feat: convert workflow execute command to standalone skill

Move execute.md from commands/workflow/ to skills/workflow-execute/SKILL.md,
update all references in workflow-plan to use Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
instead of the old /workflow:execute command path.
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-02-13 23:17:37 +08:00
parent 696141ee66
commit 674bdc7866
4 changed files with 917 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
---
name: execute
description: Coordinate agent execution for workflow tasks with automatic session discovery, parallel task processing, and status tracking
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] [--resume-session=\"session-id\"] [--with-commit]"
name: workflow-execute
description: Coordinate agent execution for workflow tasks with automatic session discovery, parallel task processing, and status tracking. Triggers on "workflow:execute".
allowed-tools: Skill, Task, AskUserQuestion, TaskCreate, TaskUpdate, TaskList, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
---
# Workflow Execute Command
# Workflow Execute
## Overview
Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, agent coordination, and progress tracking. **Executes entire workflow without user interruption** (except initial session selection if multiple active sessions exist), providing complete context to agents and ensuring proper flow control execution with comprehensive TodoWrite tracking.
**Resume Mode**: When called with `--resume-session` flag, skips discovery phase and directly enters TodoWrite generation and agent execution for the specified session.
@@ -366,7 +365,7 @@ if (autoYes) {
- Serialization Requirements (which tasks must run sequentially)
- Critical Path (priority execution order)
3. **Use TODO_LIST.md for status tracking** only
4. **IMPL_PLAN decides "HOW"**, execute.md implements it
4. **IMPL_PLAN decides "HOW"**, workflow-execute implements it
**Intelligent Fallback (When IMPL_PLAN lacks execution details)**:
1. **Analyze task structure**:
@@ -595,5 +594,14 @@ meta.agent missing → Infer from meta.type:
**Error Handling**: Skip commit on no changes/missing summary, log errors, continue workflow.
## Related Skills
**Prerequisite Skills**:
- `/workflow:plan` - Generate implementation plan and task JSONs
**Called During Execution**:
- `/workflow:session:complete` - Archive session after all tasks complete
- `/workflow:review` - Post-implementation review
**Follow-up Skills**:
- `/issue:new` - Create follow-up issues (test/enhance/refactor/doc)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
---
name: workflow-plan
description: Unified planning skill - 4-phase planning workflow, plan verification, and interactive replanning. Triggers on "workflow:plan", "workflow:plan-verify", "workflow:replan".
allowed-tools: Skill, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
---
# Workflow Plan
Unified planning skill combining 4-phase planning workflow, plan quality verification, and interactive replanning. Produces IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, verification reports, and manages plan lifecycle through session-level artifact updates.
## Architecture Overview
```
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Workflow Plan Orchestrator (SKILL.md) │
│ → Route by mode: plan | verify | replan │
│ → Pure coordinator: Execute phases, parse outputs, pass context │
└──────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────┘
┌───────────────────────┼───────────────────────┐
↓ ↓ ↓
┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ Plan Mode │ │ Verify │ │ Replan │
│ (default) │ │ Mode │ │ Mode │
│ Phase 1-4 │ │ Phase 5 │ │ Phase 6 │
└─────┬─────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘
┌───┼───┬───┐
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
┌───┐┌───┐┌───┐┌───┐
│ 1 ││ 2 ││ 3 ││ 4 │
│Ses││Ctx││Con││Gen│
└───┘└───┘└───┘└─┬─┘
┌───────────┐
│ Confirm │─── Verify ──→ Phase 5
│ (choice) │─── Execute ─→ Skill("workflow-execute")
└───────────┘─── Review ──→ /workflow:status
```
## Key Design Principles
1. **Pure Orchestrator**: SKILL.md routes and coordinates only; execution detail lives in phase files
2. **Progressive Phase Loading**: Read phase docs ONLY when that phase is about to execute
3. **Multi-Mode Routing**: Single skill handles plan/verify/replan via mode detection
4. **Task Attachment Model**: Sub-command tasks are ATTACHED, executed sequentially, then COLLAPSED
5. **Auto-Continue**: After each phase completes, automatically execute next pending phase
6. **Accumulated State**: planning-notes.md carries context across phases for N+1 decisions
## Auto Mode
When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-continue all phases (skip confirmations), use recommended conflict resolutions, use safe defaults for replan.
## Mode Detection
```javascript
const args = $ARGUMENTS
const mode = detectMode(args)
function detectMode(args) {
// Skill trigger determines mode
if (skillName === 'workflow:plan-verify') return 'verify'
if (skillName === 'workflow:replan') return 'replan'
return 'plan' // default: workflow:plan
}
```
## Execution Flow
### Plan Mode (default)
```
Input Parsing:
└─ Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
Phase 1: Session Discovery
└─ Ref: phases/01-session-discovery.md
└─ Output: sessionId (WFS-xxx), planning-notes.md
Phase 2: Context Gathering
└─ Ref: phases/02-context-gathering.md
├─ Tasks attached: Analyze structure → Identify integration → Generate package
└─ Output: contextPath + conflictRisk
Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (conditional: conflictRisk ≥ medium)
└─ Decision (conflictRisk check):
├─ conflictRisk ≥ medium → Ref: phases/03-conflict-resolution.md
│ ├─ Tasks attached: Detect conflicts → Present to user → Apply strategies
│ └─ Output: Modified brainstorm artifacts
└─ conflictRisk < medium → Skip to Phase 4
Phase 4: Task Generation
└─ Ref: phases/04-task-generation.md
└─ Output: IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
Plan Confirmation (User Decision Gate):
└─ Decision (user choice):
├─ "Verify Plan Quality" (Recommended) → Route to Phase 5 (plan-verify)
├─ "Start Execution" → Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
└─ "Review Status Only" → Route to /workflow:status
```
### Verify Mode
```
Phase 5: Plan Verification
└─ Ref: phases/05-plan-verify.md
└─ Output: PLAN_VERIFICATION.md with quality gate recommendation
```
### Replan Mode
```
Phase 6: Interactive Replan
└─ Ref: phases/06-replan.md
└─ Output: Updated IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
```
**Phase Reference Documents** (read on-demand when phase executes):
| Phase | Document | Purpose | Mode |
|-------|----------|---------|------|
| 1 | [phases/01-session-discovery.md](phases/01-session-discovery.md) | Create or discover workflow session | plan |
| 2 | [phases/02-context-gathering.md](phases/02-context-gathering.md) | Gather project context and analyze codebase | plan |
| 3 | [phases/03-conflict-resolution.md](phases/03-conflict-resolution.md) | Detect and resolve conflicts (conditional) | plan |
| 4 | [phases/04-task-generation.md](phases/04-task-generation.md) | Generate implementation plan and task JSONs | plan |
| 5 | [phases/05-plan-verify.md](phases/05-plan-verify.md) | Read-only verification with quality gate | verify |
| 6 | [phases/06-replan.md](phases/06-replan.md) | Interactive replanning with boundary clarification | replan |
## Core Rules
1. **Start Immediately**: First action is mode detection + TodoWrite initialization, second action is phase execution
2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files, analyze structure, or gather context before Phase 1
3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each phase output for next phase
4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
6. **Task Attachment Model**: Skill execute **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
7. **Progressive Phase Loading**: Read phase docs ONLY when that phase is about to execute
8. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
## Input Processing
**Convert User Input to Structured Format**:
1. **Simple Text** → Structure it:
```
User: "Build authentication system"
Structured:
GOAL: Build authentication system
SCOPE: Core authentication features
CONTEXT: New implementation
```
2. **Detailed Text** → Extract components:
```
User: "Add JWT authentication with email/password login and token refresh"
Structured:
GOAL: Implement JWT-based authentication
SCOPE: Email/password login, token generation, token refresh endpoints
CONTEXT: JWT token-based security, refresh token rotation
```
3. **File Reference** (e.g., `requirements.md`) → Read and structure:
- Read file content
- Extract goal, scope, requirements
- Format into structured description
## Data Flow
### Plan Mode
```
User Input (task description)
[Convert to Structured Format]
↓ Structured Description:
↓ GOAL: [objective]
↓ SCOPE: [boundaries]
↓ CONTEXT: [background]
Phase 1: session:start --auto "structured-description"
↓ Output: sessionId
↓ Write: planning-notes.md (User Intent section)
Phase 2: context-gather --session sessionId "structured-description"
↓ Input: sessionId + structured description
↓ Output: contextPath (context-package.json) + conflictRisk
↓ Update: planning-notes.md (Context Findings + Consolidated Constraints)
Phase 3: conflict-resolution [conditional: conflictRisk ≥ medium]
↓ Input: sessionId + contextPath + conflictRisk
↓ Output: Modified brainstorm artifacts
↓ Update: planning-notes.md (Conflict Decisions + Consolidated Constraints)
↓ Skip if conflictRisk is none/low → proceed directly to Phase 4
Phase 4: task-generate-agent --session sessionId
↓ Input: sessionId + planning-notes.md + context-package.json + brainstorm artifacts
↓ Output: IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
Plan Confirmation (User Decision Gate):
├─ "Verify Plan Quality" (Recommended) → Route to Phase 5
├─ "Start Execution" → Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
└─ "Review Status Only" → Route to /workflow:status
```
**Session Memory Flow**: Each phase receives session ID, which provides access to:
- Previous task summaries
- Existing context and analysis
- Brainstorming artifacts (potentially modified by Phase 3)
- Session-specific configuration
### Verify Mode
```
Input: --session sessionId (or auto-detect)
Phase 5: Load artifacts → Agent-driven verification → Generate report
↓ Output: PLAN_VERIFICATION.md with quality gate
```
### Replan Mode
```
Input: [--session sessionId] [task-id] "requirements"
Phase 6: Mode detection → Clarification → Impact analysis → Backup → Apply → Verify
↓ Output: Updated artifacts + change summary
```
## TodoWrite Pattern
**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for real-time visibility into workflow execution.
### Key Principles
1. **Task Attachment** (when phase executed):
- Sub-tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
- **Phase 2, 3**: Multiple sub-tasks attached
- **Phase 1, 4**: Single task (atomic)
- First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
- Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks sequentially
2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
- **Applies to Phase 2, 3**: Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
- **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
- **Phase 1, 4**: No collapse needed (single task, just mark completed)
- Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
3. **Continuous Execution**: After completion, automatically proceed to next pending phase
**Lifecycle**: Initial pending → Phase executed (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED for 2/3, marked completed for 1/4) → Next phase → Repeat
### Phase 2 (Tasks Attached):
```json
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Analyze codebase structure", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Identify integration points", "status": "pending"},
{"content": " → Generate context package", "status": "pending"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending"}
]
```
### Phase 2 (Collapsed):
```json
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending"}
]
```
### Phase 3 (Tasks Attached, conditional):
```json
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 3: Conflict Resolution", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Detect conflicts with CLI analysis", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Present conflicts to user", "status": "pending"},
{"content": " → Apply resolution strategies", "status": "pending"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending"}
]
```
**Note**: See individual Phase descriptions for detailed TodoWrite Update examples.
## Post-Phase Updates
After each phase completes, update planning-notes.md:
- **After Phase 1**: Initialize with user intent (GOAL, KEY_CONSTRAINTS)
- **After Phase 2**: Add context findings (CRITICAL_FILES, ARCHITECTURE, CONFLICT_RISK, CONSTRAINTS)
- **After Phase 3**: Add conflict decisions (RESOLVED, MODIFIED_ARTIFACTS, CONSTRAINTS) if executed
- **Memory State Check**: After heavy phases (Phase 2-3), evaluate context window usage; if high (>120K tokens), trigger `compact`
See phase files for detailed update code.
## Error Handling
- **Parsing Failure**: If output parsing fails, retry command once, then report error
- **Validation Failure**: If validation fails, report which file/data is missing
- **Command Failure**: Keep phase `in_progress`, report error to user, do not proceed to next phase
- **Session Not Found** (verify/replan): Report error with available sessions list
- **Task Not Found** (replan): Report error with available tasks list
## Coordinator Checklist
### Plan Mode
- **Pre-Phase**: Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
- Initialize TodoWrite before any command (Phase 3 added dynamically after Phase 2)
- Execute Phase 1 immediately with structured description
- Parse session ID from Phase 1 output, store in memory
- Pass session ID and structured description to Phase 2 command
- Parse context path from Phase 2 output, store in memory
- **Extract conflictRisk from context-package.json**: Determine Phase 3 execution
- **If conflictRisk ≥ medium**: Launch Phase 3 conflict-resolution with sessionId and contextPath
- Wait for Phase 3 to finish executing (if executed), verify conflict-resolution.json created
- **If conflictRisk is none/low**: Skip Phase 3, proceed directly to Phase 4
- Pass session ID to Phase 4 command
- Verify all Phase 4 outputs
- **Plan Confirmation Gate**: Present user with choice (Verify → Phase 5 / Execute / Review Status)
- **If user selects Verify**: Read phases/05-plan-verify.md, execute Phase 5 in-process
- **If user selects Execute**: Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
- **If user selects Review**: Route to /workflow:status
- **Auto mode (--yes)**: Auto-select "Verify Plan Quality", then auto-continue to execute if PROCEED
- Update TodoWrite after each phase
- After each phase, automatically continue to next phase based on TodoList status
### Verify Mode
- Detect/validate session (from --session flag or auto-detect)
- Initialize TodoWrite with single verification task
- Execute Phase 5 verification agent
- Present quality gate result and next step options
### Replan Mode
- Parse flags (--session, --interactive, task-id)
- Detect operation mode (task vs session)
- Initialize TodoWrite with replan-specific tasks
- Execute Phase 6 through all sub-phases (clarification → impact → backup → apply → verify)
## Structure Template Reference
**Minimal Structure**:
```
GOAL: [What to achieve]
SCOPE: [What's included]
CONTEXT: [Relevant info]
```
**Detailed Structure** (optional, when more context available):
```
GOAL: [Primary objective]
SCOPE: [Included features/components]
CONTEXT: [Existing system, constraints, dependencies]
REQUIREMENTS: [Specific technical requirements]
CONSTRAINTS: [Limitations or boundaries]
```
## Related Skills
**Prerequisite Skills**:
- `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts` - Optional: Generate role-based analyses before planning
- `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` - Optional: Refine brainstorm analyses with clarifications
**Called by Plan Mode** (4 phases):
- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create or discover workflow session
- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Phase 2: Gather project context and analyze codebase
- `/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution` - Phase 3: Detect and resolve conflicts (conditional)
- `/compact` - Phase 3: Memory optimization (if context approaching limits)
- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent` - Phase 4: Generate task JSON files
**Follow-up Skills**:
- `/workflow:plan-verify` - Verify plan quality (can also invoke via verify mode)
- `/workflow:status` - Review task breakdown and current progress
- `Skill(skill="workflow-execute")` - Begin implementation of generated tasks (skill: workflow-execute)
- `/workflow:replan` - Modify plan (can also invoke via replan mode)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
# Phase 4: Task Generation
Generate implementation plan and task JSONs via action-planning-agent.
## Objective
- Generate IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, and TODO_LIST.md
- Present user with plan confirmation choices (verify / execute / review)
- Route to Phase 5 (verify) if user selects verification
## Relationship with Brainstorm Phase
- If brainstorm role analyses exist ([role]/analysis.md files), they are incorporated as input
- **User's original intent is ALWAYS primary**: New or refined user goals override brainstorm recommendations
- **Role analysis.md files define "WHAT"**: Requirements, design specs, role-specific insights
- **IMPL_PLAN.md defines "HOW"**: Executable task breakdown, dependencies, implementation sequence
- Task generation translates high-level role analyses into concrete, actionable work items
- **Intent priority**: Current user prompt > role analysis.md files > guidance-specification.md
## Execution
### Step 4.1: Execute Task Generation
```javascript
Skill(skill="workflow:tools:task-generate-agent", args="--session [sessionId]")
```
**CLI Execution Note**: CLI tool usage is now determined semantically by action-planning-agent based on user's task description. If user specifies "use Codex/Gemini/Qwen for X", CLI tool usage is controlled by `meta.execution_config.method` per task, not by `command` fields in implementation steps.
**Input**:
- `sessionId` from Phase 1
- **planning-notes.md**: Consolidated constraints from all phases (Phase 1-3)
- Path: `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/planning-notes.md`
- Contains: User intent, context findings, conflict decisions, consolidated constraints
- **Purpose**: Provides structured, minimal context summary to action-planning-agent
**Validation**:
- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/plan.json` exists (structured plan overview)
- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md` exists
- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.task/IMPL-*.json` exists (at least one)
- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/TODO_LIST.md` exists
### TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 Skill executed - agent task attached)
```json
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
]
```
**Note**: Single agent task attached. Agent autonomously completes discovery, planning, and output generation internally.
### TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 completed)
```json
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
]
```
**Note**: Agent task completed. No collapse needed (single task).
### Step 4.2: Plan Confirmation (User Decision Gate)
After Phase 4 completes, present user with action choices:
```javascript
console.log(`
Planning complete for session: ${sessionId}
Tasks generated: ${taskCount}
Plan: .workflow/active/${sessionId}/IMPL_PLAN.md
`);
// Ask user for next action
const userChoice = AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "Planning complete. What would you like to do next?",
header: "Next Action",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{
label: "Verify Plan Quality (Recommended)",
description: "Run quality verification to catch issues before execution. Checks plan structure, task dependencies, and completeness."
},
{
label: "Start Execution",
description: "Begin implementing tasks immediately. Use this if you've already reviewed the plan or want to start quickly."
},
{
label: "Review Status Only",
description: "View task breakdown and session status without taking further action. You can decide what to do next manually."
}
]
}]
});
// Execute based on user choice
if (userChoice.answers["Next Action"] === "Verify Plan Quality (Recommended)") {
console.log("\nStarting plan verification...\n");
// Route to Phase 5 (plan-verify) within this skill
// Orchestrator reads phases/05-plan-verify.md and executes
} else if (userChoice.answers["Next Action"] === "Start Execution") {
console.log("\nStarting task execution...\n");
Skill(skill="workflow-execute", args="--session " + sessionId);
} else if (userChoice.answers["Next Action"] === "Review Status Only") {
console.log("\nDisplaying session status...\n");
Skill(skill="workflow:status", args="--session " + sessionId);
}
```
**Auto Mode (--yes)**: Auto-select "Verify Plan Quality", then auto-continue to execute if quality gate is PROCEED.
**Return to Orchestrator**: Based on user's choice:
- **Verify** → Orchestrator reads phases/05-plan-verify.md and executes Phase 5 in-process
- **Execute** → Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
- **Review** → Route to /workflow:status
## Output
- **File**: `IMPL_PLAN.md` (implementation plan)
- **File**: `IMPL-*.json` (task JSON files)
- **File**: `TODO_LIST.md` (task list)
- **File**: `plan.json` (structured plan overview)
- **TodoWrite**: Mark Phase 4 completed
## Next Phase (Conditional)
Based on user's plan confirmation choice:
- If "Verify" → [Phase 5: Plan Verification](05-plan-verify.md)
- If "Execute" → Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
- If "Review" → External: /workflow:status

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,388 @@
# Phase 5: Plan Verification
Perform READ-ONLY verification analysis between IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, and brainstorming artifacts. Generates structured report with quality gate recommendation. Does NOT modify any source files.
## Objective
- Generate comprehensive verification report identifying inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities
- Produce quality gate recommendation (BLOCK_EXECUTION / PROCEED_WITH_FIXES / PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION / PROCEED)
- Route to next action based on quality gate result
## Entry Points
- **From Plan Mode**: After Phase 4 completes, user selects "Verify Plan Quality"
- **From Verify Mode**: Directly triggered via `/workflow:plan-verify`
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Operating Constraints
**STRICTLY READ-ONLY FOR SOURCE ARTIFACTS**:
- **MUST NOT** modify `IMPL_PLAN.md`, any `task.json` files, or brainstorming artifacts
- **MUST NOT** create or delete task files
- **MUST ONLY** write the verification report to `.process/PLAN_VERIFICATION.md`
**Synthesis Authority**: The `role analysis documents` are **authoritative** for requirements and design decisions. Any conflicts between IMPL_PLAN/tasks and synthesis are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the plan/tasks—not reinterpretation of requirements.
**Quality Gate Authority**: The verification report provides a binding recommendation based on objective severity criteria. User MUST review critical/high issues before proceeding with implementation.
