Compare commits

...

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
catlog22
6f9dc836c3 chore: release v7.2.5 2026-03-09 23:24:04 +08:00
catlog22
663620955c chore: update commands, specs, and ccw tools
Update DDD commands (doc-generate, doc-refresh, sync), workflow commands
(session/sync, spec/add, spec/setup, spec/load), ccw specs, personal
preferences, and add generate-ddd-docs tool.
2026-03-09 23:20:39 +08:00
catlog22
cbd1813ea7 feat(team-coordinate): align with team-skill-designer and team-lifecycle-v4 standards
Add quality-gates.md and knowledge-transfer.md specs. Update SKILL.md
with Shared Constants, Specs Reference, and new user commands. Enhance
coordinator role.md with frontmatter, Message Types, Message Bus Protocol,
and Toolbox. Add When to Use + Strategy sections to all command files.
Update role-spec-template with Identity/Boundaries blocks and validation
checklist.
2026-03-09 23:20:17 +08:00
catlog22
b2fc2f60f1 feat: implement ignore patterns and extension filters in CodexLens
- Added tests to ensure loading of ignore patterns and extension filters from settings.
- Implemented functionality to respect ignore patterns and extension filters during file indexing.
- Created integration tests for CodexLens ignore-pattern configuration routes.
- Added a new AdvancedTab component with tests for managing ignore patterns and extension filters.
- Established a comprehensive branding naming system for the Maestro project, including guidelines for package names, CLI commands, and directory structure.
2026-03-09 14:43:21 +08:00
catlog22
3341a2e772 chore: release v7.2.4 2026-03-08 23:44:55 +08:00
catlog22
61ea9d47a6 Enhance UX and Coordinator Role Constraints in Skills Documentation
- Added detailed constraints for the Coordinator role in the team UX improvement skill, emphasizing orchestration responsibilities and workflow management.
- Updated test cases in DashboardToolbar, useIssues, and useWebSocket to improve reliability and clarity.
- Introduced new tests for configStore and ignore patterns in Codex Lens to ensure proper functionality and configuration handling.
- Enhanced smart search functionality with improved embedding selection logic and added tests for various scenarios.
- Updated installation and usage documentation to reflect changes in directory structure and role specifications.
2026-03-08 23:43:44 +08:00
catlog22
f3ae78f95e fix(configStore): add type guard for CLI tool type validation
- Add isValidType type guard to ensure type safety
- Validate tool type against allowed values before assignment
- Fixes TypeScript compilation error in build
2026-03-08 21:43:43 +08:00
catlog22
334f82eaad feat(app): sync backend config on app initialization
- Call syncConfigStoreFromBackend() on app mount
- Export __testables from smart-search for testing
- Complements configStore refactoring
2026-03-08 21:41:27 +08:00
165 changed files with 5316 additions and 742 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
---
title: "Personal Coding Style"
dimension: personal
category: general
keywords:
- style
- preference
readMode: optional
priority: medium
---
# Personal Coding Style
## Preferences
- Describe your preferred coding style here
- Example: verbose variable names vs terse, functional vs imperative
## Patterns I Prefer
- List patterns you reach for most often
- Example: builder pattern, factory functions, tagged unions
## Things I Avoid
- List anti-patterns or approaches you dislike
- Example: deep inheritance hierarchies, magic strings

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
---
title: "Tool Preferences"
dimension: personal
category: general
keywords:
- tool
- cli
- editor
readMode: optional
priority: low
---
# Tool Preferences
## Editor
- Preferred editor and key extensions/plugins
## CLI Tools
- Preferred shell, package manager, build tools
## Debugging
- Preferred debugging approach and tools

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
---
title: Architecture Constraints
readMode: optional
priority: medium
category: general
scope: project
dimension: specs
keywords: [architecture, constraint, schema, compatibility, portability, design, arch]
---
# Architecture Constraints
## Schema Evolution

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
---
title: Coding Conventions
readMode: optional
priority: medium
category: general
scope: project
dimension: specs
keywords: [coding, convention, style, naming, pattern, navigation, schema, error-handling, implementation, validation, clarity, doc]
---
# Coding Conventions
## Navigation & Path Handling
@@ -9,6 +19,7 @@
## Document Generation
- [architecture] For document generation systems, adopt Layer 3→2→1 pattern (components → features → indexes) for efficient incremental updates. (learned: 2026-03-07)
- [tools] When commands need to generate files with deterministic paths and frontmatter, use dedicated ccw tool endpoints (`ccw tool exec`) instead of raw `ccw cli -p` calls. Endpoints control output path, file naming, and structural metadata; CLI tools only generate prose content. (learned: 2026-03-09)
## Implementation Quality

View File

@@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ description: |
Examples:
- Context: Coordinator spawns analyst worker
user: "role: analyst\nrole_spec: .claude/skills/team-lifecycle/role-specs/analyst.md\nsession: .workflow/.team/TLS-xxx"
user: "role: analyst\nrole_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle/role-specs/analyst.md\nsession: .workflow/.team/TLS-xxx"
assistant: "Loading role spec, discovering RESEARCH-* tasks, executing Phase 2-4 domain logic"
commentary: Agent parses prompt, loads role spec, runs built-in Phase 1 then role-specific Phase 2-4 then built-in Phase 5
- Context: Coordinator spawns writer worker with inner loop
user: "role: writer\nrole_spec: .claude/skills/team-lifecycle/role-specs/writer.md\ninner_loop: true"
user: "role: writer\nrole_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle/role-specs/writer.md\ninner_loop: true"
assistant: "Loading role spec, processing all DRAFT-* tasks in inner loop"
commentary: Agent detects inner_loop=true, loops Phase 1-5 for each same-prefix task
color: green

