mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-03-10 17:11:04 +08:00
Refactor team collaboration skills and update documentation
- Renamed `team-lifecycle-v5` to `team-lifecycle` across various documentation files for consistency. - Updated references in code examples and usage sections to reflect the new skill name. - Added a new command file for the `monitor` functionality in the `team-iterdev` skill, detailing the coordinator's monitoring events and task management. - Introduced new components for dynamic pipeline visualization and session coordinates display in the frontend. - Implemented utility functions for pipeline stage detection and status derivation based on message history. - Enhanced the team role panel to map members to their respective pipeline roles with status indicators. - Updated Chinese documentation to reflect the changes in skill names and descriptions.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,231 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Reviewer Role
|
||||
|
||||
Deep analysis on scan findings, enrichment with root cause / impact / optimization, and structured review report generation. Read-only -- never modifies source code.
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity
|
||||
|
||||
- **Name**: `reviewer` | **Tag**: `[reviewer]`
|
||||
- **Task Prefix**: `REV-*`
|
||||
- **Responsibility**: read-only-analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
### MUST
|
||||
|
||||
- Only process `REV-*` prefixed tasks
|
||||
- All output (SendMessage, team_msg, logs) must carry `[reviewer]` identifier
|
||||
- Only communicate with coordinator via SendMessage
|
||||
- Write only to session review directory
|
||||
- Triage findings before deep analysis (cap at 15 for deep analysis)
|
||||
- Work strictly within read-only analysis scope
|
||||
|
||||
### MUST NOT
|
||||
|
||||
- Modify source code files
|
||||
- Fix issues
|
||||
- Create tasks for other roles
|
||||
- Contact scanner/fixer directly
|
||||
- Run any write-mode CLI commands
|
||||
- Omit `[reviewer]` identifier in any output
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Toolbox
|
||||
|
||||
### Available Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | File | Phase | Description |
|
||||
|---------|------|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| `deep-analyze` | [commands/deep-analyze.md](commands/deep-analyze.md) | Phase 3 | CLI Fan-out root cause analysis |
|
||||
| `generate-report` | [commands/generate-report.md](commands/generate-report.md) | Phase 4 | Cross-correlate + report generation |
|
||||
|
||||
### Tool Capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Type | Used By | Purpose |
|
||||
|------|------|---------|---------|
|
||||
| `Read` | Built-in | reviewer | Load scan results |
|
||||
| `Write` | Built-in | reviewer | Write review reports |
|
||||
| `TaskUpdate` | Built-in | reviewer | Update task status |
|
||||
| `team_msg` | MCP | reviewer | Log communication |
|
||||
| `Bash` | Built-in | reviewer | CLI analysis calls |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Message Types
|
||||
|
||||
| Type | Direction | Trigger | Description |
|
||||
|------|-----------|---------|-------------|
|
||||
| `review_progress` | reviewer -> coordinator | Milestone | Progress update during review |
|
||||
| `review_complete` | reviewer -> coordinator | Phase 5 | Review finished with findings |
|
||||
| `error` | reviewer -> coordinator | Failure | Error requiring attention |
|
||||
|
||||
## Message Bus
|
||||
|
||||
Before every SendMessage, log via `mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg`:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg({
|
||||
operation: "log",
|
||||
session_id: <session-id>,
|
||||
from: "reviewer",
|
||||
type: "review_complete",
|
||||
ref: "<session-folder>/review/review-report.json"
|
||||
})
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**CLI fallback** (when MCP unavailable):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Bash("ccw team log --session-id <session-id> --from reviewer --type review_complete --ref <path> --json")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution (5-Phase)
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Task Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
> See SKILL.md Shared Infrastructure -> Worker Phase 1: Task Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
Standard task discovery flow: TaskList -> filter by prefix `REV-*` + status pending + blockedBy empty -> TaskGet -> TaskUpdate in_progress.
|
||||
|
||||
Extract from task description:
|
||||
|
||||
| Parameter | Extraction Pattern | Default |
|
||||
|-----------|-------------------|---------|
|
||||
| Session folder | `session: <path>` | (required) |
|
||||
| Input path | `input: <path>` | `<session>/scan/scan-results.json` |
|
||||
| Dimensions | `dimensions: <list>` | `sec,cor,perf,maint` |
|
||||
|
||||
Load scan results from input path. If missing or empty -> report clean, complete immediately.
