mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-11 02:33:51 +08:00
feat(cli): 添加 --rule 选项支持模板自动发现
重构 ccw cli 模板系统: - 新增 template-discovery.ts 模块,支持扁平化模板自动发现 - 添加 --rule <template> 选项,自动加载 protocol 和 template - 模板目录从嵌套结构 (prompts/category/file.txt) 迁移到扁平结构 (prompts/category-function.txt) - 更新所有 agent/command 文件,使用 $PROTO $TMPL 环境变量替代 $(cat ...) 模式 - 支持模糊匹配:--rule 02-review-architecture 可匹配 analysis-review-architecture.txt 其他更新: - Dashboard: 添加 Claude Manager 和 Issue Manager 页面 - Codex-lens: 增强 chain_search 和 clustering 模块 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Skip", description: "No review" },
|
||||
{ label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI tool" },
|
||||
{ label: "Codex Review", description: "codex review --uncommitted" },
|
||||
{ label: "Agent Review", description: "Current agent review" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -485,7 +486,7 @@ TASK: • Verify plan acceptance criteria fulfillment • Analyze code quality
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/* @{plan.json} [@{exploration.json}] | Memory: Review lite-execute changes against plan requirements
|
||||
EXPECTED: Quality assessment with acceptance criteria verification, issue identification, and recommendations. Explicitly check each acceptance criterion from plan.json tasks.
|
||||
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-review-code-quality.txt) | Focus on plan acceptance criteria and plan adherence | analysis=READ-ONLY
|
||||
RULES: $PROTO $TMPL | Focus on plan acceptance criteria and plan adherence | analysis=READ-ONLY
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool-Specific Execution** (Apply shared prompt template above):
|
||||
@@ -504,8 +505,9 @@ ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool gemini --mode analys
|
||||
ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool qwen --mode analysis
|
||||
# Same prompt as Gemini, different execution engine
|
||||
|
||||
# Method 4: Codex Review (autonomous)
|
||||
ccw cli -p "[Verify plan acceptance criteria at ${plan.json}]" --tool codex --mode write
|
||||
# Method 4: Codex Review (git-aware)
|
||||
ccw cli -p "[Shared Prompt Template with artifacts]" --tool codex --mode review --uncommitted
|
||||
# Reviews uncommitted changes against plan acceptance criteria
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Multi-Round Review with Fixed IDs**:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ TASK: ${tasks.map(t => `• ${t}`).join(' ')}
|
||||
MODE: analysis
|
||||
CONTEXT: @**/*
|
||||
EXPECTED: ${expected}
|
||||
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | ${rules}
|
||||
RULES: $PROTO | ${rules}
|
||||
`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ TASK: ${extractedTasks.join(' • ')}
|
||||
MODE: write
|
||||
CONTEXT: @${affectedFiles.join(' @')}
|
||||
EXPECTED: Working implementation with all changes applied
|
||||
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/write-protocol.md)
|
||||
RULES: $PROTO
|
||||
" --tool ${executionTool.name} --mode write`,
|
||||
run_in_background: false
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ ${plan.tasks.map((t, i) => `${i+1}. ${t.title} (${t.file})`).join('\n')}
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 4.2: Collect Confirmation**
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// Note: Execution "Other" option allows specifying CLI tools from ~/.claude/cli-tools.json
|
||||
AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
questions: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -524,8 +525,9 @@ AskUserQuestion({
|
||||
header: "Review",
|
||||
multiSelect: false,
|
||||
options: [
|
||||
{ label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI" },
|
||||
{ label: "Agent Review", description: "@code-reviewer" },
|
||||
{ label: "Gemini Review", description: "Gemini CLI review" },
|
||||
{ label: "Codex Review", description: "codex review --uncommitted" },
|
||||
{ label: "Agent Review", description: "@code-reviewer agent" },
|
||||
{ label: "Skip", description: "No review" }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -154,8 +154,8 @@ Task(subagent_type="cli-execution-agent", run_in_background=false, prompt=`
|
||||
- Validation of exploration conflict_indicators
|
||||
- ModuleOverlap conflicts with overlap_analysis
|
||||
- Targeted clarification questions
|
||||
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/02-analyze-code-patterns.txt) | Focus on breaking changes, migration needs, and functional overlaps | Prioritize exploration-identified conflicts | analysis=READ-ONLY
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd {project_root}
|
||||
RULES: $PROTO $TMPL | Focus on breaking changes, migration needs, and functional overlaps | Prioritize exploration-identified conflicts | analysis=READ-ONLY
|
||||
" --tool gemini --mode analysis --rule analysis-code-patterns --cd {project_root}
|
||||
|
||||
Fallback: Qwen (same prompt) → Claude (manual analysis)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Template: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/test/test-concept-analysis.t
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION STEPS
|
||||
1. Execute Gemini analysis:
|
||||
ccw cli -p "$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/test/test-concept-analysis.txt)" --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process
|
||||
ccw cli -p "..." --tool gemini --mode write --rule test-test-concept-analysis --cd .workflow/active/{test_session_id}/.process
|
||||
|
||||
2. Generate TEST_ANALYSIS_RESULTS.md:
|
||||
Synthesize gemini-test-analysis.md into standardized format for task generation
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user