View File

@@ -48,8 +48,9 @@ doc-index.json → tech-registry/*.md (L3) → feature-maps/*.md (L2) → _index
├── tech-registry/ ← Component documentation (Layer 3)
│ ├── _index.md
│ └── {component-slug}.md
└── sessions/
── _index.md ← Planning sessions index (Layer 1)
└── planning/ ← Planning sessions (Layer 1)
── _index.md ← Planning sessions index
└── {task-slug}-{date}/ ← Individual session folders
```
## Phase 1: Load & Validate
@@ -87,147 +88,82 @@ IF docs already exist AND NOT --force:
Ask user (unless -y → overwrite)
```
## Phase 2: Layer 3 Component Documentation
## Phase 2: Layer 3 -- Component Documentation
For each component in `technicalComponents[]`:
For each component in `technicalComponents[]`, call the generate_ddd_docs endpoint:
```bash
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate component documentation for {component.name}
TASK:
• Document component purpose and responsibility
• List exported symbols (classes, functions, types)
• Document dependencies (internal and external)
• Include code examples for key APIs
• Document integration points with other components
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @{component.codeLocations[].path}
EXPECTED: Markdown file with: Overview, API Reference, Dependencies, Usage Examples
CONSTRAINTS: Focus on public API | Include type signatures
" --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/.doc-index/tech-registry/
for COMPONENT_ID in "${technicalComponents[@]}"; do
ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs '{"strategy":"component","entityId":"'"$COMPONENT_ID"'","tool":"gemini"}'
done
```
The endpoint handles:
- Loading the component entity from doc-index.json
- Building YAML frontmatter (layer: 3, component_id, name, type, features, code_locations, generated_at)
- Constructing the CLI prompt with code context paths
- **Including Change History section**: Pull related entries from `doc-index.json.actions[]` where `affectedComponents` includes this component ID. Display as timeline (date, action type, description)
- Writing output to `.workflow/.doc-index/tech-registry/{slug}.md`
- Tool fallback (gemini -> qwen -> codex) on failure
Output: `.workflow/.doc-index/tech-registry/{component-slug}.md`
Frontmatter:
```markdown
---
layer: 3
component_id: tech-{slug}
name: ComponentName
type: service|controller|model|...
features: [feat-auth]
code_locations:
- path: src/services/auth.ts
symbols: [AuthService, AuthService.login]
generated_at: ISO8601
---
```
## Phase 3: Layer 2 -- Feature Documentation
Sections: Responsibility, Code Locations, Related Requirements, Architecture Decisions, Dependencies (in/out)
## Phase 3: Layer 2 — Feature Documentation
For each feature in `features[]`:
For each feature in `features[]`, call the generate_ddd_docs endpoint:
```bash
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate feature documentation for {feature.name}
TASK:
• Describe feature purpose and business value
• List requirements (from requirementIds)
• Document components involved (from techComponentIds)
• Include architecture decisions (from adrIds)
• Provide integration guide
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @.workflow/.doc-index/tech-registry/{related-components}.md
EXPECTED: Markdown file with: Overview, Requirements, Components, Architecture, Integration
CONSTRAINTS: Reference Layer 3 component docs | Business-focused language
" --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/.doc-index/feature-maps/
for FEATURE_ID in "${features[@]}"; do
ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs '{"strategy":"feature","entityId":"'"$FEATURE_ID"'","tool":"gemini"}'
done
```
The endpoint handles:
- Loading the feature entity from doc-index.json
- Building YAML frontmatter (layer: 2, feature_id, name, epic_id, status, requirements, components, tags, generated_at)
- Constructing the CLI prompt referencing Layer 3 component docs
- **Including Change History section**: Pull related entries from `doc-index.json.actions[]` where `affectedFeatures` includes this feature ID. Display as timeline (date, action type, description)
- Writing output to `.workflow/.doc-index/feature-maps/{slug}.md`
- Tool fallback (gemini -> qwen -> codex) on failure
Output: `.workflow/.doc-index/feature-maps/{feature-slug}.md`
Frontmatter:
```markdown
---
layer: 2
feature_id: feat-{slug}
name: Feature Name
epic_id: EPIC-NNN|null
status: implemented|in-progress|planned|partial
requirements: [REQ-001, REQ-002]
components: [tech-auth-service, tech-user-model]
depends_on_layer3: [tech-auth-service, tech-user-model]
tags: [auth, security]
generated_at: ISO8601
---
```
Sections: Overview, Requirements (with mapping status), Technical Components, Architecture Decisions, Change History
## Phase 4: Layer 1 — Index & Overview Documentation
## Phase 4: Layer 1 -- Index & Overview Documentation
### 4.1 Index Documents
Generate catalog files:
Generate catalog files for each subdirectory:
- **feature-maps/_index.md** — Feature overview table with status
- **tech-registry/_index.md** — Component registry table with types
- **action-logs/_index.md** — Action history table (empty initially for new projects)
```bash
# Feature maps index
ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs '{"strategy":"index","entityId":"feature-maps","tool":"gemini"}'
# Tech registry index
ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs '{"strategy":"index","entityId":"tech-registry","tool":"gemini"}'
# Action logs index
ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs '{"strategy":"index","entityId":"action-logs","tool":"gemini"}'
# Planning sessions index
ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs '{"strategy":"index","entityId":"planning","tool":"gemini"}'
```
Or generate all indexes at once (omit entityId):
```bash
ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs '{"strategy":"index","tool":"gemini"}'
```
### 4.2 README.md (unless --skip-overview)
```bash
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate project README with overview and navigation
TASK:
• Project summary and purpose
• Quick start guide
• Navigation to features, components, and architecture
• Link to doc-index.json
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @.workflow/.doc-index/doc-index.json @.workflow/.doc-index/feature-maps/_index.md
EXPECTED: README.md with: Overview, Quick Start, Navigation, Links
CONSTRAINTS: High-level only | Entry point for new developers
" --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/.doc-index/
ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs '{"strategy":"overview","tool":"gemini"}'
```
### 4.3 ARCHITECTURE.md (unless --skip-overview)
```bash
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate architecture overview document
TASK:
• System design overview
• Component relationships and dependencies
• Key architecture decisions (from ADRs)
• Technology stack
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @.workflow/.doc-index/doc-index.json @.workflow/.doc-index/tech-registry/*.md
EXPECTED: ARCHITECTURE.md with: System Design, Component Diagram, ADRs, Tech Stack
CONSTRAINTS: Architecture-focused | Reference component docs for details
" --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/.doc-index/
```
### 4.4 sessions/_index.md (unless --skip-overview)
```bash
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Generate planning sessions index
TASK:
• List all planning session folders chronologically
• Link to each session's plan.json
• Show session status and task count
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @.workflow/.doc-index/planning/*/plan.json
EXPECTED: sessions/_index.md with: Session List, Links, Status
CONSTRAINTS: Chronological order | Link to session folders
" --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/.doc-index/sessions/
```
Layer 1 frontmatter:
```markdown
---
layer: 1
depends_on_layer2: [feat-auth, feat-orders]
generated_at: ISO8601
---
ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs '{"strategy":"overview","entityId":"architecture","tool":"gemini"}'
```
## Phase 5: SCHEMA.md (unless --skip-schema)
@@ -235,17 +171,7 @@ generated_at: ISO8601
### 5.1 Generate Schema Documentation
```bash
ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Document doc-index.json schema structure and versioning
TASK:
• Document current schema structure (all fields)
• Define versioning policy (semver: major.minor)
• Document migration protocol for version upgrades
• Provide examples for each schema section
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @.workflow/.doc-index/doc-index.json
EXPECTED: SCHEMA.md with: Schema Structure, Versioning Policy, Migration Protocol, Examples
CONSTRAINTS: Complete field documentation | Clear migration steps
" --tool gemini --mode write --cd .workflow/.doc-index/
ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs '{"strategy":"schema","tool":"gemini"}'
```
### 5.2 Versioning Policy
@@ -284,7 +210,7 @@ Total: {N} documents generated
| `-y, --yes` | Auto-confirm all decisions |
| `--layer <3\|2\|1\|all>` | Generate specific layer only (default: all) |
| `--force` | Overwrite existing documents |
| `--skip-overview` | Skip README.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, sessions/_index.md |
| `--skip-overview` | Skip README.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, planning/_index.md |
| `--skip-schema` | Skip SCHEMA.md generation |
## Integration Points
@@ -293,3 +219,4 @@ Total: {N} documents generated
- **Called by**: `/ddd:scan` (after index assembly), `/ddd:index-build` (after index assembly)
- **Standalone**: Can be run independently on any project with existing doc-index.json
- **Output**: Complete document tree in `.workflow/.doc-index/`
- **Endpoint**: `ccw tool exec generate_ddd_docs` handles prompt construction, frontmatter, tool fallback, and file creation

View File

@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ ccw cli -p "PURPOSE: Update project overview docs after feature changes
TASK:
• Update README.md feature list
• Update ARCHITECTURE.md if new components added
• Update sessions/_index.md with new planning sessions
• Update planning/_index.md with new planning sessions
MODE: write
CONTEXT: @.workflow/.doc-index/feature-maps/*.md @.workflow/.doc-index/doc-index.json
EXPECTED: Updated overview docs with current project state

