docs: Update documentation for v5.9.6 with new commands and features

- Update README_CN.md version badge to v5.9.6
- Update COMMAND_REFERENCE.md with new commands:
  - workflow:lite-fix (bug diagnosis workflow)
  - workflow:lite-execute (in-memory execution)
  - workflow:review-module-cycle (module code review)
  - workflow:review-session-cycle (session code review)
  - workflow:review-fix (automated fixing)
  - memory:docs-* CLI commands
  - memory:skill-memory, tech-research, workflow-skill-memory
- Update analyze_commands.py:
  - Add lite workflows relationships
  - Add review cycle workflows relationships
  - Update essential commands list
- Rebuild command-guide index with updated relationships

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2025-11-28 17:08:59 +08:00
parent 79b13f363b
commit e75cdf0b61
64 changed files with 6376 additions and 8127 deletions

View File

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ AskUserQuestion({
**Trigger**: User calls with file path
**Input**: Path to file containing task description or Enhanced Task JSON
**Input**: Path to file containing task description or plan.json
**Step 1: Read and Detect Format**
@@ -103,42 +103,30 @@ fileContent = Read(filePath)
try {
jsonData = JSON.parse(fileContent)
// Check if Enhanced Task JSON from lite-plan
if (jsonData.meta?.workflow === "lite-plan") {
// Extract plan data
planObject = {
summary: jsonData.context.plan.summary,
approach: jsonData.context.plan.approach,
tasks: jsonData.context.plan.tasks,
estimated_time: jsonData.meta.estimated_time,
recommended_execution: jsonData.meta.recommended_execution,
complexity: jsonData.meta.complexity
}
explorationContext = jsonData.context.exploration || null
clarificationContext = jsonData.context.clarifications || null
originalUserInput = jsonData.title
isEnhancedTaskJson = true
// Check if plan.json from lite-plan session
if (jsonData.summary && jsonData.approach && jsonData.tasks) {
planObject = jsonData
originalUserInput = jsonData.summary
isPlanJson = true
} else {
// Valid JSON but not Enhanced Task JSON - treat as plain text
// Valid JSON but not plan.json - treat as plain text
originalUserInput = fileContent
isEnhancedTaskJson = false
isPlanJson = false
}
} catch {
// Not valid JSON - treat as plain text prompt
originalUserInput = fileContent
isEnhancedTaskJson = false
isPlanJson = false
}
```
**Step 2: Create Execution Plan**
If `isEnhancedTaskJson === true`:
- Use extracted `planObject` directly
- Skip planning, use lite-plan's existing plan
- User still selects execution method and code review
If `isPlanJson === true`:
- Use `planObject` directly
- User selects execution method and code review
If `isEnhancedTaskJson === false`:
If `isPlanJson === false`:
- Treat file content as prompt (same behavior as Mode 2)
- Create simple execution plan from content
@@ -150,26 +138,30 @@ If `isEnhancedTaskJson === false`:
## Execution Process
### Workflow Overview
```
Input Processing → Mode Detection
|
v
[Mode 1] --in-memory: Load executionContext → Skip selection
[Mode 2] Prompt: Create plan → User selects method + review
[Mode 3] File: Detect format → Extract plan OR treat as prompt → User selects
|
v
Execution & Progress Tracking
├─ Step 1: Initialize execution tracking
├─ Step 2: Create TodoWrite execution list
├─ Step 3: Launch execution (Agent or Codex)
├─ Step 4: Track execution progress
└─ Step 5: Code review (optional)
|
v
Execution Complete
Input Parsing:
└─ Decision (mode detection):
├─ --in-memory flag → Mode 1: Load executionContext → Skip user selection
├─ Ends with .md/.json/.txt → Mode 3: Read file → Detect format
│ ├─ Valid plan.json → Use planObject → User selects method + review
│ └─ Not plan.json → Treat as prompt → User selects method + review
└─ Other → Mode 2: Prompt description → User selects method + review
Execution:
├─ Step 1: Initialize result tracking (previousExecutionResults = [])
├─ Step 2: Task grouping & batch creation
├─ Extract explicit depends_on (no file/keyword inference)
├─ Group: independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
│ ├─ Group: dependent tasks → sequential phases (respect dependencies)
│ └─ Create TodoWrite list for batches
├─ Step 3: Launch execution
│ ├─ Phase 1: All independent tasks (⚡ single batch, concurrent)
│ └─ Phase 2+: Dependent tasks by dependency order
├─ Step 4: Track progress (TodoWrite updates per batch)
└─ Step 5: Code review (if codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip")
Output:
└─ Execution complete with results in previousExecutionResults[]
```
## Detailed Execution Steps
@@ -189,66 +181,68 @@ previousExecutionResults = []
