feat: convert workflow execute command to standalone skill

Move execute.md from commands/workflow/ to skills/workflow-execute/SKILL.md,
update all references in workflow-plan to use Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
instead of the old /workflow:execute command path.
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-02-13 23:17:37 +08:00
parent 696141ee66
commit 674bdc7866
4 changed files with 917 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,607 @@
---
name: workflow-execute
description: Coordinate agent execution for workflow tasks with automatic session discovery, parallel task processing, and status tracking. Triggers on "workflow:execute".
allowed-tools: Skill, Task, AskUserQuestion, TaskCreate, TaskUpdate, TaskList, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
---
# Workflow Execute
Orchestrates autonomous workflow execution through systematic task discovery, agent coordination, and progress tracking. **Executes entire workflow without user interruption** (except initial session selection if multiple active sessions exist), providing complete context to agents and ensuring proper flow control execution with comprehensive TodoWrite tracking.
**Resume Mode**: When called with `--resume-session` flag, skips discovery phase and directly enters TodoWrite generation and agent execution for the specified session.
## Usage
```bash
# Interactive mode (with confirmations)
/workflow:execute
/workflow:execute --resume-session="WFS-auth"
# Auto mode (skip confirmations, use defaults)
/workflow:execute --yes
/workflow:execute -y
/workflow:execute -y --resume-session="WFS-auth"
# With auto-commit (commit after each task completion)
/workflow:execute --with-commit
/workflow:execute -y --with-commit
/workflow:execute -y --with-commit --resume-session="WFS-auth"
```
## Auto Mode Defaults
When `--yes` or `-y` flag is used:
- **Session Selection**: Automatically selects the first (most recent) active session
- **Completion Choice**: Automatically completes session (runs `/workflow:session:complete --yes`)
When `--with-commit` flag is used:
- **Auto-Commit**: After each agent task completes, commit changes based on summary document
- **Commit Principle**: Minimal commits - only commit files modified by the completed task
- **Commit Message**: Generated from task summary with format: "feat/fix/refactor: {task-title} - {summary}"
**Flag Parsing**:
```javascript
const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
const withCommit = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--with-commit')
```
## Performance Optimization Strategy
**Lazy Loading**: Task JSONs read **on-demand** during execution, not upfront. TODO_LIST.md + IMPL_PLAN.md provide metadata for planning.
**Loading Strategy**:
- **TODO_LIST.md**: Read in Phase 3 (task metadata, status, dependencies for TodoWrite generation)
- **IMPL_PLAN.md**: Check existence in Phase 2 (normal mode), parse execution strategy in Phase 4A
- **Task JSONs**: Lazy loading - read only when task is about to execute (Phase 4B)
## Core Rules
**Complete entire workflow autonomously without user interruption, using TodoWrite for comprehensive progress tracking.**
**Execute all discovered pending tasks until workflow completion or blocking dependency.**
**User-choice completion: When all tasks finished, ask user to choose review or complete.**
**ONE AGENT = ONE TASK JSON: Each agent instance executes exactly one task JSON file - never batch multiple tasks into single agent execution.**
## Core Responsibilities
- **Session Discovery**: Identify and select active workflow sessions
- **Execution Strategy Parsing**: Extract execution model from IMPL_PLAN.md
- **TodoWrite Progress Tracking**: Maintain real-time execution status throughout entire workflow
- **Agent Orchestration**: Coordinate specialized agents with complete context
- **Status Synchronization**: Update task JSON files and workflow state
- **Autonomous Completion**: Continue execution until all tasks complete or reach blocking state
- **Session User-Choice Completion**: Ask user to choose review or complete when all tasks finished
## Execution Philosophy
- **Progress tracking**: Continuous TodoWrite updates throughout entire workflow execution
- **Autonomous completion**: Execute all tasks without user interruption until workflow complete
## Execution Process
```
Normal Mode:
Phase 1: Discovery
├─ Count active sessions
└─ Decision:
├─ count=0 → ERROR: No active sessions
├─ count=1 → Auto-select session → Phase 2
└─ count>1 → AskUserQuestion (max 4 options) → Phase 2
Phase 2: Planning Document Validation
├─ Check IMPL_PLAN.md exists
├─ Check TODO_LIST.md exists
└─ Validate .task/ contains IMPL-*.json files
Phase 3: TodoWrite Generation
├─ Update session status to "active" (Step 0)
├─ Parse TODO_LIST.md for task statuses
├─ Generate TodoWrite for entire workflow
└─ Prepare session context paths
Phase 4: Execution Strategy & Task Execution
├─ Step 4A: Parse execution strategy from IMPL_PLAN.md
└─ Step 4B: Execute tasks with lazy loading
└─ Loop:
├─ Get next in_progress task from TodoWrite
├─ Lazy load task JSON
├─ Launch agent with task context
├─ Mark task completed (update IMPL-*.json status)
│ # Quick fix: Update task status for ccw dashboard
│ # TS=$(date -Iseconds) && jq --arg ts "$TS" '.status="completed" | .status_history=(.status_history // [])+[{"from":"in_progress","to":"completed","changed_at":$ts}]' IMPL-X.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json IMPL-X.json
├─ [with-commit] Commit changes based on summary (minimal principle)
│ # Read summary from .summaries/IMPL-X-summary.md
│ # Extract changed files from summary's "Files Modified" section
│ # Generate commit message: "feat/fix/refactor: {task-title} - {summary}"
│ # git add <changed-files> && git commit -m "<commit-message>"
└─ Advance to next task
Phase 5: Completion
├─ Update task statuses in JSON files
├─ Generate summaries
└─ AskUserQuestion: Choose next step
├─ "Enter Review" → /workflow:review
└─ "Complete Session" → /workflow:session:complete
Resume Mode (--resume-session):
├─ Skip Phase 1 & Phase 2
└─ Entry Point: Phase 3 (TodoWrite Generation)
├─ Update session status to "active" (if not already)
└─ Continue: Phase 4 → Phase 5
```
## Execution Lifecycle
### Phase 1: Discovery
**Applies to**: Normal mode only (skipped in resume mode)
**Purpose**: Find and select active workflow session with user confirmation when multiple sessions exist
**Process**:
#### Step 1.1: Count Active Sessions
```bash
bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
```
#### Step 1.2: Handle Session Selection
**Case A: No Sessions** (count = 0)
```
ERROR: No active workflow sessions found
Run /workflow:plan "task description" to create a session
```
**Case B: Single Session** (count = 1)
```bash
bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename)
```
Auto-select and continue to Phase 2.