View File

@@ -37,11 +37,42 @@ After completing a development task, synchronize the document index with actual
- `doc-index.json` must exist
- Git repository with committed or staged changes
## Phase 0: Consistency Validation
Before processing changes, verify that `doc-index.json` entries are consistent with actual code state.
### 0.1 Validate Code Locations
For each `technicalComponents[].codeLocations[]`:
- Verify file exists on disk
- If file was deleted/moved → flag for removal or update
- If file exists → verify listed `symbols[]` still exist (quick grep/AST check)
### 0.2 Validate Symbols
For components with `codeLocations[].symbols[]`:
- Check each symbol still exists in the referenced file
- Detect new exported symbols not yet tracked
- Report: `{N} stale symbols, {N} untracked symbols`
### 0.3 Validation Report
```
Consistency Check:
Components validated: {N}
Files verified: {N}
Stale references: {N} (files missing or symbols removed)
Untracked symbols: {N} (new exports not in index)
```
If stale references found: warn and auto-fix during Phase 3 updates.
If `--dry-run`: report only, no fixes.
## Phase 1: Change Detection
### 0.1 Schema Version Check (TASK-006)
### 1.0.1 Schema Version Check
Before processing changes, verify doc-index schema compatibility:
Before processing changes, verify doc-index.json schema compatibility:
```javascript
const docIndex = JSON.parse(Read('.workflow/.doc-index/doc-index.json'));
@@ -201,6 +232,7 @@ For each affected component in `doc-index.json`:
- Update `codeLocations` if file paths or line ranges changed
- Update `symbols` if new exports were added
- Add new `actionIds` entry
- **Auto-update `responsibility`**: If symbols changed (new methods/exports added or removed), re-infer responsibility from current symbols list using Gemini analysis. This prevents stale descriptions (e.g., responsibility still says "登录、注册" after adding logout support)
### 3.2 Register New Components

View File

@@ -65,11 +65,14 @@ Analyze context and produce two update payloads. Use LLM reasoning (current agen
```javascript
// ── Guidelines extraction ──
// Scan git diff + session for:
// - New patterns adopted → convention
// - Restrictions discovered → constraint
// - Surprises / gotchas → learning
// - Debugging experiences → bug
// - Reusable code patterns → pattern
// - Architecture/design decisions → decision
// - Conventions, constraints, insights → rule
//
// Output: array of { type, category, text }
// Output: array of { type, tag, text }
// type: 'bug' | 'pattern' | 'decision' | 'rule'
// tag: domain tag (api, routing, schema, security, etc.)
// RULE: Only extract genuinely reusable insights. Skip trivial/obvious items.
// RULE: Deduplicate against existing guidelines before adding.
@@ -118,7 +121,7 @@ console.log(`
── Sync Preview ──
Guidelines (${guidelineUpdates.length} items):
${guidelineUpdates.map(g => ` [${g.type}/${g.category}] ${g.text}`).join('\n') || ' (none)'}
${guidelineUpdates.map(g => ` [${g.type}:${g.tag}] ${g.text}`).join('\n') || ' (none)'}
Tech [${detectCategory(summary)}]:
${techEntry.title}
@@ -137,26 +140,102 @@ if (!autoYes) {
## Step 4: Write
```javascript
// ── Update specs/*.md ──
// Uses .ccw/specs/ directory (same as frontend/backend spec-index-builder)
if (guidelineUpdates.length > 0) {
// Map guideline types to spec files
const specFileMap = {
convention: '.ccw/specs/coding-conventions.md',
constraint: '.ccw/specs/architecture-constraints.md',
learning: '.ccw/specs/coding-conventions.md' // learnings appended to conventions
const matter = require('gray-matter') // YAML frontmatter parser
// ── Frontmatter check & repair helper ──
// Ensures target spec file has valid YAML frontmatter with keywords
// Uses gray-matter for robust parsing (handles malformed frontmatter, missing fields)
function ensureFrontmatter(filePath, tag, type) {
const titleMap = {
'coding-conventions': 'Coding Conventions',
'architecture-constraints': 'Architecture Constraints',
'learnings': 'Learnings',
'quality-rules': 'Quality Rules'
}
const basename = filePath.split('/').pop().replace('.md', '')
const title = titleMap[basename] || basename
const defaultFm = {
title,
readMode: 'optional',
priority: 'medium',
scope: 'project',
dimension: 'specs',
keywords: [tag, type]
}
if (!file_exists(filePath)) {
// Case A: Create new file with frontmatter
Write(filePath, matter.stringify(`\n# ${title}\n\n`, defaultFm))
return
}
const raw = Read(filePath)
let parsed
try {
parsed = matter(raw)
} catch {
parsed = { data: {}, content: raw }
}
const hasFrontmatter = raw.trimStart().startsWith('---')
if (!hasFrontmatter) {
// Case B: File exists but no frontmatter → prepend
Write(filePath, matter.stringify(raw, defaultFm))
return
}
// Case C: Frontmatter exists → ensure keywords include current tag
const existingKeywords = parsed.data.keywords || []
const newKeywords = [...new Set([...existingKeywords, tag, type])]
if (newKeywords.length !== existingKeywords.length) {
parsed.data.keywords = newKeywords
Write(filePath, matter.stringify(parsed.content, parsed.data))
}
}
// ── Update specs/*.md ──
// Uses .ccw/specs/ directory - unified [type:tag] entry format
if (guidelineUpdates.length > 0) {
// Map knowledge types to spec files
const specFileMap = {
bug: '.ccw/specs/learnings.md',
pattern: '.ccw/specs/coding-conventions.md',
decision: '.ccw/specs/architecture-constraints.md',
rule: null // determined by content below
}
const date = new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0]
const needsDate = { bug: true, pattern: true, decision: true, rule: false }
for (const g of guidelineUpdates) {
const targetFile = specFileMap[g.type]
// For rule type, route by content and tag
let targetFile = specFileMap[g.type]
if (!targetFile) {
const isQuality = /\b(test|coverage|lint|eslint|质量|测试覆盖|pre-commit|tsc|type.check)\b/i.test(g.text)
|| ['testing', 'quality', 'lint'].includes(g.tag)
const isConstraint = /\b(禁止|no|never|must not|forbidden|不得|不允许)\b/i.test(g.text)
if (isQuality) {
targetFile = '.ccw/specs/quality-rules.md'
} else if (isConstraint) {
targetFile = '.ccw/specs/architecture-constraints.md'
} else {
targetFile = '.ccw/specs/coding-conventions.md'
}
}
// Ensure frontmatter exists and keywords are up-to-date
ensureFrontmatter(targetFile, g.tag, g.type)
const existing = Read(targetFile)
const ruleText = g.type === 'learning'
? `- [${g.category}] ${g.text} (learned: ${new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0]})`
: `- [${g.category}] ${g.text}`
const entryLine = needsDate[g.type]
? `- [${g.type}:${g.tag}] ${g.text} (${date})`
: `- [${g.type}:${g.tag}] ${g.text}`
// Deduplicate: skip if text already in file
if (!existing.includes(g.text)) {
const newContent = existing.trimEnd() + '\n' + ruleText + '\n'
const newContent = existing.trimEnd() + '\n' + entryLine + '\n'
Write(targetFile, newContent)
}
}
@@ -198,4 +277,5 @@ Write(techPath, JSON.stringify(tech, null, 2))
## Related Commands
- `/workflow:spec:setup` - Initialize project with specs scaffold
- `/workflow:spec:add` - Interactive wizard to create individual specs with scope selection
- `/workflow:spec:add` - Add knowledge entries (bug/pattern/decision/rule) with unified [type:tag] format
- `/workflow:spec:load` - Interactive spec loader with keyword/type/tag filtering

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,392 @@
---
name: load
description: Interactive spec loader - ask what user needs, then load relevant specs by keyword routing
argument-hint: "[--all] [--type <bug|pattern|decision|rule>] [--tag <tag>] [\"keyword query\"]"
examples:
- /workflow:spec:load
- /workflow:spec:load "api routing"
- /workflow:spec:load --type bug
- /workflow:spec:load --all
- /workflow:spec:load --tag security
---
# Spec Load Command (/workflow:spec:load)
## Overview
Interactive entry point for loading and browsing project specs. Asks the user what they need, then routes to the appropriate spec content based on keywords, type filters, or tag filters.
**Design**: Menu-driven → keyword match → load & display. No file modifications.
**Note**: This command may be called by other workflow commands. Upon completion, return immediately to continue the calling workflow.
## Usage
```bash
/workflow:spec:load # Interactive menu
/workflow:spec:load "api routing" # Direct keyword search
/workflow:spec:load --type bug # Filter by knowledge type
/workflow:spec:load --tag security # Filter by domain tag
/workflow:spec:load --all # Load all specs
```
## Execution Process
```
Input Parsing:
├─ Parse --all flag → loadAll = true | false
├─ Parse --type (bug|pattern|decision|rule)
├─ Parse --tag (domain tag)
└─ Parse keyword query (positional text)
Decision:
├─ --all → Load all specs (Path C)
├─ --type or --tag or keyword → Direct filter (Path B)
└─ No args → Interactive menu (Path A)
Path A: Interactive Menu
├─ Step A1: Ask user intent
├─ Step A2: Route to action
└─ Step A3: Display results
Path B: Direct Filter
├─ Step B1: Build filter from args
├─ Step B2: Search specs
└─ Step B3: Display results
Path C: Load All
└─ Display all spec contents
Output:
└─ Formatted spec entries matching user query
```
## Implementation
### Step 1: Parse Input
```javascript
const args = $ARGUMENTS
const argsLower = args.toLowerCase()
const loadAll = argsLower.includes('--all')
const hasType = argsLower.includes('--type')
const hasTag = argsLower.includes('--tag')
let type = hasType ? args.match(/--type\s+(\w+)/i)?.[1]?.toLowerCase() : null
let tag = hasTag ? args.match(/--tag\s+([\w-]+)/i)?.[1]?.toLowerCase() : null
// Extract keyword query (everything that's not a flag)
let keyword = args
.replace(/--type\s+\w+/gi, '')
.replace(/--tag\s+[\w-]+/gi, '')
.replace(/--all/gi, '')
.replace(/^["']|["']$/g, '')
.trim()
// Validate type
if (type && !['bug', 'pattern', 'decision', 'rule'].includes(type)) {
console.log("Invalid type. Use 'bug', 'pattern', 'decision', or 'rule'.")
return
}
```
### Step 2: Determine Mode
```javascript
const useInteractive = !loadAll && !hasType && !hasTag && !keyword
```
### Path A: Interactive Menu
```javascript
if (useInteractive) {
const answer = AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "What specs would you like to load?",
header: "Action",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{
label: "Browse all specs",
description: "Load and display all project spec entries"
},
{
label: "Search by keyword",
description: "Find specs matching a keyword (e.g., api, security, routing)"
},
{
label: "View bug experiences",
description: "Load all [bug:*] debugging experience entries"
},
{
label: "View code patterns",
description: "Load all [pattern:*] reusable code pattern entries"
}
]
}]
})
const choice = answer.answers["Action"]
if (choice === "Browse all specs") {
loadAll = true
} else if (choice === "View bug experiences") {
type = "bug"
} else if (choice === "View code patterns") {
type = "pattern"
} else if (choice === "Search by keyword") {
// Ask for keyword
const kwAnswer = AskUserQuestion({
questions: [{
question: "Enter keyword(s) to search for:",
header: "Keyword",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "api", description: "API endpoints, HTTP, REST, routing" },
{ label: "security", description: "Authentication, authorization, input validation" },
{ label: "arch", description: "Architecture, design patterns, module structure" },
{ label: "perf", description: "Performance, caching, optimization" }
]
}]
})
keyword = kwAnswer.answers["Keyword"].toLowerCase()
} else {
// "Other" — user typed custom input, use as keyword
keyword = choice.toLowerCase()
}
}
```
### Step 3: Load Spec Files
```javascript
// Discover all spec files
const specFiles = [
'.ccw/specs/coding-conventions.md',
'.ccw/specs/architecture-constraints.md',
'.ccw/specs/learnings.md',
'.ccw/specs/quality-rules.md'
]
// Also check personal specs
const personalFiles = [
'~/.ccw/personal/conventions.md',
'~/.ccw/personal/constraints.md',
'~/.ccw/personal/learnings.md',
'.ccw/personal/conventions.md',
'.ccw/personal/constraints.md',
'.ccw/personal/learnings.md'
]
// Read all existing spec files
const allEntries = []
for (const file of [...specFiles, ...personalFiles]) {
if (!file_exists(file)) continue
const content = Read(file)
// Extract entries using unified format regex
// Entry line: - [type:tag] summary (date)
// Extended: - key: value
const lines = content.split('\n')
let currentEntry = null
for (const line of lines) {
const entryMatch = line.match(/^- \[(\w+):([\w-]+)\] (.*?)(?:\s+\((\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2})\))?$/)
if (entryMatch) {
if (currentEntry) allEntries.push(currentEntry)
currentEntry = {
type: entryMatch[1],
tag: entryMatch[2],
summary: entryMatch[3],
date: entryMatch[4] || null,
extended: {},
source: file,
raw: line
}
} else if (currentEntry && /^\s{4}- ([\w-]+):\s?(.*)/.test(line)) {
const fieldMatch = line.match(/^\s{4}- ([\w-]+):\s?(.*)/)
currentEntry.extended[fieldMatch[1]] = fieldMatch[2]
} else if (currentEntry && !/^\s{4}/.test(line) && line.trim() !== '') {
// Non-indented non-empty line = end of current entry
allEntries.push(currentEntry)
currentEntry = null
}
// Also handle legacy format: - [tag] text (learned: date)
const legacyMatch = line.match(/^- \[([\w-]+)\] (.+?)(?:\s+\(learned: (\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2})\))?$/)
if (!entryMatch && legacyMatch) {
if (currentEntry) allEntries.push(currentEntry)
currentEntry = {
type: 'rule',
tag: legacyMatch[1],
summary: legacyMatch[2],
date: legacyMatch[3] || null,
extended: {},
source: file,
raw: line,
legacy: true
}
}
}
if (currentEntry) allEntries.push(currentEntry)
}
```
### Step 4: Filter Entries
```javascript
let filtered = allEntries
// Filter by type
if (type) {
filtered = filtered.filter(e => e.type === type)
}
// Filter by tag
if (tag) {
filtered = filtered.filter(e => e.tag === tag)
}
// Filter by keyword (search in tag, summary, and extended fields)
if (keyword) {
const kw = keyword.toLowerCase()
const kwTerms = kw.split(/\s+/)
filtered = filtered.filter(e => {
const searchText = [
e.type, e.tag, e.summary,
...Object.values(e.extended)
].join(' ').toLowerCase()
return kwTerms.every(term => searchText.includes(term))
})
}
// If --all, keep everything (no filter)
```
### Step 5: Display Results
```javascript
if (filtered.length === 0) {
const filterDesc = []
if (type) filterDesc.push(`type=${type}`)
if (tag) filterDesc.push(`tag=${tag}`)
if (keyword) filterDesc.push(`keyword="${keyword}"`)
console.log(`
No specs found matching: ${filterDesc.join(', ') || '(all)'}
Available spec files:
${specFiles.filter(f => file_exists(f)).map(f => ` - ${f}`).join('\n') || ' (none)'}
Suggestions:
- Use /workflow:spec:setup to initialize specs
- Use /workflow:spec:add to add new entries
- Use /workflow:spec:load --all to see everything
`)
return
}
// Group by source file
const grouped = {}
for (const entry of filtered) {
if (!grouped[entry.source]) grouped[entry.source] = []
grouped[entry.source].push(entry)
}
// Display
console.log(`
## Specs Loaded (${filtered.length} entries)
${type ? `Type: ${type}` : ''}${tag ? ` Tag: ${tag}` : ''}${keyword ? ` Keyword: "${keyword}"` : ''}
`)
for (const [source, entries] of Object.entries(grouped)) {
console.log(`### ${source}`)
console.log('')
for (const entry of entries) {
// Render entry
const datePart = entry.date ? ` (${entry.date})` : ''
console.log(`- [${entry.type}:${entry.tag}] ${entry.summary}${datePart}`)
// Render extended fields
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(entry.extended)) {
console.log(` - ${key}: ${value}`)
}
}
console.log('')
}
// Summary footer
const typeCounts = {}
for (const e of filtered) {
typeCounts[e.type] = (typeCounts[e.type] || 0) + 1
}
const typeBreakdown = Object.entries(typeCounts)
.map(([t, c]) => `${t}: ${c}`)
.join(', ')
console.log(`---`)
console.log(`Total: ${filtered.length} entries (${typeBreakdown})`)
console.log(`Sources: ${Object.keys(grouped).join(', ')}`)
```
## Examples
### Interactive Browse
```bash
/workflow:spec:load
# → Menu: "What specs would you like to load?"
# → User selects "Browse all specs"
# → Displays all entries grouped by file
```
### Keyword Search
```bash
/workflow:spec:load "api routing"
# → Filters entries where tag/summary/extended contains "api" AND "routing"
# → Displays matching entries
```
### Type Filter
```bash
/workflow:spec:load --type bug
# → Shows all [bug:*] entries from learnings.md
```
