refactor: 统一 lite 工作流产物结构,合并 exploration+understanding 为 planning-context

- 合并 exploration.md 和 understanding.md 为单一的 planning-context.md
- 为所有 lite 工作流添加 Output Artifacts 表格
- 统一 agent 提示词的 Output Location 格式
- 更新 Session Folder Structure 包含 planning-context.md

涉及文件:
- cli-lite-planning-agent.md: 更新产物文档和格式模板
- collaborative-plan.md: 简化为 planning-context.md + sub-plan.json
- lite-plan.md: 添加产物表格和输出地址
- lite-fix.md: 添加产物表格和输出地址
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-01-30 10:25:45 +08:00
parent 3f46a02df3
commit 64d2156319
4 changed files with 206 additions and 161 deletions

View File

@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
--- ---
name: cli-lite-planning-agent name: cli-lite-planning-agent
description: | description: |
Generic planning agent for lite-plan and lite-fix workflows. Generates structured plan JSON based on provided schema reference. Generic planning agent for lite-plan, collaborative-plan, and lite-fix workflows. Generates structured plan JSON based on provided schema reference.
Core capabilities: Core capabilities:
- Schema-driven output (plan-json-schema or fix-plan-json-schema) - Schema-driven output (plan-json-schema or fix-plan-json-schema)
- Task decomposition with dependency analysis - Task decomposition with dependency analysis
- CLI execution ID assignment for fork/merge strategies - CLI execution ID assignment for fork/merge strategies
- Multi-angle context integration (explorations or diagnoses) - Multi-angle context integration (explorations or diagnoses)
- Process documentation (planning-context.md) for collaborative workflows
color: cyan color: cyan
--- ---
@@ -15,6 +16,40 @@ You are a generic planning agent that generates structured plan JSON for lite wo
**CRITICAL**: After generating plan.json, you MUST execute internal **Plan Quality Check** (Phase 5) using CLI analysis to validate and auto-fix plan quality before returning to orchestrator. Quality dimensions: completeness, granularity, dependencies, acceptance criteria, implementation steps, constraint compliance. **CRITICAL**: After generating plan.json, you MUST execute internal **Plan Quality Check** (Phase 5) using CLI analysis to validate and auto-fix plan quality before returning to orchestrator. Quality dimensions: completeness, granularity, dependencies, acceptance criteria, implementation steps, constraint compliance.
## Output Artifacts
The agent produces different artifacts based on workflow context:
### Standard Output (lite-plan, lite-fix)
| Artifact | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| `plan.json` | Structured plan following plan-json-schema.json |
### Extended Output (collaborative-plan sub-agents)
When invoked with `process_docs: true` in input context:
| Artifact | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| `planning-context.md` | Evidence paths + synthesized understanding (insights, decisions, approach) |
| `sub-plan.json` | Sub-plan following plan-json-schema.json with source_agent metadata |
**planning-context.md format**:
```markdown
# Planning Context: {focus_area}
## Source Evidence
- `exploration-{angle}.json` - {key finding}
- `{file}:{line}` - {what this proves}
## Understanding
- Current state: {analysis}
- Proposed approach: {strategy}
## Key Decisions
- Decision: {what} | Rationale: {why} | Evidence: {file ref}
```
## Input Context ## Input Context
@@ -34,10 +69,39 @@ You are a generic planning agent that generates structured plan JSON for lite wo
clarificationContext: { [question]: answer } | null, clarificationContext: { [question]: answer } | null,
complexity: "Low" | "Medium" | "High", // For lite-plan complexity: "Low" | "Medium" | "High", // For lite-plan
severity: "Low" | "Medium" | "High" | "Critical", // For lite-fix severity: "Low" | "Medium" | "High" | "Critical", // For lite-fix
cli_config: { tool, template, timeout, fallback } cli_config: { tool, template, timeout, fallback },
// Process documentation (collaborative-plan)
process_docs: boolean, // If true, generate planning-context.md
focus_area: string, // Sub-requirement focus area (collaborative-plan)
output_folder: string // Where to write process docs (collaborative-plan)
} }
``` ```
## Process Documentation (collaborative-plan)
When `process_docs: true`, generate planning-context.md before sub-plan.json:
```markdown
# Planning Context: {focus_area}
## Source Evidence
- `exploration-{angle}.json` - {key finding from exploration}
- `{file}:{line}` - {code evidence for decision}
