refactor: rename meta-skill → flow-coordinator, update template cmd paths

**Major changes:**
- Rename skill from meta-skill to flow-coordinator (avoid /ccw conflicts)
- Update all 17 templates: store full /workflow: command paths in cmd field
  - Session ID prefix: ms → fc (fc-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS)
  - Workflow path: .workflow/.meta-skill → .workflow/.flow-coordinator
- Simplify SKILL.md schema documentation
  - Streamline Status Schema section
  - Consolidate Template Schema with single example
  - Remove redundant Field Explanations and behavior tables
- All templates now store cmd as full paths (e.g. /workflow:lite-plan)
  - Eliminates need for path assembly during execution
  - Matches ccw-coordinator execution format
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-01-30 12:29:38 +08:00
parent a9df4c6659
commit fca03a3f9c
19 changed files with 1190 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,394 @@
---
name: flow-coordinator
description: Template-driven workflow coordinator with minimal state tracking. Executes command chains from workflow templates with slash-command execution (mainprocess/async). Triggers on "flow-coordinator", "workflow template", "orchestrate".
allowed-tools: Task, AskUserQuestion, Read, Write, Bash, Glob, Grep
---
# Flow Coordinator
Lightweight workflow coordinator that executes command chains from predefined templates, supporting slash-command execution with mainprocess (blocking) and async (background) modes.
## Architecture
```
User Task → Select Template → status.json Init → Execute Steps → Complete
↑ │
└──────────────── Resume (from status.json) ─────┘
Step Execution:
execution mode?
├─ mainprocess → SlashCommand (blocking, main process)
└─ async → ccw cli --tool claude --mode write (background)
```
## Core Concepts
**Template-Driven**: Workflows defined as JSON templates in `templates/`, decoupled from coordinator logic.
**Execution Type**: `slash-command` only
- ALL workflow commands (`/workflow:*`) use `slash-command` type
- Two execution modes:
- `mainprocess`: SlashCommand (blocking, main process)
- `async`: CLI background (ccw cli with claude tool)
**Dynamic Discovery**: Templates discovered at runtime via Glob, not hardcoded.
---
## Execution Flow
```javascript
async function execute(task) {
// 1. Discover and select template
const templates = await discoverTemplates();
const template = await selectTemplate(templates);
// 2. Init status
const sessionId = `fc-${timestamp()}`;
const statusPath = `.workflow/.flow-coordinator/${sessionId}/status.json`;
const status = initStatus(template, task);
write(statusPath, JSON.stringify(status, null, 2));
// 3. Execute steps based on execution config
await executeSteps(status, statusPath);
}
async function executeSteps(status, statusPath) {
for (let i = status.current; i < status.steps.length; i++) {
const step = status.steps[i];
status.current = i;
// Execute based on step mode (all steps use slash-command type)
const execConfig = step.execution || { type: 'slash-command', mode: 'mainprocess' };
if (execConfig.mode === 'async') {
// Async execution - stop and wait for hook callback
await executeSlashCommandAsync(step, status, statusPath);
break;
} else {
// Mainprocess execution - continue immediately
await executeSlashCommandSync(step, status);
step.status = 'done';
write(statusPath, JSON.stringify(status, null, 2));
}
}
// All steps complete
if (status.current >= status.steps.length) {
status.complete = true;
write(statusPath, JSON.stringify(status, null, 2));
}
}
```
---
## Template Discovery
**Dynamic query** - never hardcode template list:
```javascript
async function discoverTemplates() {
// Discover all JSON templates
const files = Glob('*.json', { path: 'templates/' });
// Parse each template
const templates = [];
for (const file of files) {
const content = JSON.parse(Read(file));
templates.push({
name: content.name,
description: content.description,
steps: content.steps.map(s => s.cmd).join(' → '),
file: file
});
}
return templates;
}
```
---
## Template Selection
User chooses from discovered templates:
```javascript
async function selectTemplate(templates) {
// Build options from discovered templates
const options = templates.slice(0, 4).map(t => ({
label: t.name,
description: t.steps
}));
const response = await AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: 'Select workflow template:',
header: 'Template',
options: options,
multiSelect: false
}]
});
// Handle "Other" - show remaining templates or custom input
if (response.template === 'Other') {
return await selectFromRemainingTemplates(templates.slice(4));
}
return templates.find(t => t.name === response.template);
}
```
---
## Status Schema
**Creation**: Copy template JSON → Update `id`, `template`, `goal`, set all steps `status: "pending"`
**Location**: `.workflow/.flow-coordinator/{session-id}/status.json`
**Core Fields**:
- `id`: Session ID (fc-YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS)
- `template`: Template name
- `goal`: User task description
- `current`: Current step index
- `steps[]`: Step array from template (with runtime `status`, `session`, `taskId`)
- `complete`: All steps done?