**Dependency Analysis & Grouping Algorithm**:
```javascript
// Infer dependencies: same file → sequential, keywords (use/integrate) → sequential
function inferDependencies(tasks) {
return tasks.map((task, i) => {
const deps = []
const file = task.file || task.title.match(/in\s+([^\s:]+)/)?.[1]
const keywords = (task.description || task.title).toLowerCase()
// Use explicit depends_on from plan.json (no inference from file/keywords)
function extractDependencies(tasks) {
const taskIdToIndex = {}
tasks.forEach((t, i) => { taskIdToIndex[t.id] = i })
for (let j = 0; j < i; j++) {
const prevFile = tasks[j].file || tasks[j].title.match(/in\s+([^\s:]+)/)?.[1]
if (file && prevFile === file) deps.push(j) // Same file
else if (/use|integrate|call|import/.test(keywords)) deps.push(j) // Keyword dependency
}
return tasks.map((task, i) => {
// Only use explicit depends_on from plan.json
const deps = (task.depends_on || [])
.map(depId => taskIdToIndex[depId])
.filter(idx => idx !== undefined && idx < i)
return { ...task, taskIndex: i, dependencies: deps }
})
}
// Group into batches: independent → parallel [P1,P2...], dependent → sequential [S1,S2...]
// Group into batches: maximize parallel execution
function createExecutionCalls(tasks, executionMethod) {
const tasksWithDeps = inferDependencies(tasks)
const maxBatch = executionMethod === "Codex" ? 4 : 7
const calls = []
const tasksWithDeps = extractDependencies(tasks)
const processed = new Set()
const calls = []
// Parallel: independent tasks, different files, max batch size
const parallelGroups = []
tasksWithDeps.forEach(t => {
if (t.dependencies.length === 0 && !processed.has(t.taskIndex)) {
const group = [t]
processed.add(t.taskIndex)
tasksWithDeps.forEach(o => {
if (!o.dependencies.length && !processed.has(o.taskIndex) &&
group.length < maxBatch && t.file !== o.file) {
group.push(o)
processed.add(o.taskIndex)
}
})
parallelGroups.push(group)
}
})
// Sequential: dependent tasks, batch when deps satisfied
const remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
while (remaining.length > 0) {
const batch = remaining.filter((t, i) =>
i < maxBatch && t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d))
)
if (!batch.length) break
batch.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
calls.push({ executionType: "sequential", groupId: `S${calls.length + 1}`, tasks: batch })
remaining.splice(0, remaining.length, ...remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex)))
// Phase 1: All independent tasks → single parallel batch (maximize utilization)
const independentTasks = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => t.dependencies.length === 0)
if (independentTasks.length > 0) {
independentTasks.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
calls.push({
method: executionMethod,
executionType: "parallel",
groupId: "P1",
taskSummary: independentTasks.map(t => t.title).join(' | '),
tasks: independentTasks
})
}
// Combine results
return [
...parallelGroups.map((g, i) => ({
method: executionMethod, executionType: "parallel", groupId: `P${i+1}`,
taskSummary: g.map(t => t.title).join(' | '), tasks: g
})),
...calls.map(c => ({ ...c, method: executionMethod, taskSummary: c.tasks.map(t => t.title).join(' → ') }))
]
// Phase 2: Dependent tasks → sequential batches (respect dependencies)
let sequentialIndex = 1
let remaining = tasksWithDeps.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
while (remaining.length > 0) {
// Find tasks whose dependencies are all satisfied
const ready = remaining.filter(t =>
t.dependencies.every(d => processed.has(d))
)
if (ready.length === 0) {
console.warn('Circular dependency detected, forcing remaining tasks')
ready.push(...remaining)
}
// Group ready tasks (can run in parallel within this phase)
ready.forEach(t => processed.add(t.taskIndex))
calls.push({
method: executionMethod,
executionType: ready.length > 1 ? "parallel" : "sequential",
groupId: ready.length > 1 ? `P${calls.length + 1}` : `S${sequentialIndex++}`,
taskSummary: ready.map(t => t.title).join(ready.length > 1 ? ' | ' : ' → '),
tasks: ready
})
remaining = remaining.filter(t => !processed.has(t.taskIndex))
}
return calls
}
executionCalls = createExecutionCalls(planObject.tasks, executionMethod).map(c => ({ ...c, id: `[${c.groupId}]` }))
@@ -292,68 +286,112 @@ When to use:
- `executionMethod = "Agent"`
- `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Low"`
**Task Formatting Principle**: Each task is a self-contained checklist. The agent only needs to know what THIS task requires, not its position or relation to other tasks.
