refactor: Streamline intelligent tools strategy with structured prompt templates

- Reorganize content into logical sections: Core Framework, Tool Specifications, Decision Matrix, Workflow Integration, Usage Patterns
- Add structured prompt templates with PURPOSE|TASK|EXPECTED format for both Gemini and Codex
- Consolidate redundant sections while preserving all unique content
- Reduce file size by 13% (221→193 lines) through better organization
- Enhance workflow integration rules with mandatory planning process
- Improve decision matrix with task categorization and frequency guidelines

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2025-09-17 20:01:57 +08:00
parent 5489ff1c73
commit 9b3f98c443
6 changed files with 284 additions and 225 deletions

View File

@@ -6,83 +6,188 @@ type: strategic-guideline
# Intelligent Tools Selection Strategy
## ⚡ Core Decision Framework
## ⚡ Core Framework
**Gemini**: Analysis & understanding large codebases
**Codex**: Development & autonomous implementation
**Gemini**: Analysis, understanding, exploration & documentation
**Codex**: Development, implementation & automation
> **Implementation Details**: See @~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md
### Decision Principles
- **Use tools early and often** - Tools are faster, more thorough, and reliable than manual approaches
- **When in doubt, use both** - Parallel usage provides comprehensive coverage
- **Default to tools** - Use specialized tools for most coding tasks, no matter how small
- **Lower barriers** - Engage tools immediately when encountering any complexity
## 🎯 Tool Selection Matrix
### Quick Decision Rules
1. **Exploring/Understanding?** → Start with Gemini
2. **Building/Fixing?** → Start with Codex
3. **Not sure?** → Use both in parallel
4. **Small task?** → Still use tools - they're faster than manual work
### When to Use Gemini
- **Command**: `~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "prompt"`
- **Strengths**: Large context window, pattern recognition across modules
- **Best For**:
- Project architecture analysis (>50 files)
- Cross-module pattern detection
- Coding convention analysis
- Refactoring with broad dependencies
- Large codebase understanding
## 🎯 Tool Specifications
### When to Use Codex
- **Command**: `codex --full-auto exec "prompt" -s danger-full-access`
- **Strengths**: Mathematical reasoning, autonomous development
- **Best For**:
- Complex algorithm analysis
- Security vulnerability assessment
- Performance optimization
- Database schema design
- API protocol specifications
- Autonomous feature development
### Gemini (Analysis & Understanding)
**Command**: `~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "PURPOSE: [analysis goal] | TASK: [what to do] | EXPECTED: [expected results]"`
## 📊 Decision Framework
**Strengths**: Large context window, pattern recognition across modules
| Analysis Need | Recommended Tool | Rationale |
|--------------|------------------|-----------|
| Project Architecture | Gemini | Needs broad context across many files |
| Algorithm Optimization | Codex | Requires deep mathematical reasoning |
| Security Analysis | Codex | Leverages deeper security knowledge |
| Code Patterns | Gemini | Pattern recognition across modules |
| Refactoring | Gemini | Needs understanding of all dependencies |
| API Design | Codex | Technical specification expertise |
| Test Coverage | Gemini | Cross-module test understanding |
| Performance Tuning | Codex | Mathematical optimization capabilities |
| Feature Implementation | Codex | Autonomous development capabilities |
| Architectural Review | Gemini | Large context analysis |
**Use Cases**:
- Any project analysis (≥5 files)
- Quick code exploration and familiarization
- Cross-module pattern detection and consistency checks
- Coding convention analysis and standardization
- Refactoring planning with dependency mapping
- Legacy code understanding and modernization paths
- API surface analysis and integration points
- Test coverage gaps and quality assessment
- Configuration file analysis and optimization
- Dependency audit and relationship mapping
- Code review preparation and checklist generation
- Documentation generation from existing code
## 🔄 Parallel Analysis Strategy
### Codex (Development & Implementation)
**Command**: `codex --full-auto exec "PURPOSE: [development goal] | TASK: [what to implement] | EXPECTED: [expected code/features]" -s danger-full-access`
**Strengths**: Mathematical reasoning, autonomous development
**Use Cases**:
- Any feature development (simple to complex)
- Quick prototyping and proof-of-concepts