## Execution
### Step 5.1: Initialize Analysis Context
```bash
# Detect active workflow session
IF --session parameter provided:
session_id = provided session
ELSE:
# Auto-detect active session
active_sessions = bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null)
IF active_sessions is empty:
ERROR: "No active workflow session found. Use --session <session-id>"
EXIT
ELSE IF active_sessions has multiple entries:
# Use most recently modified session
session_id = bash(ls -td .workflow/active/WFS-*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename)
ELSE:
session_id = basename(active_sessions[0])
# Derive absolute paths
session_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}
brainstorm_dir = session_dir/.brainstorming
task_dir = session_dir/.task
process_dir = session_dir/.process
session_file = session_dir/workflow-session.json
# Create .process directory if not exists (report output location)
IF NOT EXISTS(process_dir):
bash(mkdir -p "{process_dir}")
# Validate required artifacts
# Note: "role analysis documents" refers to [role]/analysis.md files (e.g., product-manager/analysis.md)
SYNTHESIS_DIR = brainstorm_dir # Contains role analysis files: */analysis.md
IMPL_PLAN = session_dir/IMPL_PLAN.md
TASK_FILES = Glob(task_dir/*.json)
PLANNING_NOTES = session_dir/planning-notes.md # N+1 context and constraints
# Abort if missing - in order of dependency
SESSION_FILE_EXISTS = EXISTS(session_file)
IF NOT SESSION_FILE_EXISTS:
WARNING: "workflow-session.json not found. User intent alignment verification will be skipped."
# Continue execution - this is optional context, not blocking
PLANNING_NOTES_EXISTS = EXISTS(PLANNING_NOTES)
IF NOT PLANNING_NOTES_EXISTS:
WARNING: "planning-notes.md not found. Constraints/N+1 context verification will be skipped."
# Continue execution - optional context
SYNTHESIS_FILES = Glob(brainstorm_dir/*/analysis.md)
IF SYNTHESIS_FILES.count == 0:
WARNING: "No role analysis documents found in .brainstorming/*/analysis.md. Synthesis-based dimensions (E, G) will use reduced coverage."
SYNTHESIS_AVAILABLE = false
# Continue execution - brainstorm artifacts are optional for direct planning workflows
ELSE:
SYNTHESIS_AVAILABLE = true
IF NOT EXISTS(IMPL_PLAN):
ERROR: "IMPL_PLAN.md not found. Run /workflow:plan first"
EXIT
IF TASK_FILES.count == 0:
ERROR: "No task JSON files found. Run /workflow:plan first"
EXIT
```
### Step 5.2: Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only minimal necessary context from each artifact:
**From workflow-session.json** (OPTIONAL - Primary Reference for User Intent):
- **ONLY IF EXISTS**: Load user intent context
- Original user prompt/intent (project or description field)
- User's stated goals and objectives
- User's scope definition
- **IF MISSING**: Set user_intent_analysis = "SKIPPED: workflow-session.json not found"
**From planning-notes.md** (OPTIONAL - Constraints & N+1 Context):
- **ONLY IF EXISTS**: Load planning context
- Consolidated Constraints (numbered list from Phase 1-3)
- N+1 Context: Decisions table (Decision | Rationale | Revisit?)
- N+1 Context: Deferred items list
- **IF MISSING**: Set planning_notes_analysis = "SKIPPED: planning-notes.md not found"
**From role analysis documents** (AUTHORITATIVE SOURCE):
- Functional Requirements (IDs, descriptions, acceptance criteria)
- Non-Functional Requirements (IDs, targets)
- Business Requirements (IDs, success metrics)
- Key Architecture Decisions
- Risk factors and mitigation strategies
- Implementation Roadmap (high-level phases)
**From IMPL_PLAN.md**:
- Summary and objectives
- Context Analysis
- Implementation Strategy
- Task Breakdown Summary
- Success Criteria
- Brainstorming Artifacts References (if present)
**From task.json files**:
- Task IDs
- Titles and descriptions
- Status
- Dependencies (depends_on, blocks)
- Context (requirements, focus_paths, acceptance, artifacts)
- Flow control (pre_analysis, implementation_approach)
- Meta (complexity, priority)
### Step 5.3: Build Semantic Models
Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
**Requirements inventory**:
- Each functional/non-functional/business requirement with stable ID
- Requirement text, acceptance criteria, priority
