mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-15 02:42:45 +08:00
feat: add Terminal Dashboard components and state management
- Implemented DashboardToolbar for managing panel toggles and layout presets. - Created FloatingPanel for a generic sliding panel interface. - Developed TerminalGrid for rendering a recursive layout of terminal panes. - Added TerminalPane to encapsulate individual terminal instances with toolbar actions. - Introduced layout utilities for managing Allotment layout trees. - Established Zustand store for terminal grid state management, supporting pane operations and layout resets.
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
@@ -51,17 +51,18 @@ Each discussion round analyzes from 4 perspectives:
|
||||
| **Technical** | Feasibility, tech debt, performance, security, maintainability | Tech Lead |
|
||||
| **Quality** | Completeness, testability, consistency, standards compliance | QA Lead |
|
||||
| **Risk** | Risk identification, dependency analysis, assumption validation, failure modes | Risk Analyst |
|
||||
| **Coverage** | Requirement completeness vs original intent, scope drift, gap detection | Requirements Analyst |
|
||||
|
||||
## Discussion Round Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
| Round | Artifact | Key Perspectives | Focus |
|
||||
|-------|----------|-----------------|-------|
|
||||
| DISCUSS-001 | discovery-context | product + risk | Scope confirmation, direction |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-002 | product-brief | product + technical + quality | Positioning, feasibility |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-003 | requirements | quality + product | Completeness, priority |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-001 | discovery-context | product + risk + **coverage** | Scope confirmation, direction, initial coverage check |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-002 | product-brief | product + technical + quality + **coverage** | Positioning, feasibility, requirement coverage |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-003 | requirements | quality + product + **coverage** | Completeness, priority, gap detection |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-004 | architecture | technical + risk | Tech choices, security |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-005 | epics | product + technical + quality | MVP scope, estimation |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-006 | readiness-report | all 4 perspectives | Final sign-off |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-005 | epics | product + technical + quality + **coverage** | MVP scope, estimation, requirement tracing |
|
||||
| DISCUSS-006 | readiness-report | all 5 perspectives | Final sign-off |
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution (5-Phase)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -91,12 +92,12 @@ const roundMatch = task.subject.match(/DISCUSS-(\d+)/)
|
||||
const roundNumber = roundMatch ? parseInt(roundMatch[1]) : 0
|
||||
|
||||
const roundConfig = {
|
||||
1: { artifact: 'discovery-context.json', type: 'json', outputFile: 'discuss-001-scope.md', perspectives: ['product', 'risk'], label: '范围讨论' },
|
||||
2: { artifact: 'product-brief.md', type: 'md', outputFile: 'discuss-002-brief.md', perspectives: ['product', 'technical', 'quality'], label: 'Brief评审' },
|
||||
3: { artifact: 'requirements/_index.md', type: 'md', outputFile: 'discuss-003-requirements.md', perspectives: ['quality', 'product'], label: '需求讨论' },
|
||||
1: { artifact: 'discovery-context.json', type: 'json', outputFile: 'discuss-001-scope.md', perspectives: ['product', 'risk', 'coverage'], label: '范围讨论' },
|
||||
2: { artifact: 'product-brief.md', type: 'md', outputFile: 'discuss-002-brief.md', perspectives: ['product', 'technical', 'quality', 'coverage'], label: 'Brief评审' },
|
||||
3: { artifact: 'requirements/_index.md', type: 'md', outputFile: 'discuss-003-requirements.md', perspectives: ['quality', 'product', 'coverage'], label: '需求讨论' },
|
||||
4: { artifact: 'architecture/_index.md', type: 'md', outputFile: 'discuss-004-architecture.md', perspectives: ['technical', 'risk'], label: '架构讨论' },
|
||||
5: { artifact: 'epics/_index.md', type: 'md', outputFile: 'discuss-005-epics.md', perspectives: ['product', 'technical', 'quality'], label: 'Epics讨论' },
|
||||
6: { artifact: 'readiness-report.md', type: 'md', outputFile: 'discuss-006-final.md', perspectives: ['product', 'technical', 'quality', 'risk'], label: '最终签收' }
|
||||
5: { artifact: 'epics/_index.md', type: 'md', outputFile: 'discuss-005-epics.md', perspectives: ['product', 'technical', 'quality', 'coverage'], label: 'Epics讨论' },
|
||||
6: { artifact: 'readiness-report.md', type: 'md', outputFile: 'discuss-006-final.md', perspectives: ['product', 'technical', 'quality', 'risk', 'coverage'], label: '最终签收' }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const config = roundConfig[roundNumber]
|
||||
@@ -112,8 +113,9 @@ Launch parallel CLI analyses for each required perspective:
|
||||
- **Technical Perspective** (codex): Feasibility, complexity, architecture decisions, tech debt risks. Rate 1-5.
|
||||
- **Quality Perspective** (claude): Completeness, testability, consistency, ambiguity detection. Rate 1-5.
|
||||
- **Risk Perspective** (gemini): Risk identification, dependency analysis, assumption validation, failure modes. Rate risk level.
|
||||
- **Coverage Perspective** (gemini): Compare current artifact against original requirements in discovery-context.json. Identify covered_requirements[], partial_requirements[], missing_requirements[], scope_creep[]. Rate coverage 1-5. **If missing_requirements is non-empty, flag as critical divergence.**
|
||||
|
||||
Each CLI call produces structured critique with: strengths[], weaknesses[], suggestions[], rating.
|
||||
Each CLI call produces structured critique with: strengths[], weaknesses[], suggestions[], rating. Coverage perspective additionally outputs: covered_requirements[], missing_requirements[], scope_creep[].
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Consensus Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -131,6 +133,17 @@ const synthesis = {
|
||||
|
||||
// Extract convergent themes (items mentioned positively by 2+ perspectives)
|
||||
// Extract divergent views (items where perspectives conflict)
|
||||
// Check coverage gaps from coverage perspective (if present)
|
||||
const coverageResult = perspectiveResults.find(p => p.perspective === 'coverage')
|
||||
if (coverageResult?.missing_requirements?.length > 0) {
|
||||
synthesis.coverage_gaps = coverageResult.missing_requirements
|
||||
synthesis.divergent_views.push({
|
||||
topic: 'requirement_coverage_gap',
|
||||
description: `${coverageResult.missing_requirements.length} requirements from discovery-context not covered: ${coverageResult.missing_requirements.join(', ')}`,
|
||||
severity: 'high',
|
||||
source: 'coverage'
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Check for unresolvable conflicts
|
||||
const criticalDivergences = synthesis.divergent_views.filter(d => d.severity === 'high')
|
||||
if (criticalDivergences.length > 0) synthesis.consensus_reached = false
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user