diff --git a/.claude/commands/workflow/analyze-with-file.md b/.claude/commands/workflow/analyze-with-file.md
index 0703e1ee..1a3a6a42 100644
--- a/.claude/commands/workflow/analyze-with-file.md
+++ b/.claude/commands/workflow/analyze-with-file.md
@@ -242,6 +242,12 @@ ${newFocusFromUser}
### Phase 2: CLI Exploration
+**⚠️ CRITICAL - CLI EXECUTION REQUIREMENT**:
+- **MUST** wait for ALL CLI executions to fully complete before proceeding
+- After launching CLI with `run_in_background: true`, **STOP** and wait for hook callback
+- **DO NOT** proceed to Phase 3 until all CLI results are received
+- Minimize output: No processing until 100% results available
+
**Step 2.1: Launch Parallel Explorations**
```javascript
@@ -285,6 +291,7 @@ Schema:
}
// Gemini CLI for deep analysis
+// ⚠️ CRITICAL: Must wait for CLI completion before aggregating
explorationPromises.push(
Bash({
command: `ccw cli -p "
@@ -314,6 +321,8 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Focus on ${dimensions.join(', ')}
)
```
+**⚠️ STOP POINT**: After launching CLI calls, stop output immediately. Wait for hook callback to receive results before continuing to Step 2.2.
+
**Step 2.2: Aggregate Findings**
```javascript
diff --git a/.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm-with-file.md b/.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm-with-file.md
index 281e0be1..22e270bd 100644
--- a/.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm-with-file.md
+++ b/.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm-with-file.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Read(*), Grep(*), Glob
When `--yes` or `-y`: Auto-confirm decisions, use balanced exploration across all perspectives.
-# Workflow Brainstorm-With-File Command (/workflow:brainstorm-with-file)
+# Workflow Brainstorm-With-File Command
## Overview
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ Output:
└─ .workflow/.brainstorm/{slug}-{date}/ideas/ (individual idea deep-dives)
```
+---
+
## Implementation
### Session Setup & Mode Detection
@@ -112,7 +114,7 @@ const forcesContinue = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--continue') || $ARGUMENTS.includes(
const mode = (hasBrainstorm || forcesContinue) ? 'continue' : 'new'
// Brainstorm mode
-const brainstormMode = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--mode')
+const brainstormMode = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--mode')
? $ARGUMENTS.match(/--mode\s+(creative|structured)/)?.[1] || 'balanced'
: 'balanced'
@@ -128,34 +130,25 @@ if (!sessionExists) {
**Step 1.1: Parse Seed & Identify Dimensions**
```javascript
-// Brainstorm dimensions for multi-perspective analysis
-const BRAINSTORM_DIMENSIONS = {
- technical: ['技术', 'technical', 'implementation', 'code', '实现', 'architecture'],
- ux: ['用户', 'user', 'experience', 'UX', 'UI', '体验', 'interaction'],
- business: ['业务', 'business', 'value', 'ROI', '价值', 'market'],
- innovation: ['创新', 'innovation', 'novel', 'creative', '新颖'],
- feasibility: ['可行', 'feasible', 'practical', 'realistic', '实际'],
- scalability: ['扩展', 'scale', 'growth', 'performance', '性能'],
- security: ['安全', 'security', 'risk', 'protection', '风险']
-}
+// See Configuration section for BRAINSTORM_DIMENSIONS definition
function identifyDimensions(topic) {
const text = topic.toLowerCase()
const matched = []
-
+
for (const [dimension, keywords] of Object.entries(BRAINSTORM_DIMENSIONS)) {
if (keywords.some(k => text.includes(k))) {
matched.push(dimension)
}
}
-
+
// Default dimensions based on mode
if (matched.length === 0) {
- return brainstormMode === 'creative'
+ return brainstormMode === 'creative'
? ['innovation', 'ux', 'technical']
: ['technical', 'feasibility', 'business']
}
-
+
return matched
}
@@ -168,7 +161,6 @@ const dimensions = identifyDimensions(idea_or_topic)
const autoYes = $ARGUMENTS.includes('--yes') || $ARGUMENTS.includes('-y')
if (mode === 'new' && !autoYes) {
- // Expand the seed with targeted questions
AskUserQuestion({
questions: [
{
@@ -230,7 +222,7 @@ Generate 5-7 exploration vectors (questions/directions) to expand this idea:
Output as structured exploration vectors for multi-perspective analysis.
