mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-03-11 17:21:03 +08:00
Add unit tests for various components and stores in the terminal dashboard
- Implement tests for AssociationHighlight, DashboardToolbar, QueuePanel, SessionGroupTree, and TerminalDashboardPage to ensure proper functionality and state management. - Create tests for cliSessionStore, issueQueueIntegrationStore, queueExecutionStore, queueSchedulerStore, sessionManagerStore, and terminalGridStore to validate state resets and workspace scoping. - Mock necessary dependencies and state management hooks to isolate tests and ensure accurate behavior.
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
687
.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/SKILL.md
Normal file
687
.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/SKILL.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,687 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: team-brainstorm
|
||||
description: Multi-agent brainstorming pipeline with Generator-Critic loop. Generates ideas, challenges assumptions, synthesizes themes, and evaluates proposals. Supports Quick, Deep, and Full pipeline modes.
|
||||
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] [-c|--concurrency N] [--continue] \"topic description\""
|
||||
allowed-tools: spawn_agents_on_csv, spawn_agent, wait, send_input, close_agent, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, AskUserQuestion
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Auto Mode
|
||||
|
||||
When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-confirm task decomposition, skip interactive validation, use defaults.
|
||||
|
||||
# Team Brainstorm
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
$team-brainstorm "How should we approach microservices migration?"
|
||||
$team-brainstorm -c 4 "Innovation strategies for AI-powered developer tools"
|
||||
$team-brainstorm -y "Quick brainstorm on naming conventions"
|
||||
$team-brainstorm --continue "brs-microservices-20260308"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Flags**:
|
||||
- `-y, --yes`: Skip all confirmations (auto mode)
|
||||
- `-c, --concurrency N`: Max concurrent agents within each wave (default: 3)
|
||||
- `--continue`: Resume existing session
|
||||
|
||||
**Output Directory**: `.workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/`
|
||||
**Core Output**: `tasks.csv` (master state) + `results.csv` (final) + `discoveries.ndjson` (shared exploration) + `context.md` (human-readable report)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Multi-agent brainstorming with Generator-Critic loop: generate ideas across multiple angles, challenge assumptions, synthesize themes, and evaluate proposals. Supports three pipeline modes (Quick/Deep/Full) with configurable depth and parallel ideation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution Model**: Hybrid — CSV wave pipeline (primary) + individual agent spawn (secondary for Generator-Critic control)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ TEAM BRAINSTORM WORKFLOW │
|
||||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ Phase 0: Pre-Wave Interactive │
|
||||
│ ├─ Topic clarification + complexity scoring │
|
||||
│ ├─ Pipeline mode selection (quick/deep/full) │
|
||||
│ └─ Output: refined requirements for decomposition │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ Phase 1: Requirement → CSV + Classification │
|
||||
│ ├─ Parse topic into brainstorm tasks per selected pipeline │
|
||||
│ ├─ Assign roles: ideator, challenger, synthesizer, evaluator │
|
||||
│ ├─ Classify tasks: csv-wave | interactive (exec_mode) │
|
||||
│ ├─ Compute dependency waves (topological sort → depth grouping) │
|
||||
│ ├─ Generate tasks.csv with wave + exec_mode columns │
|
||||
│ └─ User validates task breakdown (skip if -y) │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ Phase 2: Wave Execution Engine (Extended) │
|
||||
│ ├─ For each wave (1..N): │
|
||||
│ │ ├─ Execute pre-wave interactive tasks (if any) │
|
||||
│ │ ├─ Build wave CSV (filter csv-wave tasks for this wave) │
|
||||
│ │ ├─ Inject previous findings into prev_context column │
|
||||
│ │ ├─ spawn_agents_on_csv(wave CSV) │
|
||||
│ │ ├─ Execute post-wave interactive tasks (if any) │
|
||||
│ │ ├─ Merge all results into master tasks.csv │
|
||||
│ │ └─ Check: any failed? → skip dependents │
|
||||
│ └─ discoveries.ndjson shared across all modes (append-only) │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ Phase 3: Post-Wave Interactive │
|
||||
│ ├─ Generator-Critic (GC) loop control │
|
||||
│ ├─ If critique severity >= HIGH: trigger revision wave │
|
||||
│ └─ Max 2 GC rounds, then force convergence │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ Phase 4: Results Aggregation │
|
||||
│ ├─ Export final results.csv │
|
||||
│ ├─ Generate context.md with all findings │
|
||||
│ ├─ Display summary: completed/failed/skipped per wave │
|
||||
│ └─ Offer: view results | retry failed | done │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Classification Rules
|
||||
|
||||
Each task is classified by `exec_mode`:
|
||||
|
||||
| exec_mode | Mechanism | Criteria |
|
||||
|-----------|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| `csv-wave` | `spawn_agents_on_csv` | One-shot, structured I/O, no multi-round interaction |
|
||||
| `interactive` | `spawn_agent`/`wait`/`send_input`/`close_agent` | Multi-round, clarification, inline utility |
|
||||
|
||||
**Classification Decision**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Task Property | Classification |
|
||||
|---------------|---------------|
|
||||
| Idea generation (single angle) | `csv-wave` |
|
||||
| Parallel ideation (Full pipeline, multiple angles) | `csv-wave` (parallel in same wave) |
|
||||
| Idea revision (GC loop) | `csv-wave` |
|
||||
| Critique / challenge | `csv-wave` |
|
||||
| Synthesis (theme extraction) | `csv-wave` |
|
||||
| Evaluation (scoring / ranking) | `csv-wave` |
|
||||
| GC loop control (severity check → decide revision or convergence) | `interactive` |
|
||||
| Topic clarification (Phase 0) | `interactive` |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## CSV Schema
|
||||
|
||||
### tasks.csv (Master State)
|
||||
|
||||
```csv
|
||||
id,title,description,role,angle,gc_round,deps,context_from,exec_mode,wave,status,findings,gc_signal,severity_summary,error
|
||||
"IDEA-001","Multi-angle idea generation","Generate 3+ ideas per angle with title, description, assumption, impact","ideator","Technical;Product;Innovation","0","","","csv-wave","1","pending","","","",""
|
||||
"CHALLENGE-001","Critique generated ideas","Challenge each idea across assumption, feasibility, risk, competition dimensions","challenger","","0","IDEA-001","IDEA-001","csv-wave","2","pending","","","",""
|
||||
"GC-CHECK-001","GC loop decision","Evaluate critique severity and decide: revision or convergence","gc-controller","","1","CHALLENGE-001","CHALLENGE-001","interactive","3","pending","","","",""
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Columns**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Column | Phase | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| `id` | Input | Unique task identifier (string) |
|
||||
| `title` | Input | Short task title |
|
||||
| `description` | Input | Detailed task description |
|
||||
| `role` | Input | Worker role: ideator, challenger, synthesizer, evaluator |
|
||||
| `angle` | Input | Brainstorming angle(s) for ideator tasks (semicolon-separated) |
|
||||
| `gc_round` | Input | Generator-Critic round number (0 = initial, 1+ = revision) |
|
||||
| `deps` | Input | Semicolon-separated dependency task IDs |
|
||||
| `context_from` | Input | Semicolon-separated task IDs whose findings this task needs |
|
||||