- Bug fixes and issue resolution
- Test generation and validation
- Code scaffolding and boilerplate creation
- Configuration setup and environment preparation
- Algorithm implementation and optimization
- Security vulnerability assessment and fixes
- Performance optimization and profiling
- Database schema design and migration
- API development and integration
- DevOps automation and deployment scripts
- Documentation automation and generation
- Code modernization and refactoring execution
- Dependency management and updates
- Build system optimization and tooling
### Structured Prompt Templates
```bash
# Gemini Analysis
~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
PURPOSE: [clear analysis goal]
TASK: [specific analysis task]
EXPECTED: [expected output]
"
# Codex Development
codex --full-auto exec "
PURPOSE: [clear development goal]
TASK: [specific development task]
EXPECTED: [expected deliverables]
" -s danger-full-access
```
**Prompt Checklist**:
- [ ] **PURPOSE** - Clear goal and intent
- [ ] **TASK** - Specific execution task
- [ ] **EXPECTED** - Clear expected results
## 📊 Decision Matrix
| Task Category | Tool | Rationale | Frequency |
|--------------|------|-----------|-----------|
| **Understanding & Analysis** |
| Project Architecture | Gemini | Broad context across files | Weekly/Monthly |
| Code Exploration | Gemini | Quick module familiarization | Daily |
| Legacy Code Analysis | Gemini | Pattern recognition across systems | As needed |
| Dependency Mapping | Gemini | Cross-module relationship analysis | Sprint planning |
| Code Review Prep | Gemini | Comprehensive context understanding | Before reviews |
| **Development & Implementation** |
| Feature Development | Codex | Autonomous implementation capabilities | Daily |
| Bug Fixes | Codex | Targeted problem resolution | As issues arise |
| Prototyping | Codex | Rapid development and iteration | Weekly |
| Test Generation | Codex | Automated test creation | After feature work |
| Configuration Setup | Codex | Environment and tooling setup | Project setup |
| **Optimization & Maintenance** |
| Algorithm Optimization | Codex | Mathematical reasoning capabilities | Performance sprints |
| Security Analysis | Codex | Security knowledge and fixes | Security reviews |
| Performance Tuning | Codex | Mathematical optimization | Performance reviews |
| Code Modernization | Both | Gemini for planning, Codex for execution | Quarterly |
| **Documentation & Quality** |
| Documentation Generation | Both | Gemini for analysis, Codex for automation | Continuous |
| Coding Standards | Gemini | Pattern recognition and consistency | Code reviews |
| Test Coverage Analysis | Gemini | Cross-module test understanding | Sprint retrospectives |
## 📋 Workflow Integration
### Mandatory Planning Process
When planning any coding task, **ALWAYS** integrate CLI tools:
#### 1. Understanding Phase (Required)
- **Gemini Analysis**: Understand existing patterns, architecture, dependencies
- **Context Discovery**: Map related modules and integration points
- **Pattern Recognition**: Identify existing conventions and standards
#### 2. Development Strategy
- **Understanding/Analysis**: Gemini (primary), Codex (occasional)
- **Implementation**: Codex (occasional), manual development (primary)
- **Complex Tasks**: Both tools in sequence
#### 3. Workflow Pattern
```
Planning → Gemini Analysis → Manual Development → Codex Assistance (as needed)
```
### Tool Usage Guidelines
#### Gemini (Primary for Understanding)
- Always use for initial codebase analysis
- Pattern discovery and convention mapping
- Architecture understanding before implementation
- Dependency analysis and impact assessment
- Code review preparation
#### Codex (Occasional for Development)
- Selective use for complex algorithms
- Prototype generation for proof-of-concepts
- Boilerplate creation when patterns are clear
- Test generation and validation
- Performance optimization tasks
### Planning Checklist
For every development task:
- [ ] **Gemini analysis** completed for understanding
- [ ] **Existing patterns** identified and documented
- [ ] **Dependencies mapped** and integration points clear
- [ ] **CLI tool usage points** identified in workflow
- [ ] **Manual development approach** defined
- [ ] **Codex assistance triggers** identified (if applicable)
## 🚀 Usage Patterns
### Immediate Engagement Triggers
- **New codebase**: Use Gemini to understand structure before changes
- **Bug reports**: Use Codex to investigate and propose fixes
- **Feature requests**: Use Codex for rapid prototyping and implementation