**Step Status**: `pending``running``done` | `failed` | `skipped`
---
## Extended Template Schema
**Templates stored in**: `templates/*.json` (discovered at runtime via Glob)
**TemplateStep Fields**:
- `cmd`: Full command path (e.g., `/workflow:lite-plan`, `/workflow:execute`)
- `args?`: Arguments with `{{goal}}` and `{{prev}}` placeholders
- `unit?`: Minimum execution unit name (groups related commands)
- `optional?`: Can be skipped by user
- `execution`: Type and mode configuration
- `type`: Always `'slash-command'` (for all workflow commands)
- `mode`: `'mainprocess'` (blocking) or `'async'` (background)
- `contextHint?`: Natural language guidance for context assembly
**Template Example**:
```json
{
"name": "rapid",
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-plan",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"unit": "quick-implementation",
"execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "mainprocess" },
"contextHint": "Create lightweight implementation plan"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-execute",
"args": "--in-memory",
"unit": "quick-implementation",
"execution": { "type": "slash-command", "mode": "async" },
"contextHint": "Execute plan from previous step"
}
]
}
```
---
## Execution Implementation
### Mainprocess Mode (Blocking)
```javascript
async function executeSlashCommandSync(step, status) {
// Build command: /workflow:cmd -y args
const cmd = buildCommand(step, status);
const result = await SlashCommand({ command: cmd });
step.session = result.session_id;
step.status = 'done';
return result;
}
```
### Async Mode (Background)
```javascript
async function executeSlashCommandAsync(step, status, statusPath) {
// Build prompt: /workflow:cmd -y args + context
const prompt = buildCommandPrompt(step, status);
step.status = 'running';
write(statusPath, JSON.stringify(status, null, 2));
// Execute via ccw cli in background
const taskId = Bash(
`ccw cli -p "${escapePrompt(prompt)}" --tool claude --mode write`,
{ run_in_background: true }
).task_id;
step.taskId = taskId;
write(statusPath, JSON.stringify(status, null, 2));
console.log(`Executing: ${step.cmd} (async)`);
console.log(`Resume: /flow-coordinator --resume ${status.id}`);
}
```
---
## Prompt Building
Prompts are built in format: `/workflow:cmd -y args` + context
```javascript
function buildCommandPrompt(step, status) {
// step.cmd already contains full path: /workflow:lite-plan, /workflow:execute, etc.
let prompt = `${step.cmd} -y`;
// Add arguments (with placeholder replacement)
if (step.args) {
const args = step.args
.replace('{{goal}}', status.goal)
.replace('{{prev}}', getPreviousSessionId(status));
prompt += ` ${args}`;
}
// Add context based on contextHint
if (step.contextHint) {
const context = buildContextFromHint(step.contextHint, status);
prompt += `\n\nContext:\n${context}`;
} else {
// Default context: previous session IDs
const previousContext = collectPreviousResults(status);
if (previousContext) {
prompt += `\n\nPrevious results:\n${previousContext}`;
}
}
return prompt;
}
function buildContextFromHint(hint, status) {
// Parse contextHint instruction and build context accordingly
// Examples:
// "Summarize IMPL_PLAN.md" → read and summarize plan
// "List test coverage gaps" → analyze previous test results
// "Pass session ID" → just return session reference
return parseAndBuildContext(hint, status);
}
```
### Example Prompt Output
```
/workflow:lite-plan -y "Implement user registration"
Context:
Task: Implement user registration
Previous results:
- None (first step)
```
```
/workflow:execute -y --in-memory
Context:
Task: Implement user registration
Previous results:
- lite-plan: WFS-plan-20250130 (planning-context.md)
```
---
## User Interaction
### Step 1: Select Template
```
Select workflow template:
○ rapid lite-plan → lite-execute → test-cycle-execute
○ coupled plan → plan-verify → execute → review → test
○ bugfix lite-fix → lite-execute → test-cycle-execute
○ tdd tdd-plan → execute → tdd-verify
○ Other (more templates or custom)
```
### Step 2: Review Execution Plan
```
Template: coupled
Steps:
1. /workflow:plan (slash-command mainprocess)
2. /workflow:plan-verify (slash-command mainprocess)
3. /workflow:execute (slash-command async)
4. /workflow:review-session-cycle (slash-command mainprocess)
5. /workflow:review-cycle-fix (slash-command mainprocess)
6. /workflow:test-fix-gen (slash-command mainprocess)
7. /workflow:test-cycle-execute (slash-command async)
Proceed? [Confirm / Cancel]
```
---
## Resume Capability
```javascript
async function resume(sessionId) {
const statusPath = `.workflow/.flow-coordinator/${sessionId}/status.json`;
const status = JSON.parse(Read(statusPath));
// Find first incomplete step
status.current = status.steps.findIndex(s => s.status !== 'done');
if (status.current === -1) {
console.log('All steps complete');
return;
}
// Continue executing steps
await executeSteps(status, statusPath);
}
```
---
## Available Templates
Templates discovered from `templates/*.json`:
| Template | Use Case | Steps |
|----------|----------|-------|
| rapid | Simple feature | /workflow:lite-plan → /workflow:lite-execute → /workflow:test-cycle-execute |
| coupled | Complex feature | /workflow:plan → /workflow:plan-verify → /workflow:execute → /workflow:review-session-cycle → /workflow:test-fix-gen |