| `exec_mode` | Input | `csv-wave` or `interactive` |
|
||||
| `wave` | Computed | Wave number (computed by topological sort, 1-based) |
|
||||
| `status` | Output | `pending` → `completed` / `failed` / `skipped` |
|
||||
| `findings` | Output | Key discoveries or implementation notes (max 500 chars) |
|
||||
| `gc_signal` | Output | Generator-Critic signal: `REVISION_NEEDED` or `CONVERGED` (challenger only) |
|
||||
| `severity_summary` | Output | Severity count: e.g. "CRITICAL:1 HIGH:2 MEDIUM:3 LOW:1" |
|
||||
| `error` | Output | Error message if failed (empty if success) |
|
||||
|
||||
### Per-Wave CSV (Temporary)
|
||||
|
||||
Each wave generates a temporary `wave-{N}.csv` with extra `prev_context` column (csv-wave tasks only).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Registry (Interactive Agents)
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent | Role File | Pattern | Responsibility | Position |
|
||||
|-------|-----------|---------|----------------|----------|
|
||||
| gc-controller | agents/gc-controller.md | 2.3 (wait-respond) | Evaluate critique severity, decide revision vs convergence | post-wave (after challenger wave) |
|
||||
| topic-clarifier | agents/topic-clarifier.md | 2.3 (wait-respond) | Clarify topic, assess complexity, select pipeline mode | standalone (Phase 0) |
|
||||
|
||||
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: Agent files are execution documents. When context compression occurs, **you MUST immediately `Read` the corresponding agent.md** to reload.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
| File | Purpose | Lifecycle |
|
||||
|------|---------|-----------|
|
||||
| `tasks.csv` | Master state — all tasks with status/findings | Updated after each wave |
|
||||
| `wave-{N}.csv` | Per-wave input (temporary, csv-wave tasks only) | Created before wave, deleted after |
|
||||
| `results.csv` | Final export of all task results | Created in Phase 4 |
|
||||
| `discoveries.ndjson` | Shared exploration board (all agents, both modes) | Append-only, carries across waves |
|
||||
| `context.md` | Human-readable execution report | Created in Phase 4 |
|
||||
| `interactive/{id}-result.json` | Results from interactive tasks | Created per interactive task |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Session Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/
|
||||
├── tasks.csv # Master state (all tasks, both modes)
|
||||
├── results.csv # Final results export
|
||||
├── discoveries.ndjson # Shared discovery board (all agents)
|
||||
├── context.md # Human-readable report
|
||||
├── wave-{N}.csv # Temporary per-wave input (csv-wave only)
|
||||
└── interactive/ # Interactive task artifacts
|
||||
└── {id}-result.json # Per-task results
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Session Initialization
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse flags
|
||||
const AUTO_YES = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
|
||||
const continueMode = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--continue')
|
||||
const concurrencyMatch = $ARGUMENTS.match(/(?:--concurrency|-c)\s+(\d+)/)
|
||||
const maxConcurrency = concurrencyMatch ? parseInt(concurrencyMatch[1]) : 3
|
||||
|
||||
// Clean requirement text (remove flags)
|
||||
const topic = $ARGUMENTS
|
||||
.replace(/--yes|-y|--continue|--concurrency\s+\d+|-c\s+\d+/g, '')
|
||||
.trim()
|
||||
|
||||
const slug = topic.toLowerCase()
|
||||
.replace(/[^a-z0-9\u4e00-\u9fa5]+/g, '-')
|
||||
.substring(0, 40)
|
||||
const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10).replace(/-/g, '')
|
||||
let sessionId = `brs-${slug}-${dateStr}`
|
||||
let sessionFolder = `.workflow/.csv-wave/${sessionId}`
|
||||
|
||||
// Continue mode: find existing session
|
||||
if (continueMode) {
|
||||
const existing = Bash(`ls -t .workflow/.csv-wave/brs-* 2>/dev/null | head -1`).trim()
|
||||
if (existing) {
|
||||
sessionId = existing.split('/').pop()
|
||||
sessionFolder = existing
|
||||
// Read existing tasks.csv, find incomplete waves, resume from Phase 2
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/interactive`)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 0: Pre-Wave Interactive
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Clarify topic, assess complexity, and select pipeline mode.
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution**:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const clarifier = spawn_agent({
|
||||
message: `
|
||||
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
|
||||
|
||||
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
|
||||
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-brainstorm/agents/topic-clarifier.md (MUST read first)
|
||||
2. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (if exists)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Goal: Clarify brainstorming topic and select pipeline mode
|
||||
Topic: ${topic}
|
||||
|
||||
### Task
|
||||
1. Assess topic complexity using signal detection:
|
||||
- Strategic/systemic keywords (+3): strategy, architecture, system, framework, paradigm
|
||||
- Multi-dimensional keywords (+2): multiple, compare, tradeoff, versus, alternative
|
||||
- Innovation-focused keywords (+2): innovative, creative, novel, breakthrough
|
||||
- Simple/basic keywords (-2): simple, quick, straightforward, basic
|
||||
2. Score >= 4 → full, 2-3 → deep, 0-1 → quick
|
||||
3. Suggest divergence angles (e.g., Technical, Product, Innovation, Risk)
|
||||
4. Return structured result
|
||||
`
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
const clarifierResult = wait({ ids: [clarifier], timeout_ms: 120000 })
|
||||
|
||||
if (clarifierResult.timed_out) {
|
||||
send_input({ id: clarifier, message: "Please finalize and output current findings." })
|
||||
const retry = wait({ ids: [clarifier], timeout_ms: 60000 })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse result for pipeline_mode, angles
|
||||
close_agent({ id: clarifier })
|
||||
|
||||
// Store result
|
||||
Write(`${sessionFolder}/interactive/topic-clarifier-result.json`, JSON.stringify({
|
||||
task_id: "topic-clarification",
|
||||
status: "completed",
|
||||
pipeline_mode: parsedMode, // "quick" | "deep" | "full"
|
||||
angles: parsedAngles, // ["Technical", "Product", "Innovation", "Risk"]
|
||||
complexity_score: parsedScore,
|
||||
timestamp: getUtc8ISOString()
|
||||
}))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If not AUTO_YES, present user with pipeline mode selection for confirmation:
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
if (!AUTO_YES) {
|
||||
const answer = AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [{
|
||||
question: `Topic: "${topic}"\nRecommended pipeline: ${pipeline_mode} (complexity: ${complexity_score})\nAngles: ${angles.join(', ')}\n\nApprove?`,
|
||||
header: "Pipeline Selection",
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Approve", description: `Use ${pipeline_mode} pipeline` },
|
||||
{ label: "Quick", description: "3 tasks: generate → challenge → synthesize" },
|
||||
{ label: "Deep", description: "6 tasks: generate → challenge → revise → re-challenge → synthesize → evaluate" },
|
||||
{ label: "Full", description: "7 tasks: 3x parallel generation → challenge → revise → synthesize → evaluate" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}]
|
||||
})
|
||||
// Update pipeline_mode based on user choice
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria**:
|
||||
- Refined requirements available for Phase 1 decomposition
|
||||
- Interactive agents closed, results stored
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Requirement → CSV + Classification
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Build tasks.csv from selected pipeline mode with proper wave assignments.
