Rename workflow-lite-planex to workflow-lite-plan across documentation and code references for consistency and clarity. Update related examples, command references, and workflow comparisons to reflect the new naming convention.

.claude/commands/workflow/analyze-with-file.md

@@ -611,8 +611,8 @@ ${conclusions.open_questions.length > 0 ? `\n**Open Questions**:\n${conclusions.
 5. **Post-Completion Options** (⚠️ TERMINAL — analyze-with-file ends after user selection)
 
    > **WORKFLOW BOUNDARY**: After user selects any option below, the analyze-with-file workflow is **COMPLETE**.
-   > If "执行任务" is selected, workflow-lite-planex takes over exclusively — do NOT return to any analyze-with-file phase.
-   > The "Phase" numbers in workflow-lite-planex (LP-Phase 1-5) are SEPARATE from analyze-with-file phases.
+   > If "执行任务" is selected, workflow-lite-plan takes over exclusively — do NOT return to any analyze-with-file phase.
+   > The "Phase" numbers in workflow-lite-plan (LP-Phase 1-5) are SEPARATE from analyze-with-file phases.
 
    ```javascript
    const hasActionableRecs = conclusions.recommendations?.some(r => r.priority === 'high' || r.priority === 'medium')
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ ${conclusions.open_questions.length > 0 ? `\n**Open Questions**:\n${conclusions.
        header: "Next Step",
        multiSelect: false,
        options: [
-         { label: hasActionableRecs ? "执行任务 (Recommended)" : "执行任务", description: "Launch workflow-lite-planex to plan & execute" },
+         { label: hasActionableRecs ? "执行任务 (Recommended)" : "执行任务", description: "Launch workflow-lite-plan to plan & execute" },
          { label: "产出Issue", description: "Launch issue-discover with conclusions" },
          { label: "完成", description: "No further action" }
        ]
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ DO NOT reference any analyze-with-file phase instructions beyond this point.
 `)
 
      // 4. Hand off to lite-plan — analyze-with-file COMPLETE, do NOT return to any analyze phase
-     Skill(skill="workflow-lite-planex", args=`"${taskDescription}\n\n${contextLines.join('\n')}"`)
+     Skill(skill="workflow-lite-plan", args=`"${taskDescription}\n\n${contextLines.join('\n')}"`)
      return  // ⛔ analyze-with-file terminates here
    }
    ```
@@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ User agrees with current direction, wants deeper code analysis
 - Quick information gathering without multi-round iteration
 - Follow-up analysis building on existing session
 
-**Use `Skill(skill="workflow-lite-planex", args="\"task description\"")` when:**
+**Use `Skill(skill="workflow-lite-plan", args="\"task description\"")` when:**
 - Ready to implement (past analysis phase)
 - Need simple task breakdown
 - Focus on quick execution planning

.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm-with-file.md

@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ See full markdown template in original file (lines 955-1161).
 - Want shared collaborative planning document
 - Need structured task breakdown with agent coordination
 
-**Use `Skill(skill="workflow-lite-planex", args="\"task description\"")` when:**
+**Use `Skill(skill="workflow-lite-plan", args="\"task description\"")` when:**
 - Direction is already clear
 - Ready to move from ideas to execution
 - Need simple implementation breakdown

.claude/commands/workflow/debug-with-file.md

@@ -651,6 +651,6 @@ if (autoYes) {
 | Empty debug.log | Verify reproduction triggered the code path |
 | All hypotheses rejected | Use Gemini to generate new hypotheses based on disproven assumptions |
 | Fix doesn't work | Document failed fix attempt, iterate with refined understanding |
-| >5 iterations | Review consolidated understanding, escalate to `workflow-lite-planex` skill with full context |
+| >5 iterations | Review consolidated understanding, escalate to `workflow-lite-plan` skill with full context |
 | Gemini unavailable | Fallback to manual hypothesis generation, document without Gemini insights |
 | Understanding too long | Consolidate aggressively, archive old iterations to separate file |

.claude/commands/workflow/refactor-cycle.md

@@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ AskUserQuestion({
 - Need regression-safe iterative refactoring with rollback
 - Want documented reasoning for each refactoring decision
 
-**Use `workflow-lite-planex` skill when:**
+**Use `workflow-lite-plan` skill when:**
 - Single specific bug or issue to fix
 - No systematic debt analysis needed
 

.claude/commands/workflow/roadmap-with-file.md

@@ -534,10 +534,10 @@ ${selectedMode === 'progressive' ? `**Progressive Mode**:
 | Scenario | Recommended Command |
 |----------|-------------------|
 | Strategic planning, need issue tracking | `/workflow:roadmap-with-file` |
-| Quick task breakdown, immediate execution | `/workflow-lite-planex` |
+| Quick task breakdown, immediate execution | `/workflow-lite-plan` |
 | Collaborative multi-agent planning | `/workflow:collaborative-plan-with-file` |
 | Full specification documents | `spec-generator` skill |
-| Code implementation from existing plan | `/workflow-lite-planex` (Phase 1: plan → Phase 2: execute) |
+| Code implementation from existing plan | `/workflow-lite-plan` (Phase 1: plan → Phase 2: execute) |
 
 ---