fix(ui-design): ensure component templates include CSS placeholders

Fix critical CSS loading issue where component templates were missing
style references due to contradictory instructions.

Changes:
- Require all templates (pages and components) to generate complete HTML5 documents
- Components now use full document structure with isolated body content
- Guarantees <head> tag presence for CSS placeholder injection
- Update validation to enforce <!DOCTYPE html> requirement
- Update documentation to reflect unified template approach

This ensures ui-instantiate-prototypes.sh can reliably inject STRUCTURAL_CSS
and TOKEN_CSS placeholders, fixing component styling issues.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2025-10-10 12:30:17 +08:00
parent 36728b6e59
commit 4e48803424
4 changed files with 66 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@@ -4,6 +4,11 @@ description: Extract design style from reference images or text prompts using Cl
usage: /workflow:ui-design:extract [--base-path <path>] [--session <id>] [--images "<glob>"] [--prompt "<desc>"] [--variants <count>]
argument-hint: "[--base-path \".workflow/WFS-xxx/design-run-xxx\"] [--session WFS-xxx] [--images \"refs/*.png\"] [--prompt \"Modern minimalist\"] [--variants 3]"
parameters:
- name: --mode
type: string
enum: [imitate, explore, auto]
default: auto
description: "Extraction mode: 'imitate' (high-fidelity single style, skip divergence), 'explore' (multi-variant with contrast analysis), 'auto' (detect from --variants: 1=imitate, 2+=explore)"
- name: --variants
type: number
default: 1
@@ -85,14 +90,29 @@ CREATE: {base_path}/style-extraction/
### Phase 0.5: AI-Driven Design Space Divergence
```bash
# Step 1: Load project context
# Determine extraction mode
extraction_mode = --mode OR "auto"
IF extraction_mode == "auto":
extraction_mode = (variants_count == 1) ? "imitate" : "explore"
REPORT: "🔍 Auto-detected mode: {extraction_mode} (variants_count={variants_count})"
# Skip divergence analysis for imitate mode
IF extraction_mode == "imitate":
REPORT: "🎯 IMITATE MODE: High-fidelity single style extraction"
REPORT: " → Skipping design space divergence analysis"
REPORT: " → Proceeding to Phase 2 for direct style synthesis"
design_space_analysis = null
# Skip to Phase 2
GOTO Phase 2
# Step 1: Load project context (explore mode only)
project_context = ""
IF exists({base_path}/.brainstorming/synthesis-specification.md):
project_context = Read(synthesis-specification.md)
ELSE IF exists({base_path}/.brainstorming/ui-designer/analysis.md):
project_context = Read(ui-designer/analysis.md)
REPORT: "🎨 Analyzing design space to generate maximally contrasting directions..."
REPORT: "🎨 EXPLORE MODE: Analyzing design space to generate maximally contrasting directions..."
# Step 2: AI-driven divergent direction generation
divergence_prompt = """
@@ -154,12 +174,13 @@ REPORT: "💾 Saved design space analysis to design-space-analysis.json"
**Analysis Prompt Template**:
```
Generate {variants_count} design style proposals, each guided by its pre-analyzed design direction.
Generate {variants_count} design style proposals{IF extraction_mode == "explore": , each guided by its pre-analyzed design direction}.
INPUT MODE: {input_mode}
{IF input_mode IN ["image", "hybrid"]: VISUAL REFERENCES: {list of loaded images}}
{IF input_mode IN ["text", "hybrid"]: TEXT GUIDANCE: "{prompt_guidance}"}
{IF extraction_mode == "explore":
DESIGN SPACE ANALYSIS: {design_space_analysis summary}
VARIANT-SPECIFIC DESIGN DIRECTIONS:
@@ -171,20 +192,29 @@ SEARCH KEYWORDS: {direction.search_keywords}
ANTI-PATTERNS (avoid): {direction.anti_keywords}
RATIONALE: {direction.rationale}
---}
}
TASK: Generate {variants_count} design style variants where EACH variant:
TASK: Generate {variants_count} design style variant{IF variants_count > 1: s} where {IF extraction_mode == "explore": EACH variant}:
{IF extraction_mode == "explore":
1. Strictly follows its pre-defined design philosophy and attributes
2. Maintains maximum contrast with other variants' attributes
3. Incorporates its design direction and avoids its anti-patterns
}
{IF extraction_mode == "imitate":
1. Provides high-fidelity replication of reference design
2. Focuses on accurate extraction of visual characteristics
}
4. Uses OKLCH color space for all color values
5. Includes complete, production-ready design token proposals
6. Applies WCAG AA accessibility guidelines (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
{IF extraction_mode == "explore":
CRITICAL RULES FOR CONTRAST:
- Variant-1 should feel completely different from Variant-2/3
- Use each variant's specific attribute scores (e.g., "monochrome" vs "vibrant")