|
||||
|
||||
**Decomposition Rules**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Pipeline | Tasks | Wave Structure |
|
||||
|----------|-------|---------------|
|
||||
| quick | IDEA-001 → CHALLENGE-001 → SYNTH-001 | 3 waves, serial |
|
||||
| deep | IDEA-001 → CHALLENGE-001 → IDEA-002 → CHALLENGE-002 → SYNTH-001 → EVAL-001 | 6 waves, serial with GC loop |
|
||||
| full | IDEA-001,002,003 (parallel) → CHALLENGE-001 → IDEA-004 → SYNTH-001 → EVAL-001 | 5 waves, fan-out + GC |
|
||||
|
||||
**Classification Rules**:
|
||||
|
||||
All brainstorm work tasks (ideation, challenging, synthesis, evaluation) are `csv-wave`. The GC loop controller between challenger and next ideation revision is `interactive` (post-wave, spawned by orchestrator to decide the GC outcome).
|
||||
|
||||
**Wave Computation**: Kahn's BFS topological sort with depth tracking (csv-wave tasks only).
|
||||
|
||||
**User Validation**: Display task breakdown with wave + exec_mode assignment (skip if AUTO_YES).
|
||||
|
||||
**Pipeline Task Definitions**:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Quick Pipeline (3 csv-wave tasks)
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Role | Wave | Deps | Description |
|
||||
|---------|------|------|------|-------------|
|
||||
| IDEA-001 | ideator | 1 | (none) | Generate multi-angle ideas: 3+ ideas per angle with title, description, assumption, impact |
|
||||
| CHALLENGE-001 | challenger | 2 | IDEA-001 | Challenge each idea across 4 dimensions (assumption, feasibility, risk, competition). Assign severity per idea. Output GC signal |
|
||||
| SYNTH-001 | synthesizer | 3 | CHALLENGE-001 | Synthesize ideas and critiques into 1-3 integrated proposals with feasibility and innovation scores |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Deep Pipeline (6 csv-wave tasks + 1 interactive GC check)
|
||||
|
||||
Same as Quick plus:
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Role | Wave | Deps | Description |
|
||||
|---------|------|------|------|-------------|
|
||||
| IDEA-002 | ideator | 4 | CHALLENGE-001 | Revise ideas based on critique feedback (GC Round 1). Address HIGH/CRITICAL challenges |
|
||||
| CHALLENGE-002 | challenger | 5 | IDEA-002 | Validate revised ideas (GC Round 2). Re-evaluate previously challenged ideas |
|
||||
| SYNTH-001 | synthesizer | 6 | CHALLENGE-002 | Synthesize all ideas and critiques |
|
||||
| EVAL-001 | evaluator | 7 | SYNTH-001 | Score and rank proposals: Feasibility 30%, Innovation 25%, Impact 25%, Cost 20% |
|
||||
|
||||
GC-CHECK-001 (interactive) runs post-wave after CHALLENGE-001 to decide whether to proceed with revision or skip to synthesis.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Full Pipeline (7 csv-wave tasks + GC control)
|
||||
|
||||
| Task ID | Role | Wave | Deps | Description |
|
||||
|---------|------|------|------|-------------|
|
||||
| IDEA-001 | ideator | 1 | (none) | Generate ideas from angle 1 |
|
||||
| IDEA-002 | ideator | 1 | (none) | Generate ideas from angle 2 |
|
||||
| IDEA-003 | ideator | 1 | (none) | Generate ideas from angle 3 |
|
||||
| CHALLENGE-001 | challenger | 2 | IDEA-001;IDEA-002;IDEA-003 | Critique all generated ideas |
|
||||
| IDEA-004 | ideator | 3 | CHALLENGE-001 | Revise ideas based on critique |
|
||||
| SYNTH-001 | synthesizer | 4 | IDEA-004 | Synthesize all ideas and critiques |
|
||||
| EVAL-001 | evaluator | 5 | SYNTH-001 | Score and rank proposals |
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria**:
|
||||
- tasks.csv created with valid schema, wave, and exec_mode assignments
|
||||
- No circular dependencies
|
||||
- User approved (or AUTO_YES)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Wave Execution Engine (Extended)
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Execute tasks wave-by-wave with hybrid mechanism support and cross-wave context propagation.
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const failedIds = new Set()
|
||||
const skippedIds = new Set()
|
||||
const MAX_GC_ROUNDS = 2
|
||||
let gcRound = 0
|
||||
|
||||
for (let wave = 1; wave <= maxWave; wave++) {
|
||||
console.log(`\n## Wave ${wave}/${maxWave}\n`)
|
||||
|
||||
// 1. Read current master CSV
|
||||
const masterCsv = parseCsv(Read(`${sessionFolder}/tasks.csv`))
|
||||
|
||||
// 2. Separate csv-wave and interactive tasks for this wave
|
||||
const waveTasks = masterCsv.filter(row => parseInt(row.wave) === wave)
|
||||
const csvTasks = waveTasks.filter(t => t.exec_mode === 'csv-wave')
|
||||
const interactiveTasks = waveTasks.filter(t => t.exec_mode === 'interactive')
|
||||
|
||||
// 3. Skip tasks whose deps failed
|
||||
const executableCsvTasks = []
|
||||
for (const task of csvTasks) {
|
||||
const deps = task.deps.split(';').filter(Boolean)
|
||||
if (deps.some(d => failedIds.has(d) || skippedIds.has(d))) {
|
||||
skippedIds.add(task.id)
|
||||
updateMasterCsvRow(sessionFolder, task.id, {
|
||||
status: 'skipped',
|
||||
error: 'Dependency failed or skipped'
|
||||
})
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
executableCsvTasks.push(task)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 4. Build prev_context for each csv-wave task
|
||||
for (const task of executableCsvTasks) {
|
||||
const contextIds = task.context_from.split(';').filter(Boolean)
|
||||
const prevFindings = contextIds
|
||||
.map(id => {
|
||||
const prevRow = masterCsv.find(r => r.id === id)
|
||||
if (prevRow && prevRow.status === 'completed' && prevRow.findings) {
|
||||
return `[Task ${id}: ${prevRow.title}] ${prevRow.findings}`
|
||||
}
|
||||
return null
|
||||
})
|
||||
.filter(Boolean)
|
||||
.join('\n')
|
||||
task.prev_context = prevFindings || 'No previous context available'
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 5. Write wave CSV and execute csv-wave tasks
|
||||
if (executableCsvTasks.length > 0) {
|
||||
const waveHeader = 'id,title,description,role,angle,gc_round,deps,context_from,exec_mode,wave,prev_context'
|
||||
const waveRows = executableCsvTasks.map(t =>
|
||||
[t.id, t.title, t.description, t.role, t.angle, t.gc_round, t.deps, t.context_from, t.exec_mode, t.wave, t.prev_context]
|
||||
.map(cell => `"${String(cell).replace(/"/g, '""')}"`)
|
||||
.join(',')
|
||||
)
|
||||
Write(`${sessionFolder}/wave-${wave}.csv`, [waveHeader, ...waveRows].join('\n'))
|
||||
|
||||
const waveResult = spawn_agents_on_csv({
|
||||
csv_path: `${sessionFolder}/wave-${wave}.csv`,
|
||||
id_column: "id",
|
||||
instruction: buildBrainstormInstruction(sessionFolder, wave),
|
||||
max_concurrency: maxConcurrency,
|
||||
max_runtime_seconds: 600,
|
||||
output_csv_path: `${sessionFolder}/wave-${wave}-results.csv`,
|
||||
output_schema: {
|
||||
type: "object",
|
||||
properties: {
|
||||
id: { type: "string" },
|
||||
status: { type: "string", enum: ["completed", "failed"] },
|
||||
findings: { type: "string" },
|
||||
gc_signal: { type: "string" },
|
||||
severity_summary: { type: "string" },
|
||||
error: { type: "string" }
|
||||
},
|
||||
required: ["id", "status", "findings"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
// Blocks until wave completes
|
||||
|
||||
// Merge results into master CSV
|
||||
const waveResults = parseCsv(Read(`${sessionFolder}/wave-${wave}-results.csv`))
|
||||
for (const result of waveResults) {
|
||||
updateMasterCsvRow(sessionFolder, result.id, {
|
||||
status: result.status,
|
||||
findings: result.findings || '',
|
||||
gc_signal: result.gc_signal || '',
|
||||
severity_summary: result.severity_summary || '',
|
||||
error: result.error || ''
|
||||
})
|
||||
if (result.status === 'failed') failedIds.add(result.id)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Bash(`rm -f "${sessionFolder}/wave-${wave}.csv"`)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 6. Execute post-wave interactive tasks (GC controller)
|
||||
for (const task of interactiveTasks) {
|
||||
if (task.status !== 'pending') continue
|
||||
const deps = task.deps.split(';').filter(Boolean)
|
||||
if (deps.some(d => failedIds.has(d) || skippedIds.has(d))) {
|
||||
skippedIds.add(task.id)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Spawn GC controller agent
|
||||
const gcAgent = spawn_agent({
|
||||
message: `
|
||||
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
|
||||
|
||||
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
|
||||
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-brainstorm/agents/gc-controller.md (MUST read first)
|
||||
2. Read: ${sessionFolder}/discoveries.ndjson (shared discoveries)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Goal: Evaluate critique severity and decide revision vs convergence
|
||||
Session: ${sessionFolder}
|
||||
GC Round: ${gcRound}
|
||||
Max GC Rounds: ${MAX_GC_ROUNDS}
|
||||
|
||||
### Context
|
||||
Read the latest critique file and determine the GC signal.
|
||||
If REVISION_NEEDED and gcRound < maxRounds: output "REVISION"
|
||||
If CONVERGED or gcRound >= maxRounds: output "CONVERGE"
|
||||
`
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
const gcResult = wait({ ids: [gcAgent], timeout_ms: 120000 })
|
||||
if (gcResult.timed_out) {
|
||||
send_input({ id: gcAgent, message: "Please finalize your decision now." })
|
||||
wait({ ids: [gcAgent], timeout_ms: 60000 })
|
||||
}
|
||||
close_agent({ id: gcAgent })
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse GC decision and potentially create/skip revision tasks
|
||||
Write(`${sessionFolder}/interactive/${task.id}-result.json`, JSON.stringify({
|
||||
task_id: task.id, status: "completed",
|
||||
gc_decision: gcDecision, gc_round: gcRound,
|
||||
timestamp: getUtc8ISOString()
|
||||
}))
|
||||
|
||||
if (gcDecision === "CONVERGE") {
|
||||
// Skip remaining GC tasks, mark revision tasks as skipped
|
||||
// Unblock SYNTH directly
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
gcRound++
|
||||
// Let the revision wave proceed naturally
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
updateMasterCsvRow(sessionFolder, task.id, { status: 'completed', findings: `GC decision: ${gcDecision}` })
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria**:
|
||||
- All waves executed in order
|
||||
- Both csv-wave and interactive tasks handled per wave
|
||||
- Each wave's results merged into master CSV before next wave starts
|
||||
- Dependent tasks skipped when predecessor failed
|
||||
- discoveries.ndjson accumulated across all waves and mechanisms
|
||||
- GC loop controlled with max 2 rounds
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Post-Wave Interactive
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Handle any final GC loop convergence and prepare for synthesis.
|
||||
|
||||
If the pipeline used GC loops and the final GC decision was CONVERGE or max rounds reached, ensure SYNTH-001 is unblocked and all remaining GC-related tasks are properly marked.
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria**:
|
||||
- Post-wave interactive processing complete
|
||||
- Interactive agents closed, results stored
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Results Aggregation
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Generate final results and human-readable report.
|
||||
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
const masterCsv = Read(`${sessionFolder}/tasks.csv`)
|
||||
Write(`${sessionFolder}/results.csv`, masterCsv)
|
||||
|
||||
const tasks = parseCsv(masterCsv)
|
||||
const completed = tasks.filter(t => t.status === 'completed')
|
||||
const failed = tasks.filter(t => t.status === 'failed')
|
||||
const skipped = tasks.filter(t => t.status === 'skipped')
|
||||
|
||||
const contextContent = `# Team Brainstorm Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Session**: ${sessionId}
|
||||
**Topic**: ${topic}
|
||||
**Pipeline**: ${pipeline_mode}
|
||||
**Completed**: ${getUtc8ISOString()}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Count |
|
||||
|--------|-------|
|
||||
| Total Tasks | ${tasks.length} |
|
||||
| Completed | ${completed.length} |
|
||||
| Failed | ${failed.length} |
|
||||
| Skipped | ${skipped.length} |
|
||||
| GC Rounds | ${gcRound} |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Wave Execution
|
||||
|
||||
${waveDetails}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Details
|
||||
|
||||
${taskDetails}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Brainstorm Artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
- Ideas: discoveries with type "idea" in discoveries.ndjson
|
||||
- Critiques: discoveries with type "critique" in discoveries.ndjson
|
||||
- Synthesis: discoveries with type "synthesis" in discoveries.ndjson
|
||||
- Evaluation: discoveries with type "evaluation" in discoveries.ndjson
|
||||
`
|
||||
|
||||
Write(`${sessionFolder}/context.md`, contextContent)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If not AUTO_YES and there are failed tasks, offer retry or view report.
