Refactor workflow file paths from .workflow/sessions/ to .workflow/active/ for improved session management and consistency across commands. Updated documentation and command references to reflect the new directory structure, ensuring all relevant commands and outputs are correctly aligned with the active session model.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/codex-feasibility-validation.txt

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Validate technical feasibility and identify implementation risks for proposed so
 □ Assess complexity, validate technology choices
 □ Evaluate performance and security implications
 □ Focus on TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY and RISK ASSESSMENT
-□ Write output to specified .workflow/sessions/{session_id}/.process/ path
+□ Write output to specified .workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/ path
 
 ## PREREQUISITE ANALYSIS
 
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Review Gemini's proposed code targets:
 ## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
 
 ### Output File
-**Path**: `.workflow/sessions/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md`
+**Path**: `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md`
 **Format**: Follow structure from `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/analysis-results-structure.txt`
 
 ### Required Sections
@@ -171,6 +171,6 @@ Rate each aspect on 1-5 scale:
 □ Risk mitigation strategies provided
 □ Resource requirements estimated
 □ Final feasibility judgment (PROCEED/RECONSIDER/REJECT)
-□ Output written to .workflow/sessions/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md
+□ Output written to .workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/codex-feasibility-validation.md
 
 Focus: Technical feasibility validation with realistic risk assessment and mitigation strategies.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/gemini-solution-design.txt

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Analyze and design optimal solution with comprehensive architecture evaluation a
 □ Analyze current architecture patterns and code structure
 □ Propose solution design with key decisions and rationale
 □ Focus on SOLUTION IMPROVEMENTS and KEY DESIGN DECISIONS
-□ Write output to specified .workflow/sessions/{session_id}/.process/ path
+□ Write output to specified .workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/ path
 
 ## ANALYSIS PRIORITY
 
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ For each target:
 ## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
 
 ### Output File
-**Path**: `.workflow/sessions/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md`
+**Path**: `.workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md`
 **Format**: Follow structure from `~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/analysis-results-structure.txt`
 
 ### Required Sections
@@ -126,6 +126,6 @@ If brainstorming artifacts exist:
 □ Code targets specified in correct format
 □ Feasibility scores provided (X/5)
 □ Final recommendation (PROCEED/RECONSIDER/REJECT)
-□ Output written to .workflow/sessions/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md
+□ Output written to .workflow/active/{session_id}/.process/gemini-solution-design.md
 
 Focus: Comprehensive solution design emphasizing architecture decisions and critical insights.

.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/workflow/impl-plan-template.txt

@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ IMPL_PLAN.md Template - Implementation Plan Document Structure
 ---
 identifier: WFS-{session-id}
 source: "User requirements" | "File: path" | "Issue: ISS-001"
-analysis: .workflow/sessions//{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
-artifacts: .workflow/sessions//{session-id}/.brainstorming/
-context_package: .workflow/sessions//{session-id}/.process/context-package.json  # CCW smart context
+analysis: .workflow/active//{session-id}/.process/ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md
+artifacts: .workflow/active//{session-id}/.brainstorming/
+context_package: .workflow/active//{session-id}/.process/context-package.json  # CCW smart context
 workflow_type: "standard | tdd | design"  # Indicates execution model
 verification_history:  # CCW quality gates
   concept_verify: "passed | skipped | pending"