### Tag Filter
```bash
/workflow:spec:load --tag security
# → Shows all [*:security] entries across all spec files
```
### Combined Filters
```bash
/workflow:spec:load --type rule --tag api
# → Shows all [rule:api] entries
```
### Load All
```bash
/workflow:spec:load --all
# → Displays every entry from every spec file
```
## Error Handling
| Error | Resolution |
|-------|------------|
| No spec files found | Suggest `/workflow:spec:setup` to initialize |
| No matching entries | Show available files and suggest alternatives |
| Invalid type | Exit with valid type list |
| Corrupt entry format | Skip unparseable lines, continue loading |
## Related Commands
- `/workflow:spec:setup` - Initialize project with specs scaffold
- `/workflow:spec:add` - Add knowledge entries (bug/pattern/decision/rule) with unified [type:tag] format
- `/workflow:session:sync` - Quick-sync session work to specs and project-tech
- `ccw spec list` - View spec file index
- `ccw spec load` - CLI-level spec loading (used by hooks)

View File

@@ -471,70 +471,129 @@ For each category of collected answers, append rules to the corresponding spec M
- Round 5 (quality): `category: execution` (testing phase)
```javascript
const matter = require('gray-matter') // YAML frontmatter parser
// ── Frontmatter check & repair helper ──
// Ensures target spec file has valid YAML frontmatter with keywords
// Uses gray-matter for robust parsing (handles malformed frontmatter, missing fields)
function ensureSpecFrontmatter(filePath, extraKeywords = []) {
const titleMap = {
'coding-conventions': 'Coding Conventions',
'architecture-constraints': 'Architecture Constraints',
'learnings': 'Learnings',
'quality-rules': 'Quality Rules'
}
const basename = filePath.split('/').pop().replace('.md', '')
const title = titleMap[basename] || basename
const defaultKw = filePath.includes('conventions') ? 'convention'
: filePath.includes('constraints') ? 'constraint' : 'quality'
const defaultFm = {
title,
readMode: 'optional',
priority: 'medium',
category: 'general',
scope: 'project',
dimension: 'specs',
keywords: [...new Set([defaultKw, ...extraKeywords])]
}
if (!file_exists(filePath)) {
// Case A: Create new file with frontmatter
const specDir = path.dirname(filePath)
if (!fs.existsSync(specDir)) {
fs.mkdirSync(specDir, { recursive: true })
}
Write(filePath, matter.stringify(`\n# ${title}\n\n`, defaultFm))
return
}
const raw = Read(filePath)
let parsed
try {
parsed = matter(raw)
} catch {
parsed = { data: {}, content: raw }
}
const hasFrontmatter = raw.trimStart().startsWith('---')
if (!hasFrontmatter) {
// Case B: File exists but no frontmatter → prepend
Write(filePath, matter.stringify(raw, defaultFm))
return
}
// Case C: Frontmatter exists → ensure keywords include extras
const existingKeywords = parsed.data.keywords || []
const newKeywords = [...new Set([...existingKeywords, defaultKw, ...extraKeywords])]
if (newKeywords.length !== existingKeywords.length) {
parsed.data.keywords = newKeywords
Write(filePath, matter.stringify(parsed.content, parsed.data))
}
}
// Helper: append rules to a spec MD file with category support
// Uses .ccw/specs/ directory (same as frontend/backend spec-index-builder)
function appendRulesToSpecFile(filePath, rules, defaultCategory = 'general') {
if (rules.length === 0) return
// Ensure .ccw/specs/ directory exists
const specDir = path.dirname(filePath)
if (!fs.existsSync(specDir)) {
fs.mkdirSync(specDir, { recursive: true })
}
// Extract domain tags from rules for keyword accumulation
const ruleTags = rules
.map(r => r.match(/\[[\w]+:([\w-]+)\]/)?.[1])
.filter(Boolean)
// Check if file exists
if (!file_exists(filePath)) {
// Create file with frontmatter including category
const frontmatter = `---
title: ${filePath.includes('conventions') ? 'Coding Conventions' : filePath.includes('constraints') ? 'Architecture Constraints' : 'Quality Rules'}
readMode: optional
priority: medium
category: ${defaultCategory}
scope: project
dimension: specs
keywords: [${defaultCategory}, ${filePath.includes('conventions') ? 'convention' : filePath.includes('constraints') ? 'constraint' : 'quality'}]
---
# ${filePath.includes('conventions') ? 'Coding Conventions' : filePath.includes('constraints') ? 'Architecture Constraints' : 'Quality Rules'}
`
Write(filePath, frontmatter)
}
// Ensure frontmatter exists and keywords include rule tags
ensureSpecFrontmatter(filePath, [...new Set(ruleTags)])
const existing = Read(filePath)
// Append new rules as markdown list items after existing content
const newContent = existing.trimEnd() + '\n' + rules.map(r => `- ${r}`).join('\n') + '\n'
// Append new rules as markdown list items - rules are already in [type:tag] format from caller
const newContent = existing.trimEnd() + '\n' + rules.map(r => {
// If rule already has - prefix or [type:tag] format, use as-is
if (/^- /.test(r)) return r
if (/^\[[\w]+:[\w-]+\]/.test(r)) return `- ${r}`
return `- [rule:${defaultCategory}] ${r}`
}).join('\n') + '\n'
Write(filePath, newContent)
}
// Write conventions (general category) - use .ccw/specs/ (same as frontend/backend)
appendRulesToSpecFile('.ccw/specs/coding-conventions.md',
[...newCodingStyle, ...newNamingPatterns, ...newFileStructure, ...newDocumentation],
'general')
// Helper: infer domain tag from rule content
function inferTag(text) {
const t = text.toLowerCase()
if (/\b(api|http|rest|endpoint|routing)\b/.test(t)) return 'api'
if (/\b(security|auth|permission|xss|sql|sanitize)\b/.test(t)) return 'security'
if (/\b(database|db|sql|postgres|mysql)\b/.test(t)) return 'db'
if (/\b(react|component|hook|jsx|tsx)\b/.test(t)) return 'react'
if (/\b(performance|cache|lazy|async|slow)\b/.test(t)) return 'perf'
if (/\b(test|coverage|mock|jest|vitest)\b/.test(t)) return 'testing'
if (/\b(architecture|layer|module|dependency)\b/.test(t)) return 'arch'
if (/\b(naming|camel|pascal|prefix|suffix)\b/.test(t)) return 'naming'
if (/\b(file|folder|directory|structure)\b/.test(t)) return 'file'
if (/\b(doc|comment|jsdoc|readme)\b/.test(t)) return 'doc'
if (/\b(build|webpack|vite|compile)\b/.test(t)) return 'build'
if (/\b(deploy|ci|cd|docker)\b/.test(t)) return 'deploy'
if (/\b(lint|eslint|prettier|format)\b/.test(t)) return 'lint'
if (/\b(type|typescript|strict|any)\b/.test(t)) return 'typing'
return 'style' // fallback for coding conventions
}
// Write constraints (planning category)
// Write conventions - infer domain tags from content
appendRulesToSpecFile('.ccw/specs/coding-conventions.md',
[...newCodingStyle, ...newNamingPatterns, ...newFileStructure, ...newDocumentation]
.map(r => /^\[[\w]+:[\w-]+\]/.test(r) ? r : `[rule:${inferTag(r)}] ${r}`),
'style')
// Write constraints - infer domain tags from content
appendRulesToSpecFile('.ccw/specs/architecture-constraints.md',
[...newArchitecture, ...newTechStack, ...newPerformance, ...newSecurity],
'planning')
[...newArchitecture, ...newTechStack, ...newPerformance, ...newSecurity]
.map(r => /^\[[\w]+:[\w-]+\]/.test(r) ? r : `[rule:${inferTag(r)}] ${r}`),
'arch')
// Write quality rules (execution category)
if (newQualityRules.length > 0) {
const qualityPath = '.ccw/specs/quality-rules.md'
if (!file_exists(qualityPath)) {
Write(qualityPath, `---
title: Quality Rules
readMode: required
priority: high
category: execution
scope: project
dimension: specs
keywords: [execution, quality, testing, coverage, lint]
---
# Quality Rules
`)
}
// ensureSpecFrontmatter handles create/repair/keyword-update
ensureSpecFrontmatter(qualityPath, ['quality', 'testing', 'coverage', 'lint'])
appendRulesToSpecFile(qualityPath,
newQualityRules.map(q => `${q.rule} (scope: ${q.scope}, enforced by: ${q.enforced_by})`),
'execution')
@@ -644,7 +703,8 @@ Next steps:
## Related Commands
- `/workflow:spec:add` - Interactive wizard to create individual specs with scope selection
- `/workflow:spec:add` - Add knowledge entries (bug/pattern/decision/rule) with unified [type:tag] format
- `/workflow:spec:load` - Interactive spec loader with keyword/type/tag filtering
- `/workflow:session:sync` - Quick-sync session work to specs and project-tech
- `workflow-plan` skill - Start planning with initialized project context
- `/workflow:status --project` - View project state and guidelines