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria**:
|
||||
- results.csv exported (all tasks, both modes)
|
||||
- context.md generated
|
||||
- All interactive agents closed
|
||||
- Summary displayed to user
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Shared Discovery Board Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
All agents across all waves share `discoveries.ndjson`. This enables cross-role knowledge sharing.
|
||||
|
||||
**Discovery Types**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Type | Dedup Key | Data Schema | Description |
|
||||
|------|-----------|-------------|-------------|
|
||||
| `idea` | `data.title` | `{title, angle, description, assumption, impact}` | Generated idea |
|
||||
| `critique` | `data.idea_title` | `{idea_title, dimension, severity, challenge, rationale}` | Critique of an idea |
|
||||
| `theme` | `data.name` | `{name, strength, supporting_ideas[]}` | Extracted theme from synthesis |
|
||||
| `proposal` | `data.title` | `{title, source_ideas[], feasibility, innovation, description}` | Integrated proposal |
|
||||
| `evaluation` | `data.proposal_title` | `{proposal_title, weighted_score, rank, recommendation}` | Proposal evaluation |
|
||||
| `gc_decision` | `data.round` | `{round, signal, severity_counts}` | GC loop decision |
|
||||
|
||||
**Format**: NDJSON, each line is self-contained JSON:
|
||||
|
||||
```jsonl
|
||||
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:00:00+08:00","worker":"IDEA-001","type":"idea","data":{"title":"API Gateway Pattern","angle":"Technical","description":"Centralized API gateway for microservice routing","assumption":"Services need unified entry point","impact":"Simplifies client integration"}}
|
||||
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:05:00+08:00","worker":"CHALLENGE-001","type":"critique","data":{"idea_title":"API Gateway Pattern","dimension":"feasibility","severity":"MEDIUM","challenge":"Single point of failure","rationale":"Requires high availability design"}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Protocol Rules**:
|
||||
1. Read board before own work → leverage existing context
|
||||
2. Write discoveries immediately via `echo >>` → don't batch
|
||||
3. Deduplicate — check existing entries by type + dedup key
|
||||
4. Append-only — never modify or delete existing lines
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Consensus Severity Routing
|
||||
|
||||
When the challenger returns critique results with severity-graded verdicts:
|
||||
|
||||
| Severity | Action |
|
||||
|----------|--------|
|
||||
| HIGH | Trigger revision round (GC loop), max 2 rounds total |
|
||||
| MEDIUM | Log warning, continue pipeline |
|
||||
| LOW | Treat as consensus reached |
|
||||
|
||||
**Constraints**: Max 2 GC rounds (revision cycles). If still HIGH after 2 rounds, force convergence to synthesizer.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Error | Resolution |
|
||||
|-------|------------|
|
||||
| Circular dependency | Detect in wave computation, abort with error message |
|
||||
| CSV agent timeout | Mark as failed in results, continue with wave |
|
||||
| CSV agent failed | Mark as failed, skip dependent tasks in later waves |
|
||||
| Interactive agent timeout | Urge convergence via send_input, then close if still timed out |
|
||||
| Interactive agent failed | Mark as failed, skip dependents |
|
||||
| All agents in wave failed | Log error, offer retry or abort |
|
||||
| CSV parse error | Validate CSV format before execution, show line number |
|
||||
| discoveries.ndjson corrupt | Ignore malformed lines, continue with valid entries |
|
||||
| GC loop exceeds 2 rounds | Force convergence to synthesizer |
|
||||
| No ideas generated | Report failure, suggest refining topic |
|
||||
| Continue mode: no session found | List available sessions, prompt user to select |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Rules
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Start Immediately**: First action is session initialization, then Phase 0/1
|
||||
2. **Wave Order is Sacred**: Never execute wave N before wave N-1 completes and results are merged
|
||||
3. **CSV is Source of Truth**: Master tasks.csv holds all state (both csv-wave and interactive)
|
||||
4. **CSV First**: Default to csv-wave for tasks; only use interactive when interaction pattern requires it
|
||||
5. **Context Propagation**: prev_context built from master CSV, not from memory
|
||||
6. **Discovery Board is Append-Only**: Never clear, modify, or recreate discoveries.ndjson — both mechanisms share it
|
||||
7. **Skip on Failure**: If a dependency failed, skip the dependent task (regardless of mechanism)
|
||||
8. **Lifecycle Balance**: Every spawn_agent MUST have a matching close_agent
|
||||
9. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
|
||||
10. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
|
||||
122
.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/agents/gc-controller.md
Normal file
122
.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/agents/gc-controller.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
|
||||
# GC Controller Agent
|
||||
|
||||
Evaluate Generator-Critic loop severity and decide whether to trigger revision or converge to synthesis.
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity
|
||||
|
||||
- **Type**: `interactive`
|
||||
- **Responsibility**: GC loop decision making
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
### MUST
|
||||
|
||||
- Load role definition via MANDATORY FIRST STEPS pattern
|
||||
- Read the latest critique file to assess severity
|
||||
- Make a binary decision: REVISION or CONVERGE
|
||||
- Respect max GC round limits
|
||||
- Produce structured output following template
|
||||
|
||||
### MUST NOT
|
||||
|
||||
- Generate ideas or perform critique (delegate to csv-wave agents)
|
||||
- Exceed 1 decision per invocation
|
||||
- Ignore the max round constraint
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Toolbox
|
||||
|
||||
### Available Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Type | Purpose |
|
||||
|------|------|---------|
|
||||
| `Read` | builtin | Load critique artifacts and session state |
|
||||
| `Glob` | builtin | Find critique files in session directory |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Context Loading
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Load critique results and GC round state
|
||||
|
||||
**Input**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Source | Required | Description |
|
||||
|--------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| Session folder | Yes | Path to session directory |
|
||||
| GC Round | Yes | Current GC round number |
|
||||
| Max GC Rounds | Yes | Maximum allowed rounds (default: 2) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Steps**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read the session's discoveries.ndjson for critique entries
|
||||
2. Parse prev_context for the challenger's findings
|
||||
3. Extract severity counts from the challenger's severity_summary
|
||||
4. Load current gc_round from spawn message
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: Severity counts and round state loaded
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Decision Making
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Determine whether to trigger revision or converge
|
||||
|
||||
**Input**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Source | Required | Description |
|
||||
|--------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| Severity counts | Yes | CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW counts |
|
||||
| GC round | Yes | Current round number |
|
||||
| Max rounds | Yes | Maximum allowed rounds |
|
||||
|
||||
**Steps**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Check severity threshold:
|
||||
|
||||
| Condition | Decision |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| gc_round >= max_rounds | CONVERGE (force, regardless of severity) |
|
||||
| CRITICAL count > 0 | REVISION (if rounds remain) |
|
||||
| HIGH count > 0 | REVISION (if rounds remain) |
|
||||
| All MEDIUM or lower | CONVERGE |
|
||||
|
||||
2. Log the decision rationale
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: Decision string "REVISION" or "CONVERGE"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Structured Output Template
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
- GC Round: <current>/<max>
|
||||
- Decision: REVISION | CONVERGE
|
||||
|
||||
## Severity Assessment
|
||||
- CRITICAL: <count>
|
||||
- HIGH: <count>
|
||||
- MEDIUM: <count>
|
||||
- LOW: <count>
|
||||
|
||||
## Rationale
|
||||
- <1-2 sentence explanation of decision>
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Action
|
||||
- REVISION: Ideator should address HIGH/CRITICAL challenges in next round
|
||||
- CONVERGE: Proceed to synthesis phase, skip remaining revision tasks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
||||
|----------|------------|
|
||||
| No critique data found | Default to CONVERGE (no evidence for revision) |
|
||||
| Severity parsing fails | Default to CONVERGE with warning |
|
||||
| Timeout approaching | Output current decision immediately |
|
||||
126
.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/agents/topic-clarifier.md
Normal file
126
.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/agents/topic-clarifier.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
|
||||
# Topic Clarifier Agent
|
||||
|
||||
Assess brainstorming topic complexity, recommend pipeline mode, and suggest divergence angles.
