catlog22
ac626e5895
feat: Review Session增加Fix进度跟踪卡片,移除独立Dashboard模板
...
- 新增Fix Progress跟踪卡片(走马灯样式)显示修复进度
- 添加/api/file端点支持读取fix-plan.json
- 移除review-fix/module-cycle/session-cycle中的独立dashboard生成
- 删除废弃的workflow-dashboard.html和review-cycle-dashboard.html模板
- 统一使用ccw view命令查看进度
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code )
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com >
2025-12-07 21:41:43 +08:00
catlog22
75ad427862
fix: Replace file:// URLs with local HTTP server for dashboard access
...
Dashboards use fetch() API which doesn't work with file:// protocol due to
browser CORS restrictions. Now starts Python HTTP server for proper access.
- review-module-cycle: port 8765
- review-session-cycle: port 8765
- review-fix: port 8766 (different port for concurrent use)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code )
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com >
2025-11-27 14:14:48 +08:00
catlog22
ef09914f94
fix: Standardize Execution Flow phase naming and remove redundant REVIEW-SUMMARY.md output
...
- Unify phase numbering format to "Phase X:" across all review workflow commands
- Add missing Phase 5: Session Completion to review-fix.md
- Replace "Update dashboard" with "Generate fix-dashboard.html" to clarify initialization vs polling
- Remove REVIEW-SUMMARY.md generation (dashboard serves as primary output)
- Align phase names with Orchestrator section (e.g., "Planning Coordination", "Execution Orchestration")
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code )
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com >
2025-11-26 20:16:35 +08:00
catlog22
7b692ce415
refactor: Clarify agent schema reading with explicit cat commands
...
Replaced ambiguous "Read: schema.json" instructions with explicit
"Execute: cat schema.json" commands to eliminate orchestrator/agent
responsibility confusion. Updated in three key sections:
- MANDATORY FIRST STEPS: Added "Execute by Agent" header with explicit
cat command for schema retrieval
- Expected Deliverables: Shortened to reference prior schema step
- Success Criteria: Simplified to "Schema obtained via cat"
Files modified:
- lite-plan.md: explore-json-schema.json + plan-json-schema.json
- review-module-cycle.md: dimension results + deep-dive schemas
- review-session-cycle.md: dimension results + deep-dive schemas
Benefits:
- Removes ambiguity about who reads schema (always agent, never orchestrator)
- Uses direct command syntax ("cat") instead of passive language
- Consistent English-only phrasing across all three files
- Three-point reinforcement ensures agents execute schema reading
2025-11-26 16:02:00 +08:00
catlog22
2cf8efec74
refactor: Optimize review cycle dashboard generation and merge JSON state files
...
Changes:
- Dashboard generation: Split piped command into 4 independent steps (cp + 3x sed -i) for higher success rate
- JSON consolidation: Merge review-metadata.json into review-state.json (2 files instead of 3)
- Enhanced constraints: Add mandatory template usage requirements and post-generation modification prohibitions
- Updated documentation: Sync changes across review-module-cycle and review-session-cycle
Benefits:
- Reduced command execution failures with independent steps
- Simplified state management with unified metadata+state JSON
- Clearer orchestrator/agent boundaries for dashboard interaction
2025-11-26 15:32:56 +08:00
catlog22
34a9a23d5b
fix: Add explicit JSON schema requirements to review cycle agent prompts
...
Move specific JSON structure requirements from cli-explore-agent (keep generic)
to review-*-cycle.md prompts. Key requirements now inline in prompts:
- Root must be array [{}] not object {}
- analysis_timestamp field (not timestamp/analyzed_at)
- Flat summary structure (not nested by_severity)
- Lowercase severity/id values
- Correct field names (snippet not code_snippet, impact not exploit_scenario)
2025-11-26 15:15:30 +08:00
catlog22
fec5d9a605
refactor: Simplify and standardize TodoWrite structure in review-module-cycle and review-session-cycle documentation for clarity
2025-11-26 10:31:04 +08:00
catlog22
97fea9f19e
refactor: Remove resume option from argument hints in review-module-cycle and review-session-cycle documentation for clarity
2025-11-26 10:26:14 +08:00
catlog22
84c180ab66
refactor: Simplify and streamline agent documentation and output schemas for clarity and consistency
2025-11-26 09:37:14 +08:00
catlog22
e70f086b7e
refactor: Update file paths in documentation to use relative paths for consistency and clarity
2025-11-25 23:48:58 +08:00
catlog22
8f2126677f
refactor: Update review commands to require active sessions and unify output directory structure for improved organization and clarity
2025-11-25 23:02:20 +08:00
catlog22
152303f1b8
refactor: optimize TodoWrite format with hierarchical display across workflow commands
...
Adopt consistent hierarchical TodoWrite format for better visual clarity:
- Phase-level tasks: "Phase N: Description"
- Sub-tasks: " → Sub-task description" (indented with arrow)
- Clear parent-child relationships through visual hierarchy
- Task attachment/collapse pattern visualization
Updated commands:
- lite-plan.md (Phase 1-4 examples)
- auto-parallel.md (Phase 0-3 examples)
- tdd-plan.md (Phase 3-5 examples)
- test-fix-gen.md (TodoWrite Pattern with examples)
- explore-auto.md (TodoWrite Pattern)
- imitate-auto.md (TodoWrite Pattern)
- review-session-cycle.md
- review-module-cycle.md
Benefits:
- Visual hierarchy shows task relationships
- Expanded view shows detailed progress
- Collapsed view maintains clean orchestrator-level summary
- Consistent format across all multi-phase workflows
2025-11-25 19:54:33 +08:00
catlog22
93d8e79b71
feat: add comprehensive review-session-cycle command for multi-dimensional code analysis
...
- Introduced a new command `/workflow:review-session-cycle` for session-based code reviews across 7 dimensions.
- Implemented hybrid parallel-iterative execution to enhance review efficiency and coverage.
- Added detailed documentation outlining command usage, execution flow, and agent roles.
- Configured specialized dimensions with priority-based allocation and defined severity assessment criteria.
- Established a robust aggregation logic for identifying cross-cutting concerns and critical findings.
- Enabled real-time progress tracking through an interactive HTML dashboard.
- Included mechanisms for deep-dive analysis and remediation planning for critical issues.
2025-11-25 17:15:37 +08:00