View File

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-arch-opt/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-arch-opt/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: arch-opt

View File

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Find ready tasks, spawn workers, STOP.
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-arch-opt/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-arch-opt/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: arch-opt

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"team_name": "arch-opt",
"team_display_name": "Architecture Optimization",
"skill_name": "team-arch-opt",
"skill_path": ".claude/skills/team-arch-opt/",
"skill_path": "~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-arch-opt/",
"pipeline_type": "Linear with Review-Fix Cycle (Parallel-Capable)",
"completion_action": "interactive",
"has_inline_discuss": true,

View File

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-brainstorm/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-brainstorm/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: brainstorm
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: ideator
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-brainstorm/roles/ideator/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-brainstorm/roles/ideator/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: brainstorm

View File

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Find ready tasks, spawn workers, STOP.
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-brainstorm/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-brainstorm/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: brainstorm

View File

@@ -32,6 +32,18 @@ Universal team coordination skill: analyze task -> generate role-specs -> dispat
ccw cli --mode write - code generation and modification
```
## Shared Constants
| Constant | Value |
|----------|-------|
| Session prefix | `TC` |
| Session path | `.workflow/.team/TC-<slug>-<date>/` |
| Worker agent | `team-worker` |
| Message bus | `mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)` |
| CLI analysis | `ccw cli --mode analysis` |
| CLI write | `ccw cli --mode write` |
| Max roles | 5 |
## Role Router
This skill is **coordinator-only**. Workers do NOT invoke this skill -- they are spawned as `team-worker` agents directly.
@@ -85,6 +97,9 @@ User provides task description
|---------|--------|
| `check` / `status` | Output execution status graph, no advancement |
| `resume` / `continue` | Check worker states, advance next step |
| `revise <TASK-ID> [feedback]` | Revise specific task with optional feedback |
| `feedback <text>` | Inject feedback into active pipeline |
| `improve [dimension]` | Auto-improve weakest quality dimension |
---
@@ -150,6 +165,17 @@ AskUserQuestion({
---
## Specs Reference
| Spec | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| [specs/pipelines.md](specs/pipelines.md) | Dynamic pipeline model, task naming, dependency graph |
| [specs/role-spec-template.md](specs/role-spec-template.md) | Template for dynamic role-spec generation |
| [specs/quality-gates.md](specs/quality-gates.md) | Quality thresholds and scoring dimensions |
| [specs/knowledge-transfer.md](specs/knowledge-transfer.md) | Context transfer protocols between roles |
---
## Session Directory
```

View File

@@ -16,6 +16,20 @@ Parse user task description -> detect required capabilities -> build dependency
If task context requires codebase knowledge, set `needs_research: true`. Phase 2 will spawn researcher worker.
## When to Use
| Trigger | Condition |
|---------|-----------|
| New task | Coordinator Phase 1 receives task description |
| Re-analysis | User provides revised requirements |
| Adapt | handleAdapt extends analysis for new capability |
## Strategy
- **Delegation**: Inline execution (coordinator processes directly)
- **Mode**: Text-level analysis only (no codebase reading)
- **Output**: `<session>/task-analysis.json`
## Phase 2: Context Loading
| Input | Source | Required |

View File

@@ -4,6 +4,20 @@
Create task chains from dynamic dependency graphs. Builds pipelines from the task-analysis.json produced by Phase 1. Workers are spawned as team-worker agents with role-spec paths.
## When to Use
| Trigger | Condition |
|---------|-----------|
| After analysis | Phase 1 complete, task-analysis.json exists |
| After adapt | handleAdapt created new roles, needs new tasks |
| Re-dispatch | Pipeline restructuring (rare) |
## Strategy
- **Delegation**: Inline execution (coordinator processes directly)
- **Inputs**: task-analysis.json + team-session.json
- **Output**: TaskCreate calls with dependency chains
## Phase 2: Context Loading
| Input | Source | Required |

View File

@@ -4,6 +4,22 @@
Event-driven pipeline coordination with Spawn-and-Stop pattern. Role names are read from `team-session.json#roles`. Workers are spawned as `team-worker` agents with role-spec paths. Includes `handleComplete` for pipeline completion action and `handleAdapt` for mid-pipeline capability gap handling.
## When to Use
| Trigger | Condition |
|---------|-----------|
| Worker callback | Message contains [role-name] from session roles |
| User command | "check", "status", "resume", "continue" |
| Capability gap | Worker reports capability_gap |
| Pipeline spawn | After dispatch, initial spawn needed |
| Pipeline complete | All tasks done |
## Strategy
- **Delegation**: Inline execution with handler routing
- **Beat model**: ONE_STEP_PER_INVOCATION — one handler then STOP
- **Workers**: Spawned as team-worker via Agent() in background
## Constants
| Constant | Value | Description |

