mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-14 02:42:04 +08:00
Add session status file creation rule across workflow commands
Updates all workflow commands to create .workflow/session_status.jsonl if it doesn't exist when checking for active sessions. This ensures consistent behavior across: - gemini-chat.md: Added creation rule and updated workflow pseudocode - gemini-execute.md: Added session file creation requirement - gemini-mode.md: Updated session check process - workflow/action-plan.md: Updated both session check locations - task/replan.md: Added creation rule to session validation - task/breakdown.md: Updated session check process - workflow/brainstorm.md: Added creation rule to session registry query Also includes cleanup of deprecated command files (context.md, sync.md) and documentation updates for task creation complexity escalation. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Your response **MUST** be in Chinese and structured in Markdown as follows:
|
||||
### **代码修改规划方案 (Code Modification Plan)**
|
||||
|
||||
### **第一部分:需求分析与规划总览 (Part 1: Requirements Analysis & Planning Overview)**
|
||||
* **1.1 用户原始需求结构化解析 (Structured Analysis of User's Original Requirements):**
|
||||
* **1.1 用户原始需求结构化解析 (Structured Analysis of Users Original Requirements):**
|
||||
* [将用户的原始需求拆解成一个或多个清晰、独立、可操作的要点列表。每个要点都是一个明确的目标。]
|
||||
* **- 需求点 A:** [描述第一个具体需求]
|
||||
* **- 需求点 B:** [描述第二个具体需求]
|
||||
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ Your response **MUST** be in Chinese and structured in Markdown as follows:
|
||||
* [清晰说明函数、类、方法或具体的代码区域,如果可能,指出大致行号范围。示例: 函数 `calculate_total_price` 内部,约第 75-80 行]
|
||||
|
||||
* **1.bis 相关原始代码片段 (Relevant Original Code Snippet):**
|
||||
* [**在此处引用需要修改或在其附近进行修改的、最相关的几行原始代码。** 这为开发者提供了直接的上下文。如果代码未提供,则注明“相关代码未提供,根据描述进行规划。]
|
||||
* [**在此处引用需要修改或在其附近进行修改的、最相关的几行原始代码。** 这为开发者提供了直接的上下文。如果代码未提供,则注明相关代码未提供,根据描述进行规划。]
|
||||
* ```[language]
|
||||
// 引用相关的1-5行原始代码
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -109,16 +109,16 @@ Your response **MUST** be in Chinese and structured in Markdown as follows:
|
||||
## VII. KEY DIRECTIVES & CONSTRAINTS
|
||||
1. **Language**: **All** descriptive parts of your plan **MUST** be in **Chinese**.
|
||||
2. **No Code Generation**: **Strictly refrain** from writing, suggesting, or generating any actual code. Your output is *purely* a descriptive modification plan.
|
||||
3. **Focus on "What" and "Why", Illustrate "How" (Logic Sketch)**: Detail what needs to be done and why. The call flow sketch illustrates the *intended how* at a logical level, not implementation code.
|
||||
4. **Completeness & Accuracy**: Ensure the plan is comprehensive. If information is insufficient, state assumptions clearly in the "思考过程 (Thinking Process)" and "必要上下文 (Necessary Context)".
|
||||
3. **Focus on What and Why, Illustrate How (Logic Sketch)**: Detail what needs to be done and why. The call flow sketch illustrates the *intended how* at a logical level, not implementation code.
|
||||
4. **Completeness & Accuracy**: Ensure the plan is comprehensive. If information is insufficient, state assumptions clearly in the 思考过程 (Thinking Process) and 必要上下文 (Necessary Context).
|
||||
5. **Professional Standard**: Your plan should meet the standards expected of a senior technical document, suitable for guiding development work.
|
||||
|
||||
## VIII. SELF-CORRECTION / REFLECTION
|
||||
* Before finalizing your response, review it to ensure:
|
||||
* The "思考过程 (Thinking Process)" clearly outlines your structured analytical approach.
|
||||
* All user requirements from "需求分析" have been addressed in the plan.
|
||||
* The 思考过程 (Thinking Process) clearly outlines your structured analytical approach.
|
||||
* All user requirements from 需求分析 have been addressed in the plan.
|
||||
* The modification plan is logical, actionable, and sufficiently detailed, with relevant original code snippets for context.
|
||||
* The "修改理由 (Reason for Modification)" explicitly links back to the initial requirements.
|
||||
* The 修改理由 (Reason for Modification) explicitly links back to the initial requirements.
|
||||
* All crucial context and risks are highlighted.
|
||||
* The entire output is in professional, clear Chinese and adheres to the specified Markdown structure.
|
||||
* You have strictly avoided generating any code.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user