`
-// Use quick Gemini call to expand seed
+// ⚠️ CRITICAL: Must wait for CLI completion - do NOT proceed until result received
const expansionResult = await Bash({
command: `ccw cli -p "${expansionPrompt}" --tool gemini --mode analysis --model gemini-2.5-flash`,
run_in_background: false
@@ -241,70 +233,22 @@ const explorationVectors = parseExpansionResult(expansionResult)
**Step 1.4: Create brainstorm.md**
-```markdown
-# Brainstorm Session
-
-**Session ID**: ${sessionId}
-**Topic**: ${idea_or_topic}
-**Started**: ${getUtc8ISOString()}
-**Mode**: ${brainstormMode}
-**Dimensions**: ${dimensions.join(', ')}
-
----
-
-## Initial Context
-
-**User Focus**: ${userFocusAreas.join(', ')}
-**Depth**: ${analysisDepth}
-**Constraints**: ${constraints.join(', ')}
-
----
-
-## Seed Expansion
-
-### Original Idea
-> ${idea_or_topic}
-
-### Exploration Vectors
-
-${explorationVectors.map((v, i) => `
-#### Vector ${i+1}: ${v.title}
-**Question**: ${v.question}
-**Angle**: ${v.angle}
-**Potential**: ${v.potential}
-`).join('\n')}
-
----
-
-## Thought Evolution Timeline
-
-### Round 1 - Seed Understanding (${timestamp})
-
-#### Initial Parsing
-- **Core concept**: ${coreConcept}
-- **Problem space**: ${problemSpace}
-- **Opportunity**: ${opportunity}
-
-#### Key Questions to Explore
-${keyQuestions.map((q, i) => `${i+1}. ${q}`).join('\n')}
-
----
-
-## Current Ideas
-
-*To be populated after exploration phases*
-
----
-
-## Idea Graveyard
-
-*Discarded ideas with reasons - kept for reference*
-```
+See **Templates** section for complete brainstorm.md structure. Initialize with:
+- Session metadata
+- Initial context (user focus, depth, constraints)
+- Seed expansion (original idea + exploration vectors)
+- Empty sections for thought evolution timeline
---
### Phase 2: Divergent Exploration (Multi-CLI Parallel)
+**⚠️ CRITICAL - CLI EXECUTION REQUIREMENT**:
+- **MUST** wait for ALL CLI executions to fully complete before proceeding
+- After launching CLI with `run_in_background: true`, **STOP** and wait for hook callback
+- **DO NOT** proceed to Phase 3 until all CLI results are received
+- Minimize output: No processing until 100% results available
+
**Step 2.1: Launch Multi-CLI Perspectives**
```javascript
@@ -409,10 +353,12 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Consider existing system architecture
})
)
-// Wait for all CLI analyses
+// ⚠️ CRITICAL: Must wait for ALL results - do NOT proceed until all CLIs complete
await Promise.all(cliPromises)
```
+**⚠️ STOP POINT**: After launching CLI calls, stop output immediately. Wait for hook callback to receive results before continuing to Step 2.2.
+
**Step 2.2: Aggregate Multi-Perspective Findings**
```javascript
@@ -420,28 +366,28 @@ const perspectives = {
session_id: sessionId,
timestamp: getUtc8ISOString(),
topic: idea_or_topic,
-
+
creative: {
source: 'gemini',
ideas: [...],
insights: [...],
challenges: [...]
},
-
+
pragmatic: {
source: 'codex',
approaches: [...],
blockers: [...],
recommendations: [...]
},
-
+
systematic: {
source: 'claude',
decomposition: [...],
patterns: [...],
tradeoffs: [...]
