catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git synced 2026-03-27 20:00:44 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor(cli): change from env var injection to direct prompt concatenation

Browse Source 
- Replace $PROTO/$TMPL environment variable injection with systemRules/roles direct concatenation
- Append rules to END of prompt instead of prepending
- Change prompt field name from RULES to CONSTRAINTS in all prompts
- Default to universal-rigorous-style template when --rule not specified
- Update all .claude documentation, agents, commands, and skills
- Add streaming_content type support for Gemini delta messages

Breaking: Prompts now use CONSTRAINTS field instead of RULES
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-01-17 21:30:05 +08:00
parent 1e691fa751
commit 5b5dc85677
21 changed files with 136 additions and 95 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
.claude/commands/cli/codex-review.md
View File

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ TASK: • [step 1] • [step 2] • [step 3]
MODE: review
CONTEXT: [review target description] | Memory: [relevant context]
EXPECTED: [deliverable format] + [quality criteria]
RULES: $PROTO $TMPL | [focus constraints]
CONSTRAINTS: [focus constraints]
```
## EXECUTION INSTRUCTIONS - START HERE
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ TASK: • Review code correctness and logic errors • Check coding standards an
MODE: review
CONTEXT: {target_description} | Memory: Project conventions from CLAUDE.md
EXPECTED: Structured review report with: severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low), file:line references, specific improvement suggestions, priority ranking
RULES: $PROTO $TMPL | Focus on actionable feedback
CONSTRAINTS: Focus on actionable feedback
```
**Security Focus Prompt:**
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ TASK: • Scan for injection vulnerabilities (SQL, XSS, command) • Check authe
MODE: review
CONTEXT: {target_description} | Memory: Security best practices, OWASP Top 10
EXPECTED: Security report with: vulnerability classification, CVE references where applicable, remediation code snippets, risk severity matrix
RULES: $PROTO $TMPL | Security-first analysis | Flag all potential vulnerabilities
CONSTRAINTS: Security-first analysis | Flag all potential vulnerabilities
```
**Performance Focus Prompt:**
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ TASK: • Analyze algorithmic complexity (Big-O) • Identify memory allocation
MODE: review
CONTEXT: {target_description} | Memory: Performance patterns and anti-patterns
EXPECTED: Performance report with: complexity analysis, bottleneck identification, optimization suggestions with expected impact, benchmark recommendations
RULES: $PROTO $TMPL | Performance optimization focus
CONSTRAINTS: Performance optimization focus
```
**Code Quality Focus Prompt:**
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ TASK: • Assess SOLID principles adherence • Identify code duplication and ab
MODE: review
CONTEXT: {target_description} | Memory: Project coding standards
EXPECTED: Quality report with: principle violations, refactoring suggestions, naming improvements, maintainability score
RULES: $PROTO $TMPL | Code quality and maintainability focus
CONSTRAINTS: Code quality and maintainability focus
```
**3.2 Build Target Description**
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ TASK: • Review correctness and logic • Check standards compliance • Identi
MODE: review
CONTEXT: Reviewing uncommitted changes | Memory: Project conventions
EXPECTED: Structured report with severity levels, file:line refs, improvement suggestions
RULES: $PROTO $TMPL | Actionable feedback
CONSTRAINTS: Actionable feedback
" --tool codex --mode review --uncommitted --rule analysis-review-code-quality
```