docs: add CLI results as memory/context section

Add comprehensive explanation of how CLI tool results can be saved and
reused as context for subsequent operations:
- Result persistence in workflow sessions (.chat/ directory)
- Using analysis results as planning basis
- Using analysis results as implementation basis
- Cross-session references
- Memory update loops with iterative optimization
- Visual memory flow diagram showing phase-to-phase context passing
- Best practices for maintaining continuity and quality

This enables intelligent workflows where Gemini/Qwen analysis informs
Codex implementation, and all results accumulate as project memory for
future decision-making. Integrates with /workflow:plan and
/workflow:lite-plan commands.
This commit is contained in:
Claude
2025-11-20 09:53:21 +00:00
parent 383da9ebb7
commit c34a6042c0
2 changed files with 240 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -357,6 +357,126 @@ Phase 1: Gemini analysis ──┐
---
#### 🔗 CLI Results as Context (Memory)
CLI tool analysis results can be saved and used as context (memory) for subsequent operations, enabling intelligent workflows:
**1. Result Persistence**
```bash
# CLI execution results automatically saved to session directory
/cli:chat --tool gemini "Analyze authentication module architecture"
→ Saved to: .workflow/active/WFS-xxx/.chat/chat-[timestamp].md
/cli:analyze --tool qwen "Evaluate performance bottlenecks"
→ Saved to: .workflow/active/WFS-xxx/.chat/analyze-[timestamp].md
/cli:execute --tool codex "Implement feature"
→ Saved to: .workflow/active/WFS-xxx/.chat/execute-[timestamp].md
```
**2. Results as Planning Basis**
```bash
# Step 1: Analyze current state (generate memory)
Use gemini to deeply analyze authentication system architecture, security, and performance issues
→ Output: Detailed analysis report (auto-saved)
# Step 2: Plan based on analysis results
/workflow:plan "Refactor authentication system based on above Gemini analysis report"
→ System automatically reads analysis reports from .chat/ as context
→ Generate precise implementation plan
```
**3. Results as Implementation Basis**
```bash
# Step 1: Parallel analysis (generate multiple memories)
Use gemini to analyze existing code structure
Use qwen to evaluate technical solution feasibility
→ Output: Multiple analysis reports
# Step 2: Implement based on all analysis results
Have codex synthesize above Gemini and Qwen analyses to implement optimal solution
→ Codex automatically reads prior analysis results
→ Generate code conforming to architecture design
```
**4. Cross-Session References**
```bash
# Reference historical session analysis results
/cli:execute --tool codex "Refer to architecture analysis in WFS-2024-001, implement new payment module"
→ System automatically loads specified session context
→ Implement based on historical analysis
```
**5. Memory Update Loop**
```bash
# Iterative optimization flow
Use gemini to analyze problems in current implementation
→ Generate problem report (memory)
Have codex optimize code based on problem report
→ Implement improvements (update memory)
Use qwen to verify optimization effectiveness
→ Verification report (append to memory)
# All results accumulate as complete project memory
→ Support subsequent decisions and implementation
```
**Memory Flow Example**:
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 1: Analysis Phase (Generate Memory) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Gemini analysis → Architecture report (.chat/analyze-001.md)│
│ Qwen evaluation → Solution report (.chat/analyze-002.md) │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│ As Memory Input
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 2: Planning Phase (Use Memory) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ /workflow:plan → Read analysis reports → Generate plan │
│ (.task/IMPL-*.json) │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│ As Memory Input
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 3: Implementation Phase (Use Memory) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Codex implement → Read plan+analysis → Generate code │
│ (.chat/execute-001.md) │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│ As Memory Input
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 4: Verification Phase (Use Memory) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Gemini review → Read implementation code → Quality report│
│ (.chat/review-001.md) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Complete Project Memory Library
Supporting All Future Decisions and Implementation
```
**Best Practices**:
1. **Maintain Continuity**: Execute related tasks in the same session to automatically share memory
2. **Explicit References**: Explicitly reference historical analyses when crossing sessions (e.g., "Refer to WFS-xxx analysis")
3. **Incremental Updates**: Each analysis and implementation appends to memory, forming complete decision chain
4. **Regular Organization**: Use `/memory:update-related` to consolidate CLI results into CLAUDE.md
5. **Quality First**: High-quality analysis memory significantly improves subsequent implementation quality
---
#### 🔄 Workflow Integration Examples
**Integration with Lite Workflow**: