mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-13 02:41:50 +08:00
Add comprehensive brainstorming commands for synthesis, system architecture, UI design, and user research perspectives
- Implemented the `brainstorm:synthesis` command to integrate insights from various roles into a cohesive analysis and recommendations report. - Created `brainstorm:system-architect` command for technical architecture and scalability analysis, including detailed execution protocols and output structures. - Developed `brainstorm:ui-designer` command focusing on user experience and interface design, with a structured approach to analysis and documentation. - Introduced `brainstorm:user-researcher` command for user behavior analysis and research insights, emphasizing user needs and usability assessments.
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
299
.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/synthesis.md
Normal file
299
.claude/commands/workflow/brainstorm/synthesis.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: brainstorm:synthesis
|
||||
description: Synthesize all brainstorming role perspectives into comprehensive analysis and recommendations
|
||||
usage: /brainstorm:synthesis
|
||||
argument-hint: "no arguments required - analyzes existing brainstorming session outputs"
|
||||
examples:
|
||||
- /brainstorm:synthesis
|
||||
allowed-tools: Read(*), Write(*), TodoWrite(*), Glob(*)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧩 **命令定义: Brainstorm Synthesis**
|
||||
|
||||
### 核心功能
|
||||
- **跨角色综合**: 整合所有角色的头脑风暴分析结果
|
||||
- **洞察提炼**: 识别共识点、分歧点和创新机会
|
||||
- **决策支持**: 生成优先级建议和行动计划
|
||||
- **报告生成**: 创建综合性的头脑风暴总结报告
|
||||
|
||||
### 分析范围
|
||||
- **产品管理**: 用户需求、商业价值、市场机会
|
||||
- **技术架构**: 系统设计、技术选型、实施可行性
|
||||
- **用户体验**: 界面设计、可用性、可访问性
|
||||
- **数据架构**: 数据模型、处理流程、分析能力
|
||||
- **安全专家**: 威胁评估、安全控制、合规要求
|
||||
- **用户研究**: 行为洞察、需求验证、体验优化
|
||||
- **业务分析**: 流程优化、成本效益、变更管理
|
||||
- **创新领导**: 技术趋势、创新机会、未来规划
|
||||
- **功能规划**: 开发计划、质量保证、交付管理
|
||||
|
||||
## ⚙️ **执行协议**
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: 会话检测与数据收集
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# 自动检测活动会话
|
||||
CHECK: .workflow/.active-* marker files
|
||||
IF active_session EXISTS:
|
||||
session_id = get_active_session()
|
||||
load_context_from(session_id)
|
||||
ELSE:
|
||||
ERROR: "No active brainstorming session found. Please run role-specific brainstorming commands first."
|
||||
EXIT
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: 角色输出扫描
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# 扫描所有角色的头脑风暴输出
|
||||
SCAN_DIRECTORY: .workflow/WFS-{session}/.brainstorming/
|
||||
COLLECT_OUTPUTS: [
|
||||
product-manager/analysis.md,
|
||||
system-architect/analysis.md,
|
||||
ui-designer/analysis.md,
|
||||
data-architect/analysis.md,
|
||||
security-expert/analysis.md,
|
||||
user-researcher/analysis.md,
|
||||
business-analyst/analysis.md,
|
||||
innovation-lead/analysis.md,
|
||||
feature-planner/analysis.md
|
||||
]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: TodoWrite 初始化
|
||||
设置综合分析任务跟踪：
|
||||
```json
|
||||
[
|
||||
{"content": "Initialize synthesis brainstorming session", "status": "completed", "activeForm": "Initializing synthesis"},
|
||||
{"content": "Collect and analyze all role perspectives", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Collecting role analyses"},
|
||||
{"content": "Identify cross-role insights and patterns", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Identifying insights"},
|
||||
{"content": "Generate consensus and disagreement analysis", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Analyzing consensus"},
|
||||
{"content": "Create prioritized recommendations matrix", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Creating recommendations"},
|
||||
{"content": "Generate comprehensive synthesis report", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Generating synthesis report"},
|
||||
{"content": "Create action plan with implementation priorities", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Creating action plan"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: 综合分析执行
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.1 数据收集和预处理
|
||||
```pseudo
|
||||
FOR each role_directory in brainstorming_roles:
|