| bugfix | Bug fix | /workflow:lite-fix → /workflow:lite-execute → /workflow:test-cycle-execute |
| tdd | Test-driven | /workflow:tdd-plan → /workflow:execute → /workflow:tdd-verify |
| test-fix | Fix failing tests | /workflow:test-fix-gen → /workflow:test-cycle-execute |
| brainstorm | Exploration | /workflow:brainstorm-with-file |
| debug | Debug with docs | /workflow:debug-with-file |
| analyze | Collaborative analysis | /workflow:analyze-with-file |
| issue | Issue workflow | /workflow:issue:plan → /workflow:issue:queue → /workflow:issue:execute |
---
## Design Principles
1. **Minimal fields**: Only essential tracking data
2. **Flat structure**: No nested objects beyond steps array
3. **Step-level execution**: Each step defines how it's executed
4. **Resumable**: Any step can be resumed from status
5. **Human readable**: Clear JSON format
---
## Reference Documents
| Document | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| templates/*.json | Workflow templates (dynamic discovery) |

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
{
"name": "analyze",
"description": "Collaborative analysis with multi-round discussion - deep exploration and understanding",
"level": 3,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:analyze-with-file",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Multi-round collaborative analysis with iterative understanding. Generate discussion.md with comprehensive analysis and conclusions"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
{
"name": "brainstorm-to-issue",
"description": "Bridge brainstorm session to issue workflow - convert exploration insights to executable issues",
"level": 4,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:issue:from-brainstorm",
"args": "--auto",
"unit": "brainstorm-to-issue",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Convert brainstorm session findings into issue plans and solutions"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:issue:queue",
"unit": "brainstorm-to-issue",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Build execution queue from converted brainstorm issues"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:issue:execute",
"args": "--queue auto",
"unit": "brainstorm-to-issue",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute issues from queue with state tracking"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
{
"name": "brainstorm",
"description": "Multi-perspective ideation with documentation - explore possibilities with multiple analytical viewpoints",
"level": 4,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:brainstorm-with-file",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Multi-perspective ideation with interactive diverge-converge cycles. Generate brainstorm.md with synthesis of ideas and recommendations"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
{
"name": "bugfix-hotfix",
"description": "Urgent production fix - immediate diagnosis and fix with minimal overhead",
"level": 1,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-fix",
"args": "--hotfix \"{{goal}}\"",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Urgent hotfix mode: quick diagnosis and immediate fix for critical production issue"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
{
"name": "bugfix",
"description": "Standard bug fix workflow - lightweight diagnosis and execution with testing",
"level": 2,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-fix",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"unit": "bug-fix",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Analyze bug report, trace execution flow, identify root cause with fix strategy"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-execute",
"args": "--in-memory",
"unit": "bug-fix",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Implement fix based on diagnosis. Execute against in-memory state from lite-fix analysis."
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen",
"unit": "test-validation",
"optional": true,
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Generate test tasks to verify bug fix and prevent regression"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute",
"unit": "test-validation",
"optional": true,
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute test-fix cycle until all tests pass"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
{
"name": "coupled",
"description": "Full workflow for complex features - detailed planning with verification, execution, review, and testing",
"level": 3,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:plan",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"unit": "verified-planning-execution",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Create detailed implementation plan with architecture design, file structure, dependencies, and milestones"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:plan-verify",
"unit": "verified-planning-execution",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Verify IMPL_PLAN.md against requirements, check for missing details, conflicts, and quality gates"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:execute",
"unit": "verified-planning-execution",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute implementation based on verified plan. Resume from planning session with all context preserved."