**Architecture decisions inventory**:
- ADRs from synthesis
- Technology choices
- Data model references
**Task coverage mapping**:
- Map each task to one or more requirements (by ID reference or keyword inference)
- Map each requirement to covering tasks
**Dependency graph**:
- Task-to-task dependencies (depends_on, blocks)
- Requirement-level dependencies (from synthesis)
### Step 5.4: Detection Passes (Agent-Driven Multi-Dimensional Analysis)
**Execution Strategy**:
- Single `cli-explore-agent` invocation
- Agent executes multiple CLI analyses internally (different dimensions: A-J)
- Token Budget: 50 findings maximum (aggregate remainder in overflow summary)
- Priority Allocation: CRITICAL (unlimited) → HIGH (15) → MEDIUM (20) → LOW (15)
- Early Exit: If CRITICAL findings > 0 in User Intent/Requirements Coverage, skip LOW/MEDIUM checks
**Execution Order** (Agent orchestrates internally):
1. **Tier 1 (CRITICAL Path)**: A, B, C, I - User intent, coverage, consistency, constraints compliance (full analysis)
2. **Tier 2 (HIGH Priority)**: D, E, J - Dependencies, synthesis alignment, N+1 context validation (limit 15 findings)
3. **Tier 3 (MEDIUM Priority)**: F - Specification quality (limit 20 findings)
4. **Tier 4 (LOW Priority)**: G, H - Duplication, feasibility (limit 15 findings)
---
#### Step 5.4.1: Launch Unified Verification Agent
```javascript
Task(
subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
run_in_background=false,
description="Multi-dimensional plan verification",
prompt=`
## Plan Verification Task
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
1. Read: ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-verify-agent-schema.json (dimensions & rules)
2. Read: ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/verify-json-schema.json (output schema)
3. Read: ${session_file} (user intent)
4. Read: ${PLANNING_NOTES} (constraints & N+1 context)
5. Read: ${IMPL_PLAN} (implementation plan)
6. Glob: ${task_dir}/*.json (task files)
7. Glob: ${SYNTHESIS_DIR}/*/analysis.md (role analyses)
### Execution Flow
**Load schema → Execute tiered CLI analysis → Aggregate findings → Write JSON**
FOR each tier in [1, 2, 3, 4]:
- Load tier config from plan-verify-agent-schema.json
- Execute: ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Verify dimensions {tier.dimensions}
TASK: {tier.checks from schema}
CONTEXT: @${session_dir}/**/*
EXPECTED: Findings JSON with dimension, severity, location, summary, recommendation
CONSTRAINTS: Limit {tier.limit} findings
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule {tier.rule}
- Parse findings, check early exit condition
- IF tier == 1 AND critical_count > 0: skip tier 3-4
### Output
Write: ${process_dir}/verification-findings.json (follow verify-json-schema.json)
Return: Quality gate decision + 2-3 sentence summary
`
)
```
---
#### Step 5.4.2: Load and Organize Findings
```javascript
// Load findings (single parse for all subsequent use)
const data = JSON.parse(Read(`${process_dir}/verification-findings.json`))
const { session_id, timestamp, verification_tiers_completed, findings, summary } = data
const { critical_count, high_count, medium_count, low_count, total_findings, coverage_percentage, recommendation } = summary
// Group by severity and dimension
const bySeverity = Object.groupBy(findings, f => f.severity)
const byDimension = Object.groupBy(findings, f => f.dimension)
// Dimension metadata (from schema)
const DIMS = {
A: "User Intent Alignment", B: "Requirements Coverage", C: "Consistency Validation",
D: "Dependency Integrity", E: "Synthesis Alignment", F: "Task Specification Quality",
G: "Duplication Detection", H: "Feasibility Assessment",
I: "Constraints Compliance", J: "N+1 Context Validation"
}
```
### Step 5.5: Generate Report
```javascript
// Helper: render dimension section
const renderDimension = (dim) => {
const items = byDimension[dim] || []
return items.length > 0
? items.map(f => `### ${f.id}: ${f.summary}\n- **Severity**: ${f.severity}\n- **Location**: ${f.location.join(', ')}\n- **Recommendation**: ${f.recommendation}`).join('\n\n')
: `> No ${DIMS[dim]} issues detected.`
}
// Helper: render severity section
const renderSeverity = (severity, impact) => {
