mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-13 02:41:50 +08:00
Refactor workflow to replace synthesis-specification.md with role analysis documents
- Updated references in various workflow commands to utilize role analysis documents instead of synthesis-specification.md. - Modified CLI templates and command references to reflect the new architecture and document structure. - Introduced conflict-resolution command to analyze and resolve conflicts between implementation plans and existing codebase. - Deprecated synthesis role template and provided migration guidance for transitioning to the new role analysis approach.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,4 +1,25 @@
|
||||
# Synthesis Role Template
|
||||
# ⚠️ DEPRECATED: Synthesis Role Template
|
||||
|
||||
## DEPRECATION NOTICE
|
||||
|
||||
**This template is DEPRECATED and no longer used.**
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Deprecated
|
||||
The `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` command has been redesigned:
|
||||
- **Old behavior**: Generated synthesis-specification.md consolidating all role analyses
|
||||
- **New behavior**: Performs cross-role analysis, identifies ambiguities, interacts with user for clarification, and updates role analysis.md files directly
|
||||
|
||||
### Migration
|
||||
- **Role analyses are the source of truth**: Each role's analysis.md file is updated directly
|
||||
- **Planning reads role documents**: The planning phase dynamically reads all role analysis.md files
|
||||
- **No template needed**: The clarification workflow doesn't require a document template
|
||||
|
||||
### Historical Context
|
||||
This template was used to guide the generation of synthesis-specification.md from multiple role perspectives. It is preserved for historical reference but should not be used in the new architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Original Template (Historical Reference)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
Generate comprehensive synthesis-specification.md that consolidates all role perspectives from brainstorming into actionable implementation specification.
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +39,7 @@ Generate comprehensive synthesis-specification.md that consolidates all role per
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# [Topic] - Integrated Implementation Specification
|
||||
|
||||
**Framework Reference**: @topic-framework.md | **Generated**: [timestamp] | **Session**: WFS-[topic-slug]
|
||||
**Framework Reference**: @guidance-specification.md | **Generated**: [timestamp] | **Session**: WFS-[topic-slug]
|
||||
**Source Integration**: All brainstorming role perspectives consolidated
|
||||
**Document Type**: Requirements & Design Specification (WHAT to build)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -344,7 +365,7 @@ Document known constraints that affect planning:
|
||||
|
||||
### Cross-Role Synthesis Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Load All Role Analyses**: Read topic-framework.md and all discovered */analysis.md files
|
||||
1. **Load All Role Analyses**: Read guidance-specification.md and all discovered */analysis.md files
|
||||
2. **Extract Key Insights**: Identify main recommendations, concerns, and innovations from each role
|
||||
3. **Identify Consensus Areas**: Find common themes across multiple roles
|
||||
4. **Document Disagreements**: Capture controversial points where roles differ
|
||||
@@ -371,7 +392,7 @@ Document known constraints that affect planning:
|
||||
Use @ references to link back to source role analyses:
|
||||
- `@role/analysis.md` - Reference entire role analysis
|
||||
- `@role/analysis.md#section` - Reference specific section
|
||||
- `@topic-framework.md#point-3` - Reference framework discussion point
|
||||
- `@guidance-specification.md#point-3` - Reference framework discussion point
|
||||
|
||||
### Dynamic Role Handling
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user