},
-
+
synthesis: {
convergent_themes: [],
conflicting_views: [],
@@ -454,71 +400,7 @@ Write(perspectivesPath, JSON.stringify(perspectives, null, 2))
**Step 2.3: Update brainstorm.md with Perspectives**
-```markdown
-### Round 2 - Multi-Perspective Exploration (${timestamp})
-
-#### Creative Perspective (Gemini)
-
-**Top Creative Ideas**:
-${creativeIdeas.map((idea, i) => `
-${i+1}. **${idea.title}** ⭐ Novelty: ${idea.novelty}/5 | Impact: ${idea.impact}/5
- ${idea.description}
-`).join('\n')}
-
-**Challenged Assumptions**:
-${challengedAssumptions.map(a => `- ~~${a.assumption}~~ → Consider: ${a.alternative}`).join('\n')}
-
-**Cross-Domain Inspirations**:
-${inspirations.map(i => `- ${i}`).join('\n')}
-
----
-
-#### Pragmatic Perspective (Codex)
-
-**Implementation Approaches**:
-${pragmaticApproaches.map((a, i) => `
-${i+1}. **${a.title}** | Effort: ${a.effort}/5 | Risk: ${a.risk}/5
- ${a.description}
- - Quick win: ${a.quickWin}
- - Dependencies: ${a.dependencies.join(', ')}
-`).join('\n')}
-
-**Technical Blockers**:
-${blockers.map(b => `- ⚠️ ${b}`).join('\n')}
-
----
-
-#### Systematic Perspective (Claude)
-
-**Problem Decomposition**:
-${decomposition}
-
-**Architectural Options**:
-${architecturalOptions.map((opt, i) => `
-${i+1}. **${opt.pattern}**
- - Pros: ${opt.pros.join(', ')}
- - Cons: ${opt.cons.join(', ')}
- - Best for: ${opt.bestFor}
-`).join('\n')}
-
----
-
-#### Perspective Synthesis
-
-**Convergent Themes** (all perspectives agree):
-${convergentThemes.map(t => `- ✅ ${t}`).join('\n')}
-
-**Conflicting Views** (need resolution):
-${conflictingViews.map(v => `
-- 🔄 ${v.topic}
- - Creative: ${v.creative}
- - Pragmatic: ${v.pragmatic}
- - Systematic: ${v.systematic}
-`).join('\n')}
-
-**Unique Contributions**:
-${uniqueContributions.map(c => `- 💡 [${c.source}] ${c.insight}`).join('\n')}
-```
+Append to brainstorm.md the Round 2 multi-perspective exploration findings (see Templates section for format).
---
@@ -532,7 +414,7 @@ let roundNumber = 3 // After initial exploration
let brainstormComplete = false
while (!brainstormComplete && roundNumber <= MAX_ROUNDS) {
-
+
// Present current state
console.log(`
## Brainstorm Round ${roundNumber}
@@ -606,10 +488,9 @@ ${openQuestions.map((q, i) => `${i+1}. ${q}`).join('\n')}
```javascript
async function deepDiveIdeas(selectedIdeas) {
for (const idea of selectedIdeas) {
- // Create dedicated idea file
const ideaPath = `${ideasFolder}/${idea.slug}.md`
-
- // Deep dive with targeted CLI call
+
+ // ⚠️ CRITICAL: Must wait for CLI completion before saving results
await Bash({
command: `ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Deep dive analysis on idea '${idea.title}'
@@ -625,7 +506,7 @@ TASK:
MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @**/*
+CONTEXT: @**/*
Original idea: ${idea.description}
Source perspective: ${idea.source}
User interest reason: ${idea.userReason || 'Selected for exploration'}
@@ -642,8 +523,7 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Focus on actionability
" --tool gemini --mode analysis`,
run_in_background: false
})
-
- // Save deep dive to dedicated file
+
Write(ideaPath, deepDiveContent)
}
}
@@ -653,6 +533,7 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Focus on actionability
```javascript
async function devilsAdvocate(ideas) {
+ // ⚠️ CRITICAL: Must wait for CLI completion before returning results
const challengeResult = await Bash({
command: `ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Devil's advocate - rigorously challenge these brainstorm ideas