- **Code reviews**: Use Gemini to prepare comprehensive analysis
- **Refactoring needs**: Use Gemini for impact analysis, Codex for execution
### Daily Integration Points
- **Morning standup prep**: Gemini for codebase overview
- **Sprint planning**: Both tools for effort estimation
- **Development tasks**: Codex for implementation
- **Testing**: Codex for test generation and coverage
- **Documentation**: Both tools for comprehensive docs
### Parallel Strategy
For complex projects requiring both broad context and deep analysis:
- **Gemini** for architectural understanding
- **Codex** for focused development tasks
- Run both via Task agents when comprehensive coverage needed
## 📈 Complexity-Based Selection
### Frequency Guidelines
- **Daily**: Use tools for routine development tasks
- **Immediate**: Engage tools at first sign of complexity
- **Continuous**: Integrate tools into regular workflow
- **Proactive**: Don't wait for problems - use tools preventively
### Simple Projects (≤50 files)
- **Content-driven choice**: Mathematical → Codex, Structural → Gemini
## 🔗 Reference
### Medium Projects (50-200 files)
- **Gemini first** for overview and patterns
- **Codex second** for specific implementations
### Large Projects (>200 files)
- **Parallel analysis** with both tools
- **Gemini** for architectural understanding
- **Codex** for focused development tasks
## 🎯 Strategic Guidelines
1. **Task-driven selection**: Let project characteristics drive tool choice
2. **Start simple**: Begin with single tool, escalate to parallel if needed
3. **Context first**: Understand scope before selecting approach
4. **Trust autonomous capabilities**: Let tools handle their specialized domains
## 🔗 Implementation Details
**Complete syntax and usage patterns**: @~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md
---
**Decision Principle**: Choose based on task nature - Gemini excels at understanding, Codex excels at building.
**Complete syntax and usage patterns**: @~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md

View File

@@ -126,19 +126,31 @@ All task files use this unified 5-field schema:
{
"step": "check_patterns",
"action": "Analyze existing patterns",
"command": "bash(rg 'auth' src/ | head -10)",
"output_to": "auth_patterns"
"command": "bash(rg 'auth' [focus_paths] | head -10)",
"output_to": "patterns"
},
{
"step": "analyze_architecture",
"action": "Review system architecture",
"command": "~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p \"analyze patterns: [patterns]\"",
"output_to": "design"
},
{
"step": "check_deps",
"action": "Check dependencies",
"command": "bash(echo [depends_on] | xargs cat)",
"output_to": "context"
}
],
"implementation_approach": {
"task_description": "Implement JWT authentication following existing patterns",
"task_description": "Implement JWT authentication following [design]",
"modification_points": [
"Add JWT generation in login handler",
"Implement token validation middleware"
"Add JWT generation using [parent] patterns",
"Implement validation middleware from [context]"
],
"logic_flow": [
"User login → validate → generate JWT → return token",
"Protected route → extract JWT → validate → allow/deny"
"User login → validate with [inherited] → generate JWT",
"Protected route → extract JWT → validate using [shared] rules"
]
},
"target_files": [
@@ -162,7 +174,7 @@ The **focus_paths** field specifies concrete project paths for task implementati
The **flow_control** field manages task execution with two main components:
**pre_analysis** - Context gathering phase:
- **Flexible commands**: Supports bash pipelines, CLI tools, and agent calls
- **Flexible commands**: Supports multiple tool types (see Tool Reference below)
- **Step structure**: Each step has `step`, `action`, `command` fields
- **Variable accumulation**: Steps can reference previous outputs via `[variable_name]`
- **Error handling**: `skip_optional`, `fail`, `retry_once`, `manual_intervention`
@@ -173,13 +185,39 @@ The **flow_control** field manages task execution with two main components:
- **logic_flow**: Business logic execution sequence
- **target_files**: Target file list in `file:function:lines` format
#### Tool Reference
**Command Types Available**:
- **Gemini CLI**: `~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "prompt"`
- **Codex CLI**: `codex --full-auto exec "task" -s danger-full-access`
- **Built-in Tools**: `grep(pattern)`, `glob(pattern)`, `search(query)`
- **Bash Commands**: `bash(rg 'pattern' src/)`, `bash(find . -name "*.ts")`