**Case C: Multiple Sessions** (count > 1)
List sessions with metadata and prompt user selection:
```bash
bash(for dir in .workflow/active/WFS-*/; do [ -d "$dir" ] || continue; session=$(basename "$dir"); project=$(jq -r '.project // "Unknown"' "${dir}workflow-session.json" 2>/dev/null || echo "Unknown"); total=$(grep -c '^\- \[' "${dir}TODO_LIST.md" 2>/dev/null || echo 0); completed=$(grep -c '^\- \[x\]' "${dir}TODO_LIST.md" 2>/dev/null || echo 0); if [ "$total" -gt 0 ]; then progress=$((completed * 100 / total)); else progress=0; fi; echo "$session | $project | $completed/$total tasks ($progress%)"; done)
```
**Parse --yes flag**:
```javascript
const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
```
**Conditional Selection**:
```javascript
if (autoYes) {
// Auto mode: Select first session (most recent)
const firstSession = sessions[0]
console.log(`[--yes] Auto-selecting session: ${firstSession.id}`)
selectedSessionId = firstSession.id
// Continue to Phase 2
} else {
// Interactive mode: Use AskUserQuestion to present formatted options (max 4 options shown)
// If more than 4 sessions, show most recent 4 with "Other" option for manual input
const sessions = getActiveSessions() // sorted by last modified
const displaySessions = sessions.slice(0, 4)
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "Multiple active sessions detected. Select one:",
header: "Session",
multiSelect: false,
options: displaySessions.map(s => ({
label: s.id,
description: `${s.project} | ${s.progress}`
}))
// Note: User can select "Other" to manually enter session ID
}]
})
}
```
**Input Validation**:
- If user selects from options: Use selected session ID
- If user selects "Other" and provides input: Validate session exists
- If validation fails: Show error and re-prompt or suggest available sessions
Parse user input (supports: number "1", full ID "WFS-auth-system", or partial "auth"), validate selection, and continue to Phase 2.
#### Step 1.3: Load Session Metadata
```bash
bash(cat .workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json)
```
**Output**: Store session metadata in memory
**DO NOT read task JSONs yet** - defer until execution phase (lazy loading)
**Resume Mode**: This entire phase is skipped when `--resume-session="session-id"` flag is provided.
### Phase 2: Planning Document Validation
**Applies to**: Normal mode only (skipped in resume mode)
**Purpose**: Validate planning artifacts exist before execution
**Process**:
1. **Check IMPL_PLAN.md**: Verify file exists (defer detailed parsing to Phase 4A)
2. **Check plan.json**: Verify file exists (structured plan overview, used in Phase 4A)
3. **Check TODO_LIST.md**: Verify file exists (defer reading to Phase 3)
4. **Validate Task Directory**: Ensure `.task/` contains at least one IMPL-*.json file
**Key Optimization**: Only existence checks here. Actual file reading happens in later phases.
**Resume Mode**: This phase is skipped when `--resume-session` flag is provided. Resume mode entry point is Phase 3.
### Phase 3: TodoWrite Generation
**Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes (resume mode entry point)
**Step 0: Update Session Status to Active**
Before generating TodoWrite, update session status from "planning" to "active":
```bash
# Update session status (idempotent - safe to run if already active)
jq '.status = "active" | .execution_started_at = (.execution_started_at // now | todate)' \
.workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json > tmp.json && \
mv tmp.json .workflow/active/${sessionId}/workflow-session.json
```
This ensures the dashboard shows the session as "ACTIVE" during execution.
**Process**:
1. **Create TodoWrite List**: Generate task list from TODO_LIST.md (not from task JSONs)
- Parse TODO_LIST.md to extract all tasks with current statuses
- Identify first pending task with met dependencies
- Generate comprehensive TodoWrite covering entire workflow
2. **Prepare Session Context**: Inject workflow paths for agent use (using provided session-id)
3. **Validate Prerequisites**: Ensure IMPL_PLAN.md and TODO_LIST.md exist and are valid
**Resume Mode Behavior**:
- Load existing TODO_LIST.md directly from `.workflow/active/{session-id}/`
- Extract current progress from TODO_LIST.md
- Generate TodoWrite from TODO_LIST.md state
- Proceed immediately to agent execution (Phase 4)
### Phase 4: Execution Strategy Selection & Task Execution
**Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes
**Step 4A: Parse Execution Strategy (plan.json preferred, IMPL_PLAN.md fallback)**
Prefer `plan.json` (structured) over `IMPL_PLAN.md` (human-readable) for execution strategy:
1. **If plan.json exists**: Read `recommended_execution`, `complexity`, `task_ids[]`, `shared_context`
2. **Fallback to IMPL_PLAN.md**: Read Section 4 to extract execution model
Extract:
- **Execution Model**: Sequential | Parallel | Phased | TDD Cycles
- **Parallelization Opportunities**: Which tasks can run in parallel
- **Serialization Requirements**: Which tasks must run sequentially
- **Critical Path**: Priority execution order
If neither has execution strategy, use intelligent fallback (analyze task structure).
**Step 4B: Execute Tasks with Lazy Loading**
**Key Optimization**: Read task JSON **only when needed** for execution
**Execution Loop Pattern**:
```
while (TODO_LIST.md has pending tasks) {
next_task_id = getTodoWriteInProgressTask()
task_json = Read(.workflow/active/{session}/.task/{next_task_id}.json) // Lazy load
executeTaskWithAgent(task_json)
updateTodoListMarkCompleted(next_task_id)
advanceTodoWriteToNextTask()
}
```
**Execution Process per Task**:
1. **Identify Next Task**: From TodoWrite, get the next `in_progress` task ID
2. **Load Task JSON on Demand**: Read `.task/{task-id}.json` for current task ONLY
3. **Validate Task Structure**: Ensure required fields exist (id, title, description, depends_on, convergence)
4. **Launch Agent**: Invoke specialized agent with complete context including flow control steps
5. **Monitor Progress**: Track agent execution and handle errors without user interruption
6. **Collect Results**: Gather implementation results and outputs
7. **[with-commit] Auto-Commit**: If `--with-commit` flag enabled, commit changes based on summary
- Read summary from `.summaries/{task-id}-summary.md`
- Extract changed files from summary's "Files Modified" section
- Determine commit type from `meta.type` (feature→feat, bugfix→fix, refactor→refactor)
- Generate commit message: "{type}: {task-title} - {summary-first-line}"
- Commit only modified files (minimal principle): `git add <files> && git commit -m "<message>"`
8. **Continue Workflow**: Identify next pending task from TODO_LIST.md and repeat