||||
IF role_directory exists:
|
||||
role_analysis = Read(role_directory + "/analysis.md")
|
||||
role_recommendations = Read(role_directory + "/recommendations.md") IF EXISTS
|
||||
role_insights[role] = extract_key_insights(role_analysis)
|
||||
role_recommendations[role] = extract_recommendations(role_analysis)
|
||||
role_concerns[role] = extract_concerns_risks(role_analysis)
|
||||
END IF
|
||||
END FOR
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.2 跨角色洞察分析
|
||||
```pseudo
|
||||
# 共识点识别
|
||||
consensus_areas = identify_common_themes(role_insights)
|
||||
agreement_matrix = create_agreement_matrix(role_recommendations)
|
||||
|
||||
# 分歧点分析
|
||||
disagreement_areas = identify_conflicting_views(role_insights)
|
||||
tension_points = analyze_role_conflicts(role_recommendations)
|
||||
|
||||
# 创新机会提取
|
||||
innovation_opportunities = extract_breakthrough_ideas(role_insights)
|
||||
synergy_opportunities = identify_cross_role_synergies(role_insights)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4.3 优先级和决策矩阵生成
|
||||
```pseudo
|
||||
# 创建综合评估矩阵
|
||||
FOR each recommendation:
|
||||
impact_score = calculate_business_impact(recommendation, role_insights)
|
||||
feasibility_score = calculate_technical_feasibility(recommendation, role_insights)
|
||||
effort_score = calculate_implementation_effort(recommendation, role_insights)
|
||||
risk_score = calculate_associated_risks(recommendation, role_insights)
|
||||
|
||||
priority_score = weighted_score(impact_score, feasibility_score, effort_score, risk_score)
|
||||
END FOR
|
||||
|
||||
SORT recommendations BY priority_score DESC
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 **输出结构**
|
||||
|
||||
### 保存位置
|
||||
```
|
||||
.workflow/WFS-{topic-slug}/.brainstorming/
|
||||
├── synthesis-report.md # 综合分析报告
|
||||
├── recommendations-matrix.md # 优先级推荐矩阵
|
||||
├── action-plan.md # 实施行动计划
|
||||
├── consensus-analysis.md # 共识和分歧分析
|
||||
└── brainstorm-summary.json # 机器可读的综合数据
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 核心输出文档
|
||||
|
||||
#### synthesis-report.md 结构
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Brainstorming Synthesis Report: {Topic}
|
||||
*Generated: {timestamp} | Session: WFS-{topic-slug}*
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
### Key Findings Overview
|
||||
### Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
### Implementation Priority
|
||||
### Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
## Participating Perspectives Analysis
|
||||
### Roles Analyzed: {list_of_completed_roles}
|
||||
### Coverage Assessment: {completeness_percentage}%
|
||||
### Analysis Quality Score: {quality_assessment}
|
||||
|
||||
## Cross-Role Insights Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
### 🤝 Consensus Areas
|
||||
**Strong Agreement (3+ roles)**:
|
||||
1. **{consensus_theme_1}**
|
||||
- Supporting roles: {role1, role2, role3}
|
||||
- Key insight: {shared_understanding}
|
||||
- Business impact: {impact_assessment}
|
||||
|
||||
2. **{consensus_theme_2}**
|
||||
- Supporting roles: {role1, role2, role4}
|
||||
- Key insight: {shared_understanding}
|
||||
- Business impact: {impact_assessment}
|
||||
|
||||
### ⚡ Breakthrough Ideas
|
||||
**Innovation Opportunities**:
|
||||
1. **{breakthrough_idea_1}**
|
||||
- Origin: {source_role}
|
||||
- Cross-role support: {supporting_roles}
|
||||
- Innovation potential: {potential_assessment}
|
||||
|
||||
2. **{breakthrough_idea_2}**
|
||||
- Origin: {source_role}
|
||||
- Cross-role support: {supporting_roles}
|
||||
- Innovation potential: {potential_assessment}
|
||||
|
||||
### 🔄 Areas of Disagreement
|
||||
**Tension Points Requiring Resolution**:
|
||||
1. **{disagreement_area_1}**
|
||||
- Conflicting views: {role1_view} vs {role2_view}
|
||||
- Root cause: {underlying_issue}
|
||||
- Resolution approach: {recommended_resolution}
|
||||
|
||||
2. **{disagreement_area_2}**
|
||||
- Conflicting views: {role1_view} vs {role2_view}
|
||||
- Root cause: {underlying_issue}
|
||||
- Resolution approach: {recommended_resolution}
|
||||
|
||||
## Comprehensive Recommendations Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
### 🎯 High Priority (Immediate Action)
|
||||
| Recommendation | Business Impact | Technical Feasibility | Implementation Effort | Risk Level | Supporting Roles |