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:review-session-cycle",
"unit": "code-review",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Perform multi-dimensional code review across correctness, security, performance, maintainability. Reference execution session for full code context."
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:review-cycle-fix",
"unit": "code-review",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Fix issues identified in review findings with prioritization by severity levels"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen",
"unit": "test-validation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Generate comprehensive test tasks for the implementation with coverage analysis"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute",
"unit": "test-validation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute iterative test-fix cycle until pass rate >= 95%"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
{
"name": "debug",
"description": "Hypothesis-driven debugging with documentation - systematic troubleshooting and logging",
"level": 3,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:debug-with-file",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Systematic debugging with hypothesis formation and verification. Generate understanding.md with root cause analysis and fix recommendations"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
{
"name": "docs",
"description": "Documentation generation workflow",
"level": 2,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-plan",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"unit": "quick-documentation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Plan documentation structure and content organization"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-execute",
"args": "--in-memory",
"unit": "quick-documentation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute documentation generation from plan"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
{
"name": "full",
"description": "Comprehensive workflow - brainstorm exploration, planning verification, execution, and testing",
"level": 4,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:brainstorm:auto-parallel",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Multi-perspective exploration of requirements and possible approaches"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:plan",
"unit": "verified-planning-execution",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Create detailed implementation plan based on brainstorm insights"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:plan-verify",
"unit": "verified-planning-execution",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Verify plan quality and completeness"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:execute",
"unit": "verified-planning-execution",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute implementation from verified plan"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen",
"unit": "test-validation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Generate comprehensive test tasks"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute",
"unit": "test-validation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute test-fix cycle until pass rate >= 95%"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
{
"name": "issue",
"description": "Issue workflow - discover issues, create plans, queue execution, and resolve",
"level": "issue",
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:issue:discover",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Discover pending issues from codebase for potential fixes"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:issue:plan",
"args": "--all-pending",
"unit": "issue-workflow",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Create execution plans for all discovered pending issues"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:issue:queue",
"unit": "issue-workflow",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Build execution queue with issue prioritization and dependencies"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:issue:execute",
"unit": "issue-workflow",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute issues from queue with state tracking and completion reporting"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
{
"name": "lite-lite-lite",
"description": "Ultra-lightweight for immediate simple tasks - minimal overhead, direct execution",
"level": 1,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-lite-lite",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Direct task execution with minimal analysis and zero documentation overhead"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
{
"name": "multi-cli-plan",
"description": "Multi-perspective planning with cross-tool verification and execution",
"level": 3,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:multi-cli-plan",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"unit": "multi-cli-planning",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Multi-perspective analysis comparing different implementation approaches with trade-off analysis"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-execute",
"args": "--in-memory",
"unit": "multi-cli-planning",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute best approach selected from multi-perspective analysis"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen",
"unit": "test-validation",
"optional": true,
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Generate test tasks for the implementation"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute",
"unit": "test-validation",
"optional": true,
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute test-fix cycle until pass rate >= 95%"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
{
"name": "rapid-to-issue",
"description": "Bridge lite workflow to issue workflow - convert simple plan to structured issue execution",
"level": 2.5,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-plan",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"unit": "rapid-to-issue",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Create lightweight plan for the task"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:issue:convert-to-plan",
"args": "--latest-lite-plan -y",
"unit": "rapid-to-issue",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Convert lite plan to structured issue plan"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:issue:queue",
"unit": "rapid-to-issue",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Build execution queue from converted plan"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:issue:execute",
"args": "--queue auto",
"unit": "rapid-to-issue",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute issues from queue with state tracking"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
{
"name": "rapid",
"description": "Quick implementation - lightweight plan and immediate execution for simple features",
"level": 2,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-plan",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"unit": "quick-implementation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Analyze requirements and create a lightweight implementation plan with key decisions and file structure"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:lite-execute",
"args": "--in-memory",
"unit": "quick-implementation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Use the plan from previous step to implement code. Execute against in-memory state."