**Note**: TODO_LIST.md updates are handled by agents (e.g., code-developer.md), not by the orchestrator.
### Phase 5: Completion
**Applies to**: Both normal and resume modes
**Process**:
1. **Update Task Status**: Mark completed tasks in JSON files
2. **Generate Summary**: Create task summary in `.summaries/`
3. **Update TodoWrite**: Mark current task complete, advance to next
4. **Synchronize State**: Update session state and workflow status
5. **Check Workflow Complete**: Verify all tasks are completed
6. **User Choice**: When all tasks finished, ask user to choose next step:
```javascript
// Parse --yes flag
const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
if (autoYes) {
// Auto mode: Complete session automatically
console.log(`[--yes] Auto-selecting: Complete Session`)
Skill(skill="workflow:session:complete", args="--yes")
} else {
// Interactive mode: Ask user
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "All tasks completed. What would you like to do next?",
header: "Next Step",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{
label: "Enter Review",
description: "Run specialized review (security/architecture/quality/action-items)"
},
{
label: "Complete Session",
description: "Archive session and update manifest"
}
]
}]
})
}
```
**Based on user selection**:
- **"Enter Review"**: Execute `/workflow:review`
- **"Complete Session"**: Execute `/workflow:session:complete`
### Post-Completion Expansion
完成后询问用户是否扩展为issue(test/enhance/refactor/doc),选中项调用 `/issue:new "{summary} - {dimension}"`
## Execution Strategy (IMPL_PLAN-Driven)
### Strategy Priority
**IMPL_PLAN-Driven Execution (Recommended)**:
1. **Read IMPL_PLAN.md execution strategy** (Section 4: Implementation Strategy)
2. **Follow explicit guidance**:
- Execution Model (Sequential/Parallel/Phased/TDD)
- Parallelization Opportunities (which tasks can run in parallel)
- Serialization Requirements (which tasks must run sequentially)
- Critical Path (priority execution order)
3. **Use TODO_LIST.md for status tracking** only
4. **IMPL_PLAN decides "HOW"**, workflow-execute implements it
**Intelligent Fallback (When IMPL_PLAN lacks execution details)**:
1. **Analyze task structure**:
- Check `meta.execution_group` in task JSONs
- Analyze `depends_on` relationships
- Understand task complexity and risk
2. **Apply smart defaults**:
- No dependencies + same execution_group → Parallel
- Has dependencies → Sequential (wait for deps)
- Critical/high-risk tasks → Sequential
3. **Conservative approach**: When uncertain, prefer sequential execution
### Execution Models
#### 1. Sequential Execution
**When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Sequential" OR no clear parallelization guidance
**Pattern**: Execute tasks one by one in TODO_LIST order
**TodoWrite**: ONE task marked as `in_progress` at a time
#### 2. Parallel Execution
**When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Parallel" with clear parallelization opportunities
**Pattern**: Execute independent task groups concurrently by launching multiple agent instances
**TodoWrite**: MULTIPLE tasks (in same batch) marked as `in_progress` simultaneously
**Agent Instantiation**: Launch one agent instance per task (respects ONE AGENT = ONE TASK JSON rule)
#### 3. Phased Execution
**When**: IMPL_PLAN specifies "Phased" with phase breakdown
**Pattern**: Execute tasks in phases, respect phase boundaries
**TodoWrite**: Within each phase, follow Sequential or Parallel rules
#### 4. Intelligent Fallback
**When**: IMPL_PLAN lacks execution strategy details
**Pattern**: Analyze task structure and apply smart defaults
**TodoWrite**: Follow Sequential or Parallel rules based on analysis
### Task Status Logic
```
pending + dependencies_met → executable
completed → skip
blocked → skip until dependencies clear
```
## TodoWrite Coordination
### TodoWrite Rules (Unified)
**Rule 1: Initial Creation**
- **Normal Mode**: Generate TodoWrite from discovered pending tasks for entire workflow
- **Resume Mode**: Generate from existing session state and current progress
**Rule 2: In-Progress Task Count (Execution-Model-Dependent)**
- **Sequential execution**: Mark ONLY ONE task as `in_progress` at a time
- **Parallel batch execution**: Mark ALL tasks in current batch as `in_progress` simultaneously
- **Execution group indicator**: Show `[execution_group: group-id]` for parallel tasks
**Rule 3: Status Updates**
- **Immediate Updates**: Update status after each task/batch completion without user interruption
- **Status Synchronization**: Sync with JSON task files after updates
- **Continuous Tracking**: Maintain TodoWrite throughout entire workflow execution until completion
**Rule 4: Workflow Completion Check**
- When all tasks marked `completed`, prompt user to choose review or complete session
### TodoWrite Tool Usage
**Example 1: Sequential Execution**
```javascript
TodoWrite({
todos: [
{
content: "Execute IMPL-1.1: Design auth schema [code-developer] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
status: "in_progress", // ONE task in progress
activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.1: Design auth schema"
},
{
content: "Execute IMPL-1.2: Implement auth logic [code-developer] [FLOW_CONTROL]",
status: "pending",
activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.2: Implement auth logic"
}
]
});
```
**Example 2: Parallel Batch Execution**
```javascript
TodoWrite({
todos: [
{
content: "Execute IMPL-1.1: Build Auth API [code-developer] [execution_group: parallel-auth-api]",
status: "in_progress", // Batch task 1
activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.1: Build Auth API"
},
{
content: "Execute IMPL-1.2: Build User UI [code-developer] [execution_group: parallel-ui-comp]",
status: "in_progress", // Batch task 2 (running concurrently)
activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.2: Build User UI"
},
{
content: "Execute IMPL-1.3: Setup Database [code-developer] [execution_group: parallel-db-schema]",
status: "in_progress", // Batch task 3 (running concurrently)
activeForm: "Executing IMPL-1.3: Setup Database"
},
{
content: "Execute IMPL-2.1: Integration Tests [test-fix-agent] [depends_on: IMPL-1.1, IMPL-1.2, IMPL-1.3]",
status: "pending", // Next batch (waits for current batch completion)
activeForm: "Executing IMPL-2.1: Integration Tests"
}
]
});
```
## Agent Execution Pattern
### Flow Control Execution
**[FLOW_CONTROL]** marker indicates task JSON contains `pre_analysis` steps for context preparation.
**Note**: Orchestrator does NOT execute flow control steps - Agent interprets and executes them autonomously.
### Agent Prompt Template
**Path-Based Invocation**: Pass paths and trigger markers, let agent parse task JSON autonomously.
```bash
Task(subagent_type="{meta.agent}",
run_in_background=false,
prompt="Implement task {task.id}: {task.title}
[FLOW_CONTROL]
**Input**:
- Task JSON: {session.task_json_path}
- Context Package: {session.context_package_path}
**Output Location**:
- Workflow: {session.workflow_dir}
- TODO List: {session.todo_list_path}
- Summaries: {session.summaries_dir}
**Execution**: Read task JSON → Execute pre_analysis → Check execution_config.method → (CLI: handoff to CLI tool | Agent: direct implementation) → Update TODO_LIST.md → Generate summary",
description="Implement: {task.id}")
```
**Key Markers**:
- `Implement` keyword: Triggers tech stack detection and guidelines loading
- `[FLOW_CONTROL]`: Triggers pre_analysis execution
**Why Path-Based**: Agent (code-developer.md) autonomously:
- Reads and parses task JSON (description, convergence, implementation, execution_config)
- Executes pre_analysis steps (Phase 1: context gathering)
- Checks execution_config.method (Phase 2: determine mode)
- CLI mode: Builds handoff prompt and executes via ccw cli with resume strategy
- Agent mode: Directly implements using modification_points and logic_flow
- Generates structured summary with integration points
Embedding task content in prompt creates duplication and conflicts with agent's parsing logic.