|
||||
|----------------|-----------------|----------------------|---------------------|------------|------------------|
|
||||
| {rec_1} | High | High | Medium | Low | PM, Arch, UX |
|
||||
| {rec_2} | High | Medium | Low | Medium | BA, PM, FP |
|
||||
|
||||
### 📋 Medium Priority (Strategic Planning)
|
||||
| Recommendation | Business Impact | Technical Feasibility | Implementation Effort | Risk Level | Supporting Roles |
|
||||
|----------------|-----------------|----------------------|---------------------|------------|------------------|
|
||||
| {rec_3} | Medium | High | High | Medium | Arch, DA, Sec |
|
||||
| {rec_4} | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low | UX, UR, PM |
|
||||
|
||||
### 🔬 Research Priority (Future Investigation)
|
||||
| Recommendation | Business Impact | Technical Feasibility | Implementation Effort | Risk Level | Supporting Roles |
|
||||
|----------------|-----------------|----------------------|---------------------|------------|------------------|
|
||||
| {rec_5} | High | Unknown | High | High | IL, Arch, PM |
|
||||
| {rec_6} | Medium | Low | High | High | IL, DA, Sec |
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Foundation (0-3 months)
|
||||
- **Focus**: High-priority, low-effort recommendations
|
||||
- **Key Actions**: {action_list}
|
||||
- **Success Metrics**: {metrics_list}
|
||||
- **Required Resources**: {resource_list}
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Development (3-9 months)
|
||||
- **Focus**: Medium-priority strategic initiatives
|
||||
- **Key Actions**: {action_list}
|
||||
- **Success Metrics**: {metrics_list}
|
||||
- **Required Resources**: {resource_list}
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Innovation (9+ months)
|
||||
- **Focus**: Research and breakthrough opportunities
|
||||
- **Key Actions**: {action_list}
|
||||
- **Success Metrics**: {metrics_list}
|
||||
- **Required Resources**: {resource_list}
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Risks Identified
|
||||
1. **{risk_1}**: {description} | Mitigation: {strategy}
|
||||
2. **{risk_2}**: {description} | Mitigation: {strategy}
|
||||
|
||||
### Success Factors
|
||||
- {success_factor_1}
|
||||
- {success_factor_2}
|
||||
- {success_factor_3}
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps and Follow-up
|
||||
### Immediate Actions Required
|
||||
### Decision Points Needing Resolution
|
||||
### Continuous Monitoring Requirements
|
||||
### Future Brainstorming Sessions Recommended
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
*This synthesis integrates insights from {role_count} perspectives to provide comprehensive strategic guidance.*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔄 **会话集成**
|
||||
|
||||
### 状态同步
|
||||
综合分析完成后，更新 `workflow-session.json`:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phases": {
|
||||
"BRAINSTORM": {
|
||||
"status": "completed",
|
||||
"synthesis_completed": true,
|
||||
"completed_at": "timestamp",
|
||||
"participating_roles": ["product-manager", "system-architect", "ui-designer", ...],
|
||||
"key_outputs": {
|
||||
"synthesis_report": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/synthesis-report.md",
|
||||
"action_plan": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/action-plan.md",
|
||||
"recommendations_matrix": ".workflow/WFS-{topic}/.brainstorming/recommendations-matrix.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"metrics": {
|
||||
"roles_analyzed": 9,
|
||||
"consensus_areas": 5,
|
||||
"breakthrough_ideas": 3,
|
||||
"high_priority_recommendations": 8,
|
||||
"implementation_phases": 3
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## ✅ **质量标准**
|
||||
|
||||
### 必须包含的综合元素
|
||||
- [ ] 所有可用角色分析的整合
|
||||
- [ ] 明确的共识和分歧识别
|
||||
- [ ] 量化的优先级推荐矩阵
|
||||
- [ ] 可执行的实施计划
|
||||
- [ ] 全面的风险评估和缓解
|
||||
|
||||
### 综合分析质量检查
|
||||
- [ ] **完整性**: 整合所有可用的角色分析
|
||||
- [ ] **洞察力**: 识别跨角色的深层次模式
|
||||
- [ ] **可操作性**: 提供具体可执行的建议
|
||||
- [ ] **平衡性**: 考虑所有角色的观点和关切
|
||||
- [ ] **前瞻性**: 包含长期战略和创新考量
|
||||
|
||||
### 输出验证标准
|
||||
- [ ] 推荐优先级基于多维度评估
|
||||
- [ ] 实施计划考虑资源和时间约束
|
||||
- [ ] 风险评估全面且有缓解策略
|
||||
- [ ] 成功指标明确可测量
|
||||
- [ ] 后续行动清晰具体
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user