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen",
"unit": "test-validation",
"optional": true,
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Generate test tasks from the implementation session"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute",
"unit": "test-validation",
"optional": true,
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute test-fix cycle until all tests pass"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
{
"name": "review",
"description": "Code review workflow - multi-dimensional review, fix issues, and test validation",
"level": 3,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:review-session-cycle",
"unit": "code-review",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Perform comprehensive multi-dimensional code review across correctness, security, performance, maintainability dimensions"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:review-cycle-fix",
"unit": "code-review",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Fix all review findings prioritized by severity level (critical → high → medium → low)"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen",
"unit": "test-validation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Generate test tasks for fixed code with coverage analysis"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute",
"unit": "test-validation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute iterative test-fix cycle until pass rate >= 95%"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
{
"name": "tdd",
"description": "Test-driven development - write tests first, implement to pass tests, verify Red-Green-Refactor cycles",
"level": 3,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:tdd-plan",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"unit": "tdd-planning-execution",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Create TDD task plan with Red-Green-Refactor cycles, test specifications, and implementation strategy"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:execute",
"unit": "tdd-planning-execution",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute TDD tasks following Red-Green-Refactor workflow with test-first development"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:tdd-verify",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Verify TDD cycle compliance, test coverage, and code quality against Red-Green-Refactor principles"
}
]
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
{
"name": "test-fix",
"description": "Fix failing tests - generate test tasks and execute iterative test-fix cycle",
"level": 2,
"steps": [
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-fix-gen",
"args": "\"{{goal}}\"",
"unit": "test-validation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "mainprocess"
},
"contextHint": "Analyze failing tests, generate targeted test tasks with root cause and fix strategy"
},
{
"cmd": "/workflow:test-cycle-execute",
"unit": "test-validation",
"execution": {
"type": "slash-command",
"mode": "async"
},
"contextHint": "Execute iterative test-fix cycle with pass rate tracking until >= 95% pass rate achieved"
}
]
}

188
META_SKILL_SUMMARY.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
# Meta-Skill Template Update Summary
## Update Overview
Successfully updated all 17 meta-skill workflow templates with proper execution configuration and context passing.
## Critical Correction: CLI Tools vs Slash Commands
**IMPORTANT**: ALL workflow commands (`/workflow:*`) must use `slash-command` type.
### Slash Command (workflow commands)
- **Type**: `slash-command`
- **Commands**: ALL `/workflow:*` commands
- Planning: plan, lite-plan, multi-cli-plan, tdd-plan
- Execution: execute, lite-execute
- Testing: test-fix-gen, test-cycle-execute, tdd-verify
- Review: review-session-cycle, review-cycle-fix, review-module-cycle
- Bug fixes: lite-fix, debug-with-file
- Exploration: brainstorm-with-file, brainstorm:auto-parallel, analyze-with-file
- **Modes**:
- `mainprocess`: Blocking, main process execution
- `async`: Background execution via `ccw cli --tool claude --mode write`
### CLI Tools (for pure analysis/generation)
- **Type**: `cli-tools`
- **When to use**: Only when there's NO specific workflow command
- **Purpose**: Dynamic prompt generation based on task content
- **Tools**: gemini (analysis), qwen (code generation), codex (review)
- **Examples**:
- "Analyze this architecture design and suggest improvements"
- "Generate unit tests for module X with 90% coverage"
- "Review code for security vulnerabilities"
## Key Changes
### 1. Schema Enhancement
All templates now include:
- **`execution`** configuration:
- Type: Always `slash-command` for workflow commands
- Mode: `mainprocess` (blocking) or `async` (background)
- **`contextHint`** field: Natural language instructions for context passing
- **`unit`** field: Groups commands into minimum execution units
- **`args`** field: Command arguments with `{{goal}}` and `{{prev}}` placeholders