#### Variable System & Context Flow
**Flow Control Variables**: Use `[variable_name]` format for dynamic content:
- **Step outputs**: `[step_output_name]` - Reference any pre_analysis step output
- **Task properties**: `[task_property]` - Reference any task context field
- **Previous results**: `[analysis_result]` - Reference accumulated context
- **Commands**: All commands wrapped with appropriate error handling
**Context Accumulation Process**:
1. **Structure Analysis**: `get_modules_by_depth.sh` → project hierarchy
2. **Pattern Analysis**: Tool-specific commands → existing patterns
3. **Dependency Mapping**: Previous task summaries → inheritance context
4. **Task Context Generation**: Combined analysis → task.context fields
**Context Inheritance Rules**:
- **Parent → Child**: Container tasks pass context via `context.inherited`
- **Dependency → Dependent**: Previous task summaries via `context.depends_on`
- **Session → Task**: Global session context included in all tasks
- **Module → Feature**: Module patterns inform feature implementation
### Task Validation Rules
1. **ID Uniqueness**: All task IDs must be unique
2. **Hierarchical Format**: Must follow IMPL-N[.M] pattern (maximum 2 levels)
3. **Parent References**: All parent IDs must exist as JSON files
4. **Status Consistency**: Status values from defined enumeration
5. **Required Fields**: All 5 core fields must be present
6. **Focus Paths Structure**: context.focus_paths must contain valid project paths
6. **Focus Paths Structure**: context.focus_paths must contain concrete paths (no wildcards)
7. **Flow Control Format**: pre_analysis must be array with required fields
8. **Dependency Integrity**: All depends_on task IDs must exist as JSON files
@@ -199,8 +237,8 @@ All workflows use the same file structure definition regardless of complexity. *
├── IMPL_PLAN.md # Planning document (REQUIRED)
├── TODO_LIST.md # Progress tracking (REQUIRED)
├── [.summaries/] # Task completion summaries (created when tasks complete)
│ ├── IMPL-*.md # Main task summaries
│ └── IMPL-*.*.md # Subtask summaries
│ ├── IMPL-*-summary.md # Main task summaries
│ └── IMPL-*.*-summary.md # Subtask summaries
└── .task/ # Task definitions (REQUIRED)
├── IMPL-*.json # Main task definitions
└── IMPL-*.*.json # Subtask definitions (created dynamically)
@@ -242,9 +280,9 @@ All workflows use the same file structure definition regardless of complexity. *
## Task Progress
**IMPL-001**: [Main Task Group] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.json)
- [ ] **IMPL-001.1**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.1.json)
- [x] **IMPL-001.2**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.2.json) | [](./.summaries/IMPL-001.2.md)
- [x] **IMPL-001.2**: [Subtask] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-001.2.json) | [](./.summaries/IMPL-001.2-summary.md)
- [x] **IMPL-002**: [Simple Task] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-002.json) | [](./.summaries/IMPL-002.md)
- [x] **IMPL-002**: [Simple Task] → [📋](./.task/IMPL-002.json) | [](./.summaries/IMPL-002-summary.md)
## Status Legend
- `▸` = Container task (has subtasks)
@@ -314,22 +352,25 @@ fi
| **Medium** | 5-15 tasks | 2 levels (IMPL-N.M) | Moderate decomposition, context coordination |
| **Complex** | >15 tasks | 2 levels (IMPL-N.M) | Frequent decomposition, multi-agent orchestration |
### Workflow Characteristics
### Workflow Characteristics & Tool Guidance
#### Simple Workflows
- **Examples**: Bug fixes, small feature additions, configuration changes
- **Task Decomposition**: Usually single-level tasks, minimal breakdown needed
- **Agent Coordination**: Direct execution without complex orchestration
- **Tool Strategy**: `bash()` commands, `grep()` for pattern matching
#### Medium Workflows
- **Examples**: New features, API endpoints with integration, database schema changes
- **Task Decomposition**: Two-level hierarchy when decomposition is needed
- **Agent Coordination**: Context coordination between related tasks
- **Tool Strategy**: `gemini-wrapper` for pattern analysis, `codex --full-auto` for implementation
#### Complex Workflows
- **Examples**: Major features, architecture refactoring, security implementations, multi-service deployments
- **Task Decomposition**: Frequent use of two-level hierarchy with dynamic subtask creation
- **Agent Coordination**: Multi-agent orchestration with deep context analysis
- **Tool Strategy**: `gemini-wrapper` for architecture analysis, `codex --full-auto` for complex problem solving, `bash()` commands for flexible analysis
### Assessment & Upgrades
- **During Creation**: System evaluates requirements and assigns complexity