Agent call format:
```javascript
function formatTaskForAgent(task, index) {
// Format single task as self-contained checklist
function formatTaskChecklist(task) {
return `
### Task ${index + 1}: ${task.title}
**File**: ${task.file}
## ${task.title}
**Target**: \`${task.file}\`
**Action**: ${task.action}
**Description**: ${task.description}
**Implementation Steps**:
${task.implementation.map((step, i) => `${i + 1}. ${step}`).join('\n')}
### What to do
${task.description}
**Reference**:
### How to do it
${task.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}
### Reference
- Pattern: ${task.reference.pattern}
- Example Files: ${task.reference.files.join(', ')}
- Guidance: ${task.reference.examples}
- Examples: ${task.reference.files.join(', ')}
- Notes: ${task.reference.examples}
**Acceptance Criteria**:
${task.acceptance.map((criterion, i) => `${i + 1}. ${criterion}`).join('\n')}
### Done when
${task.acceptance.map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}
`
}
// For batch execution: aggregate tasks without numbering
function formatBatchPrompt(batch) {
const tasksSection = batch.tasks.map(t => formatTaskChecklist(t)).join('\n---\n')
return `
${originalUserInput ? `## Goal\n${originalUserInput}\n` : ''}
## Tasks
${tasksSection}
${batch.context ? `## Context\n${batch.context}` : ''}
Complete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.
`
}
Task(
subagent_type="code-developer",
description="Implement planned tasks",
prompt=`
${originalUserInput ? `## Original User Request\n${originalUserInput}\n\n` : ''}
## Implementation Plan
**Summary**: ${planObject.summary}
**Approach**: ${planObject.approach}
## Task Breakdown (${planObject.tasks.length} tasks)
${planObject.tasks.map((task, i) => formatTaskForAgent(task, i)).join('\n')}
${previousExecutionResults.length > 0 ? `\n## Previous Execution Results\n${previousExecutionResults.map(result => `
[${result.executionId}] ${result.status}
Tasks: ${result.tasksSummary}
Completion: ${result.completionSummary}
Outputs: ${result.keyOutputs || 'See git diff'}
${result.notes ? `Notes: ${result.notes}` : ''}
`).join('\n---\n')}` : ''}
## Code Context
${explorationContext || "No exploration performed"}
${clarificationContext ? `\n## Clarifications\n${JSON.stringify(clarificationContext, null, 2)}` : ''}
${executionContext?.session?.artifacts ? `\n## Planning Artifacts
Detailed planning context available in:
${executionContext.session.artifacts.exploration ? `- Exploration: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.exploration}` : ''}
- Plan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}
- Task: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.task}
Read these files for detailed architecture, patterns, and constraints.` : ''}
## Requirements
MUST complete ALL ${planObject.tasks.length} tasks listed above in this single execution.
Return only after all tasks are fully implemented and tested.
`
description=batch.taskSummary,
prompt=formatBatchPrompt({
tasks: batch.tasks,
context: buildRelevantContext(batch.tasks)
})
)
// Helper: Build relevant context for batch
// Context serves as REFERENCE ONLY - helps agent understand existing state
function buildRelevantContext(tasks) {
const sections = []
// 1. Previous work completion - what's already done (reference for continuity)
if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0) {
sections.push(`### Previous Work (Reference)
Use this to understand what's already completed. Avoid duplicating work.