### Agent Assignment Rules
```
meta.agent specified → Use specified agent
meta.agent missing → Infer from meta.type:
- "feature" → @code-developer
- "test-gen" → @code-developer
- "test-fix" → @test-fix-agent
- "review" → @universal-executor
- "docs" → @doc-generator
```
## Workflow File Structure Reference
```
.workflow/active/WFS-[topic-slug]/
├── workflow-session.json # Session state and metadata
├── plan.json # Structured plan overview (machine-readable)
├── IMPL_PLAN.md # Planning document and requirements (human-readable)
├── TODO_LIST.md # Progress tracking (updated by agents)
├── .task/ # Task definitions (JSON only)
│ ├── IMPL-1.json # Main task definitions
│ └── IMPL-1.1.json # Subtask definitions
├── .summaries/ # Task completion summaries
│ ├── IMPL-1-summary.md # Task completion details
│ └── IMPL-1.1-summary.md # Subtask completion details
└── .process/ # Planning artifacts
├── context-package.json # Smart context package
└── ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md # Planning analysis results
```
## Error Handling & Recovery
### Common Errors & Recovery
| Error Type | Cause | Recovery Strategy | Max Attempts |
|-----------|-------|------------------|--------------|
| **Discovery Errors** |
| No active session | No sessions in `.workflow/active/` | Create or resume session: `/workflow:plan "project"` | N/A |
| Multiple sessions | Multiple sessions in `.workflow/active/` | Prompt user selection | N/A |
| Corrupted session | Invalid JSON files | Recreate session structure or validate files | N/A |
| **Execution Errors** |
| Agent failure | Agent crash/timeout | Retry with simplified context | 2 |
| Flow control error | Command failure | Skip optional, fail critical | 1 per step |
| Context loading error | Missing dependencies | Reload from JSON, use defaults | 3 |
| JSON file corruption | File system issues | Restore from backup/recreate | 1 |
### Error Prevention
- **Pre-flight Checks**: Validate session integrity before execution
- **Backup Strategy**: Create task snapshots before major operations
- **Atomic Updates**: Update JSON files atomically to prevent corruption
- **Dependency Validation**: Check all depends_on references exist
- **Context Verification**: Ensure all required context is available
## Auto-Commit Mode (--with-commit)
**Behavior**: After each agent task completes, automatically commit changes based on summary document.
**Minimal Principle**: Only commit files modified by the completed task.
**Commit Message Format**: `{type}: {task-title} - {summary}`
**Type Mapping** (from `meta.type`):
- `feature``feat` | `bugfix``fix` | `refactor``refactor`
- `test-gen``test` | `docs``docs` | `review``chore`
**Implementation**:
```bash
# 1. Read summary from .summaries/{task-id}-summary.md
# 2. Extract files from "Files Modified" section
# 3. Commit: git add <files> && git commit -m "{type}: {title} - {summary}"
```
**Error Handling**: Skip commit on no changes/missing summary, log errors, continue workflow.
## Related Skills
**Prerequisite Skills**:
- `/workflow:plan` - Generate implementation plan and task JSONs
**Called During Execution**:
- `/workflow:session:complete` - Archive session after all tasks complete
- `/workflow:review` - Post-implementation review
**Follow-up Skills**:
- `/issue:new` - Create follow-up issues (test/enhance/refactor/doc)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
---
name: workflow-plan
description: Unified planning skill - 4-phase planning workflow, plan verification, and interactive replanning. Triggers on "workflow:plan", "workflow:plan-verify", "workflow:replan".
allowed-tools: Skill, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
---
# Workflow Plan
Unified planning skill combining 4-phase planning workflow, plan quality verification, and interactive replanning. Produces IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, verification reports, and manages plan lifecycle through session-level artifact updates.
## Architecture Overview
```
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Workflow Plan Orchestrator (SKILL.md) │
│ → Route by mode: plan | verify | replan │
│ → Pure coordinator: Execute phases, parse outputs, pass context │
└──────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────┘
┌───────────────────────┼───────────────────────┐
↓ ↓ ↓
┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ Plan Mode │ │ Verify │ │ Replan │
│ (default) │ │ Mode │ │ Mode │
│ Phase 1-4 │ │ Phase 5 │ │ Phase 6 │
└─────┬─────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘
┌───┼───┬───┐
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
┌───┐┌───┐┌───┐┌───┐
│ 1 ││ 2 ││ 3 ││ 4 │
│Ses││Ctx││Con││Gen│
└───┘└───┘└───┘└─┬─┘
┌───────────┐
│ Confirm │─── Verify ──→ Phase 5
│ (choice) │─── Execute ─→ Skill("workflow-execute")
└───────────┘─── Review ──→ /workflow:status
```
## Key Design Principles
1. **Pure Orchestrator**: SKILL.md routes and coordinates only; execution detail lives in phase files
2. **Progressive Phase Loading**: Read phase docs ONLY when that phase is about to execute
3. **Multi-Mode Routing**: Single skill handles plan/verify/replan via mode detection
4. **Task Attachment Model**: Sub-command tasks are ATTACHED, executed sequentially, then COLLAPSED
5. **Auto-Continue**: After each phase completes, automatically execute next pending phase
6. **Accumulated State**: planning-notes.md carries context across phases for N+1 decisions
## Auto Mode
When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-continue all phases (skip confirmations), use recommended conflict resolutions, use safe defaults for replan.
## Mode Detection
```javascript
const args = $ARGUMENTS
const mode = detectMode(args)
function detectMode(args) {
// Skill trigger determines mode
if (skillName === 'workflow:plan-verify') return 'verify'
if (skillName === 'workflow:replan') return 'replan'
return 'plan' // default: workflow:plan
}
```
## Execution Flow
### Plan Mode (default)
```
Input Parsing:
└─ Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
Phase 1: Session Discovery
└─ Ref: phases/01-session-discovery.md
└─ Output: sessionId (WFS-xxx), planning-notes.md
Phase 2: Context Gathering
└─ Ref: phases/02-context-gathering.md
├─ Tasks attached: Analyze structure → Identify integration → Generate package
└─ Output: contextPath + conflictRisk
Phase 3: Conflict Resolution (conditional: conflictRisk ≥ medium)
└─ Decision (conflictRisk check):
├─ conflictRisk ≥ medium → Ref: phases/03-conflict-resolution.md
│ ├─ Tasks attached: Detect conflicts → Present to user → Apply strategies
│ └─ Output: Modified brainstorm artifacts
└─ conflictRisk < medium → Skip to Phase 4
Phase 4: Task Generation
└─ Ref: phases/04-task-generation.md
└─ Output: IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
Plan Confirmation (User Decision Gate):
└─ Decision (user choice):
├─ "Verify Plan Quality" (Recommended) → Route to Phase 5 (plan-verify)
├─ "Start Execution" → Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
└─ "Review Status Only" → Route to /workflow:status
```
### Verify Mode
```
Phase 5: Plan Verification
└─ Ref: phases/05-plan-verify.md