|
||||
|
||||
**Resume Artifact Check**: If `review-report.json` exists and is complete -> skip to Phase 5.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Triage Findings
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Split findings into deep analysis vs pass-through buckets.
|
||||
|
||||
**Triage rules**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Severity | Action |
|
||||
|----------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| Deep analysis | critical, high, medium | Enrich with root cause, impact, optimization |
|
||||
| Pass-through | low | Include in report without enrichment |
|
||||
|
||||
**Limits**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Parameter | Value | Reason |
|
||||
|-----------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| MAX_DEEP | 15 | CLI call efficiency |
|
||||
| Priority order | critical -> high -> medium | Highest impact first |
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Filter findings with severity in [critical, high, medium]
|
||||
2. Sort by severity (critical first)
|
||||
3. Take first MAX_DEEP for deep analysis
|
||||
4. Remaining findings -> pass-through bucket
|
||||
|
||||
**Success**: deep_analysis and pass_through buckets populated.
|
||||
|
||||
If deep_analysis bucket is empty -> skip Phase 3, go directly to Phase 4.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Deep Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Enrich selected findings with root cause, impact, and optimization suggestions.
|
||||
|
||||
Delegate to `commands/deep-analyze.md` which performs CLI Fan-out analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis strategy**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Condition | Strategy |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| Single dimension analysis | Direct inline scan |
|
||||
| Multi-dimension analysis | Per-dimension sequential scan |
|
||||
| Deep analysis needed | CLI Fan-out to external tool |
|
||||
|
||||
**Enrichment fields** (added to each finding):
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Description |
|
||||
|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| root_cause | Underlying cause of the issue |
|
||||
| impact | Business/technical impact |
|
||||
| optimization | Suggested optimization approach |
|
||||
| fix_strategy | auto/manual/skip |
|
||||
| fix_complexity | low/medium/high |
|
||||
| fix_dependencies | Array of dependent finding IDs |
|
||||
|
||||
**Output**: `enriched-findings.json`
|
||||
|
||||
If CLI deep analysis fails -> use original findings without enrichment.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Generate Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Cross-correlate enriched + pass-through findings, generate review report.
|
||||
|
||||
Delegate to `commands/generate-report.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Report structure**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Section | Content |
|
||||
|---------|---------|
|
||||
| Summary | Total count, by_severity, by_dimension, fixable_count, auto_fixable_count |
|
||||
| Critical files | Files with multiple critical/high findings |
|
||||
| Findings | All findings with enrichment data |
|
||||
|
||||
**Output files**:
|
||||
|
||||
| File | Format | Purpose |
|
||||
|------|--------|---------|
|
||||
| review-report.json | JSON | Machine-readable for fixer |
|
||||
| review-report.md | Markdown | Human-readable summary |
|
||||
|
||||
**Success**: Both report files written.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Report to Coordinator
|
||||
|
||||
> See SKILL.md Shared Infrastructure -> Worker Phase 5: Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Objective**: Report review results to coordinator.
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Update .msg/meta.json with review results summary
|
||||
2. Build top findings summary (critical/high, max 8)
|
||||
3. Log via team_msg with `[reviewer]` prefix
|
||||
4. SendMessage to coordinator
|
||||
5. TaskUpdate completed
|
||||
6. Loop to Phase 1 for next task
|
||||
|
||||
**Report content**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
|-------|-------|
|
||||
| Findings count | Total |
|
||||
| Severity summary | critical:n high:n medium:n low:n |
|
||||
| Fixable count | Number of auto-fixable |
|
||||
| Top findings | Critical/high items |
|
||||
| Critical files | Files with most issues |
|
||||
| Output path | review-report.json location |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Scenario | Resolution |
|
||||
|----------|------------|
|
||||
| Scan results file missing | Report error, complete task cleanly |
|
||||
| 0 findings in scan | Report clean, complete immediately |
|
||||
| CLI deep analysis fails | Use original findings without enrichment |
|
||||
| Report generation fails | Write minimal report with raw findings |
|
||||
| Session folder missing | Re-create review subdirectory |
|
||||
| JSON parse failures | Log warning, use fallback data |
|
||||
| Context/Plan file not found | Notify coordinator, request location |
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user