${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `**${r.tasksSummary}**
- Status: ${r.status}
- Outputs: ${r.keyOutputs || 'See git diff'}
${r.notes ? `- Notes: ${r.notes}` : ''}`
).join('\n\n')}`)
}
// 2. Related files - files that may need to be read/referenced
const relatedFiles = extractRelatedFiles(tasks)
if (relatedFiles.length > 0) {
sections.push(`### Related Files (Reference)
These files may contain patterns, types, or utilities relevant to your tasks:
${relatedFiles.map(f => `- \`${f}\``).join('\n')}`)
}
// 3. Clarifications from user
if (clarificationContext) {
sections.push(`### User Clarifications
${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- **${q}**: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
}
// 4. Artifact files (for deeper context if needed)
if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan) {
sections.push(`### Artifacts
For detailed planning context, read: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
}
return sections.join('\n\n')
}
// Extract related files from task references
function extractRelatedFiles(tasks) {
const files = new Set()
tasks.forEach(task => {
// Add reference example files
if (task.reference?.files) {
task.reference.files.forEach(f => files.add(f))
}
})
return [...files]
}
```
**Result Collection**: After completion, collect result following `executionResult` structure (see Data Structures section)
@@ -364,83 +402,93 @@ When to use:
- `executionMethod = "Codex"`
- `executionMethod = "Auto" AND complexity = "Medium" or "High"`
**Artifact Path Delegation**:
- Include artifact file paths in CLI prompt for enhanced context
- Codex can read artifact files for detailed planning information
- Example: Reference exploration.json for architecture patterns
**Task Formatting Principle**: Same as Agent - each task is a self-contained checklist. No task numbering or position awareness.
Command format:
```bash
function formatTaskForCodex(task, index) {
// Format single task as compact checklist for CLI
function formatTaskForCLI(task) {
return `
${index + 1}. ${task.title} (${task.file})
Action: ${task.action}
What: ${task.description}
How:
${task.implementation.map((step, i) => ` ${i + 1}. ${step}`).join('\n')}
Reference: ${task.reference.pattern} (see ${task.reference.files.join(', ')})
Guidance: ${task.reference.examples}
Verify:
${task.acceptance.map((criterion, i) => ` - ${criterion}`).join('\n')}
## ${task.title}
File: ${task.file}
Action: ${task.action}
What: ${task.description}
How:
${task.implementation.map(step => `- ${step}`).join('\n')}
Reference: ${task.reference.pattern} (see ${task.reference.files.join(', ')})
Notes: ${task.reference.examples}
Done when:
${task.acceptance.map(c => `- [ ] ${c}`).join('\n')}
`
}
codex --full-auto exec "
${originalUserInput ? `## Original User Request\n${originalUserInput}\n\n` : ''}
// Build CLI prompt for batch
// Context provides REFERENCE information - not requirements to fulfill
function buildCLIPrompt(batch) {
const tasksSection = batch.tasks.map(t => formatTaskForCLI(t)).join('\n---\n')
## Implementation Plan
let prompt = `${originalUserInput ? `## Goal\n${originalUserInput}\n\n` : ''}`
prompt += `## Tasks\n\n${tasksSection}\n`
TASK: ${planObject.summary}
APPROACH: ${planObject.approach}
// Context section - reference information only
const contextSections = []
### Task Breakdown (${planObject.tasks.length} tasks)
${planObject.tasks.map((task, i) => formatTaskForCodex(task, i)).join('\n')}
// 1. Previous work - what's already completed
if (previousExecutionResults.length > 0) {
contextSections.push(`### Previous Work (Reference)
Already completed - avoid duplicating:
${previousExecutionResults.map(r => `- ${r.tasksSummary}: ${r.status}${r.keyOutputs ? ` (${r.keyOutputs})` : ''}`).join('\n')}`)
}
${previousExecutionResults.length > 0 ? `\n### Previous Execution Results\n${previousExecutionResults.map(result => `
[${result.executionId}] ${result.status}
Tasks: ${result.tasksSummary}
Status: ${result.completionSummary}
Outputs: ${result.keyOutputs || 'See git diff'}
${result.notes ? `Notes: ${result.notes}` : ''}
`).join('\n---\n')}
// 2. Related files from task references
const relatedFiles = [...new Set(batch.tasks.flatMap(t => t.reference?.files || []))]
if (relatedFiles.length > 0) {
contextSections.push(`### Related Files (Reference)
Patterns and examples to follow:
${relatedFiles.map(f => `- ${f}`).join('\n')}`)
}
IMPORTANT: Review previous results. Build on completed work. Avoid duplication.