└─ Output: PLAN_VERIFICATION.md with quality gate recommendation
```
### Replan Mode
```
Phase 6: Interactive Replan
└─ Ref: phases/06-replan.md
└─ Output: Updated IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
```
**Phase Reference Documents** (read on-demand when phase executes):
| Phase | Document | Purpose | Mode |
|-------|----------|---------|------|
| 1 | [phases/01-session-discovery.md](phases/01-session-discovery.md) | Create or discover workflow session | plan |
| 2 | [phases/02-context-gathering.md](phases/02-context-gathering.md) | Gather project context and analyze codebase | plan |
| 3 | [phases/03-conflict-resolution.md](phases/03-conflict-resolution.md) | Detect and resolve conflicts (conditional) | plan |
| 4 | [phases/04-task-generation.md](phases/04-task-generation.md) | Generate implementation plan and task JSONs | plan |
| 5 | [phases/05-plan-verify.md](phases/05-plan-verify.md) | Read-only verification with quality gate | verify |
| 6 | [phases/06-replan.md](phases/06-replan.md) | Interactive replanning with boundary clarification | replan |
## Core Rules
1. **Start Immediately**: First action is mode detection + TodoWrite initialization, second action is phase execution
2. **No Preliminary Analysis**: Do not read files, analyze structure, or gather context before Phase 1
3. **Parse Every Output**: Extract required data from each phase output for next phase
4. **Auto-Continue via TodoList**: Check TodoList status to execute next pending phase automatically
5. **Track Progress**: Update TodoWrite dynamically with task attachment/collapse pattern
6. **Task Attachment Model**: Skill execute **attaches** sub-tasks to current workflow. Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks itself, then **collapses** them after completion
7. **Progressive Phase Loading**: Read phase docs ONLY when that phase is about to execute
8. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After executing all attached tasks, immediately collapse them and execute next phase
## Input Processing
**Convert User Input to Structured Format**:
1. **Simple Text** → Structure it:
```
User: "Build authentication system"
Structured:
GOAL: Build authentication system
SCOPE: Core authentication features
CONTEXT: New implementation
```
2. **Detailed Text** → Extract components:
```
User: "Add JWT authentication with email/password login and token refresh"
Structured:
GOAL: Implement JWT-based authentication
SCOPE: Email/password login, token generation, token refresh endpoints
CONTEXT: JWT token-based security, refresh token rotation
```
3. **File Reference** (e.g., `requirements.md`) → Read and structure:
- Read file content
- Extract goal, scope, requirements
- Format into structured description
## Data Flow
### Plan Mode
```
User Input (task description)
[Convert to Structured Format]
↓ Structured Description:
↓ GOAL: [objective]
↓ SCOPE: [boundaries]
↓ CONTEXT: [background]
Phase 1: session:start --auto "structured-description"
↓ Output: sessionId
↓ Write: planning-notes.md (User Intent section)
Phase 2: context-gather --session sessionId "structured-description"
↓ Input: sessionId + structured description
↓ Output: contextPath (context-package.json) + conflictRisk
↓ Update: planning-notes.md (Context Findings + Consolidated Constraints)
Phase 3: conflict-resolution [conditional: conflictRisk ≥ medium]
↓ Input: sessionId + contextPath + conflictRisk
↓ Output: Modified brainstorm artifacts
↓ Update: planning-notes.md (Conflict Decisions + Consolidated Constraints)
↓ Skip if conflictRisk is none/low → proceed directly to Phase 4
Phase 4: task-generate-agent --session sessionId
↓ Input: sessionId + planning-notes.md + context-package.json + brainstorm artifacts
↓ Output: IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, TODO_LIST.md
Plan Confirmation (User Decision Gate):
├─ "Verify Plan Quality" (Recommended) → Route to Phase 5
├─ "Start Execution" → Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
└─ "Review Status Only" → Route to /workflow:status
```
**Session Memory Flow**: Each phase receives session ID, which provides access to:
- Previous task summaries
- Existing context and analysis
- Brainstorming artifacts (potentially modified by Phase 3)
- Session-specific configuration
### Verify Mode
```
Input: --session sessionId (or auto-detect)
Phase 5: Load artifacts → Agent-driven verification → Generate report
↓ Output: PLAN_VERIFICATION.md with quality gate
```
### Replan Mode
```
Input: [--session sessionId] [task-id] "requirements"
Phase 6: Mode detection → Clarification → Impact analysis → Backup → Apply → Verify
↓ Output: Updated artifacts + change summary
```
## TodoWrite Pattern
**Core Concept**: Dynamic task attachment and collapse for real-time visibility into workflow execution.
### Key Principles
1. **Task Attachment** (when phase executed):
- Sub-tasks are **attached** to orchestrator's TodoWrite
- **Phase 2, 3**: Multiple sub-tasks attached
- **Phase 1, 4**: Single task (atomic)
- First attached task marked as `in_progress`, others as `pending`
- Orchestrator **executes** these attached tasks sequentially
2. **Task Collapse** (after sub-tasks complete):
- **Applies to Phase 2, 3**: Remove detailed sub-tasks from TodoWrite
- **Collapse** to high-level phase summary
- **Phase 1, 4**: No collapse needed (single task, just mark completed)
- Maintains clean orchestrator-level view
3. **Continuous Execution**: After completion, automatically proceed to next pending phase
**Lifecycle**: Initial pending → Phase executed (tasks ATTACHED) → Sub-tasks executed → Phase completed (tasks COLLAPSED for 2/3, marked completed for 1/4) → Next phase → Repeat
### Phase 2 (Tasks Attached):
```json
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Analyze codebase structure", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Identify integration points", "status": "pending"},
{"content": " → Generate context package", "status": "pending"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending"}
]
```
### Phase 2 (Collapsed):
```json
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending"}
]
```
### Phase 3 (Tasks Attached, conditional):
```json
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed"},
{"content": "Phase 3: Conflict Resolution", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Detect conflicts with CLI analysis", "status": "in_progress"},
{"content": " → Present conflicts to user", "status": "pending"},
{"content": " → Apply resolution strategies", "status": "pending"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "pending"}
]
```
**Note**: See individual Phase descriptions for detailed TodoWrite Update examples.
## Post-Phase Updates
After each phase completes, update planning-notes.md:
- **After Phase 1**: Initialize with user intent (GOAL, KEY_CONSTRAINTS)
- **After Phase 2**: Add context findings (CRITICAL_FILES, ARCHITECTURE, CONFLICT_RISK, CONSTRAINTS)
- **After Phase 3**: Add conflict decisions (RESOLVED, MODIFIED_ARTIFACTS, CONSTRAINTS) if executed
- **Memory State Check**: After heavy phases (Phase 2-3), evaluate context window usage; if high (>120K tokens), trigger `compact`
See phase files for detailed update code.