### 2. Execution Patterns
**Planning (mainprocess)**:
- Interactive planning needs main process
- Examples: plan, lite-plan, tdd-plan, multi-cli-plan
**Execution (async)**:
- Long-running tasks need background
- Examples: execute, lite-execute, test-cycle-execute
**Review/Verify (mainprocess)**:
- Needs immediate feedback
- Examples: plan-verify, review-session-cycle, tdd-verify
**Fix (mainprocess/async)**:
- Simple fixes: mainprocess
- Complex fixes: async
- Examples: lite-fix (mainprocess), review-cycle-fix (mainprocess)
### 3. Minimum Execution Units
Preserved atomic command groups from ccw-coordinator.md:
| Unit | Commands | Purpose |
|------|----------|---------|
| `quick-implementation` | lite-plan → lite-execute | Lightweight implementation |
| `verified-planning-execution` | plan → plan-verify → execute | Full planning with verification |
| `bug-fix` | lite-fix → lite-execute | Bug diagnosis and fix |
| `test-validation` | test-fix-gen → test-cycle-execute | Test generation and validation |
| `code-review` | review-session-cycle → review-cycle-fix | Code review and fixes |
| `tdd-planning-execution` | tdd-plan → execute | Test-driven development |
| `multi-cli-planning` | multi-cli-plan → lite-execute | Multi-perspective planning |
| `issue-workflow` | issue:plan → issue:queue → issue:execute | Issue lifecycle |
| `rapid-to-issue` | lite-plan → convert-to-plan → queue → execute | Bridge lite to issue |
| `brainstorm-to-issue` | from-brainstorm → queue → execute | Bridge brainstorm to issue |
## Updated Templates
### Simple Workflows (Level 1-2)
1. **lite-lite-lite.json** - Ultra-lightweight direct execution
2. **bugfix-hotfix.json** - Urgent production fix (single async step)
3. **rapid.json** - Quick implementation with optional testing
4. **bugfix.json** - Bug fix with diagnosis and testing
5. **test-fix.json** - Fix failing tests workflow
6. **docs.json** - Documentation generation
### Complex Workflows (Level 3-4)
7. **tdd.json** - Test-driven development with verification
8. **coupled.json** - Full workflow with review and testing
9. **review.json** - Standalone code review workflow
10. **multi-cli-plan.json** - Multi-perspective planning
11. **full.json** - Comprehensive workflow with brainstorm
### Exploration Workflows
12. **brainstorm.json** - Multi-perspective ideation
13. **debug.json** - Hypothesis-driven debugging
14. **analyze.json** - Collaborative analysis
### Issue Workflows
15. **issue.json** - Full issue lifecycle
16. **rapid-to-issue.json** - Bridge lite plan to issue
17. **brainstorm-to-issue.json** - Bridge brainstorm to issue
## Design Principles Applied
1. **Slash Commands Only**: All workflow commands use `slash-command` type
2. **Minimum Execution Units**: Preserved atomic command groups
3. **Context Flow**: `contextHint` provides natural language guidance
4. **Execution Modes**:
- `mainprocess`: Interactive, needs user feedback
- `async`: Long-running, background execution
## CLI Tools Usage (Future Extension)
The `cli-tools` type is reserved for pure analysis/generation tasks WITHOUT specific workflow commands:
```json
{
"name": "custom-analysis",
"steps": [
{
"execution": {
"type": "cli-tools",
"mode": "mainprocess",
"tool": "gemini",
"cliMode": "analysis",
"rule": "analysis-analyze-technical-document"
},
"contextHint": "Analyze architecture design and provide recommendations"
}
]
}
```
**Note**: This is for future extension only. Current templates use slash commands exclusively.
## Files Modified
```
.claude/skills/meta-skill/templates/
├── rapid.json ✓ Updated (slash-command only)
├── coupled.json ✓ Updated (slash-command only)
├── bugfix.json ✓ Fixed (removed cli-tools)
├── bugfix-hotfix.json ✓ Updated (slash-command only)
├── tdd.json ✓ Fixed (removed cli-tools)
├── test-fix.json ✓ Updated (slash-command only)
├── review.json ✓ Fixed (removed cli-tools)
├── brainstorm.json ✓ Fixed (removed cli-tools)
├── debug.json ✓ Fixed (removed cli-tools)
├── analyze.json ✓ Fixed (removed cli-tools)
├── issue.json ✓ Updated (slash-command only)
├── multi-cli-plan.json ✓ Fixed (removed cli-tools)
├── docs.json ✓ Updated (slash-command only)
├── full.json ✓ Fixed (removed cli-tools)
├── rapid-to-issue.json ✓ Updated (slash-command only)
├── brainstorm-to-issue.json ✓ Updated (slash-command only)
├── lite-lite-lite.json ✓ Updated (slash-command only)
├── coupled-enhanced.json ✗ Removed (experimental)
└── rapid-cli.json ✗ Removed (experimental)
```
## Result
All 17 templates now correctly use:
-`slash-command` type exclusively
- ✅ Flexible `mainprocess`/`async` modes
- ✅ Context passing via `contextHint`
- ✅ Minimum execution unit preservation
- ✅ Consistent execution patterns
## Next Steps
The meta-skill workflow coordinator can now:
1. Discover templates dynamically via Glob
2. Parse execution configuration from each step
3. Execute slash commands with mainprocess/async modes
4. Pass context between steps using contextHint
5. Maintain minimum execution unit integrity
6. (Future) Support cli-tools for custom analysis tasks