Add comprehensive code review specifications and templates

- Introduced best practices requirements specification covering code quality, performance, maintainability, error handling, and documentation standards.
- Established quality standards with overall quality metrics and mandatory checks for security, code quality, performance, and maintainability.
- Created security requirements specification aligned with OWASP Top 10 and CWE Top 25, detailing checks and patterns for common vulnerabilities.
- Developed templates for documenting best practice findings, security findings, and generating reports, including structured markdown and JSON formats.
- Updated dependencies in the project, ensuring compatibility and stability.
- Added test files and README documentation for vector indexing tests.
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-01-06 23:11:15 +08:00
parent 02d66325a0
commit ef770ff29b
32 changed files with 4530 additions and 164 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Phase 3: Best Practices Review
## Objective
Analyze code for best practices violations including code quality, performance issues, and maintainability concerns.
## Input
- **File Inventory**: From Phase 1 (`.code-review/inventory.json`)
- **Security Findings**: From Phase 2 (`.code-review/security-findings.json`)
- **User Arguments**:
- `--focus best-practices`: Best practices only mode
- `--check quality,performance,maintainability`: Specific areas to check
## Process
### Step 1: Code Quality Analysis
Check naming conventions, function complexity, code duplication, and dead code detection.
### Step 2: Performance Analysis
Detect N+1 queries, inefficient algorithms, and memory leaks.
### Step 3: Maintainability Analysis
Check documentation coverage, test coverage, and dependency management.
## Output
- best-practices-findings.json
- Markdown report with recommendations
## Next Phase
**Phase 4: Report Generation**