## Error Handling
- **Parsing Failure**: If output parsing fails, retry command once, then report error
- **Validation Failure**: If validation fails, report which file/data is missing
- **Command Failure**: Keep phase `in_progress`, report error to user, do not proceed to next phase
- **Session Not Found** (verify/replan): Report error with available sessions list
- **Task Not Found** (replan): Report error with available tasks list
## Coordinator Checklist
### Plan Mode
- **Pre-Phase**: Convert user input to structured format (GOAL/SCOPE/CONTEXT)
- Initialize TodoWrite before any command (Phase 3 added dynamically after Phase 2)
- Execute Phase 1 immediately with structured description
- Parse session ID from Phase 1 output, store in memory
- Pass session ID and structured description to Phase 2 command
- Parse context path from Phase 2 output, store in memory
- **Extract conflictRisk from context-package.json**: Determine Phase 3 execution
- **If conflictRisk ≥ medium**: Launch Phase 3 conflict-resolution with sessionId and contextPath
- Wait for Phase 3 to finish executing (if executed), verify conflict-resolution.json created
- **If conflictRisk is none/low**: Skip Phase 3, proceed directly to Phase 4
- Pass session ID to Phase 4 command
- Verify all Phase 4 outputs
- **Plan Confirmation Gate**: Present user with choice (Verify → Phase 5 / Execute / Review Status)
- **If user selects Verify**: Read phases/05-plan-verify.md, execute Phase 5 in-process
- **If user selects Execute**: Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
- **If user selects Review**: Route to /workflow:status
- **Auto mode (--yes)**: Auto-select "Verify Plan Quality", then auto-continue to execute if PROCEED
- Update TodoWrite after each phase
- After each phase, automatically continue to next phase based on TodoList status
### Verify Mode
- Detect/validate session (from --session flag or auto-detect)
- Initialize TodoWrite with single verification task
- Execute Phase 5 verification agent
- Present quality gate result and next step options
### Replan Mode
- Parse flags (--session, --interactive, task-id)
- Detect operation mode (task vs session)
- Initialize TodoWrite with replan-specific tasks
- Execute Phase 6 through all sub-phases (clarification → impact → backup → apply → verify)
## Structure Template Reference
**Minimal Structure**:
```
GOAL: [What to achieve]
SCOPE: [What's included]
CONTEXT: [Relevant info]
```
**Detailed Structure** (optional, when more context available):
```
GOAL: [Primary objective]
SCOPE: [Included features/components]
CONTEXT: [Existing system, constraints, dependencies]
REQUIREMENTS: [Specific technical requirements]
CONSTRAINTS: [Limitations or boundaries]
```
## Related Skills
**Prerequisite Skills**:
- `/workflow:brainstorm:artifacts` - Optional: Generate role-based analyses before planning
- `/workflow:brainstorm:synthesis` - Optional: Refine brainstorm analyses with clarifications
**Called by Plan Mode** (4 phases):
- `/workflow:session:start` - Phase 1: Create or discover workflow session
- `/workflow:tools:context-gather` - Phase 2: Gather project context and analyze codebase
- `/workflow:tools:conflict-resolution` - Phase 3: Detect and resolve conflicts (conditional)
- `/compact` - Phase 3: Memory optimization (if context approaching limits)
- `/workflow:tools:task-generate-agent` - Phase 4: Generate task JSON files
**Follow-up Skills**:
- `/workflow:plan-verify` - Verify plan quality (can also invoke via verify mode)
- `/workflow:status` - Review task breakdown and current progress
- `Skill(skill="workflow-execute")` - Begin implementation of generated tasks (skill: workflow-execute)
- `/workflow:replan` - Modify plan (can also invoke via replan mode)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
# Phase 4: Task Generation
Generate implementation plan and task JSONs via action-planning-agent.
## Objective
- Generate IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, and TODO_LIST.md
- Present user with plan confirmation choices (verify / execute / review)
- Route to Phase 5 (verify) if user selects verification
## Relationship with Brainstorm Phase
- If brainstorm role analyses exist ([role]/analysis.md files), they are incorporated as input
- **User's original intent is ALWAYS primary**: New or refined user goals override brainstorm recommendations
- **Role analysis.md files define "WHAT"**: Requirements, design specs, role-specific insights
- **IMPL_PLAN.md defines "HOW"**: Executable task breakdown, dependencies, implementation sequence
- Task generation translates high-level role analyses into concrete, actionable work items
- **Intent priority**: Current user prompt > role analysis.md files > guidance-specification.md
## Execution
### Step 4.1: Execute Task Generation
```javascript
Skill(skill="workflow:tools:task-generate-agent", args="--session [sessionId]")
```
**CLI Execution Note**: CLI tool usage is now determined semantically by action-planning-agent based on user's task description. If user specifies "use Codex/Gemini/Qwen for X", CLI tool usage is controlled by `meta.execution_config.method` per task, not by `command` fields in implementation steps.
**Input**:
- `sessionId` from Phase 1
- **planning-notes.md**: Consolidated constraints from all phases (Phase 1-3)
- Path: `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/planning-notes.md`
- Contains: User intent, context findings, conflict decisions, consolidated constraints
- **Purpose**: Provides structured, minimal context summary to action-planning-agent
**Validation**:
- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/plan.json` exists (structured plan overview)
- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/IMPL_PLAN.md` exists
- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/.task/IMPL-*.json` exists (at least one)
- `.workflow/active/[sessionId]/TODO_LIST.md` exists
### TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 Skill executed - agent task attached)
```json
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
]
```
**Note**: Single agent task attached. Agent autonomously completes discovery, planning, and output generation internally.
### TodoWrite Update (Phase 4 completed)
```json
[
{"content": "Phase 1: Session Discovery", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing session discovery"},
{"content": "Phase 2: Context Gathering", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing context gathering"},
{"content": "Phase 4: Task Generation", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Executing task generation"}
]
```
**Note**: Agent task completed. No collapse needed (single task).
### Step 4.2: Plan Confirmation (User Decision Gate)
After Phase 4 completes, present user with action choices:
```javascript
console.log(`
Planning complete for session: ${sessionId}
Tasks generated: ${taskCount}
Plan: .workflow/active/${sessionId}/IMPL_PLAN.md
`);
// Ask user for next action
const userChoice = AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "Planning complete. What would you like to do next?",
header: "Next Action",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{
label: "Verify Plan Quality (Recommended)",
description: "Run quality verification to catch issues before execution. Checks plan structure, task dependencies, and completeness."
},
{
label: "Start Execution",
description: "Begin implementing tasks immediately. Use this if you've already reviewed the plan or want to start quickly."
},
{
label: "Review Status Only",
description: "View task breakdown and session status without taking further action. You can decide what to do next manually."
}
]
}]
});
// Execute based on user choice
if (userChoice.answers["Next Action"] === "Verify Plan Quality (Recommended)") {
console.log("\nStarting plan verification...\n");
// Route to Phase 5 (plan-verify) within this skill
// Orchestrator reads phases/05-plan-verify.md and executes
} else if (userChoice.answers["Next Action"] === "Start Execution") {
console.log("\nStarting task execution...\n");
Skill(skill="workflow-execute", args="--session " + sessionId);
} else if (userChoice.answers["Next Action"] === "Review Status Only") {
console.log("\nDisplaying session status...\n");
Skill(skill="workflow:status", args="--session " + sessionId);
}
```
**Auto Mode (--yes)**: Auto-select "Verify Plan Quality", then auto-continue to execute if quality gate is PROCEED.
**Return to Orchestrator**: Based on user's choice:
- **Verify** → Orchestrator reads phases/05-plan-verify.md and executes Phase 5 in-process
- **Execute** → Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
- **Review** → Route to /workflow:status
## Output
- **File**: `IMPL_PLAN.md` (implementation plan)
- **File**: `IMPL-*.json` (task JSON files)
- **File**: `TODO_LIST.md` (task list)
- **File**: `plan.json` (structured plan overview)
- **TodoWrite**: Mark Phase 4 completed
## Next Phase (Conditional)
Based on user's plan confirmation choice:
- If "Verify" → [Phase 5: Plan Verification](05-plan-verify.md)
- If "Execute" → Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
- If "Review" → External: /workflow:status

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,388 @@
# Phase 5: Plan Verification
Perform READ-ONLY verification analysis between IMPL_PLAN.md, task JSONs, and brainstorming artifacts. Generates structured report with quality gate recommendation. Does NOT modify any source files.