- Each variant should embody its unique design direction
- If Variant-1 is "minimal/geometric", Variant-2 must be "bold/organic" or similar contrast
}
OUTPUT FORMAT: JSON matching this structure:
{"extraction_metadata": {"session_id": "...", "input_mode": "...", "timestamp": "...", "variants_count": N},
@@ -203,7 +233,8 @@ OUTPUT FORMAT: JSON matching this structure:
// Repeat for ALL {variants_count} variants
]}
RULES: Each variant must strictly adhere to pre-defined attributes; maximize visual contrast;
RULES: {IF extraction_mode == "explore": Each variant must strictly adhere to pre-defined attributes; maximize visual contrast;}
{IF extraction_mode == "imitate": Focus on high-fidelity replication;}
all colors in OKLCH format; complete token structures; semantic naming;
WCAG AA accessibility (4.5:1 text, 3:1 UI)
```
@@ -220,10 +251,10 @@ Write({file_path: "{base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json", content: styl
```javascript
TodoWrite({todos: [
{content: "Validate inputs and create directories", status: "completed", activeForm: "Validating inputs"},
{content: "Analyze design space for maximum contrast", status: "completed", activeForm: "Analyzing design space"},
{content: `Generate ${variants_count} divergent design directions`, status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating directions"},
{content: "Save design space analysis for consolidation", status: "completed", activeForm: "Saving design space analysis"},
{content: `Generate ${variants_count} contrasting style variants`, status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating variants"}
{content: extraction_mode == "explore" ? "Analyze design space for maximum contrast" : "Skip design space analysis (imitate mode)", status: "completed", activeForm: extraction_mode == "explore" ? "Analyzing design space" : "Skipping analysis"},
{content: extraction_mode == "explore" ? `Generate ${variants_count} divergent design directions` : "Prepare for high-fidelity extraction", status: "completed", activeForm: extraction_mode == "explore" ? "Generating directions" : "Preparing extraction"},
{content: extraction_mode == "explore" ? "Save design space analysis for consolidation" : "Skip design space output", status: "completed", activeForm: extraction_mode == "explore" ? "Saving design space analysis" : "Skipping output"},
{content: `Generate ${variants_count} ${extraction_mode == "explore" ? "contrasting" : "high-fidelity"} style variant${variants_count > 1 ? "s" : ""}`, status: "completed", activeForm: "Generating variants"}
]});
```
@@ -231,25 +262,33 @@ TodoWrite({todos: [
```
✅ Style extraction complete for session: {session_id}
Mode: {extraction_mode == "imitate" ? "🎯 IMITATE (high-fidelity)" : "🎨 EXPLORE (contrast analysis)"}
Input mode: {input_mode}
{IF image mode: Images analyzed: {count}}
{IF prompt mode: Prompt: "{truncated_prompt}"}
{IF extraction_mode == "explore":
🎨 Design Space Analysis:
- Generated {variants_count} MAXIMALLY CONTRASTING design directions
- Min pairwise contrast distance: {design_space_analysis.contrast_verification.min_pairwise_distance}
- Strategy: {design_space_analysis.contrast_verification.strategy}
}
{IF extraction_mode == "imitate":
🎯 Imitation Mode:
- High-fidelity single style extraction
- Design space divergence skipped for faster execution
}
Generated {variants_count} style variant(s):
Generated {variants_count} style variant{variants_count > 1 ? "s" : ""}:
{FOR each card: - {card.name} ({card.id}) - {card.design_philosophy}}
📂 Outputs:
- {base_path}/style-extraction/style-cards.json
- {base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json
{IF extraction_mode == "explore": - {base_path}/style-extraction/design-space-analysis.json}
Next: /workflow:ui-design:consolidate --session {session_id} --variants {variants_count} [--layout-variants <count>]
Note: When called from /workflow:ui-design:auto, consolidation is triggered automatically.
Note: When called from /workflow:ui-design:{extraction_mode == "imitate" ? "imitate" : "explore"}-auto, consolidation is triggered automatically.
```
## Output Structure
@@ -257,13 +296,13 @@ Note: When called from /workflow:ui-design:auto, consolidation is triggered auto
```
.workflow/WFS-{session}/design-{run_id}/style-extraction/
├── style-cards.json # Complete style variants with token proposals
└── design-space-analysis.json # Design directions for consolidation phase
└── design-space-analysis.json # Design directions (explore mode only)
OR (standalone mode):
.workflow/.design/{run_id}/style-extraction/
├── style-cards.json
└── design-space-analysis.json
└── design-space-analysis.json # Only in explore mode
```
### style-cards.json Format