` : ''}
// 3. User clarifications
if (clarificationContext) {
contextSections.push(`### Clarifications
${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `- ${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}`)
}
### Code Context from Exploration
${explorationContext ? `
Project Structure: ${explorationContext.project_structure || 'Standard structure'}
Relevant Files: ${explorationContext.relevant_files?.join(', ') || 'TBD'}
Current Patterns: ${explorationContext.patterns || 'Follow existing conventions'}
Integration Points: ${explorationContext.dependencies || 'None specified'}
Constraints: ${explorationContext.constraints || 'None'}
` : 'No prior exploration - analyze codebase as needed'}
// 4. Plan artifact for deeper context
if (executionContext?.session?.artifacts?.plan) {
contextSections.push(`### Artifacts
Detailed plan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`)
}
${clarificationContext ? `\n### User Clarifications\n${Object.entries(clarificationContext).map(([q, a]) => `${q}: ${a}`).join('\n')}` : ''}
if (contextSections.length > 0) {
prompt += `\n## Context\n${contextSections.join('\n\n')}\n`
}
${executionContext?.session?.artifacts ? `\n### Planning Artifact Files
Detailed planning context available in session folder:
${executionContext.session.artifacts.exploration ? `- Exploration: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.exploration}` : ''}
- Plan: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}
- Task: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.task}
prompt += `\nComplete each task according to its "Done when" checklist.`
Read these files for complete architecture details, code patterns, and integration constraints.
` : ''}
return prompt
}
## Requirements
MUST complete ALL ${planObject.tasks.length} tasks listed above in this single execution.
Return only after all tasks are fully implemented and tested.
Complexity: ${planObject.complexity}
" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
codex --full-auto exec "${buildCLIPrompt(batch)}" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
```
**Execution with tracking**:
```javascript
// Launch CLI in foreground (NOT background)
// Timeout based on complexity: Low=40min, Medium=60min, High=100min
const timeoutByComplexity = {
"Low": 2400000, // 40 minutes
"Medium": 3600000, // 60 minutes
"High": 6000000 // 100 minutes
}
bash_result = Bash(
command=cli_command,
timeout=600000 // 10 minutes
timeout=timeoutByComplexity[planObject.complexity] || 3600000
)
// Update TodoWrite when execution completes
@@ -456,64 +504,63 @@ Progress tracked at batch level (not individual task level). Icons: ⚡ (paralle
**Skip Condition**: Only run if `codeReviewTool ≠ "Skip"`
**Review Focus**: Verify implementation against task.json acceptance criteria
- Read task.json from session artifacts for acceptance criteria
**Review Focus**: Verify implementation against plan acceptance criteria
- Read plan.json for task acceptance criteria
- Check each acceptance criterion is fulfilled
- Validate code quality and identify issues
- Ensure alignment with planned approach
**Operations**:
- Agent Review: Current agent performs direct review (read task.json for acceptance criteria)
- Gemini Review: Execute gemini CLI with review prompt (task.json in CONTEXT)
- Custom tool: Execute specified CLI tool (qwen, codex, etc.) with task.json reference
- Agent Review: Current agent performs direct review
- Gemini Review: Execute gemini CLI with review prompt
- Custom tool: Execute specified CLI tool (qwen, codex, etc.)