## Objective
- Generate comprehensive verification report identifying inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities
- Produce quality gate recommendation (BLOCK_EXECUTION / PROCEED_WITH_FIXES / PROCEED_WITH_CAUTION / PROCEED)
- Route to next action based on quality gate result
## Entry Points
- **From Plan Mode**: After Phase 4 completes, user selects "Verify Plan Quality"
- **From Verify Mode**: Directly triggered via `/workflow:plan-verify`
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Operating Constraints
**STRICTLY READ-ONLY FOR SOURCE ARTIFACTS**:
- **MUST NOT** modify `IMPL_PLAN.md`, any `task.json` files, or brainstorming artifacts
- **MUST NOT** create or delete task files
- **MUST ONLY** write the verification report to `.process/PLAN_VERIFICATION.md`
**Synthesis Authority**: The `role analysis documents` are **authoritative** for requirements and design decisions. Any conflicts between IMPL_PLAN/tasks and synthesis are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the plan/tasks—not reinterpretation of requirements.
**Quality Gate Authority**: The verification report provides a binding recommendation based on objective severity criteria. User MUST review critical/high issues before proceeding with implementation.
## Execution
### Step 5.1: Initialize Analysis Context
```bash
# Detect active workflow session
IF --session parameter provided:
session_id = provided session
ELSE:
# Auto-detect active session
active_sessions = bash(find .workflow/active/ -name "WFS-*" -type d 2>/dev/null)
IF active_sessions is empty:
ERROR: "No active workflow session found. Use --session <session-id>"
EXIT
ELSE IF active_sessions has multiple entries:
# Use most recently modified session
session_id = bash(ls -td .workflow/active/WFS-*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1 | xargs basename)
ELSE:
session_id = basename(active_sessions[0])
# Derive absolute paths
session_dir = .workflow/active/WFS-{session}
brainstorm_dir = session_dir/.brainstorming
task_dir = session_dir/.task
process_dir = session_dir/.process
session_file = session_dir/workflow-session.json
# Create .process directory if not exists (report output location)
IF NOT EXISTS(process_dir):
bash(mkdir -p "{process_dir}")
# Validate required artifacts
# Note: "role analysis documents" refers to [role]/analysis.md files (e.g., product-manager/analysis.md)
SYNTHESIS_DIR = brainstorm_dir # Contains role analysis files: */analysis.md
IMPL_PLAN = session_dir/IMPL_PLAN.md
TASK_FILES = Glob(task_dir/*.json)
PLANNING_NOTES = session_dir/planning-notes.md # N+1 context and constraints
# Abort if missing - in order of dependency
SESSION_FILE_EXISTS = EXISTS(session_file)
IF NOT SESSION_FILE_EXISTS:
WARNING: "workflow-session.json not found. User intent alignment verification will be skipped."
# Continue execution - this is optional context, not blocking
PLANNING_NOTES_EXISTS = EXISTS(PLANNING_NOTES)
IF NOT PLANNING_NOTES_EXISTS:
WARNING: "planning-notes.md not found. Constraints/N+1 context verification will be skipped."
# Continue execution - optional context
SYNTHESIS_FILES = Glob(brainstorm_dir/*/analysis.md)
IF SYNTHESIS_FILES.count == 0:
WARNING: "No role analysis documents found in .brainstorming/*/analysis.md. Synthesis-based dimensions (E, G) will use reduced coverage."
SYNTHESIS_AVAILABLE = false
# Continue execution - brainstorm artifacts are optional for direct planning workflows
ELSE:
SYNTHESIS_AVAILABLE = true
IF NOT EXISTS(IMPL_PLAN):
ERROR: "IMPL_PLAN.md not found. Run /workflow:plan first"
EXIT
IF TASK_FILES.count == 0:
ERROR: "No task JSON files found. Run /workflow:plan first"
EXIT
```
### Step 5.2: Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only minimal necessary context from each artifact:
**From workflow-session.json** (OPTIONAL - Primary Reference for User Intent):
- **ONLY IF EXISTS**: Load user intent context
- Original user prompt/intent (project or description field)
- User's stated goals and objectives
- User's scope definition
- **IF MISSING**: Set user_intent_analysis = "SKIPPED: workflow-session.json not found"
**From planning-notes.md** (OPTIONAL - Constraints & N+1 Context):
- **ONLY IF EXISTS**: Load planning context
- Consolidated Constraints (numbered list from Phase 1-3)
- N+1 Context: Decisions table (Decision | Rationale | Revisit?)
- N+1 Context: Deferred items list
- **IF MISSING**: Set planning_notes_analysis = "SKIPPED: planning-notes.md not found"
**From role analysis documents** (AUTHORITATIVE SOURCE):
- Functional Requirements (IDs, descriptions, acceptance criteria)
- Non-Functional Requirements (IDs, targets)
- Business Requirements (IDs, success metrics)
- Key Architecture Decisions
- Risk factors and mitigation strategies
- Implementation Roadmap (high-level phases)
**From IMPL_PLAN.md**:
- Summary and objectives
- Context Analysis
- Implementation Strategy
- Task Breakdown Summary
- Success Criteria
- Brainstorming Artifacts References (if present)
**From task.json files**:
- Task IDs
- Titles and descriptions
- Status
- Dependencies (depends_on, blocks)
- Context (requirements, focus_paths, acceptance, artifacts)
- Flow control (pre_analysis, implementation_approach)
- Meta (complexity, priority)
### Step 5.3: Build Semantic Models
Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
**Requirements inventory**:
- Each functional/non-functional/business requirement with stable ID
- Requirement text, acceptance criteria, priority
**Architecture decisions inventory**:
- ADRs from synthesis
- Technology choices
- Data model references
**Task coverage mapping**:
- Map each task to one or more requirements (by ID reference or keyword inference)
- Map each requirement to covering tasks
**Dependency graph**:
- Task-to-task dependencies (depends_on, blocks)
- Requirement-level dependencies (from synthesis)
### Step 5.4: Detection Passes (Agent-Driven Multi-Dimensional Analysis)
**Execution Strategy**:
- Single `cli-explore-agent` invocation
- Agent executes multiple CLI analyses internally (different dimensions: A-J)
- Token Budget: 50 findings maximum (aggregate remainder in overflow summary)
- Priority Allocation: CRITICAL (unlimited) → HIGH (15) → MEDIUM (20) → LOW (15)
- Early Exit: If CRITICAL findings > 0 in User Intent/Requirements Coverage, skip LOW/MEDIUM checks
**Execution Order** (Agent orchestrates internally):
1. **Tier 1 (CRITICAL Path)**: A, B, C, I - User intent, coverage, consistency, constraints compliance (full analysis)
2. **Tier 2 (HIGH Priority)**: D, E, J - Dependencies, synthesis alignment, N+1 context validation (limit 15 findings)
3. **Tier 3 (MEDIUM Priority)**: F - Specification quality (limit 20 findings)
4. **Tier 4 (LOW Priority)**: G, H - Duplication, feasibility (limit 15 findings)
---
#### Step 5.4.1: Launch Unified Verification Agent
```javascript
Task(
subagent_type="cli-explore-agent",
run_in_background=false,
description="Multi-dimensional plan verification",