## Understanding
- **Current State**: {what exists now}
- **Problem**: {what needs to change}
- **Approach**: {proposed solution strategy}
## Key Decisions
- Decision: {what} | Rationale: {why} | Evidence: {file:line or exploration ref}
## Dependencies
- Depends on: {other sub-requirements or none}
- Provides for: {what this enables}
```
## Schema-Driven Output ## Schema-Driven Output
**CRITICAL**: Read the schema reference first to determine output structure: **CRITICAL**: Read the schema reference first to determine output structure:

View File

@@ -29,13 +29,33 @@ When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-approve splits, use default merge rule, skip confirma
**CLI Tools**: cli-lite-planning-agent (internally calls ccw cli with gemini/codex/qwen) **CLI Tools**: cli-lite-planning-agent (internally calls ccw cli with gemini/codex/qwen)
**Schema**: plan-json-schema.json (sub-plans & final plan share same base schema) **Schema**: plan-json-schema.json (sub-plans & final plan share same base schema)
## Output Artifacts
### Per Sub-Agent (Phase 2)
| Artifact | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| `planning-context.md` | Evidence paths + synthesized understanding |
| `sub-plan.json` | Sub-plan following plan-json-schema.json |
### Final Output (Phase 4)
| Artifact | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| `requirement-analysis.json` | Requirement breakdown and sub-agent assignments |
| `conflicts.json` | Detected conflicts between sub-plans |
| `plan.json` | Merged plan (plan-json-schema + merge_metadata) |
| `plan.md` | Human-readable plan summary |
**Agent**: `cli-lite-planning-agent` with `process_docs: true` for sub-agents
## Overview ## Overview
Unified collaborative planning workflow that: Unified collaborative planning workflow that:
1. **Analyzes** complex requirements and splits into sub-requirements 1. **Analyzes** complex requirements and splits into sub-requirements
2. **Spawns** parallel sub-agents, each responsible for one sub-requirement 2. **Spawns** parallel sub-agents, each responsible for one sub-requirement
3. **Each agent** maintains process files: exploration.md → understanding.md sub-plan.json 3. **Each agent** maintains process files: planning-refs.md + sub-plan.json
4. **Merges** all sub-plans into unified plan.json with conflict resolution 4. **Merges** all sub-plans into unified plan.json with conflict resolution
``` ```
@@ -51,10 +71,9 @@ Unified collaborative planning workflow that:
│ Phase 2: Parallel Sub-Agent Execution │ │ Phase 2: Parallel Sub-Agent Execution │
│ ┌──────────────┬──────────────┬──────────────┐ │ │ ┌──────────────┬──────────────┬──────────────┐ │
│ │ Agent 1 │ Agent 2 │ Agent N │ │ │ │ Agent 1 │ Agent 2 │ Agent N │ │
├──────────────┼──────────────┼──────────────┤ │ ├──────────────┼──────────────┼──────────────┤ │
│ │ explorationexploration │ exploration │ → exploration.md │ │ planning planning │ planning │ → planning-context.md
│ │ understanding│ understanding│ understanding│ → understanding.md │ │ + sub-plan │ + sub-plan │ + sub-plan │ → sub-plan.json
│ │ planning │ planning │ planning │ → sub-plan.json │
│ └──────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────┘ │ │ └──────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────┘ │
│ │ │ │
│ Phase 3: Cross-Verification & Conflict Detection │ │ Phase 3: Cross-Verification & Conflict Detection │
@@ -77,9 +96,8 @@ Unified collaborative planning workflow that:
├── requirement-analysis.json # Phase 1: Requirement breakdown ├── requirement-analysis.json # Phase 1: Requirement breakdown
├── agents/ # Phase 2: Per-agent process files ├── agents/ # Phase 2: Per-agent process files
│ ├── {focus-area-1}/ │ ├── {focus-area-1}/
│ │ ├── exploration.md # What was discovered │ │ ├── planning-context.md # Evidence + understanding
│ │ ── understanding.md # Synthesized insights │ │ ── sub-plan.json # Agent's plan for this focus area
│ │ └── sub-plan.json # Agent's plan for this focus area
│ ├── {focus-area-2}/ │ ├── {focus-area-2}/
│ │ └── ... │ │ └── ...
│ └── {focus-area-N}/ │ └── {focus-area-N}/
@@ -243,129 +261,38 @@ const agentPromises = subRequirements.map((sub, index) => {
run_in_background: false, run_in_background: false,
description: `Plan: ${sub.focus_area}`, description: `Plan: ${sub.focus_area}`,
prompt: ` prompt: `
## Sub-Agent Mission ## Sub-Agent Context
You are responsible for planning ONE sub-requirement of a larger task. You are planning ONE sub-requirement. Generate process docs + sub-plan.