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity
|
||||
|
||||
- **Type**: `interactive`
|
||||
- **Responsibility**: Topic analysis and pipeline selection
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
### MUST
|
||||
|
||||
- Load role definition via MANDATORY FIRST STEPS pattern
|
||||
- Perform text-level analysis only (no source code reading)
|
||||
- Produce structured output with pipeline recommendation
|
||||
- Suggest meaningful divergence angles for ideation
|
||||
|
||||
### MUST NOT
|
||||
|
||||
- Read source code or explore codebase
|
||||
- Generate ideas (that is the ideator's job)
|
||||
- Make final pipeline decisions (orchestrator confirms with user)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Toolbox
|
||||
|
||||
### Available Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Type | Purpose |
|
||||
|------|------|---------|
|
||||
| `Read` | builtin | Load project context if available |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Signal Detection
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Analyze topic keywords for complexity signals
|
||||
|
||||
**Input**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Source | Required | Description |
|
||||
|--------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| Topic text | Yes | The brainstorming topic from user |
|
||||
|
||||
**Steps**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Scan topic for complexity signals:
|
||||
|
||||
| Signal | Weight | Keywords |
|
||||
|--------|--------|----------|
|
||||
| Strategic/systemic | +3 | strategy, architecture, system, framework, paradigm |
|
||||
| Multi-dimensional | +2 | multiple, compare, tradeoff, versus, alternative |
|
||||
| Innovation-focused | +2 | innovative, creative, novel, breakthrough |
|
||||
| Simple/basic | -2 | simple, quick, straightforward, basic |
|
||||
|
||||
2. Calculate complexity score
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: Complexity score and matched signals
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Pipeline Recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Map complexity to pipeline mode and suggest angles
|
||||
|
||||
**Steps**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Map score to pipeline:
|
||||
|
||||
| Score | Complexity | Pipeline |
|
||||
|-------|------------|----------|
|
||||
| >= 4 | High | full (3x parallel ideation + GC + evaluation) |
|
||||
| 2-3 | Medium | deep (serial with GC loop + evaluation) |
|
||||
| 0-1 | Low | quick (generate → challenge → synthesize) |
|
||||
|
||||
2. Identify divergence angles from topic context:
|
||||
- **Technical**: Implementation approaches, architecture patterns
|
||||
- **Product**: User experience, market fit, value proposition
|
||||
- **Innovation**: Novel approaches, emerging tech, disruption potential
|
||||
- **Risk**: Failure modes, mitigation strategies, worst cases
|
||||
- **Business**: Cost, ROI, competitive advantage
|
||||
- **Organizational**: Team structure, process, culture
|
||||
|
||||
3. Select 3-4 most relevant angles based on topic keywords
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: Pipeline mode, angles, complexity rationale
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Structured Output Template
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
- Topic: <topic>
|
||||
- Complexity Score: <score> (<level>)
|
||||
- Recommended Pipeline: <quick|deep|full>
|
||||
|
||||
## Signal Detection
|
||||
- Matched signals: <list of matched signals with weights>
|
||||
|
||||
## Suggested Angles
|
||||
1. <Angle 1>: <why relevant>
|
||||
2. <Angle 2>: <why relevant>
|
||||
3. <Angle 3>: <why relevant>
|
||||
|
||||
## Pipeline Details
|
||||
- <pipeline>: <brief description of what this pipeline does>
|
||||
- Expected tasks: <count>
|
||||
- Parallel ideation: <yes/no>
|
||||
- GC rounds: <0/1/2>
|
||||
- Evaluation: <yes/no>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
||||
|----------|------------|
|
||||
| Topic too vague | Suggest clarifying questions in output |
|
||||
| No signal matches | Default to "deep" pipeline with general angles |
|
||||
| Timeout approaching | Output current analysis with "PARTIAL" status |
|
||||
105
.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/instructions/agent-instruction.md
Normal file
105
.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/instructions/agent-instruction.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
|
||||
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
|
||||
|
||||
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
|
||||
1. Read shared discoveries: .workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/discoveries.ndjson (if exists, skip if not)
|
||||
2. Read project context: .workflow/project-tech.json (if exists)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Task
|
||||
|
||||
**Task ID**: {id}
|
||||
**Title**: {title}
|
||||
**Role**: {role}
|
||||
**Description**: {description}
|
||||
**Angle(s)**: {angle}
|
||||
**GC Round**: {gc_round}
|
||||
|
||||
### Previous Tasks' Findings (Context)
|
||||
{prev_context}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Read discoveries**: Load shared discoveries from the session's discoveries.ndjson for cross-task context
|
||||
2. **Use context**: Apply previous tasks' findings from prev_context above
|
||||
3. **Execute by role**:
|
||||
|
||||
### Role: ideator (IDEA-* tasks)
|
||||
- **Initial Generation** (gc_round = 0):
|
||||
- For each angle listed in the Angle(s) field, generate 3+ ideas
|
||||
- Each idea must include: title, description (2-3 sentences), key assumption, potential impact, implementation hint
|
||||
- Self-review: ensure >= 6 ideas total, no duplicates, all angles covered
|
||||
- **GC Revision** (gc_round > 0):
|
||||
- Read critique findings from prev_context
|
||||
- Focus on HIGH/CRITICAL severity challenges
|
||||
- Retain unchallenged ideas intact
|
||||
- Revise challenged ideas with revision rationale
|
||||
- Replace unsalvageable ideas with new alternatives
|
||||
|
||||
### Role: challenger (CHALLENGE-* tasks)
|
||||
- Read all idea findings from prev_context
|
||||
- Challenge each idea across 4 dimensions:
|
||||
- **Assumption Validity**: Does the core assumption hold? Counter-examples?
|
||||
- **Feasibility**: Technical/resource/time feasibility?
|
||||
- **Risk Assessment**: Worst case scenario? Hidden risks?
|
||||
- **Competitive Analysis**: Better alternatives already exist?