prompt=`
## Plan Verification Task
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
1. Read: ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/plan-verify-agent-schema.json (dimensions & rules)
2. Read: ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/verify-json-schema.json (output schema)
3. Read: ${session_file} (user intent)
4. Read: ${PLANNING_NOTES} (constraints & N+1 context)
5. Read: ${IMPL_PLAN} (implementation plan)
6. Glob: ${task_dir}/*.json (task files)
7. Glob: ${SYNTHESIS_DIR}/*/analysis.md (role analyses)
### Execution Flow
**Load schema → Execute tiered CLI analysis → Aggregate findings → Write JSON**
FOR each tier in [1, 2, 3, 4]:
- Load tier config from plan-verify-agent-schema.json
- Execute: ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Verify dimensions {tier.dimensions}
TASK: {tier.checks from schema}
CONTEXT: @${session_dir}/**/*
EXPECTED: Findings JSON with dimension, severity, location, summary, recommendation
CONSTRAINTS: Limit {tier.limit} findings
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule {tier.rule}
- Parse findings, check early exit condition
- IF tier == 1 AND critical_count > 0: skip tier 3-4
### Output
Write: ${process_dir}/verification-findings.json (follow verify-json-schema.json)
Return: Quality gate decision + 2-3 sentence summary
`
)
```
---
#### Step 5.4.2: Load and Organize Findings
```javascript
// Load findings (single parse for all subsequent use)
const data = JSON.parse(Read(`${process_dir}/verification-findings.json`))
const { session_id, timestamp, verification_tiers_completed, findings, summary } = data
const { critical_count, high_count, medium_count, low_count, total_findings, coverage_percentage, recommendation } = summary
// Group by severity and dimension
const bySeverity = Object.groupBy(findings, f => f.severity)
const byDimension = Object.groupBy(findings, f => f.dimension)
// Dimension metadata (from schema)
const DIMS = {
A: "User Intent Alignment", B: "Requirements Coverage", C: "Consistency Validation",
D: "Dependency Integrity", E: "Synthesis Alignment", F: "Task Specification Quality",
G: "Duplication Detection", H: "Feasibility Assessment",
I: "Constraints Compliance", J: "N+1 Context Validation"
}
```
### Step 5.5: Generate Report
```javascript
// Helper: render dimension section
const renderDimension = (dim) => {
const items = byDimension[dim] || []
return items.length > 0
? items.map(f => `### ${f.id}: ${f.summary}\n- **Severity**: ${f.severity}\n- **Location**: ${f.location.join(', ')}\n- **Recommendation**: ${f.recommendation}`).join('\n\n')
: `> No ${DIMS[dim]} issues detected.`
}
// Helper: render severity section
const renderSeverity = (severity, impact) => {
const items = bySeverity[severity] || []
return items.length > 0
? items.map(f => `#### ${f.id}: ${f.summary}\n- **Dimension**: ${f.dimension_name}\n- **Location**: ${f.location.join(', ')}\n- **Impact**: ${impact}\n- **Recommendation**: ${f.recommendation}`).join('\n\n')
: `> No ${severity.toLowerCase()}-severity issues detected.`
}
// Build Markdown report
const fullReport = `
# Plan Verification Report
**Session**: WFS-${session_id} | **Generated**: ${timestamp}
**Tiers Completed**: ${verification_tiers_completed.join(', ')}
---
## Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Risk Level | ${critical_count > 0 ? 'CRITICAL' : high_count > 0 ? 'HIGH' : medium_count > 0 ? 'MEDIUM' : 'LOW'} | ${critical_count > 0 ? 'RED' : high_count > 0 ? 'ORANGE' : medium_count > 0 ? 'YELLOW' : 'GREEN'} |
| Critical/High/Medium/Low | ${critical_count}/${high_count}/${medium_count}/${low_count} | |
| Coverage | ${coverage_percentage}% | ${coverage_percentage >= 90 ? 'GREEN' : coverage_percentage >= 75 ? 'YELLOW' : 'RED'} |
**Recommendation**: **${recommendation}**
---
## Findings Summary
| ID | Dimension | Severity | Location | Summary |
|----|-----------|----------|----------|---------|
${findings.map(f => `| ${f.id} | ${f.dimension_name} | ${f.severity} | ${f.location.join(', ')} | ${f.summary} |`).join('\n')}
---
## Analysis by Dimension
${['A','B','C','D','E','F','G','H','I','J'].map(d => `### ${d}. ${DIMS[d]}\n\n${renderDimension(d)}`).join('\n\n---\n\n')}
---
## Findings by Severity
### CRITICAL (${critical_count})
${renderSeverity('CRITICAL', 'Blocks execution')}
### HIGH (${high_count})
${renderSeverity('HIGH', 'Fix before execution recommended')}
### MEDIUM (${medium_count})
${renderSeverity('MEDIUM', 'Address during/after implementation')}
### LOW (${low_count})
${renderSeverity('LOW', 'Optional improvement')}
---
## Next Steps
${recommendation === 'BLOCK_EXECUTION' ? 'BLOCK: Fix critical issues then re-verify' :
recommendation === 'PROCEED_WITH_FIXES' ? 'FIX RECOMMENDED: Address high issues then re-verify or execute' :
'READY: Proceed to Skill(skill="workflow-execute")'}
Re-verify: \`/workflow:plan-verify --session ${session_id}\`
Execute: \`Skill(skill="workflow-execute", args="--resume-session=${session_id}")\`
`
// Write report
Write(`${process_dir}/PLAN_VERIFICATION.md`, fullReport)
console.log(`Report: ${process_dir}/PLAN_VERIFICATION.md\n${recommendation} | C:${critical_count} H:${high_count} M:${medium_count} L:${low_count} | Coverage:${coverage_percentage}%`)
```
### Step 5.6: Next Step Selection
```javascript
const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
const canExecute = recommendation !== 'BLOCK_EXECUTION'
// Auto mode
if (autoYes) {
if (canExecute) {
Skill(skill="workflow-execute", args="--yes --resume-session=\"${session_id}\"")
} else {
console.log(`[--yes] BLOCK_EXECUTION - Fix ${critical_count} critical issues first.`)
}
return
}
// Interactive mode - build options based on quality gate
const options = canExecute
? [
{ label: canExecute && recommendation === 'PROCEED_WITH_FIXES' ? "Execute Anyway" : "Execute (Recommended)",
description: "Proceed to Skill(skill=\"workflow-execute\")" },
{ label: "Review Report", description: "Review findings before deciding" },
{ label: "Re-verify", description: "Re-run after manual fixes" }
]
: [
{ label: "Review Report", description: "Review critical issues" },
{ label: "Re-verify", description: "Re-run after fixing issues" }
]
const selection = AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: `Quality gate: ${recommendation}. Next step?`,
header: "Action",
multiSelect: false,
options
}]
})
// Handle selection
if (selection.includes("Execute")) {
Skill(skill="workflow-execute", args="--resume-session=\"${session_id}\"")
} else if (selection === "Re-verify") {
Skill(skill="workflow:plan-verify", args="--session ${session_id}")
}
```
## Output
- **File**: `PLAN_VERIFICATION.md` (verification report with quality gate)
- **File**: `verification-findings.json` (structured findings data)
## Completion
Phase 5 is a terminal phase. Based on quality gate result, user routes to:
- Execute → Skill(skill="workflow-execute")
- Re-verify → Re-run Phase 5
- Review → Manual inspection