Maintain 3 process files documenting your exploration, understanding, and plan.
## Your Focus Area
**Index**: ${index + 1}
**Focus Area**: ${sub.focus_area} **Focus Area**: ${sub.focus_area}
**Description**: ${sub.description} **Description**: ${sub.description}
**Key Concerns**: ${sub.key_concerns.join(', ')} **Key Concerns**: ${sub.key_concerns.join(', ')}
**Suggested Tool**: ${sub.suggested_cli_tool} **CLI Tool**: ${sub.suggested_cli_tool}
**Depth**: ${depth} **Depth**: ${depth}
## Parent Context ## Input Context
**Original Requirement**: ${taskDescription} \`\`\`json
**Session**: ${sessionId} {
**Your Folder**: ${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/ "task_description": "${sub.description}",
"schema_path": "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-json-schema.json",
## Schema Reference "session": { "id": "${sessionId}", "folder": "${sessionFolder}" },
"process_docs": true,
Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-json-schema.json "focus_area": "${sub.focus_area}",
"output_folder": "${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}",
## Execution Process (3 Stages) "cli_config": { "tool": "${sub.suggested_cli_tool}" },
"parent_requirement": "${taskDescription}"
### Stage 1: Exploration (→ exploration.md) }
Use ccw cli to explore the codebase for your focus area:
\`\`\`bash
ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Explore codebase for ${sub.focus_area}
Success: Identify all relevant files, patterns, and constraints
TASK:
• Find existing code related to ${sub.focus_area}
• Identify current architecture and patterns
• Discover integration points and dependencies
• Note any constraints or limitations
CONTEXT: @**/*
MODE: analysis
" --tool ${sub.suggested_cli_tool} --mode analysis
\`\`\` \`\`\`
After CLI completes, write exploration.md:
\`\`\`markdown
# Exploration: ${sub.focus_area}
## Discovered Files
- [list relevant files with brief descriptions]
## Current Architecture
- [describe existing structure]
## Integration Points
- [list dependencies and interfaces]
## Constraints & Limitations
- [note any blockers or constraints]
## Key Findings
- [most important discoveries]
\`\`\`
### Stage 2: Understanding (→ understanding.md)
Synthesize exploration findings into actionable understanding:
\`\`\`markdown
# Understanding: ${sub.focus_area}
## Problem Statement
[Restate what needs to be done for this focus area]
## Current State Analysis
[What exists now, what's missing]
## Proposed Approach
[High-level strategy for implementation]
## Technical Decisions
- Decision 1: [choice] because [rationale]
- Decision 2: [choice] because [rationale]
## Risks & Mitigations
- Risk 1: [description] → Mitigation: [approach]
## Dependencies on Other Sub-Requirements
- Depends on: [list any dependencies on other focus areas]
- Provides for: [what this provides to other focus areas]
## Key Insights
[Most important understanding gained]
\`\`\`
### Stage 3: Planning (→ sub-plan.json)
Generate sub-plan.json following plan-json-schema.json:
- 2-5 tasks for this focus area
- Clear modification_points with file, target, change
- Verification criteria (unit_tests, integration_tests, manual_checks)
- Risk assessment per task
- Dependencies (internal to this sub-plan)
- Add source_agent: "${sub.focus_area}" to _metadata
## Output Requirements ## Output Requirements
Write exactly 3 files: Write 2 files to \`${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/\`:
1. \`${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/exploration.md\` 1. **planning-context.md** - Evidence paths + synthesized understanding
2. \`${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/understanding.md\` 2. **sub-plan.json** - Plan with \`_metadata.source_agent: "${sub.focus_area}"\`
