feat: Add explorer and synthesizer roles with commands for codebase exploration and synthesis

- Implemented `explorer` role for parallel codebase exploration using `cli-explore-agent`.
- Created `explore.md` command documentation detailing exploration strategy and execution steps.
- Established `synthesizer` role for integrating insights from explorations, analyses, and discussions.
- Developed `synthesize.md` command documentation outlining synthesis strategy and output format.
- Configured team settings in `team-config.json` to support new roles and pipeline modes.
- Added regression test for CodexLens bootstrap fallback to ensure robustness in error handling.
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-02-18 18:40:12 +08:00
parent 32d2d534ab
commit 65762af254
14 changed files with 3465 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
# Command: synthesize
> 跨视角整合。从所有探索、分析、讨论结果中提取主题、解决冲突、生成最终结论和建议。
## When to Use
- Phase 3 of Synthesizer
- 所有探索、分析、讨论已完成
- 每个 SYNTH-* 任务触发一次
**Trigger conditions**:
- 讨论循环结束后(用户选择"分析完成"或达到最大轮次)
- Quick 模式下分析完成后直接触发
## Strategy
### Delegation Mode
**Mode**: Inline纯整合不调用外部工具
### Decision Logic
```javascript
function buildSynthesisStrategy(explorationCount, analysisCount, discussionCount) {
if (analysisCount <= 1 && discussionCount === 0) {
return 'simple' // Quick mode: 单视角直接总结
}
if (discussionCount > 2) {
return 'deep' // Deep mode: 多轮讨论需要追踪演进
}
return 'standard' // Standard: 多视角交叉整合
}
```
## Execution Steps
### Step 1: Context Preparation
```javascript
const strategy = buildSynthesisStrategy(
allExplorations.length, allAnalyses.length, allDiscussions.length
)
// 提取所有洞察
const allInsights = allAnalyses.flatMap(a =>
(a.key_insights || []).map(i => ({
...(typeof i === 'string' ? { insight: i } : i),
perspective: a.perspective
}))
)
// 提取所有发现
const allFindings = allAnalyses.flatMap(a =>
(a.key_findings || []).map(f => ({
...(typeof f === 'string' ? { finding: f } : f),
perspective: a.perspective
}))
)
// 提取所有建议
const allRecommendations = allAnalyses.flatMap(a =>
(a.recommendations || []).map(r => ({
...(typeof r === 'string' ? { action: r } : r),
perspective: a.perspective
}))
)
// 提取讨论演进
const discussionEvolution = allDiscussions.map(d => ({
round: d.round,
type: d.type,
confirmed: d.updated_understanding?.confirmed || [],
corrected: d.updated_understanding?.corrected || [],
new_insights: d.updated_understanding?.new_insights || []
}))
```
### Step 2: Cross-Perspective Synthesis
```javascript
// 1. Theme Extraction — 跨视角共同主题
const themes = extractThemes(allInsights)
// 2. Conflict Resolution — 视角间矛盾
const conflicts = identifyConflicts(allAnalyses)
// 3. Evidence Consolidation — 证据汇总
const consolidatedEvidence = consolidateEvidence(allFindings)
// 4. Recommendation Prioritization — 建议优先级排序
const prioritizedRecommendations = prioritizeRecommendations(allRecommendations)
// 5. Decision Trail Integration — 决策追踪整合
const decisionSummary = summarizeDecisions(decisionTrail)
function extractThemes(insights) {
// 按关键词聚类,识别跨视角共同主题
const themeMap = {}
for (const insight of insights) {
const text = insight.insight || insight
// 简单聚类:相似洞察归为同一主题
const key = text.slice(0, 30)
if (!themeMap[key]) {
themeMap[key] = { theme: text, perspectives: [], count: 0 }
}
themeMap[key].perspectives.push(insight.perspective)
themeMap[key].count++
}
return Object.values(themeMap)
.sort((a, b) => b.count - a.count)
.slice(0, 10)
}
function identifyConflicts(analyses) {
// 识别不同视角间的矛盾发现
const conflicts = []
for (let i = 0; i < analyses.length; i++) {
for (let j = i + 1; j < analyses.length; j++) {
// 比较两个视角的发现是否矛盾
// 实际实现中需要语义比较
}
}
return conflicts
}
function consolidateEvidence(findings) {
// 去重并按文件引用聚合
const byFile = {}
for (const f of findings) {
