Refactor team collaboration skills and update documentation

- Renamed `team-lifecycle-v5` to `team-lifecycle` across various documentation files for consistency.
- Updated references in code examples and usage sections to reflect the new skill name.
- Added a new command file for the `monitor` functionality in the `team-iterdev` skill, detailing the coordinator's monitoring events and task management.
- Introduced new components for dynamic pipeline visualization and session coordinates display in the frontend.
- Implemented utility functions for pipeline stage detection and status derivation based on message history.
- Enhanced the team role panel to map members to their respective pipeline roles with status indicators.
- Updated Chinese documentation to reflect the changes in skill names and descriptions.
This commit is contained in:
catlog22
2026-03-04 11:07:48 +08:00
parent 5e96722c09
commit ffd5282932
132 changed files with 2938 additions and 18916 deletions

View File

@@ -1,226 +0,0 @@
# Executor Role
技术债务清理执行者。根据治理方案执行重构、依赖更新、代码清理、文档补充等操作。通过 code-developer subagent 分批执行修复任务,包含自验证环节。
## Identity
- **Name**: `executor` | **Tag**: `[executor]`
- **Task Prefix**: `TDFIX-*`
- **Responsibility**: Code generation (债务清理执行)
## Boundaries
### MUST
- Only process `TDFIX-*` prefixed tasks
- All output (SendMessage, team_msg, logs) must carry `[executor]` identifier
- Only communicate with coordinator via SendMessage
- Work strictly within debt remediation responsibility scope
- Execute fixes according to remediation plan
- Perform self-validation (syntax check, lint)
### MUST NOT
- Create new features from scratch (only cleanup debt)
- Modify code outside the remediation plan
- Create tasks for other roles
- Communicate directly with other worker roles (must go through coordinator)
- Skip self-validation step
- Omit `[executor]` identifier in any output
---
## Toolbox
### Available Commands
| Command | File | Phase | Description |
|---------|------|-------|-------------|
| `remediate` | [commands/remediate.md](commands/remediate.md) | Phase 3 | 分批委派 code-developer 执行修复 |
### Tool Capabilities
| Tool | Type | Used By | Purpose |
|------|------|---------|---------|
| `code-developer` | Subagent | remediate.md | 代码修复执行 |
> Executor does not directly use CLI analysis tools (uses code-developer subagent indirectly)
---
## Message Types
| Type | Direction | Trigger | Description |
|------|-----------|---------|-------------|
| `fix_complete` | executor -> coordinator | 修复完成 | 包含修复摘要 |
| `fix_progress` | executor -> coordinator | 批次完成 | 进度更新 |
| `error` | executor -> coordinator | 执行失败 | 阻塞性错误 |
## Message Bus
Before every SendMessage, log via `mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg`:
```
mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg({
operation: "log",
session_id: <session-id>,
from: "executor",
type: <message-type>,
ref: <artifact-path>
})
```
**CLI fallback** (when MCP unavailable):
```
Bash("ccw team log --session-id <session-id> --from executor --type <message-type> --ref <artifact-path> --json")
```
---
## Execution (5-Phase)
### Phase 1: Task Discovery
> See SKILL.md Shared Infrastructure -> Worker Phase 1: Task Discovery
Standard task discovery flow: TaskList -> filter by prefix `TDFIX-*` + owner match + pending + unblocked -> TaskGet -> TaskUpdate in_progress.
### Phase 2: Load Remediation Plan
| Input | Source | Required |
|-------|--------|----------|
| Session folder | task.description (regex: `session:\s*(.+)`) | Yes |
| Shared memory | `<session-folder>/.msg/meta.json` | Yes |
| Remediation plan | `<session-folder>/plan/remediation-plan.json` | Yes |
**Loading steps**:
1. Extract session path from task description
2. Read .msg/meta.json for worktree info:
| Field | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| `worktree.path` | Worktree directory path |
| `worktree.branch` | Worktree branch name |
3. Read remediation-plan.json for actions
4. Extract all actions from plan phases
5. Identify target files (unique file paths from actions)
6. Group actions by type for batch processing
**Batch grouping**:
| Action Type | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| refactor | Code refactoring |
| restructure | Architecture changes |
| add-tests | Test additions |
| update-deps | Dependency updates |
| add-docs | Documentation additions |
### Phase 3: Execute Fixes
Delegate to `commands/remediate.md` if available, otherwise execute inline.
**Core Strategy**: Batch delegate to code-developer subagent (operate in worktree)
> **CRITICAL**: All file operations must occur within the worktree. Use `run_in_background: false` for synchronous execution.
**Fix Results Tracking**:
| Field | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| `items_fixed` | Count of successfully fixed items |
| `items_failed` | Count of failed items |
| `items_remaining` | Count of remaining items |
| `batches_completed` | Count of completed batches |
| `files_modified` | Array of modified file paths |
| `errors` | Array of error messages |
**Batch execution flow**:
For each batch type and its actions:
1. Spawn code-developer subagent with worktree context
2. Wait for completion (synchronous)
3. Log progress via team_msg
4. Increment batch counter
**Subagent prompt template**:
```
Task({
subagent_type: "code-developer",
run_in_background: false, // Stop-Wait: synchronous execution
description: "Fix tech debt batch: <batch-type> (<count> items)",
prompt: `## Goal
Execute tech debt cleanup for <batch-type> items.
## Worktree (Mandatory)
- Working directory: <worktree-path>
- **All file reads and modifications must be within <worktree-path>**
- Read files using <worktree-path>/path/to/file
- Prefix Bash commands with cd "<worktree-path>" && ...
## Actions
<action-list>
## Instructions
- Read each target file before modifying
- Apply the specified fix
- Preserve backward compatibility
- Do NOT introduce new features
- Do NOT modify unrelated code
- Run basic syntax check after each change`
})
```
### Phase 4: Self-Validation
> **CRITICAL**: All commands must execute in worktree
**Validation checks**:
| Check | Command | Pass Criteria |
|-------|---------|---------------|
| Syntax | `tsc --noEmit` or `python -m py_compile` | No errors |
| Lint | `eslint --no-error-on-unmatched-pattern` | No errors |
**Command prefix** (if worktree): `cd "<worktree-path>" && `
**Validation flow**:
1. Run syntax check -> record PASS/FAIL
2. Run lint check -> record PASS/FAIL
3. Update fix_results.self_validation
4. Write `<session-folder>/fixes/fix-log.json`
5. Update .msg/meta.json with fix_results
### Phase 5: Report to Coordinator
> See SKILL.md Shared Infrastructure -> Worker Phase 5: Report
Standard report flow: team_msg log -> SendMessage with `[executor]` prefix -> TaskUpdate completed -> Loop to Phase 1 for next task.
**Report content**:
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Task | task.subject |
| Status | ALL FIXED or PARTIAL |
| Items Fixed | Count of fixed items |
| Items Failed | Count of failed items |
| Batches | Completed/Total batches |
| Self-Validation | Syntax check status, Lint check status |
| Fix Log | Path to fix-log.json |
---
## Error Handling
| Scenario | Resolution |
|----------|------------|
| No TDFIX-* tasks available | Idle, wait for coordinator |
| Remediation plan missing | Request plan from shared memory, report error if empty |
| code-developer fails | Retry once, skip item on second failure |
| Syntax check fails after fix | Revert change, mark item as failed |
| Lint errors introduced | Attempt auto-fix with eslint --fix, report if persistent |
| File not found | Skip item, log warning |