3. \`${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/sub-plan.json\`
## Success Criteria See cli-lite-planning-agent documentation for file formats.
- [ ] Exploration covers all relevant code areas
- [ ] Understanding synthesizes findings into clear approach
- [ ] sub-plan.json follows plan-json-schema.json with 2-5 tasks
- [ ] Each task has modification_points, acceptance, verification
- [ ] Dependencies clearly stated
- [ ] All 3 files written to correct location
` `
}) })
}) })
@@ -515,9 +442,9 @@ TodoWrite({ todos: [
{ content: "Phase 4: Merge & Synthesis", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Merging plans" } { content: "Phase 4: Merge & Synthesis", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Merging plans" }
]}) ]})
// Collect all understanding documents for context // Collect all planning context documents for context
const understandingDocs = subRequirements.map(sub => { const contextDocs = subRequirements.map(sub => {
const path = `${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/understanding.md` const path = `${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/planning-context.md`
return { return {
focus_area: sub.focus_area, focus_area: sub.focus_area,
content: Read(path) content: Read(path)
@@ -559,11 +486,11 @@ ${JSON.stringify(sp.plan, null, 2)}
\`\`\` \`\`\`
`).join('\n')} `).join('\n')}
## Understanding Documents ## Planning Context Documents
${understandingDocs.map(ud => ` ${contextDocs.map(cd => `
### Understanding: ${ud.focus_area} ### Context: ${cd.focus_area}
${ud.content} ${cd.content}
`).join('\n')} `).join('\n')}
## Detected Conflicts ## Detected Conflicts
@@ -740,8 +667,7 @@ ${task.acceptance?.map(ac => `- ${ac}`).join('\n') || 'N/A'}
${subRequirements.map(sub => ` ${subRequirements.map(sub => `
### ${sub.focus_area} ### ${sub.focus_area}
- Exploration: \`${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/exploration.md\` - Context: \`${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/planning-context.md\`
- Understanding: \`${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/understanding.md\`
- Sub-Plan: \`${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/sub-plan.json\` - Sub-Plan: \`${sessionFolder}/agents/${sub.focus_area}/sub-plan.json\`
`).join('\n')} `).join('\n')}
@@ -776,8 +702,7 @@ console.log(`
├── requirement-analysis.json # Requirement breakdown ├── requirement-analysis.json # Requirement breakdown
├── agents/ # Per-agent process files ├── agents/ # Per-agent process files
${subRequirements.map(sub => `│ ├── ${sub.focus_area}/ ${subRequirements.map(sub => `│ ├── ${sub.focus_area}/
│ │ ├── exploration.md │ │ ├── planning-context.md
│ │ ├── understanding.md
│ │ └── sub-plan.json`).join('\n')} │ │ └── sub-plan.json`).join('\n')}
├── conflicts.json # Detected conflicts ├── conflicts.json # Detected conflicts
├── plan.json # Unified plan (execution-ready) ├── plan.json # Unified plan (execution-ready)
@@ -792,7 +717,7 @@ Execute the plan:
Review a specific agent's work: Review a specific agent's work:
\`\`\`bash \`\`\`bash
cat ${sessionFolder}/agents/{focus-area}/understanding.md cat ${sessionFolder}/agents/{focus-area}/planning-context.md
\`\`\` \`\`\`
`) `)
``` ```
@@ -827,7 +752,7 @@ cat ${sessionFolder}/agents/{focus-area}/understanding.md
## Best Practices ## Best Practices
1. **Be Specific**: Detailed requirements lead to better splits 1. **Be Specific**: Detailed requirements lead to better splits
2. **Review Process Files**: Check exploration.md and understanding.md for insights 2. **Review Process Files**: Check planning-context.md for insights
3. **Trust the Merge**: Conflict resolution follows defined rules 3. **Trust the Merge**: Conflict resolution follows defined rules
4. **Iterate if Needed**: Re-run with different --merge-rule if results unsatisfactory 4. **Iterate if Needed**: Re-run with different --merge-rule if results unsatisfactory

View File

@@ -37,6 +37,23 @@ Intelligent lightweight bug fixing command with dynamic workflow adaptation base
/workflow:lite-fix -y --hotfix "生产环境数据库连接失败" # Auto + hotfix mode /workflow:lite-fix -y --hotfix "生产环境数据库连接失败" # Auto + hotfix mode
``` ```
## Output Artifacts
| Artifact | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| `diagnosis-{angle}.json` | Per-angle diagnosis results (1-4 files based on severity) |
| `diagnoses-manifest.json` | Index of all diagnosis files |
| `planning-context.md` | Evidence paths + synthesized understanding |
| `fix-plan.json` | Structured fix plan (fix-plan-json-schema.json) |
**Output Directory**: `.workflow/.lite-fix/{bug-slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/`
**Agent Usage**:
- Low/Medium severity → Direct Claude planning (no agent)
- High/Critical severity → `cli-lite-planning-agent` generates `fix-plan.json`
**Schema Reference**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/fix-plan-json-schema.json`
## Auto Mode Defaults ## Auto Mode Defaults
When `--yes` or `-y` flag is used: When `--yes` or `-y` flag is used:
@@ -192,11 +209,15 @@ const diagnosisTasks = selectedAngles.map((angle, index) =>
## Task Objective ## Task Objective
Execute **${angle}** diagnosis for bug root cause analysis. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover root cause, affected paths, and fix hints. Execute **${angle}** diagnosis for bug root cause analysis. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover root cause, affected paths, and fix hints.