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
---
role: coordinator
---
# Coordinator Role
Orchestrate the team-coordinate workflow: task analysis, dynamic role-spec generation, task dispatching, progress monitoring, session state, and completion action. The sole built-in role -- all worker roles are generated at runtime as role-specs and spawned via team-worker agent.
@@ -33,6 +37,30 @@ Orchestrate the team-coordinate workflow: task analysis, dynamic role-spec gener
---
## Message Types
| Type | Direction | Trigger |
|------|-----------|---------|
| state_update | outbound | Session init, pipeline progress |
| task_unblocked | outbound | Task ready for execution |
| fast_advance | inbound | Worker skipped coordinator |
| capability_gap | inbound | Worker needs new capability |
| error | inbound | Worker failure |
| impl_complete | inbound | Worker task done |
| consensus_blocked | inbound | Discussion verdict conflict |
## Message Bus Protocol
All coordinator state changes MUST be logged to team_msg BEFORE SendMessage:
1. `team_msg(operation="log", ...)` — log the event
2. `SendMessage(...)` — communicate to worker/user
3. `TaskUpdate(...)` — update task state
Read state before every handler: `team_msg(operation="get_state", session_id=<session-id>)`
---
## Command Execution Protocol
When coordinator needs to execute a command (analyze-task, dispatch, monitor):
@@ -52,6 +80,20 @@ Phase 1 needs task analysis
-> Continue to Phase 2
```
## Toolbox
| Tool | Type | Purpose |
|------|------|---------|
| commands/analyze-task.md | Command | Task analysis and role design |
| commands/dispatch.md | Command | Task chain creation |
| commands/monitor.md | Command | Pipeline monitoring and handlers |
| team-worker | Subagent | Worker spawning |
| TeamCreate / TeamDelete | System | Team lifecycle |
| TaskCreate / TaskList / TaskGet / TaskUpdate | System | Task lifecycle |
| team_msg | System | Message bus operations |
| SendMessage | System | Inter-agent communication |
| AskUserQuestion | System | User interaction |
---
## Entry Router

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
# Knowledge Transfer Protocols
## 1. Transfer Channels
| Channel | Scope | Mechanism | When to Use |
|---------|-------|-----------|-------------|
| **Artifacts** | Producer -> Consumer | Write to `<session>/artifacts/<name>.md`, consumer reads in Phase 2 | Structured deliverables (reports, plans, specs) |
| **State Updates** | Cross-role | `team_msg(operation="log", type="state_update", data={...})` / `team_msg(operation="get_state", session_id=<session-id>)` | Key findings, decisions, metadata (small, structured data) |
| **Wisdom** | Cross-task | Append to `<session>/wisdom/{learnings,decisions,conventions,issues}.md` | Patterns, conventions, risks discovered during execution |
| **Context Accumulator** | Intra-role (inner loop) | In-memory array, passed to each subsequent task in same-prefix loop | Prior task summaries within same role's inner loop |
| **Exploration Cache** | Cross-role | `<session>/explorations/cache-index.json` + per-angle JSON | Codebase discovery results, prevents duplicate exploration |
## 2. Context Loading Protocol (Phase 2)
Every role MUST load context in this order before starting work.
| Step | Action | Required |
|------|--------|----------|
| 1 | Extract session path from task description | Yes |
| 2 | `team_msg(operation="get_state", session_id=<session-id>)` | Yes |
| 3 | Read artifact files from upstream state's `ref` paths | Yes |
| 4 | Read `<session>/wisdom/*.md` if exists | Yes |
| 5 | Check `<session>/explorations/cache-index.json` before new exploration | If exploring |
| 6 | For inner_loop roles: load context_accumulator from prior tasks | If inner_loop |
**Loading rules**:
- Never skip step 2 -- state contains key decisions and findings
- If `ref` path in state does not exist, log warning and continue
- Wisdom files are append-only -- read all entries, newest last
## 3. Context Publishing Protocol (Phase 4)
| Step | Action | Required |
|------|--------|----------|
| 1 | Write deliverable to `<session>/artifacts/<task-id>-<name>.md` | Yes |
| 2 | Send `team_msg(type="state_update")` with payload (see schema below) | Yes |
| 3 | Append wisdom entries for learnings, decisions, issues found | If applicable |
## 4. State Update Schema
Sent via `team_msg(type="state_update")` on task completion.
```json
{
"status": "task_complete",
"task_id": "<TASK-NNN>",
"ref": "<session>/artifacts/<filename>",
"key_findings": [
"Finding 1",
"Finding 2"
],
"decisions": [
"Decision with rationale"
],
"files_modified": [
"path/to/file.ts"
],
"verification": "self-validated | peer-reviewed | tested"
}
```
**Field rules**:
- `ref`: Always an artifact path, never inline content
- `key_findings`: Max 5 items, each under 100 chars
- `decisions`: Include rationale, not just the choice
- `files_modified`: Only for implementation tasks
- `verification`: One of `self-validated`, `peer-reviewed`, `tested`
**Write state** (namespaced by role):
```
team_msg(operation="log", session_id=<session-id>, from=<role>, type="state_update", data={
"<role_name>": { "key_findings": [...], "scope": "..." }
})
```
**Read state**:
```
team_msg(operation="get_state", session_id=<session-id>)
// Returns merged state from all state_update messages
```
## 5. Exploration Cache Protocol
Prevents redundant research across tasks and discussion rounds.
| Step | Action |
|------|--------|
| 1 | Read `<session>/explorations/cache-index.json` |
| 2 | If angle already explored, read cached result from `explore-<angle>.json` |
| 3 | If not cached, perform exploration |
| 4 | Write result to `<session>/explorations/explore-<angle>.json` |
| 5 | Update `cache-index.json` with new entry |
**cache-index.json format**:
```json
{
"entries": [
{
"angle": "competitor-analysis",
"file": "explore-competitor-analysis.json",
"created_by": "RESEARCH-001",
"timestamp": "2026-01-15T10:30:00Z"
}
]
}
```
**Rules**:
- Cache key is the exploration `angle` (normalized to kebab-case)
- Cache entries never expire within a session
- Any role can read cached explorations; only the creator updates them

View File

@@ -81,3 +81,17 @@ message_types:
## Specs Reference
- [role-spec-template.md](role-spec-template.md) — Template for generating dynamic role-specs
- [quality-gates.md](quality-gates.md) — Quality thresholds and scoring dimensions
- [knowledge-transfer.md](knowledge-transfer.md) — Context transfer protocols between roles
## Quality Gate Integration
Dynamic pipelines reference quality thresholds from [specs/quality-gates.md](quality-gates.md).
| Gate Point | Trigger | Criteria Source |
|------------|---------|----------------|
| After artifact production | Producer role Phase 4 | Behavioral Traits in role-spec |
| After validation tasks | Tester/analyst completion | quality-gates.md thresholds |
| Pipeline completion | All tasks done | Aggregate scoring |
Issue classification: Error (blocks) > Warning (proceed with justification) > Info (log for future).

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
# Quality Gates
## 1. Quality Thresholds
| Result | Score | Action |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Pass | >= 80% | Report completed |
| Review | 60-79% | Report completed with warnings |
| Fail | < 60% | Retry Phase 3 (max 2 retries) |
## 2. Scoring Dimensions
| Dimension | Weight | Criteria |
|-----------|--------|----------|
| Completeness | 25% | All required outputs present with substantive content |
| Consistency | 25% | Terminology, formatting, cross-references are uniform |
| Accuracy | 25% | Outputs are factually correct and verifiable against sources |
| Depth | 25% | Sufficient detail for downstream consumers to act on deliverables |
**Score** = weighted average of all dimensions (0-100 per dimension).
## 3. Dynamic Role Quality Checks
Quality checks vary by `output_type` (from task-analysis.json role metadata).
### output_type: artifact
| Check | Pass Criteria |
|-------|---------------|
| Artifact exists | File written to `<session>/artifacts/` |
| Content non-empty | Substantive content, not just headers |
| Format correct | Expected format (MD, JSON) matches deliverable |
| Cross-references | All references to upstream artifacts resolve |
### output_type: codebase
| Check | Pass Criteria |
|-------|---------------|
| Files modified | Claimed files actually changed (Read to confirm) |
| Syntax valid | No syntax errors in modified files |
| No regressions | Existing functionality preserved |
| Summary artifact | Implementation summary written to artifacts/ |
### output_type: mixed
All checks from both `artifact` and `codebase` apply.
## 4. Verification Protocol
Derived from Behavioral Traits in [role-spec-template.md](role-spec-template.md).
| Step | Action | Required |
|------|--------|----------|
| 1 | Verify all claimed files exist via Read | Yes |
| 2 | Confirm artifact written to `<session>/artifacts/` | Yes |
| 3 | Check verification summary fields present | Yes |
| 4 | Score against quality dimensions | Yes |
| 5 | Apply threshold -> Pass/Review/Fail | Yes |
**On Fail**: Retry Phase 3 (max 2 retries). After 2 retries, report `partial_completion`.
**On Review**: Proceed with warnings logged to `<session>/wisdom/issues.md`.
## 5. Code Review Dimensions
For REVIEW-* or validation tasks during implementation pipelines.
### Quality
| Check | Severity |
|-------|----------|
| Empty catch blocks | Error |
| `as any` type casts | Warning |
| `@ts-ignore` / `@ts-expect-error` | Warning |
| `console.log` in production code | Warning |
| Unused imports/variables | Info |
### Security
| Check | Severity |
|-------|----------|
| Hardcoded secrets/credentials | Error |
| SQL injection vectors | Error |
| `eval()` or `Function()` usage | Error |
| `innerHTML` assignment | Warning |
| Missing input validation | Warning |
### Architecture
| Check | Severity |
|-------|----------|
| Circular dependencies | Error |
| Deep cross-boundary imports (3+ levels) | Warning |
| Files > 500 lines | Warning |
| Functions > 50 lines | Info |
### Requirements Coverage
| Check | Severity |
|-------|----------|
| Core functionality implemented | Error if missing |
| Acceptance criteria covered | Error if missing |
| Edge cases handled | Warning |
| Error states handled | Warning |
## 6. Issue Classification
| Class | Label | Action |
|-------|-------|--------|
| Error | Must fix | Blocks progression, must resolve before proceeding |
| Warning | Should fix | Should resolve, can proceed with justification |
| Info | Nice to have | Optional improvement, log for future |

View File

@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ message_types:
| `prefix` | Yes | Task prefix to filter (e.g., RESEARCH, DRAFT, IMPL) |
| `inner_loop` | Yes | Whether team-worker loops through same-prefix tasks |
| `CLI tools` | No | Array of CLI tool types this role may call |
| `output_tag` | Yes | Output tag for all messages, e.g., `[researcher]` |
| `message_types` | Yes | Message type mapping for team_msg |
| `message_types.success` | Yes | Type string for successful completion |
| `message_types.error` | Yes | Type string for errors (usually "error") |
@@ -63,6 +64,29 @@ message_types:
| `<placeholder>` notation | Use angle brackets for variable substitution |
| Reference CLI tools by name | team-worker resolves invocation from its delegation templates |
## Generated Role-Spec Structure
Every generated role-spec MUST include these blocks:
### Identity Block (mandatory — first section of generated spec)
```
Tag: [<role_name>] | Prefix: <PREFIX>-*
Responsibility: <one-line from task analysis>
```
### Boundaries Block (mandatory — after Identity)
```
### MUST
- <3-5 rules derived from task analysis>
### MUST NOT
- Execute work outside assigned prefix
- Modify artifacts from other roles
- Skip Phase 4 verification
```
## Behavioral Traits
All dynamically generated role-specs MUST embed these traits into Phase 4. Coordinator copies this section verbatim into every generated role-spec as a Phase 4 appendix.
@@ -93,6 +117,11 @@ Phase 4 must produce a verification summary with these fields:
- Still fails → report `partial_completion` with details, NOT `completed`
- Update shared state via `team_msg(operation="log", type="state_update", data={...})` after verification passes
Quality thresholds from [specs/quality-gates.md](quality-gates.md):
- Pass >= 80%: report completed
- Review 60-79%: report completed with warnings
- Fail < 60%: retry Phase 3 (max 2)
### Error Protocol
- Primary approach fails → try alternative (different CLI tool / different tool)
@@ -139,48 +168,25 @@ Coordinator MAY reference these patterns when composing Phase 2-4 content for a
## Knowledge Transfer Protocol
How context flows between roles. Coordinator MUST reference this when composing Phase 2 of any role-spec.
Full protocol: [specs/knowledge-transfer.md](knowledge-transfer.md)
### Transfer Channels
Generated role-specs Phase 2 MUST declare which upstream sources to load.
Generated role-specs Phase 4 MUST include state update and artifact publishing.
| Channel | Scope | Mechanism | When to Use |
|---------|-------|-----------|-------------|
| **Artifacts** | Producer -> Consumer | Write to `<session>/artifacts/<name>.md`, consumer reads in Phase 2 | Structured deliverables (reports, plans, specs) |
| **State Updates** | Cross-role | `team_msg(operation="log", type="state_update", data={...})` / `team_msg(operation="get_state", session_id=<session-id>)` | Key findings, decisions, metadata (small, structured data) |
| **Wisdom** | Cross-task | Append to `<session>/wisdom/{learnings,decisions,conventions,issues}.md` | Patterns, conventions, risks discovered during execution |
| **context_accumulator** | Intra-role (inner loop) | In-memory array, passed to each subsequent task in same-prefix loop | Prior task summaries within same role's inner loop |
| **Exploration cache** | Cross-role | `<session>/explorations/cache-index.json` + per-angle JSON | Codebase discovery results, prevents duplicate exploration |
---
### Phase 2 Context Loading (role-spec must specify)
## Generated Role-Spec Validation
Every generated role-spec Phase 2 MUST declare which upstream sources to load:
Coordinator verifies before writing each role-spec:
```
1. Extract session path from task description
2. Read upstream artifacts: <list which artifacts from which upstream role>
3. Read cross-role state via `team_msg(operation="get_state", session_id=<session-id>)`
4. Load wisdom files for accumulated knowledge
5. For inner_loop roles: load context_accumulator from prior tasks
6. Check exploration cache before running new explorations
```
### State Update Convention
Cross-role state is managed via `team_msg` state updates instead of a separate file:
- **Write state**: `team_msg(operation="log", session_id=<session-id>, from=<role>, type="state_update", data={ "<role_name>": { ... } })`
- **Read state**: `team_msg(operation="get_state", session_id=<session-id>)`
- **Namespaced keys**: Each role writes under its own namespace key in `data`
- **Small data only**: Key findings, decision summaries, metadata. NOT full documents
- **State stored in**: `.msg/meta.json` (auto-managed by team_msg)
- **Example write**:
```
team_msg(operation="log", session_id="TC-auth-2026-03-03", from="researcher", type="state_update", data={
"researcher": { "key_findings": [...], "scope": "..." }
})
```
- **Example read**:
```
team_msg(operation="get_state", session_id="TC-auth-2026-03-03")
// Returns merged state from all state_update messages
```
| Check | Criteria |
|-------|----------|
| Frontmatter complete | All required fields present (role, prefix, inner_loop, output_tag, message_types, CLI tools) |
| Identity block | Tag, prefix, responsibility defined |
| Boundaries | MUST and MUST NOT rules present |
| Phase 2 | Context loading sources specified |
| Phase 3 | Execution goal clear, not prescriptive about tools |
| Phase 4 | Behavioral Traits copied verbatim |
| Error Handling | Table with 3+ scenarios |
| Line count | Target ~80 lines (max 120) |
| No built-in overlap | No Phase 1/5, no message bus code, no consensus handling |

View File

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Generate complete team skills following the team-lifecycle-v4 architecture: SKIL
## Key Design Principles
1. **v4 Architecture Compliance**: Generated skills follow team-lifecycle-v4 pattern — SKILL.md = pure router, beat model = coordinator-only, unified structure (roles/ + specs/ + templates/)
2. **Golden Sample Reference**: Uses `team-lifecycle-v4` as reference implementation at `.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/`
2. **Golden Sample Reference**: Uses `team-lifecycle-v4` as reference implementation at `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/`
3. **Intelligent Commands Distribution**: Auto-determines which roles need `commands/` (2+ commands) vs inline logic (1 command)
4. **team-worker Compatibility**: Role.md files include correct YAML frontmatter for team-worker agent parsing
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Return:
## Golden Sample
Generated skills follow the architecture of `.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/`:
Generated skills follow the architecture of `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/`:
```
.claude/skills/<skill-name>/