@@ -682,7 +563,7 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Be genuinely critical, not just contrarian
" --tool codex --mode analysis`,
run_in_background: false
})
-
+
return challengeResult
}
```
@@ -692,7 +573,8 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Be genuinely critical, not just contrarian
```javascript
async function mergeIdeas(ideaIds) {
const selectedIdeas = ideas.filter(i => ideaIds.includes(i.id))
-
+
+ // ⚠️ CRITICAL: Must wait for CLI completion before processing merge result
const mergeResult = await Bash({
command: `ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Synthesize multiple ideas into unified concept
@@ -726,85 +608,17 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Don't force incompatible ideas together
" --tool gemini --mode analysis`,
run_in_background: false
})
-
- // Add merged idea to list
+
const mergedIdea = parseMergeResult(mergeResult)
ideas.push(mergedIdea)
-
+
return mergedIdea
}
```
**Step 3.5: Document Each Round**
-Append to brainstorm.md:
-```markdown
-### Round ${n} - ${roundType} (${timestamp})
-
-#### User Direction
-- **Selected ideas**: ${selectedIdeas.join(', ')}
-- **Action**: ${action}
-- **Reasoning**: ${userReasoning || 'Not specified'}
-
-${roundType === 'deep-dive' ? `
-#### Deep Dive: ${ideaTitle}
-
-**Elaborated Concept**:
-${elaboratedConcept}
-
-**Implementation Requirements**:
-${requirements.map(r => `- ${r}`).join('\n')}
-
-**Challenges & Mitigations**:
-${challenges.map(c => `- ⚠️ ${c.challenge} → ✅ ${c.mitigation}`).join('\n')}
-
-**MVP Definition**:
-${mvpDefinition}
-
-**Recommendation**: ${recommendation}
-` : ''}
-
-${roundType === 'challenge' ? `
-#### Devil's Advocate Results
-
-**Challenges Raised**:
-${challenges.map(c => `
-- 🔴 **${c.idea}**: ${c.objection}
- - Counter: ${c.counter || 'No strong counter-argument'}
- - Survivability: ${c.survivability}/5
-`).join('\n')}
-
-**Ideas That Survived**:
-${survivedIdeas.map(i => `- ✅ ${i}`).join('\n')}
-
-**Eliminated/Parked**:
-${eliminatedIdeas.map(i => `- ❌ ${i.title}: ${i.reason}`).join('\n')}
-` : ''}
-
-${roundType === 'merge' ? `
-#### Merged Idea: ${mergedIdea.title}
-
-**Source Ideas Combined**:
-${sourceIdeas.map(i => `- ${i}`).join('\n')}
-
-**Unified Concept**:
-${mergedIdea.description}
-
-**Key Elements Preserved**:
-${preservedElements.map(e => `- ✅ ${e}`).join('\n')}
-
-**Tradeoffs Accepted**:
-${tradeoffs.map(t => `- ⚖️ ${t}`).join('\n')}
-` : ''}
-
-#### Updated Idea Ranking
-
-${updatedRanking.map((idea, i) => `
-${i+1}. **${idea.title}** ${idea.status}
- - Score: ${idea.score}/10
- - Source: ${idea.source}
-`).join('\n')}
-```
+Append each round's findings to brainstorm.md (see Templates section for format).
---
@@ -818,8 +632,7 @@ const synthesis = {
topic: idea_or_topic,
completed: getUtc8ISOString(),
total_rounds: roundNumber,
-
- // Top ideas with full details
+
top_ideas: ideas.filter(i => i.status === 'active').sort((a,b) => b.score - a.score).slice(0, 5).map(idea => ({
title: idea.title,
description: idea.description,
@@ -831,25 +644,21 @@ const synthesis = {
main_challenges: idea.challenges,
next_steps: idea.nextSteps
})),
-
- // Parked ideas for future reference
+
parked_ideas: ideas.filter(i => i.status === 'parked').map(idea => ({
title: idea.title,
reason_parked: idea.parkReason,
potential_future_trigger: idea.futureTrigger
})),
-
- // Key insights from the process
+
key_insights: keyInsights,
-
- // Recommendations
+
recommendations: {
primary: primaryRecommendation,
alternatives: alternativeApproaches,
not_recommended: notRecommended