## Output Location
**Session Folder**: ${sessionFolder}
**Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/diagnosis-${angle}.json
## Assigned Context ## Assigned Context
- **Diagnosis Angle**: ${angle} - **Diagnosis Angle**: ${angle}
- **Bug Description**: ${bug_description} - **Bug Description**: ${bug_description}
- **Diagnosis Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length} - **Diagnosis Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length}
- **Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/diagnosis-${angle}.json
## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent) ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
**You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:** **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
@@ -225,8 +246,6 @@ Execute **${angle}** diagnosis for bug root cause analysis. Analyze codebase fro
## Expected Output ## Expected Output
**File**: ${sessionFolder}/diagnosis-${angle}.json
**Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 3, follow schema exactly **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 3, follow schema exactly
**Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused): **Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused):
@@ -255,9 +274,9 @@ Execute **${angle}** diagnosis for bug root cause analysis. Analyze codebase fro
- [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
- [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended - [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended
## Output ## Execution
Write: ${sessionFolder}/diagnosis-${angle}.json **Write**: \`${sessionFolder}/diagnosis-${angle}.json\`
Return: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} diagnosis findings **Return**: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} diagnosis findings
` `
) )
) )
@@ -493,6 +512,13 @@ Task(
prompt=` prompt=`
Generate fix plan and write fix-plan.json. Generate fix plan and write fix-plan.json.
## Output Location
**Session Folder**: ${sessionFolder}
**Output Files**:
- ${sessionFolder}/planning-context.md (evidence + understanding)
- ${sessionFolder}/fix-plan.json (fix plan)
## Output Schema Reference ## Output Schema Reference
Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/fix-plan-json-schema.json (get schema reference before generating plan) Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/fix-plan-json-schema.json (get schema reference before generating plan)
@@ -588,8 +614,9 @@ Generate fix-plan.json with:
- For High/Critical: REQUIRED new fields (rationale, verification, risks, code_skeleton, data_flow, design_decisions) - For High/Critical: REQUIRED new fields (rationale, verification, risks, code_skeleton, data_flow, design_decisions)
- Each task MUST have rationale (why this fix), verification (how to verify success), and risks (potential issues) - Each task MUST have rationale (why this fix), verification (how to verify success), and risks (potential issues)
5. Parse output and structure fix-plan 5. Parse output and structure fix-plan
6. Write JSON: Write('${sessionFolder}/fix-plan.json', jsonContent) 6. **Write**: \`${sessionFolder}/planning-context.md\` (evidence paths + understanding)
7. Return brief completion summary 7. **Write**: \`${sessionFolder}/fix-plan.json\`
8. Return brief completion summary
## Output Format for CLI ## Output Format for CLI
Include these sections in your fix-plan output: Include these sections in your fix-plan output:
@@ -747,22 +774,24 @@ SlashCommand(command="/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory --mode bugfix")
``` ```
.workflow/.lite-fix/{bug-slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/ .workflow/.lite-fix/{bug-slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/
|- diagnosis-{angle1}.json # Diagnosis angle 1 ├── diagnosis-{angle1}.json # Diagnosis angle 1
|- diagnosis-{angle2}.json # Diagnosis angle 2 ├── diagnosis-{angle2}.json # Diagnosis angle 2
|- diagnosis-{angle3}.json # Diagnosis angle 3 (if applicable) ├── diagnosis-{angle3}.json # Diagnosis angle 3 (if applicable)
|- diagnosis-{angle4}.json # Diagnosis angle 4 (if applicable) ├── diagnosis-{angle4}.json # Diagnosis angle 4 (if applicable)
|- diagnoses-manifest.json # Diagnosis index ├── diagnoses-manifest.json # Diagnosis index
+- fix-plan.json # Fix plan ├── planning-context.md # Evidence + understanding
└── fix-plan.json # Fix plan
``` ```
**Example**: **Example**:
``` ```
.workflow/.lite-fix/user-avatar-upload-fails-413-2025-11-25-14-30-25/ .workflow/.lite-fix/user-avatar-upload-fails-413-2025-11-25/
|- diagnosis-error-handling.json ├── diagnosis-error-handling.json
|- diagnosis-dataflow.json ├── diagnosis-dataflow.json
|- diagnosis-validation.json ├── diagnosis-validation.json
|- diagnoses-manifest.json ├── diagnoses-manifest.json