|
||||
- Assign severity per idea: CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
|
||||
- Determine GC signal:
|
||||
- Any CRITICAL or HIGH severity → `REVISION_NEEDED`
|
||||
- All MEDIUM or lower → `CONVERGED`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role: synthesizer (SYNTH-* tasks)
|
||||
- Read all idea and critique findings from prev_context
|
||||
- Execute synthesis steps:
|
||||
1. **Theme Extraction**: Identify common themes, rate strength (1-10), list supporting ideas
|
||||
2. **Conflict Resolution**: Identify contradictions, determine resolution approach
|
||||
3. **Complementary Grouping**: Group complementary ideas together
|
||||
4. **Gap Identification**: Discover uncovered perspectives
|
||||
5. **Integrated Proposals**: Generate 1-3 consolidated proposals with feasibility score (1-10) and innovation score (1-10)
|
||||
|
||||
### Role: evaluator (EVAL-* tasks)
|
||||
- Read synthesis findings from prev_context
|
||||
- Score each proposal across 4 weighted dimensions:
|
||||
- Feasibility (30%): Technical feasibility, resource needs, timeline
|
||||
- Innovation (25%): Novelty, differentiation, breakthrough potential
|
||||
- Impact (25%): Scope of impact, value creation, problem resolution
|
||||
- Cost Efficiency (20%): Implementation cost, risk cost, opportunity cost
|
||||
- Weighted score = (Feasibility * 0.30) + (Innovation * 0.25) + (Impact * 0.25) + (Cost * 0.20)
|
||||
- Provide recommendation per proposal: Strong Recommend / Recommend / Consider / Pass
|
||||
- Generate final ranking
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Share discoveries**: Append exploration findings to shared board:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
echo '{"ts":"<ISO8601>","worker":"{id}","type":"<type>","data":{...}}' >> .workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/discoveries.ndjson
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Discovery types to share:
|
||||
- `idea`: {title, angle, description, assumption, impact} — generated idea
|
||||
- `critique`: {idea_title, dimension, severity, challenge, rationale} — critique finding
|
||||
- `theme`: {name, strength, supporting_ideas[]} — extracted theme
|
||||
- `proposal`: {title, source_ideas[], feasibility, innovation, description} — integrated proposal
|
||||
- `evaluation`: {proposal_title, weighted_score, rank, recommendation} — scored proposal
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Report result**: Return JSON via report_agent_job_result
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output (report_agent_job_result)
|
||||
|
||||
Return JSON:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "{id}",
|
||||
"status": "completed" | "failed",
|
||||
"findings": "Key discoveries and implementation notes (max 500 chars)",
|
||||
"gc_signal": "REVISION_NEEDED | CONVERGED | (empty for non-challenger roles)",
|
||||
"severity_summary": "CRITICAL:N HIGH:N MEDIUM:N LOW:N (challenger only, empty for others)",
|
||||
"error": ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
**Role-specific findings guidance**:
|
||||
- **ideator**: List idea count, angles covered, key themes. Example: "Generated 8 ideas across Technical, Product, Innovation. Top ideas: API Gateway, Event Sourcing, DevEx Platform."
|
||||
- **challenger**: Summarize severity counts and GC signal. Example: "Challenged 8 ideas. 2 HIGH (require revision), 3 MEDIUM, 3 LOW. GC signal: REVISION_NEEDED."
|
||||
- **synthesizer**: List proposal count and key themes. Example: "Synthesized 3 proposals from 5 themes. Top: Infrastructure Modernization (feasibility:8, innovation:7)."
|
||||
- **evaluator**: List ranking and top recommendation. Example: "Ranked 3 proposals. #1: Infrastructure Modernization (7.85) - Strong Recommend."
|
||||
171
.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/schemas/tasks-schema.md
Normal file
171
.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/schemas/tasks-schema.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
|
||||
# Team Brainstorm — CSV Schema
|
||||
|
||||
## Master CSV: tasks.csv
|
||||
|
||||
### Column Definitions
|
||||
|
||||
#### Input Columns (Set by Decomposer)
|
||||
|
||||
| Column | Type | Required | Description | Example |
|
||||
|--------|------|----------|-------------|---------|
|
||||
| `id` | string | Yes | Unique task identifier | `"IDEA-001"` |
|
||||
| `title` | string | Yes | Short task title | `"Multi-angle idea generation"` |
|
||||
| `description` | string | Yes | Detailed task description (self-contained) | `"Generate 3+ ideas per angle..."` |
|
||||
| `role` | string | Yes | Worker role: ideator, challenger, synthesizer, evaluator | `"ideator"` |
|
||||
| `angle` | string | No | Brainstorming angle(s) for ideator tasks (semicolon-separated) | `"Technical;Product;Innovation"` |
|
||||
| `gc_round` | integer | Yes | Generator-Critic round number (0 = initial, 1+ = revision) | `"0"` |
|
||||
| `deps` | string | No | Semicolon-separated dependency task IDs | `"IDEA-001"` |
|
||||
| `context_from` | string | No | Semicolon-separated task IDs for context | `"IDEA-001"` |
|
||||
| `exec_mode` | enum | Yes | Execution mechanism: `csv-wave` or `interactive` | `"csv-wave"` |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Computed Columns (Set by Wave Engine)
|
||||
|
||||
| Column | Type | Description | Example |
|
||||
|--------|------|-------------|---------|
|
||||
| `wave` | integer | Wave number (1-based, from topological sort) | `2` |
|
||||
| `prev_context` | string | Aggregated findings from context_from tasks (per-wave CSV only) | `"[Task IDEA-001] Generated 8 ideas..."` |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Output Columns (Set by Agent)
|
||||
|
||||
| Column | Type | Description | Example |
|
||||
|--------|------|-------------|---------|
|
||||
| `status` | enum | `pending` → `completed` / `failed` / `skipped` | `"completed"` |
|
||||
| `findings` | string | Key discoveries (max 500 chars) | `"Generated 8 ideas across 3 angles..."` |
|
||||
| `gc_signal` | string | Generator-Critic signal (challenger only): `REVISION_NEEDED` or `CONVERGED` | `"REVISION_NEEDED"` |
|
||||
| `severity_summary` | string | Severity count summary (challenger only) | `"CRITICAL:0 HIGH:2 MEDIUM:3 LOW:1"` |
|
||||
| `error` | string | Error message if failed | `""` |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### exec_mode Values
|
||||
|
||||
| Value | Mechanism | Description |
|
||||
|-------|-----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `csv-wave` | `spawn_agents_on_csv` | One-shot batch execution within wave |
|
||||
| `interactive` | `spawn_agent`/`wait`/`send_input`/`close_agent` | Multi-round individual execution |
|
||||
|
||||
Interactive tasks appear in master CSV for dependency tracking but are NOT included in wave-{N}.csv files.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Example Data
|
||||
|
||||
```csv
|
||||
id,title,description,role,angle,gc_round,deps,context_from,exec_mode,wave,status,findings,gc_signal,severity_summary,error
|
||||
"IDEA-001","Multi-angle idea generation","Generate 3+ ideas per angle with title, description, assumption, and potential impact. Cover all assigned angles comprehensively.","ideator","Technical;Product;Innovation","0","","","csv-wave","1","pending","","","",""
|
||||