},
-
- // Follow-up suggestions
+
follow_up: [
{ type: 'implementation', summary: '...' },
{ type: 'research', summary: '...' },
@@ -862,104 +671,7 @@ Write(synthesisPath, JSON.stringify(synthesis, null, 2))
**Step 4.2: Final brainstorm.md Update**
-```markdown
----
-
-## Synthesis & Conclusions (${timestamp})
-
-### Executive Summary
-
-${executiveSummary}
-
-### Top Ideas (Final Ranking)
-
-${topIdeas.map((idea, i) => `
-#### ${i+1}. ${idea.title} ⭐ Score: ${idea.score}/10
-
-**Description**: ${idea.description}
-
-**Why This Idea**:
-${idea.strengths.map(s => `- ✅ ${s}`).join('\n')}
-
-**Main Challenges**:
-${idea.challenges.map(c => `- ⚠️ ${c}`).join('\n')}
-
-**Recommended Next Steps**:
-${idea.nextSteps.map((s, j) => `${j+1}. ${s}`).join('\n')}
-
----
-`).join('\n')}
-
-### Primary Recommendation
-
-> ${primaryRecommendation}
-
-**Rationale**: ${primaryRationale}
-
-**Quick Start Path**:
-1. ${step1}
-2. ${step2}
-3. ${step3}
-
-### Alternative Approaches
-
-${alternatives.map((alt, i) => `
-${i+1}. **${alt.title}**
- - When to consider: ${alt.whenToConsider}
- - Tradeoff: ${alt.tradeoff}
-`).join('\n')}
-
-### Ideas Parked for Future
-
-${parkedIdeas.map(idea => `
-- **${idea.title}** (Parked: ${idea.reason})
- - Revisit when: ${idea.futureTrigger}
-`).join('\n')}
-
----
-
-## Key Insights
-
-### Process Discoveries
-
-${processDiscoveries.map(d => `- 💡 ${d}`).join('\n')}
-
-### Assumptions Challenged
-
-${challengedAssumptions.map(a => `- ~~${a.original}~~ → ${a.updated}`).join('\n')}
-
-### Unexpected Connections
-
-${unexpectedConnections.map(c => `- 🔗 ${c}`).join('\n')}
-
----
-
-## Current Understanding (Final)
-
-### Problem Reframed
-
-${reframedProblem}
-
-### Solution Space Mapped
-
-${solutionSpaceMap}
-
-### Decision Framework
-
-When to choose each approach:
-${decisionFramework}
-
----
-
-## Session Statistics
-
-- **Total Rounds**: ${totalRounds}
-- **Ideas Generated**: ${totalIdeas}
-- **Ideas Survived**: ${survivedIdeas}
-- **Perspectives Used**: Gemini (creative), Codex (pragmatic), Claude (systematic)
-- **Duration**: ${duration}
-- **Artifacts**: brainstorm.md, perspectives.json, synthesis.json, ${ideaFiles.length} idea deep-dives
-```
+Update brainstorm.md with synthesis & conclusions (see Templates section for format).
**Step 4.3: Post-Completion Options**
@@ -999,7 +711,62 @@ if (selection.includes("导出分享")) {
---
-## Session Folder Structure
+## Configuration
+
+### Brainstorm Dimensions
+
+```javascript
+const BRAINSTORM_DIMENSIONS = {
+ technical: ['技术', 'technical', 'implementation', 'code', '实现', 'architecture'],
+ ux: ['用户', 'user', 'experience', 'UX', 'UI', '体验', 'interaction'],
+ business: ['业务', 'business', 'value', 'ROI', '价值', 'market'],
+ innovation: ['创新', 'innovation', 'novel', 'creative', '新颖'],
+ feasibility: ['可行', 'feasible', 'practical', 'realistic', '实际'],
+ scalability: ['扩展', 'scale', 'growth', 'performance', '性能'],
+ security: ['安全', 'security', 'risk', 'protection', '风险']
+}
+```
+
+### Multi-CLI Collaboration Strategy
+
+**Perspective Roles**
+
+| CLI | Role | Focus | Best For |
+|-----|------|-------|----------|
+| Gemini | Creative | Innovation, cross-domain | Generating novel ideas |
+| Codex | Pragmatic | Implementation, feasibility | Reality-checking ideas |
+| Claude | Systematic | Architecture, structure | Organizing solutions |
+
+**Collaboration Patterns**
+
+1. **Parallel Divergence**: All CLIs explore simultaneously from different angles
+2. **Sequential Deep-Dive**: One CLI expands, others critique/refine
