- Implemented the `docs-related-cli` command for context-aware documentation generation and update for changed modules using CLI execution with tool fallback.
- Introduced the `lite-fix` command for lightweight bug diagnosis and fix workflow, featuring intelligent severity assessment and optional hotfix mode for production incidents.
- Create dedicated session folder (.workflow/.lite-plan/{task-slug}-{timestamp}/)
for each lite-plan execution to organize all planning artifacts
- Always export task.json (removed optional export question from Phase 4)
- Save exploration.json, plan.json, and task.json to session folder
- Add session artifact paths to executionContext for lite-execute delegation
- Update lite-execute to use artifact file paths for CLI/agent context
- Enable CLI tools (Gemini/Qwen/Codex) and agents to access detailed
planning context via file references
Benefits:
- Clean separation between different task executions
- All artifacts automatically saved for reusability
- Enhanced context available for execution phase
- Natural audit trail of planning sessions
Restructure lite-plan.md (844→668 lines, -176) and lite-execute.md (597→569 lines, -28) following agent document patterns. Move Data Structures sections to end as reference, simplify repeated content, improve hierarchical organization. All original content preserved.
Key changes:
- Data Structures moved to end (from beginning)
- Simplified Execution Process to avoid duplication
- Improved section hierarchy and flow
- Consistent structure across both documents
Issue found by Gemini analysis:
- executionContext.planObject.tasks was incorrectly documented as string[]
- Actual runtime structure is array of structured task objects (7 fields)
- This caused documentation mismatch between lite-plan and lite-execute
Fix:
- Update executionContext definition to show full task object structure
- Add comment clarifying it's an array of structured objects (7 fields each)
- Aligns with actual implementation and lite-execute consumption logic
Impact: Documentation only (no code changes, runtime behavior was already correct)
Major changes:
- Add cli-lite-planning-agent.md for generating structured task objects
- Upgrade planObject.tasks from string[] to structured objects with 7 fields:
- title, file, action, description (what to do)
- implementation (3-7 steps on how to do it)
- reference (pattern, files, examples to follow)
- acceptance (verification criteria)
- Update lite-execute.md to format structured tasks for Agent/Codex execution
- Clean up agent files: remove "how to call me" sections (cli-planning-agent, cli-explore-agent)
- Update lite-plan.md to use cli-lite-planning-agent for Medium/High complexity tasks
Benefits:
- Execution agents receive complete "how to do" guidance instead of vague descriptions
- Each task includes specific file paths, implementation steps, and verification criteria
- Clear separation of concerns: agents only describe what they do, not how they are called
- Architecture validated by Gemini: 100% consistency, no responsibility leakage
Breaking changes: None (backward compatible via task.title || task fallback in lite-execute)
Changes:
1. Initialize previousExecutionResults array in Step 5.1
2. Add id field to executionCalls objects (format: [Method-Index])
3. Add execution loop structure in Step 5.2 showing sequential processing
4. Clarify executionId comes from executionCalls[currentIndex].id
5. Add comments explaining ID storage for result collection
Benefits:
- Clear definition of where executionId comes from
- Explicit initialization of tracking variables
- Better understanding of execution flow and result collection
- Proper context continuity across multiple execution calls
Improvements:
1. Add plan summary in confirmation question for quick review
2. Add previousExecutionResults tracking for multi-execution flows
3. Include execution result collection mechanism after each call
4. Update both Agent and Codex execution prompts with context continuity
Benefits:
- Subsequent executions can see what previous calls completed
- Avoid duplicate work across multiple execution calls
- Better dependency management and task flow
- Clear context propagation: executionId, status, tasks, outputs, notes
Change Phase 4 confirmation flow from single-step to two-step process:
- Step 4.1: Display complete plan as readable text output
- Step 4.2: Collect three-dimensional input via AskUserQuestion
Benefits:
- Clearer plan presentation (not embedded in question)
- Simpler question interface focused on user decisions
- Better user experience with logical separation
