mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-12 02:37:45 +08:00
refactor: Streamline intelligent tools strategy with structured prompt templates
- Reorganize content into logical sections: Core Framework, Tool Specifications, Decision Matrix, Workflow Integration, Usage Patterns - Add structured prompt templates with PURPOSE|TASK|EXPECTED format for both Gemini and Codex - Consolidate redundant sections while preserving all unique content - Reduce file size by 13% (221→193 lines) through better organization - Enhance workflow integration rules with mandatory planning process - Improve decision matrix with task categorization and frequency guidelines 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -77,54 +77,6 @@ ELSE:
|
||||
→ Proceed with review using standard quality checks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Flow Control Pre-Analysis Phase (Execute When Required)
|
||||
|
||||
### Flow Control Execution
|
||||
When [FLOW_CONTROL] flag is present, execute comprehensive pre-review analysis:
|
||||
|
||||
Process each step from pre_analysis array sequentially:
|
||||
|
||||
**多步上下文获取过程**:
|
||||
1. 按顺序执行pre_analysis步骤:
|
||||
- 文档引用:读取项目规范、依赖任务总结
|
||||
- 搜索命令:灵活搜索相关代码和模式
|
||||
- CLI分析:使用gemini/codex进行深度分析
|
||||
- 自由探索:使用Read、Grep等工具获取补充上下文
|
||||
|
||||
**灵活命令示例**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# 读取依赖任务总结
|
||||
bash(cat .workflow/WFS-[session-id]/.summaries/IMPL-1.1-summary.md)
|
||||
|
||||
# 搜索相关代码
|
||||
bash(rg "test|spec" src/ | head -20)
|
||||
|
||||
# 深度分析
|
||||
bash(gemini-wrapper -p "分析代码质量和测试覆盖")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This executes comprehensive pre-review analysis that covers:
|
||||
- **Change understanding**: What specific task was being implemented
|
||||
- **Repository conventions**: Standards used in similar files and functions
|
||||
- **Impact analysis**: Other code that might be affected by these changes
|
||||
- **Test coverage validation**: Whether changes are properly tested
|
||||
- **Integration verification**: If necessary integration points are handled
|
||||
- **Security implications**: Potential security considerations
|
||||
- **Performance impact**: Performance-related changes and implications
|
||||
|
||||
This executes autonomous Codex CLI analysis that provides:
|
||||
- **Autonomous understanding**: Intelligent discovery of implementation context
|
||||
- **Code generation insights**: Autonomous development recommendations
|
||||
- **System-wide impact**: Comprehensive integration analysis
|
||||
- **Automated testing strategy**: Autonomous test implementation approach
|
||||
- **Quality assurance**: Self-guided validation and optimization recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Application for Review**:
|
||||
- Review changes against repository-specific standards for similar code
|
||||
- Compare implementation approach with established patterns for this type of feature
|
||||
- Validate test coverage specifically for the functionality that was implemented
|
||||
- Ensure integration points are properly handled based on repository practices
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Process (Mode-Adaptive)
|
||||
|
||||
### Deep Mode Review Process
|
||||
@@ -173,11 +125,10 @@ if [FAST_MODE]: apply targeted review process
|
||||
- Input validation and sanitization
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Quality & Dependencies
|
||||
- **Module import verification first** - Use `rg` to check all imports exist before other checks
|
||||
- Import/export correctness and path validation
|
||||
- Missing or unused imports identification
|
||||
- Circular dependency detection
|
||||
- Single responsibility principle
|
||||
- Clear variable and function names
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance
|
||||
- Algorithm complexity (time and space)
|
||||
@@ -230,7 +181,7 @@ if [FAST_MODE]: apply targeted review process
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Update TODO_LIST.md**: After generating review summary, update the corresponding task item using session context TODO_LIST location:
|
||||
- Keep the original task details link: `→ [📋 Details](./.task/[Task-ID].json)`
|
||||
- Add review summary link after pipe separator: `| [✅ Review](./.summaries/[Task-ID]-review.md)`
|
||||
- Add review summary link after pipe separator: `| [✅ Review](./.summaries/IMPL-[Task-ID]-summary.md)`
|
||||
- Mark the checkbox as completed: `- [x]`
|
||||
- Update progress percentages in the progress overview section
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -240,9 +191,9 @@ if [FAST_MODE]: apply targeted review process
|
||||
- Update last modified timestamp
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Review Summary Document Naming Convention**:
|
||||
- Implementation Task Reviews: `IMPL-001-review.md`
|
||||
- Subtask Reviews: `IMPL-001.1-review.md`
|
||||
- Detailed Subtask Reviews: `IMPL-001.1.1-review.md`
|
||||
- Implementation Task Reviews: `IMPL-001-summary.md`
|
||||
- Subtask Reviews: `IMPL-001.1-summary.md`
|
||||
- Detailed Subtask Reviews: `IMPL-001.1.1-summary.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user