+3. **Debate Mode**: CLIs argue for/against specific approaches
+4. **Synthesis Mode**: Combine insights from all perspectives
+
+**When to Use Each Pattern**
+
+- **New topic**: Parallel Divergence → get diverse initial ideas
+- **Promising idea**: Sequential Deep-Dive → thorough exploration
+- **Controversial approach**: Debate Mode → uncover hidden issues
+- **Ready to decide**: Synthesis Mode → create actionable conclusion
+
+### Error Handling
+
+| Situation | Action |
+|-----------|--------|
+| CLI timeout | Retry with shorter prompt, or continue without that perspective |
+| No good ideas | Reframe the problem, adjust constraints, try different angles |
+| User disengaged | Summarize progress, offer break point with resume option |
+| Perspectives conflict | Present as tradeoff, let user decide direction |
+| Max rounds reached | Force synthesis, highlight unresolved questions |
+| All ideas fail challenge | Return to divergent phase with new constraints |
+
+---
+
+## Templates
+
+### Session Folder Structure
```
.workflow/.brainstorm/BS-{slug}-{date}/
@@ -1012,14 +779,14 @@ if (selection.includes("导出分享")) {
└── merged-idea-1.md
```
-## Brainstorm Document Template
+### Brainstorm Document Template
```markdown
# Brainstorm Session
-**Session ID**: BS-xxx-2025-01-27
+**Session ID**: BS-xxx-YYYY-MM-DD
**Topic**: [idea or topic]
-**Started**: 2025-01-27T10:00:00+08:00
+**Started**: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss+08:00
**Mode**: creative | structured | balanced
**Dimensions**: [technical, ux, innovation, ...]
@@ -1039,115 +806,207 @@ if (selection.includes("导出分享")) {
> [the initial idea]
### Exploration Vectors
-[generated questions and directions]
+
+#### Vector 1: [title]
+**Question**: [question]
+**Angle**: [angle]
+**Potential**: [potential]
+
+[... more vectors ...]
---
## Thought Evolution Timeline
-### Round 1 - Seed Understanding
-...
+### Round 1 - Seed Understanding (timestamp)
-### Round 2 - Multi-Perspective Exploration
+#### Initial Parsing
+- **Core concept**: [concept]
+- **Problem space**: [space]
+- **Opportunity**: [opportunity]
-#### Creative Perspective (Gemini)
-...
-
-#### Pragmatic Perspective (Codex)
-...
-
-#### Systematic Perspective (Claude)
-...
-
-#### Perspective Synthesis
-...
-
-### Round 3 - Deep Dive
-...
-
-### Round 4 - Challenge
+#### Key Questions to Explore
+1. [question 1]
+2. [question 2]
...
---
-## Synthesis & Conclusions
+### Round 2 - Multi-Perspective Exploration (timestamp)
+
+#### Creative Perspective (Gemini)
+
+**Top Creative Ideas**:
+1. **[Title]** ⭐ Novelty: X/5 | Impact: Y/5
+ [description]
+
+**Challenged Assumptions**:
+- ~~[assumption]~~ → Consider: [alternative]
+
+**Cross-Domain Inspirations**:
+- [inspiration]
+
+---
+
+#### Pragmatic Perspective (Codex)
+
+**Implementation Approaches**:
+1. **[Title]** | Effort: X/5 | Risk: Y/5
+ [description]
+ - Quick win: [win]
+ - Dependencies: [deps]
+
+**Technical Blockers**:
+- ⚠️ [blocker]
+
+---
+
+#### Systematic Perspective (Claude)
+
+**Problem Decomposition**:
+[decomposition]
+
+**Architectural Options**:
+1. **[Pattern]**
+ - Pros: [pros]
+ - Cons: [cons]
+ - Best for: [context]
+
+---
+
+#### Perspective Synthesis
+
+**Convergent Themes** (all perspectives agree):
+- ✅ [theme]
+
+**Conflicting Views** (need resolution):
+- 🔄 [topic]
+ - Creative: [view]
+ - Pragmatic: [view]
+ - Systematic: [view]
+
+**Unique Contributions**:
+- 💡 [source] [insight]
+
+---
+
+### Round 3+ - [Round Type] (timestamp)
+
+[Round-specific content: deep-dive, challenge, merge, etc.]