const items = bySeverity[severity] || []
return items.length > 0
? items.map(f => `#### ${f.id}: ${f.summary}\n- **Dimension**: ${f.dimension_name}\n- **Location**: ${f.location.join(', ')}\n- **Impact**: ${impact}\n- **Recommendation**: ${f.recommendation}`).join('\n\n')
: `> No ${severity.toLowerCase()}-severity issues detected.`
}
// Build Markdown report
const fullReport = `
# Plan Verification Report
**Session**: WFS-${session_id} | **Generated**: ${timestamp}
**Tiers Completed**: ${verification_tiers_completed.join(', ')}
---
## Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Risk Level | ${critical_count > 0 ? 'CRITICAL' : high_count > 0 ? 'HIGH' : medium_count > 0 ? 'MEDIUM' : 'LOW'} | ${critical_count > 0 ? 'RED' : high_count > 0 ? 'ORANGE' : medium_count > 0 ? 'YELLOW' : 'GREEN'} |
| Critical/High/Medium/Low | ${critical_count}/${high_count}/${medium_count}/${low_count} | |
| Coverage | ${coverage_percentage}% | ${coverage_percentage >= 90 ? 'GREEN' : coverage_percentage >= 75 ? 'YELLOW' : 'RED'} |
**Recommendation**: **${recommendation}**
---
## Findings Summary
| ID | Dimension | Severity | Location | Summary |
|----|-----------|----------|----------|---------|
${findings.map(f => `| ${f.id} | ${f.dimension_name} | ${f.severity} | ${f.location.join(', ')} | ${f.summary} |`).join('\n')}
---
## Analysis by Dimension
${['A','B','C','D','E','F','G','H','I','J'].map(d => `### ${d}. ${DIMS[d]}\n\n${renderDimension(d)}`).join('\n\n---\n\n')}
---
## Findings by Severity
### CRITICAL (${critical_count})
${renderSeverity('CRITICAL', 'Blocks execution')}
### HIGH (${high_count})
${renderSeverity('HIGH', 'Fix before execution recommended')}
### MEDIUM (${medium_count})
${renderSeverity('MEDIUM', 'Address during/after implementation')}
### LOW (${low_count})
${renderSeverity('LOW', 'Optional improvement')}
---
## Next Steps
${recommendation === 'BLOCK_EXECUTION' ? 'BLOCK: Fix critical issues then re-verify' :
recommendation === 'PROCEED_WITH_FIXES' ? 'FIX RECOMMENDED: Address high issues then re-verify or execute' :
'READY: Proceed to Skill(skill="workflow-execute")'}
Re-verify: \`/workflow:plan-verify --session ${session_id}\`
Execute: \`Skill(skill="workflow-execute", args="--resume-session=${session_id}")\`
`
// Write report
Write(`${process_dir}/PLAN_VERIFICATION.md`, fullReport)
console.log(`Report: ${process_dir}/PLAN_VERIFICATION.md\n${recommendation} | C:${critical_count} H:${high_count} M:${medium_count} L:${low_count} | Coverage:${coverage_percentage}%`)
```
### Step 5.6: Next Step Selection
```javascript
const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
const canExecute = recommendation !== 'BLOCK_EXECUTION'
// Auto mode
if (autoYes) {
if (canExecute) {
Skill(skill="workflow-execute", args="--yes --resume-session=\"${session_id}\"")
} else {
console.log(`[--yes] BLOCK_EXECUTION - Fix ${critical_count} critical issues first.`)
}
return
}
// Interactive mode - build options based on quality gate
const options = canExecute
? [
{ label: canExecute && recommendation === 'PROCEED_WITH_FIXES' ? "Execute Anyway" : "Execute (Recommended)",
description: "Proceed to Skill(skill=\"workflow-execute\")" },
{ label: "Review Report", description: "Review findings before deciding" },
{ label: "Re-verify", description: "Re-run after manual fixes" }
]
: [
{ label: "Review Report", description: "Review critical issues" },
{ label: "Re-verify", description: "Re-run after fixing issues" }
]
const selection = AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: `Quality gate: ${recommendation}. Next step?`,
header: "Action",
multiSelect: false,
options
}]
})
// Handle selection
if (selection.includes("Execute")) {
Skill(skill="workflow-execute", args="--resume-session=\"${session_id}\"")
} else if (selection === "Re-verify") {
Skill(skill="workflow:plan-verify", args="--session ${session_id}")
}
```
## Output
- **File**: `PLAN_VERIFICATION.md` (verification report with quality gate)
- **File**: `verification-findings.json` (structured findings data)
## Completion
Phase 5 is a terminal phase. Based on quality gate result, user routes to:
- Execute → Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
- Re-verify → Re-run Phase 5
- Review → Manual inspection