**Unified Review Template** (All tools use same standard):
**Review Criteria**:
- **Acceptance Criteria**: Verify each criterion from task.json `context.acceptance`
- **Acceptance Criteria**: Verify each criterion from plan.tasks[].acceptance
- **Code Quality**: Analyze quality, identify issues, suggest improvements
- **Plan Alignment**: Validate implementation matches planned approach
**Shared Prompt Template** (used by all CLI tools):
```
PURPOSE: Code review for implemented changes against task.json acceptance criteria
TASK: • Verify task.json acceptance criteria fulfillment • Analyze code quality • Identify issues • Suggest improvements • Validate plan adherence
PURPOSE: Code review for implemented changes against plan acceptance criteria
TASK: • Verify plan acceptance criteria fulfillment • Analyze code quality • Identify issues • Suggest improvements • Validate plan adherence
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/* @{task.json} @{plan.json} [@{exploration.json}] | Memory: Review lite-execute changes against task.json requirements
EXPECTED: Quality assessment with acceptance criteria verification, issue identification, and recommendations. Explicitly check each acceptance criterion from task.json.
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-review-code-quality.txt) | Focus on task.json acceptance criteria and plan adherence | analysis=READ-ONLY
CONTEXT: @**/* @{plan.json} [@{exploration.json}] | Memory: Review lite-execute changes against plan requirements
EXPECTED: Quality assessment with acceptance criteria verification, issue identification, and recommendations. Explicitly check each acceptance criterion from plan.json tasks.
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-review-code-quality.txt) | Focus on plan acceptance criteria and plan adherence | analysis=READ-ONLY
```
**Tool-Specific Execution** (Apply shared prompt template above):
```bash
# Method 1: Agent Review (current agent)
# - Read task.json: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.task}
# - Read plan.json: ${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}
# - Apply unified review criteria (see Shared Prompt Template)
# - Report findings directly
# Method 2: Gemini Review (recommended)
gemini -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]"
# CONTEXT includes: @**/* @${task.json} @${plan.json} [@${exploration.json}]
# CONTEXT includes: @**/* @${plan.json} [@${exploration.json}]
# Method 3: Qwen Review (alternative)
qwen -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]"
# Same prompt as Gemini, different execution engine
# Method 4: Codex Review (autonomous)
codex --full-auto exec "[Verify task.json acceptance criteria at ${task.json}]" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
codex --full-auto exec "[Verify plan acceptance criteria at ${plan.json}]" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
```
**Implementation Note**: Replace `[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]` placeholder with actual template content, substituting:
- `@{task.json}``@${executionContext.session.artifacts.task}`
- `@{plan.json}``@${executionContext.session.artifacts.plan}`
- `[@{exploration.json}]``@${executionContext.session.artifacts.exploration}` (if exists)
- `[@{exploration.json}]`exploration files from artifacts (if exists)
## Best Practices
**Input Modes**: In-memory (lite-plan), prompt (standalone), file (JSON/text)
**Batch Limits**: Agent 7 tasks, CLI 4 tasks
**Execution**: Parallel batches use single Claude message with multiple tool calls (no concurrency limit)
**Task Grouping**: Based on explicit depends_on only; independent tasks run in single parallel batch
**Execution**: All independent tasks launch concurrently via single Claude message with multiple tool calls
## Error Handling
@@ -543,7 +590,9 @@ Passed from lite-plan via global variable:
recommended_execution: string,
complexity: string
},
explorationContext: {...} | null,
explorationsContext: {...} | null, // Multi-angle explorations
explorationAngles: string[], // List of exploration angles
explorationManifest: {...} | null, // Exploration manifest
clarificationContext: {...} | null,
executionMethod: "Agent" | "Codex" | "Auto",
codeReviewTool: "Skip" | "Gemini Review" | "Agent Review" | string,
@@ -554,9 +603,9 @@ Passed from lite-plan via global variable:
id: string, // Session identifier: {taskSlug}-{shortTimestamp}
folder: string, // Session folder path: .workflow/.lite-plan/{session-id}
artifacts: {
exploration: string | null, // exploration.json path (if exploration performed)
plan: string, // plan.json path (always present)
task: string // task.json path (always exported)
explorations: [{angle, path}], // exploration-{angle}.json paths
explorations_manifest: string, // explorations-manifest.json path
plan: string // plan.json path (always present)
}
}
}