+
+---
+
+## Synthesis & Conclusions (timestamp)
### Executive Summary
-...
+
+[summary]
### Top Ideas (Final Ranking)
-...
+
+#### 1. [Title] ⭐ Score: X/10
+
+**Description**: [description]
+
+**Why This Idea**:
+- ✅ [strength]
+
+**Main Challenges**:
+- ⚠️ [challenge]
+
+**Recommended Next Steps**:
+1. [step]
+2. [step]
+
+---
+
+[... more ideas ...]
### Primary Recommendation
-...
+
+> [recommendation]
+
+**Rationale**: [rationale]
+
+**Quick Start Path**:
+1. [step]
+2. [step]
+3. [step]
+
+### Alternative Approaches
+
+1. **[Title]**
+ - When to consider: [when]
+ - Tradeoff: [tradeoff]
+
+### Ideas Parked for Future
+
+- **[Title]** (Parked: [reason])
+ - Revisit when: [trigger]
---
## Key Insights
-...
+
+### Process Discoveries
+
+- 💡 [discovery]
+
+### Assumptions Challenged
+
+- ~~[original]~~ → [updated]
+
+### Unexpected Connections
+
+- 🔗 [connection]
---
## Current Understanding (Final)
-...
+
+### Problem Reframed
+
+[reframed problem]
+
+### Solution Space Mapped
+
+[solution space]
+
+### Decision Framework
+
+When to choose each approach:
+[framework]
---
## Session Statistics
-...
+
+- **Total Rounds**: [n]
+- **Ideas Generated**: [n]
+- **Ideas Survived**: [n]
+- **Perspectives Used**: Gemini (creative), Codex (pragmatic), Claude (systematic)
+- **Duration**: [duration]
+- **Artifacts**: brainstorm.md, perspectives.json, synthesis.json, [n] idea deep-dives
```
-## Multi-CLI Collaboration Strategy
-
-### Perspective Roles
-
-| CLI | Role | Focus | Best For |
-|-----|------|-------|----------|
-| Gemini | Creative | Innovation, cross-domain | Generating novel ideas |
-| Codex | Pragmatic | Implementation, feasibility | Reality-checking ideas |
-| Claude | Systematic | Architecture, structure | Organizing solutions |
-
-### Collaboration Patterns
-
-1. **Parallel Divergence**: All CLIs explore simultaneously from different angles
-2. **Sequential Deep-Dive**: One CLI expands, others critique/refine
-3. **Debate Mode**: CLIs argue for/against specific approaches
-4. **Synthesis Mode**: Combine insights from all perspectives
-
-### When to Use Each Pattern
-
-- **New topic**: Parallel Divergence → get diverse initial ideas
-- **Promising idea**: Sequential Deep-Dive → thorough exploration
-- **Controversial approach**: Debate Mode → uncover hidden issues
-- **Ready to decide**: Synthesis Mode → create actionable conclusion
-
-## Error Handling
-
-| Situation | Action |
-|-----------|--------|
-| CLI timeout | Retry with shorter prompt, or continue without that perspective |
-| No good ideas | Reframe the problem, adjust constraints, try different angles |
-| User disengaged | Summarize progress, offer break point with resume option |
-| Perspectives conflict | Present as tradeoff, let user decide direction |
-| Max rounds reached | Force synthesis, highlight unresolved questions |
-| All ideas fail challenge | Return to divergent phase with new constraints |
+---
## Usage Recommendations
-Use `/workflow:brainstorm-with-file` when:
+**Use `/workflow:brainstorm-with-file` when:**
- Starting a new feature/product without clear direction
- Facing a complex problem with multiple possible solutions
- Need to explore alternatives before committing
- Want documented thinking process for team review
- Combining multiple stakeholder perspectives
-Use `/workflow:analyze-with-file` when:
+**Use `/workflow:analyze-with-file` when:**
- Investigating existing code/system
- Need factual analysis over ideation
- Debugging or troubleshooting
- Understanding current state
-Use `/workflow:plan` when:
+**Use `/workflow:plan` when:**
- Direction is already clear
- Ready to move from ideas to execution
- Need implementation breakdown
diff --git a/.claude/commands/workflow/collaborative-plan-with-file.md b/.claude/commands/workflow/collaborative-plan-with-file.md
index 80416171..0518e9d0 100644
--- a/.claude/commands/workflow/collaborative-plan-with-file.md
+++ b/.claude/commands/workflow/collaborative-plan-with-file.md
@@ -135,6 +135,12 @@ Bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}/agents`)
Use CLI to analyze and split requirements:
+**⚠️ CRITICAL - CLI EXECUTION REQUIREMENT**:
+- **MUST** wait for CLI execution to fully complete before proceeding
+- After launching CLI with `run_in_background: true`, **STOP** and wait for hook callback
+- **DO NOT** proceed to Phase 2 until CLI results are fully received
+- Minimize scope: Proceed only when 100% result available
+
```javascript
TodoWrite({ todos: [
{ content: "Phase 1: Requirement Analysis", status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Analyzing requirements" },
@@ -193,9 +199,12 @@ CONSTRAINTS: Maximum ${maxAgents} sub-requirements | Ensure clear boundaries
})
// Wait for CLI completion and parse result
+// ⚠️ CRITICAL: Must wait for CLI complete - do NOT proceed until results received
// ... (hook callback will provide result)
```
+**⚠️ STOP POINT**: After launching CLI, stop output immediately. Wait for hook callback to receive complete result before continuing.