"IDEA-002","Parallel angle generation (Risk)","Generate 3+ ideas focused on Risk angle with title, description, assumption, and potential impact.","ideator","Risk","0","","","csv-wave","1","pending","","","",""
|
||||
"CHALLENGE-001","Critique generated ideas","Read all idea artifacts. Challenge each idea across assumption validity, feasibility, risk, and competition dimensions. Assign severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) per idea. Output GC signal.","challenger","","0","IDEA-001;IDEA-002","IDEA-001;IDEA-002","csv-wave","2","pending","","","",""
|
||||
"GC-CHECK-001","GC loop decision","Evaluate critique severity counts. If any HIGH/CRITICAL: REVISION_NEEDED. Else: CONVERGED.","gc-controller","","1","CHALLENGE-001","CHALLENGE-001","interactive","3","pending","","","",""
|
||||
"IDEA-003","Revise ideas (GC Round 1)","Address HIGH/CRITICAL challenges from critique. Retain unchallenged ideas intact. Replace unsalvageable ideas.","ideator","","1","GC-CHECK-001","CHALLENGE-001","csv-wave","4","pending","","","",""
|
||||
"SYNTH-001","Synthesize proposals","Extract themes from ideas and critiques. Resolve conflicts. Generate 1-3 integrated proposals with feasibility and innovation scores.","synthesizer","","0","IDEA-003","IDEA-001;IDEA-002;IDEA-003;CHALLENGE-001","csv-wave","5","pending","","","",""
|
||||
"EVAL-001","Score and rank proposals","Score each proposal: Feasibility 30%, Innovation 25%, Impact 25%, Cost 20%. Generate final ranking and recommendation.","evaluator","","0","SYNTH-001","SYNTH-001","csv-wave","6","pending","","","",""
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Column Lifecycle
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Decomposer (Phase 1) Wave Engine (Phase 2) Agent (Execution)
|
||||
───────────────────── ──────────────────── ─────────────────
|
||||
id ───────────► id ──────────► id
|
||||
title ───────────► title ──────────► (reads)
|
||||
description ───────────► description ──────────► (reads)
|
||||
role ───────────► role ──────────► (reads)
|
||||
angle ───────────► angle ──────────► (reads)
|
||||
gc_round ───────────► gc_round ──────────► (reads)
|
||||
deps ───────────► deps ──────────► (reads)
|
||||
context_from───────────► context_from──────────► (reads)
|
||||
exec_mode ───────────► exec_mode ──────────► (reads)
|
||||
wave ──────────► (reads)
|
||||
prev_context ──────────► (reads)
|
||||
status
|
||||
findings
|
||||
gc_signal
|
||||
severity_summary
|
||||
error
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Schema (JSON)
|
||||
|
||||
Agent output via `report_agent_job_result` (csv-wave tasks):
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "IDEA-001",
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"findings": "Generated 8 ideas across Technical, Product, Innovation angles. Key themes: API gateway pattern, event-driven architecture, developer experience tools.",
|
||||
"gc_signal": "",
|
||||
"severity_summary": "",
|
||||
"error": ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Challenger-specific output:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "CHALLENGE-001",
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"findings": "Challenged 8 ideas. 2 HIGH severity (require revision), 3 MEDIUM, 3 LOW.",
|
||||
"gc_signal": "REVISION_NEEDED",
|
||||
"severity_summary": "CRITICAL:0 HIGH:2 MEDIUM:3 LOW:3",
|
||||
"error": ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Interactive tasks output via structured text or JSON written to `interactive/{id}-result.json`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Discovery Types
|
||||
|
||||
| Type | Dedup Key | Data Schema | Description |
|
||||
|------|-----------|-------------|-------------|
|
||||
| `idea` | `data.title` | `{title, angle, description, assumption, impact}` | Generated brainstorm idea |
|
||||
| `critique` | `data.idea_title` | `{idea_title, dimension, severity, challenge, rationale}` | Critique of an idea |
|
||||
| `theme` | `data.name` | `{name, strength, supporting_ideas[]}` | Extracted theme from synthesis |
|
||||
| `proposal` | `data.title` | `{title, source_ideas[], feasibility, innovation, description}` | Integrated proposal |
|
||||
| `evaluation` | `data.proposal_title` | `{proposal_title, weighted_score, rank, recommendation}` | Scored proposal |
|
||||
| `gc_decision` | `data.round` | `{round, signal, severity_counts}` | GC loop decision record |
|
||||
|
||||
### Discovery NDJSON Format
|
||||
|
||||
```jsonl
|
||||
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:00:00+08:00","worker":"IDEA-001","type":"idea","data":{"title":"API Gateway Pattern","angle":"Technical","description":"Centralized API gateway for microservice routing","assumption":"Services need unified entry point","impact":"Simplifies client integration"}}
|
||||
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:01:00+08:00","worker":"IDEA-001","type":"idea","data":{"title":"Event Sourcing Migration","angle":"Technical","description":"Adopt event sourcing for service state management","assumption":"Current state is hard to trace across services","impact":"Full audit trail and temporal queries"}}
|
||||
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:05:00+08:00","worker":"CHALLENGE-001","type":"critique","data":{"idea_title":"API Gateway Pattern","dimension":"feasibility","severity":"MEDIUM","challenge":"Single point of failure risk","rationale":"Requires HA design with circuit breakers"}}
|
||||
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:10:00+08:00","worker":"SYNTH-001","type":"theme","data":{"name":"Infrastructure Modernization","strength":8,"supporting_ideas":["API Gateway Pattern","Event Sourcing Migration"]}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
> Both csv-wave and interactive agents read/write the same discoveries.ndjson file.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Cross-Mechanism Context Flow
|
||||
|
||||
| Source | Target | Mechanism |
|
||||
|--------|--------|-----------|
|
||||
| CSV task findings | Interactive task | Injected via spawn message or send_input |
|
||||
| Interactive task result | CSV task prev_context | Read from interactive/{id}-result.json |
|
||||
| Any agent discovery | Any agent | Shared via discoveries.ndjson |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Rules
|
||||
|
||||
| Rule | Check | Error |
|
||||
|------|-------|-------|
|
||||
| Unique IDs | No duplicate `id` values | "Duplicate task ID: {id}" |
|
||||
| Valid deps | All dep IDs exist in tasks | "Unknown dependency: {dep_id}" |
|
||||
| No self-deps | Task cannot depend on itself | "Self-dependency: {id}" |
|
||||
| No circular deps | Topological sort completes | "Circular dependency detected involving: {ids}" |
|
||||
| context_from valid | All context IDs exist and in earlier waves | "Invalid context_from: {id}" |
|
||||
| exec_mode valid | Value is `csv-wave` or `interactive` | "Invalid exec_mode: {value}" |
|
||||
| Description non-empty | Every task has description | "Empty description for task: {id}" |
|
||||
| Status enum | status in {pending, completed, failed, skipped} | "Invalid status: {status}" |
|
||||
| Valid role | role in {ideator, challenger, synthesizer, evaluator, gc-controller} | "Invalid role: {role}" |
|
||||
| GC round non-negative | gc_round >= 0 | "Invalid gc_round: {value}" |
|
||||
| Cross-mechanism deps | Interactive→CSV deps resolve correctly | "Cross-mechanism dependency unresolvable: {id}" |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user