const ref = f.file_ref || f.finding
if (!byFile[ref]) byFile[ref] = []
byFile[ref].push(f)
}
return byFile
}
function prioritizeRecommendations(recommendations) {
const priorityOrder = { high: 0, medium: 1, low: 2 }
return recommendations
.sort((a, b) => (priorityOrder[a.priority] || 2) - (priorityOrder[b.priority] || 2))
.slice(0, 10)
}
function summarizeDecisions(trail) {
return trail.map(d => ({
round: d.round,
decision: d.decision,
context: d.context,
impact: d.impact || 'Shaped analysis direction'
}))
}
```
### Step 3: Build Conclusions
```javascript
const conclusions = {
session_id: sessionFolder.split('/').pop(),
topic,
completed: new Date().toISOString(),
total_rounds: allDiscussions.length,
strategy_used: strategy,
summary: generateSummary(themes, allFindings, allDiscussions),
key_conclusions: themes.slice(0, 7).map(t => ({
point: t.theme,
evidence: t.perspectives.join(', ') + ' perspectives',
confidence: t.count >= 3 ? 'high' : t.count >= 2 ? 'medium' : 'low'
})),
recommendations: prioritizedRecommendations.map(r => ({
action: r.action,
rationale: r.rationale || 'Based on analysis findings',
priority: r.priority || 'medium',
source_perspective: r.perspective
})),
open_questions: allAnalyses
.flatMap(a => a.open_questions || [])
.filter((q, i, arr) => arr.indexOf(q) === i)
.slice(0, 5),
follow_up_suggestions: generateFollowUps(conclusions),
decision_trail: decisionSummary,
cross_perspective_synthesis: {
convergent_themes: themes.filter(t => t.perspectives.length > 1),
conflicts_resolved: conflicts,
unique_contributions: allAnalyses.map(a => ({
perspective: a.perspective,
unique_insights: (a.key_insights || []).slice(0, 2)
}))
},
_metadata: {
explorations: allExplorations.length,
analyses: allAnalyses.length,
discussions: allDiscussions.length,
decisions: decisionTrail.length,
synthesis_strategy: strategy
}
}
function generateSummary(themes, findings, discussions) {
const topThemes = themes.slice(0, 3).map(t => t.theme).join('; ')
const roundCount = discussions.length
return `Analysis of "${topic}" identified ${themes.length} key themes across ${allAnalyses.length} perspective(s) and ${roundCount} discussion round(s). Top themes: ${topThemes}`
}
function generateFollowUps(conclusions) {
const suggestions = []
if ((conclusions.open_questions || []).length > 2) {
suggestions.push({ type: 'deeper-analysis', summary: 'Further analysis needed for open questions' })
}
if ((conclusions.recommendations || []).some(r => r.priority === 'high')) {
suggestions.push({ type: 'issue-creation', summary: 'Create issues for high-priority recommendations' })
}
suggestions.push({ type: 'implementation-plan', summary: 'Generate implementation plan from recommendations' })
return suggestions
}
```
## Output Format
```json
{
"session_id": "UAN-auth-analysis-2026-02-18",
"topic": "认证架构优化",
"completed": "2026-02-18T...",
"total_rounds": 2,
"summary": "Analysis identified 5 key themes...",
"key_conclusions": [
{"point": "JWT stateless approach is sound", "evidence": "technical, architectural", "confidence": "high"}
],
"recommendations": [
{"action": "Add rate limiting", "rationale": "Prevent brute force", "priority": "high"}
],
"open_questions": ["Token rotation strategy?"],
"decision_trail": [
{"round": 1, "decision": "Focus on security", "context": "User preference"}
]
}
```
## Error Handling
| Scenario | Resolution |
|----------|------------|
| No analyses available | Synthesize from explorations only |
| Single perspective only | Generate focused synthesis without cross-perspective |
| Irreconcilable conflicts | Present both sides with trade-off analysis |
| Empty discussion rounds | Skip discussion evolution, focus on analysis results |
| Shared memory corrupted | Rebuild from individual JSON files |