+
**After CLI completes**:
```javascript
diff --git a/.claude/commands/workflow/multi-cli-plan.md b/.claude/commands/workflow/multi-cli-plan.md
index e3f2d157..0323b317 100644
--- a/.claude/commands/workflow/multi-cli-plan.md
+++ b/.claude/commands/workflow/multi-cli-plan.md
@@ -126,6 +126,13 @@ const aceQueries = [
**Core Principle**: Orchestrator only delegates and reads output - NO direct CLI execution.
+**⚠️ CRITICAL - CLI EXECUTION REQUIREMENT**:
+- **MUST** execute CLI calls via `Bash` with `run_in_background: true`
+- **MUST** wait for hook callback to receive complete results
+- **MUST NOT** proceed with next phase until CLI execution fully completes
+- Do NOT use `TaskOutput` polling during CLI execution - wait passively for results
+- Minimize scope: Proceed only when 100% result available
+
**Agent Invocation**:
```javascript
Task({
diff --git a/.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-task-generate.md b/.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-task-generate.md
index fa25dfb3..97d5e04f 100644
--- a/.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-task-generate.md
+++ b/.claude/commands/workflow/tools/test-task-generate.md
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ Write(testPlanningNotesPath, `# Test Planning Notes
**Execution Steps**:
1. Load TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md from `.workflow/active/{test-session-id}/.process/`
2. Invoke `cli-execution-agent` with Gemini for test enhancement analysis
-3. Use template: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/test/test-suggestions-enhancement.txt`
+3. Use template: `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/test-suggestions-enhancement.txt`
4. Gemini generates enriched test suggestions across L1-L3 layers → gemini-enriched-suggestions.md
5. Record enriched suggestions to test-planning-notes.md (Gemini Enhancement section)
diff --git a/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/test/test-suggestions-enhancement.txt b/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/test-suggestions-enhancement.txt
similarity index 100%
rename from .claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/test/test-suggestions-enhancement.txt
rename to .claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/test-suggestions-enhancement.txt
diff --git a/ccw/frontend/index.html b/ccw/frontend/index.html
index 49a9fe02..c8c33d00 100644
--- a/ccw/frontend/index.html
+++ b/ccw/frontend/index.html
@@ -4,6 +4,9 @@
+
+
+
CCW Dashboard
diff --git a/ccw/frontend/src/components/layout/Sidebar.tsx b/ccw/frontend/src/components/layout/Sidebar.tsx
index e6abd6d6..b8cd0ff3 100644
--- a/ccw/frontend/src/components/layout/Sidebar.tsx
+++ b/ccw/frontend/src/components/layout/Sidebar.tsx
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ export function Sidebar({
mobileOpen && 'fixed left-0 top-14 flex translate-x-0 z-50 h-[calc(100vh-56px)] w-64 shadow-lg'
)}
role="navigation"
- aria-label={formatMessage({ id: 'header.brand' })}
+ aria-label={formatMessage({ id: 'navigation.header.brand' })}
>