent call |
|
||||
| Skill load | Reads SKILL.md + role.md | None (prompt contains all logic) |
|
||||
| Task discovery | TaskList + TaskGet + TaskUpdate | None (called with context) |
|
||||
| Report overhead | team_msg + SendMessage + TaskUpdate | Return value to caller |
|
||||
| Total overhead | ~25-45s framework | ~5s call overhead |
|
||||
| Pipeline beat | 1 beat per discuss round | 0 additional beats |
|
||||
172
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/subagents/explore-subagent.md
Normal file
172
.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/subagents/explore-subagent.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
|
||||
# Explore Subagent
|
||||
|
||||
Shared codebase exploration utility with centralized caching. Callable by any role needing code context. Replaces v3's standalone explorer role.
|
||||
|
||||
## Design Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
In v3, exploration happened in 3 separate places:
|
||||
- `analyst` Phase 3: ACE semantic search for architecture patterns
|
||||
- `planner` Phase 2: multi-angle cli-explore-agent
|
||||
- `explorer` role: standalone service with full spawn cycle
|
||||
|
||||
Results were scattered across different directories and never shared. In v4, all exploration routes through this subagent with a **unified cache** in `explorations/`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Task({
|
||||
subagent_type: "Explore",
|
||||
run_in_background: false,
|
||||
description: "Explore <angle>",
|
||||
prompt: `Explore codebase for: <query>
|
||||
|
||||
Focus angle: <angle>
|
||||
Keywords: <keyword-list>
|
||||
Session folder: <session-folder>
|
||||
|
||||
## Cache Check
|
||||
1. Read <session-folder>/explorations/cache-index.json (if exists)
|
||||
2. Look for entry with matching angle
|
||||
3. If found AND file exists -> read cached result, return summary
|
||||
4. If not found -> proceed to exploration
|
||||
|
||||
## Exploration
|
||||
<angle-specific-focus-from-table-below>
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
Write JSON to: <session-folder>/explorations/explore-<angle>.json
|
||||
Update cache-index.json with new entry
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Schema
|
||||
{
|
||||
"angle": "<angle>",
|
||||
"query": "<query>",
|
||||
"relevant_files": [
|
||||
{ "path": "...", "rationale": "...", "role": "...", "discovery_source": "...", "key_symbols": [] }
|
||||
],
|
||||
"patterns": [],
|
||||
"dependencies": [],
|
||||
"external_refs": [],
|
||||
"_metadata": { "created_by": "<calling-role>", "timestamp": "...", "cache_key": "..." }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Return summary: file count, pattern count, top 5 files, output path`
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Cache Mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
### Cache Index Schema
|
||||
|
||||
`<session-folder>/explorations/cache-index.json`:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"angle": "architecture",
|
||||
"keywords": ["auth", "middleware"],
|
||||
"file": "explore-architecture.json",
|
||||
"created_by": "analyst",
|
||||
"created_at": "2026-02-27T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
"file_count": 15
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Cache Lookup Rules
|
||||
|
||||
| Condition | Action |
|
||||
|-----------|--------|
|
||||
| Exact angle match exists | Return cached result |
|
||||
| No match | Execute exploration, cache result |
|
||||
| Cache file missing but index has entry | Remove stale entry, re-explore |
|
||||
|
||||
### Cache Invalidation
|
||||
|
||||
Cache is session-scoped. No explicit invalidation needed -- each session starts fresh. If a role suspects stale data, it can pass `force_refresh: true` in the prompt to bypass cache.
|
||||
|
||||
## Angle Focus Guide
|
||||
|
||||
| Angle | Focus Points | Typical Caller |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|----------------|
|
||||
| architecture | Layer boundaries, design patterns, component responsibilities, ADRs | analyst, planner |
|
||||
| dependencies | Import chains, external libraries, circular dependencies, shared utilities | planner |
|
||||
| modularity | Module interfaces, separation of concerns, extraction opportunities | planner |
|
||||
| integration-points | API endpoints, data flow between modules, event systems | analyst, planner |
|
||||
| security | Auth/authz logic, input validation, sensitive data handling, middleware | planner |
|
||||
| auth-patterns | Auth flows, session management, token validation, permissions | planner |
|
||||
| dataflow | Data transformations, state propagation, validation points | planner |
|
||||
| performance | Bottlenecks, N+1 queries, blocking operations, algorithm complexity | planner |
|
||||
| error-handling | Try-catch blocks, error propagation, recovery strategies, logging | planner |
|
||||
| patterns | Code conventions, design patterns, naming conventions, best practices | analyst, planner |
|
||||
| testing | Test files, coverage gaps, test patterns, mocking strategies | planner |
|
||||
| general | Broad semantic search for topic-related code | analyst |
|
||||
|
||||
## Exploration Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### Low Complexity (direct search)
|
||||
|
||||
For simple queries, use ACE semantic search:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
mcp__ace-tool__search_context(project_root_path="<project-root>", query="<query>")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
ACE failure fallback: `rg -l '<keywords>' --type ts`
|
||||
|
||||
### Medium/High Complexity (multi-angle)
|
||||
|
||||
For complex queries, call cli-explore-agent per angle. The calling role determines complexity and selects angles (see planner's `commands/explore.md`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Search Tool Priority
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Priority | Use Case |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|
|
||||
| mcp__ace-tool__search_context | P0 | Semantic search |
|
||||
| Grep / Glob | P1 | Pattern matching |
|
||||
| cli-explore-agent | Deep | Multi-angle exploration |
|
||||
| WebSearch | P3 | External docs |
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Roles
|
||||
|
||||
### analyst (RESEARCH-001)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
# After seed analysis, explore codebase context
|
||||
Task({
|
||||
subagent_type: "Explore",
|
||||
description: "Explore general context",
|
||||
prompt: "Explore codebase for: <topic>\nFocus angle: general\n..."
|
||||
})
|
||||
# Result feeds into discovery-context.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### planner (PLAN-001)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
# Multi-angle exploration before plan generation
|
||||
for angle in selected_angles:
|
||||
Task({
|
||||
subagent_type: "Explore",
|
||||
description: "Explore <angle>",
|
||||
prompt: "Explore codebase for: <task>\nFocus angle: <angle>\n..."
|
||||
})
|
||||
# Explorations manifest built from cache-index.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Any role needing context
|
||||
|
||||
Any role can call explore subagent when needing codebase context for better decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison with v3
|
||||
|
||||
| Aspect | v3 (explorer role) | v4 (explore subagent) |
|
||||
|--------|-------------------|----------------------|
|
||||
| Identity | Full team member | Utility subagent |
|
||||
| Task creation | Coordinator creates EXPLORE-* tasks | No tasks, direct call |
|
||||
| Spawn overhead | Full agent lifecycle | Subagent call (~5s) |
|
||||
| Result sharing | Isolated in explorations/ | Shared cache with index |
|
||||
| Caller | Only via coordinator dispatch | Any role directly |
|
||||
| Duplication | analyst + planner + explorer all explore | Single cached path |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user