feat: Enhance workflow execution and documentation processes

- Added compact protection directives to execution phases to ensure critical instructions are preserved during context compression.
- Introduced checkpoints in execution steps to verify active memory of execution protocols.
- Created new command files for team lifecycle roles:
  - `dispatch.md`: Manage task chains based on execution modes.
  - `monitor.md`: Event-driven pipeline coordination with worker callbacks.
  - `critique.md`: Multi-perspective CLI critique for structured analysis.
  - `implement.md`: Multi-backend code implementation with retry and fallback mechanisms.
  - `explore.md`: Complexity-driven codebase exploration for task planning.
  - `generate-doc.md`: Multi-CLI document generation for various document types.
- Updated SKILL.md to include compact protection patterns and phase reference documentation.

.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v3/roles/discussant/commands/critique.md

@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+# Command: critique
+
+## Purpose
+
+Multi-perspective CLI critique: launch parallel analyses from assigned perspectives, collect structured ratings, detect divergences, and synthesize consensus.
+
+## Phase 2: Context Loading
+
+| Input | Source | Required |
+|-------|--------|----------|
+| Round config | DISCUSS-NNN → look up round in role.md table | Yes |
+| Artifact | `<session-folder>/<artifact-path>` from round config | Yes |
+| Perspectives | Round config perspectives column | Yes |
+| Discovery context | `<session-folder>/spec/discovery-context.json` | For coverage perspective |
+| Prior discussions | `<session-folder>/discussions/` | No |
+
+## Phase 3: Multi-Perspective Critique
+
+### Perspective Routing
+
+| Perspective | CLI Tool | Role | Focus Areas |
+|-------------|----------|------|-------------|
+| Product | gemini | Product Manager | Market fit, user value, business viability, competitive differentiation |
+| Technical | codex | Tech Lead | Feasibility, tech debt, performance, security, maintainability |
+| Quality | claude | QA Lead | Completeness, testability, consistency, standards compliance |
+| Risk | gemini | Risk Analyst | Risk identification, dependencies, failure modes, mitigation |
+| Coverage | gemini | Requirements Analyst | Requirement completeness vs discovery-context, gap detection, scope creep |
+
+### Execution Flow
+
+```
+For each perspective in round config:
+  ├─ Build prompt with perspective focus + artifact content
+  ├─ Launch CLI analysis (background)
+  │   Bash(command="ccw cli -p '<prompt>' --tool <cli-tool> --mode analysis", run_in_background=true)
+  └─ Collect result via hook callback
+```
+
+### CLI Call Template
+
+```bash
+Bash(command="ccw cli -p 'PURPOSE: Analyze from <role> perspective for <round-id>
+TASK: <focus-areas-from-table>
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: Artifact content below
+EXPECTED: JSON with strengths[], weaknesses[], suggestions[], rating (1-5)
+CONSTRAINTS: Output valid JSON only
+
+Artifact:
+<artifact-content>' --tool <cli-tool> --mode analysis", run_in_background=true)
+```
+
+### Extra Fields by Perspective
+
+| Perspective | Additional Output Fields |
+|-------------|------------------------|
+| Risk | `risk_level`: low / medium / high / critical |
+| Coverage | `covered_requirements[]`, `partial_requirements[]`, `missing_requirements[]`, `scope_creep[]` |
+
+---
+
+### Divergence Detection
+
+After all perspectives return, scan results for critical signals:
+
+| Signal | Condition | Severity |
+|--------|-----------|----------|
+| Coverage gap | `missing_requirements` non-empty | High |
+| High risk | `risk_level` is high or critical | High |
+| Low rating | Any perspective rating <= 2 | Medium |
+| Rating spread | Max rating - min rating >= 3 | Medium |
+
+### Consensus Determination
+
+| Condition | Verdict |
+|-----------|---------|
+| No high-severity divergences AND average rating >= 3.0 | consensus_reached |
+| Any high-severity divergence OR average rating < 3.0 | consensus_blocked |
+
+### Synthesis Process
+
+```
+Collect all perspective results
+  ├─ Extract convergent themes (agreed by 2+ perspectives)
+  ├─ Extract divergent views (conflicting assessments)
+  ├─ Check coverage gaps from coverage result
+  ├─ Compile action items from all suggestions
+  └─ Determine consensus per table above
+```
+
+## Phase 4: Validation
+
+### Discussion Record
+
+Write to `<session-folder>/discussions/<round-id>-discussion.md`:
+
+```
+# Discussion Record: <round-id>
+
+**Artifact**: <artifact-path>
+**Perspectives**: <list>
+**Consensus**: reached / blocked
+
+## Convergent Themes
+- <theme>
+
+## Divergent Views
+- **<topic>** (<severity>): <description>
+
+## Action Items
+1. <item>
+
+## Ratings
+| Perspective | Rating |
+|-------------|--------|
+| <name> | <n>/5 |
+
+**Average**: <avg>/5
+```
+
+### Result Routing
+
+| Outcome | Message Type | Content |
+|---------|-------------|---------|
+| Consensus reached | discussion_ready | Action items, record path, average rating |
+| Consensus blocked | discussion_blocked | Divergence points, severity, record path |
+| Artifact not found | error | Missing artifact path |
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Scenario | Resolution |
+|----------|------------|
+| Artifact not found | Report error to coordinator |
+| Single CLI perspective fails | Fallback to direct Claude analysis for that perspective |
+| All CLI analyses fail | Generate basic discussion from direct artifact reading |
+| All perspectives diverge | Report as discussion_blocked with all divergence points |