+- fix-plan.json ├── planning-context.md
└── fix-plan.json
``` ```
## Error Handling ## Error Handling

View File

@@ -37,6 +37,23 @@ Intelligent lightweight planning command with dynamic workflow adaptation based
/workflow:lite-plan -y -e "优化数据库查询性能" # Auto mode + force exploration /workflow:lite-plan -y -e "优化数据库查询性能" # Auto mode + force exploration
``` ```
## Output Artifacts
| Artifact | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| `exploration-{angle}.json` | Per-angle exploration results (1-4 files based on complexity) |
| `explorations-manifest.json` | Index of all exploration files |
| `planning-context.md` | Evidence paths + synthesized understanding |
| `plan.json` | Structured implementation plan (plan-json-schema.json) |
**Output Directory**: `.workflow/.lite-plan/{task-slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/`
**Agent Usage**:
- Low complexity → Direct Claude planning (no agent)
- Medium/High complexity → `cli-lite-planning-agent` generates `plan.json`
**Schema Reference**: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-json-schema.json`
## Auto Mode Defaults ## Auto Mode Defaults
When `--yes` or `-y` flag is used: When `--yes` or `-y` flag is used:
@@ -193,11 +210,15 @@ const explorationTasks = selectedAngles.map((angle, index) =>
## Task Objective ## Task Objective
Execute **${angle}** exploration for task planning context. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover relevant structure, patterns, and constraints. Execute **${angle}** exploration for task planning context. Analyze codebase from this specific angle to discover relevant structure, patterns, and constraints.
## Output Location
**Session Folder**: ${sessionFolder}
**Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
## Assigned Context ## Assigned Context
- **Exploration Angle**: ${angle} - **Exploration Angle**: ${angle}
- **Task Description**: ${task_description} - **Task Description**: ${task_description}
- **Exploration Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length} - **Exploration Index**: ${index + 1} of ${selectedAngles.length}
- **Output File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent) ## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Execute by Agent)
**You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:** **You (cli-explore-agent) MUST execute these steps in order:**
@@ -225,8 +246,6 @@ Execute **${angle}** exploration for task planning context. Analyze codebase fro
## Expected Output ## Expected Output
**File**: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json
**Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 3, follow schema exactly **Schema Reference**: Schema obtained in MANDATORY FIRST STEPS step 3, follow schema exactly
**Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused): **Required Fields** (all ${angle} focused):
@@ -252,9 +271,9 @@ Execute **${angle}** exploration for task planning context. Analyze codebase fro
- [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly - [ ] JSON output follows schema exactly
- [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended - [ ] clarification_needs includes options + recommended
## Output ## Execution
Write: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json **Write**: \`${sessionFolder}/exploration-${angle}.json\`
Return: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} findings **Return**: 2-3 sentence summary of ${angle} findings
` `
) )
) )
@@ -443,6 +462,13 @@ Task(
prompt=` prompt=`
Generate implementation plan and write plan.json. Generate implementation plan and write plan.json.
## Output Location
**Session Folder**: ${sessionFolder}
**Output Files**:
- ${sessionFolder}/planning-context.md (evidence + understanding)
- ${sessionFolder}/plan.json (implementation plan)
## Output Schema Reference ## Output Schema Reference
Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-json-schema.json (get schema reference before generating plan) Execute: cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-json-schema.json (get schema reference before generating plan)
@@ -492,8 +518,9 @@ Generate plan.json following the schema obtained above. Key constraints:
2. Execute CLI planning using Gemini (Qwen fallback) 2. Execute CLI planning using Gemini (Qwen fallback)
3. Read ALL exploration files for comprehensive context 3. Read ALL exploration files for comprehensive context
4. Synthesize findings and generate plan following schema 4. Synthesize findings and generate plan following schema
5. Write JSON: Write('${sessionFolder}/plan.json', jsonContent) 5. **Write**: \`${sessionFolder}/planning-context.md\` (evidence paths + understanding)
6. Return brief completion summary 6. **Write**: \`${sessionFolder}/plan.json\`
7. Return brief completion summary
` `
) )
``` ```