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Generate all role files, specs, and templates based on `teamConfig` and the gene
## Golden Sample Reference
Read the golden sample at `.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/` for each file type before generating. This ensures pattern fidelity.
Read the golden sample at `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/` for each file type before generating. This ensures pattern fidelity.
## Step 3.1: Generate Coordinator
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ For each additional spec in `teamConfig.specs` (beyond pipelines), generate doma
For each template in `teamConfig.templates`:
1. Check if golden sample has matching template at `.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/templates/`
1. Check if golden sample has matching template at `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/templates/`
2. If exists: copy and adapt for new domain
3. If not: generate domain-appropriate template structure

View File

@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Agent({
name: "<role>",
team_name: "<team_name>",
prompt: `role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-edict/role-specs/<role>.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-edict/role-specs/<role>.md
session: <session_path>
session_id: <session_id>
team_name: <team_name>

View File

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ team_msg(operation="log", session_id=<session_id>, from="xingbu",
1. 读取当前任务QA-* task description
2. 读取 `<session_path>/plan/dispatch-plan.md` 获取验收标准
3. 读取 `.claude/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md` 获取质量门标准
3. 读取 `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md` 获取质量门标准
4. 读取被测部门(通常为工部)的产出报告
## Phase 3: 质量审查

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
```javascript
// Phase 0/1 启动时执行
Read(".claude/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json") // 加载路由规则和artifact路径
Read("~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json") // 加载路由规则和artifact路径
```
---
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ Read(".claude/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json") // 加载路由规则
name: "zhongshu",
team_name: <team_name>,
prompt: `role: zhongshu
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-edict/role-specs/zhongshu.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-edict/role-specs/zhongshu.md
session: <session_path>
session_id: <session_id>
team_name: <team_name>
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ inner_loop: false`,
name: "menxia",
team_name: <team_name>,
prompt: `role: menxia
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-edict/role-specs/menxia.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-edict/role-specs/menxia.md
session: <session_path>
session_id: <session_id>
team_name: <team_name>
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ inner_loop: false`,
name: "shangshu",
team_name: <team_name>,
prompt: `role: shangshu
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-edict/role-specs/shangshu.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-edict/role-specs/shangshu.md
session: <session_path>
session_id: <session_id>
team_name: <team_name>

View File

@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: <team-name>

View File

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ EXPECTED: <artifact path> + <quality criteria>
CONSTRAINTS: <scope limits>
---
InnerLoop: <true|false>
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/<role>/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/<role>/role.md
```
---
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ EXPECTED: <session>/artifacts/TEST-001-report.md + <session>/artifacts/TEST-001-
CONSTRAINTS: Use Chrome DevTools MCP only | Do not modify any code | Test all listed features
---
InnerLoop: true
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/tester/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/tester/role.md
```
### ANALYZE-001 (Test Mode): Analyze Discovered Issues
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ EXPECTED: <session>/artifacts/ANALYZE-001-rca.md with root causes for all issues
CONSTRAINTS: Read-only analysis | Skip low-severity warnings unless user requests
---
InnerLoop: false
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/analyzer/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/analyzer/role.md
```
**Conditional**: If TEST-001 reports zero issues → skip ANALYZE-001, FIX-001, VERIFY-001. Pipeline completes.
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ EXPECTED: Modified source files + <session>/artifacts/FIX-001-changes.md
CONSTRAINTS: Minimal changes per issue | Follow existing code style
---
InnerLoop: true
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/fixer/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/fixer/role.md
```
### VERIFY-001 (Test Mode): Re-Test After Fix
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ EXPECTED: <session>/artifacts/VERIFY-001-report.md with pass/fail per previously
CONSTRAINTS: Only re-test failed scenarios | Use Chrome DevTools MCP only
---
InnerLoop: false
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/verifier/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/verifier/role.md
```
---
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ EXPECTED: <session>/evidence/ directory with all captures + reproduction report
CONSTRAINTS: Use Chrome DevTools MCP only | Do not modify any code
---
InnerLoop: false
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/reproducer/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/reproducer/role.md
```
### ANALYZE-001 (Debug Mode): Root Cause Analysis
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ EXPECTED: <session>/artifacts/ANALYZE-001-rca.md with root cause, file:line, fix
CONSTRAINTS: Read-only analysis | Request more evidence if inconclusive
---
InnerLoop: false
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/analyzer/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/analyzer/role.md
```
### FIX-001 (Debug Mode): Code Fix
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ EXPECTED: Modified source files + <session>/artifacts/FIX-001-changes.md
CONSTRAINTS: Minimal changes | Follow existing code style | No breaking changes
---
InnerLoop: true
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/fixer/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/fixer/role.md
```
### VERIFY-001 (Debug Mode): Fix Verification
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ EXPECTED: <session>/artifacts/VERIFY-001-report.md with pass/fail verdict
CONSTRAINTS: Use Chrome DevTools MCP only | Same steps as reproduction
---
InnerLoop: false
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/verifier/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/verifier/role.md
```
---
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ TASK: <specific evidence requests from Analyzer>
CONTEXT: Session + Analyzer request
---
InnerLoop: false
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/reproducer/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/reproducer/role.md
```
### FIX-002 (Either Mode): Re-Fix After Failed Verification
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ TASK: Review VERIFY-001 failure details, apply corrective fix
CONTEXT: Session + VERIFY-001-report.md
---
InnerLoop: true
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/fixer/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend-debug/roles/fixer/role.md
```
## Conditional Skip Rules

View File

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-frontend/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: frontend

View File

@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-frontend/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-frontend/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: frontend

View File

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-issue/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-issue/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: issue
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-issue/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-issue/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: issue

View File

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Find ready tasks, spawn workers, STOP.
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-issue/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-issue/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: issue
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-issue/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-issue/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: issue

View File

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: iterdev

View File

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-iterdev/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: iterdev

View File

@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: <team-name>
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: supervisor
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/supervisor/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/supervisor/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: <team-name>

View File

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ EXPECTED: <artifact path> + <quality criteria>
CONSTRAINTS: <scope limits>
---
InnerLoop: <true|false>
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/<role>/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/<role>/role.md
```
## InnerLoop Flag Rules
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ CHECKPOINT tasks are dispatched like regular tasks but handled differently at sp
- Owner: supervisor
- **NOT spawned as team-worker** — coordinator wakes the resident supervisor via SendMessage
- If `supervision: false` in team-session.json, skip creating CHECKPOINT tasks entirely
- RoleSpec in description: `.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/supervisor/role.md`
- RoleSpec in description: `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/roles/supervisor/role.md`
## Dependency Validation

View File

@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-perf-opt/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-perf-opt/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: perf-opt

View File

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-perf-opt/role-specs/<role>.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-perf-opt/role-specs/<role>.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: perf-opt

View File

@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ Execute `commands/dispatch.md` inline (Command Execution Protocol).
### Initial Spawn
Find first unblocked task and spawn its worker using SKILL.md Worker Spawn Template with:
- `role_spec: .claude/skills/team-perf-opt/roles/<role>/role.md`
- `role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-perf-opt/roles/<role>/role.md`
- `team_name: perf-opt`
**STOP** after spawning. Wait for worker callback.

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"team_name": "perf-opt",
"team_display_name": "Performance Optimization",
"skill_name": "team-perf-opt",
"skill_path": ".claude/skills/team-perf-opt/",
"skill_path": "~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-perf-opt/",
"worker_agent": "team-worker",
"pipeline_type": "Linear with Review-Fix Cycle (Parallel-Capable)",
"completion_action": "interactive",

View File

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-planex/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-planex/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: planex

View File

@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ Collect task states from TaskList()
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-planex/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-planex/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: <team-name>

View File

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: quality-assurance

View File

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ EXPECTED: <artifact path> + <quality criteria>
CONSTRAINTS: <scope limits>
---
InnerLoop: <true|false>
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/roles/<role>/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/roles/<role>/role.md
```
## Pipeline Task Registry

View File

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ EXPECTED: Fixed test files | Improved coverage
CONSTRAINTS: Only modify test files | No source changes
---
InnerLoop: false
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/roles/generator/role.md"
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/roles/generator/role.md"
})
TaskCreate({
subject: "QARUN-gc-<round>: Re-execute <layer> (GC #<round>)",
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ EXPECTED: <session>/results/run-<layer>-gc-<round>.json
CONSTRAINTS: Read-only execution
---
InnerLoop: false
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/roles/executor/role.md",
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/roles/executor/role.md",
blockedBy: ["QAGEN-fix-<round>"]
})
```
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-quality-assurance/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: quality-assurance

View File

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-review/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-review/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: review

View File

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ EXPECTED: <artifact path> + <quality criteria>
CONSTRAINTS: <scope limits>
---
InnerLoop: <true|false>
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-review/roles/<role>/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-review/roles/<role>/role.md
```
## Pipeline Task Registry

View File

@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ Event-driven pipeline coordination. Beat model: coordinator wake -> process -> s
| Prefix | Role | Role Spec | inner_loop |
|--------|------|-----------|------------|
| SCAN-* | scanner | `.claude/skills/team-review/roles/scanner/role.md` | false |
| REV-* | reviewer | `.claude/skills/team-review/roles/reviewer/role.md` | false |
| FIX-* | fixer | `.claude/skills/team-review/roles/fixer/role.md` | true |
| SCAN-* | scanner | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-review/roles/scanner/role.md` | false |
| REV-* | reviewer | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-review/roles/reviewer/role.md` | false |
| FIX-* | fixer | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-review/roles/fixer/role.md` | true |
## handleCallback
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-review/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-review/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: review

View File

@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: roadmap-dev

View File

@@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ Handle all coordinator monitoring events for the roadmap-dev pipeline using the
| Prefix | Role | Role Spec | inner_loop |
|--------|------|-----------|------------|
| PLAN | planner | `.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/planner/role.md` | true (cli_tools: gemini --mode analysis) |
| EXEC | executor | `.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/executor/role.md` | true (cli_tools: gemini --mode write) |
| VERIFY | verifier | `.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/verifier/role.md` | true |
| PLAN | planner | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/planner/role.md` | true (cli_tools: gemini --mode analysis) |
| EXEC | executor | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/executor/role.md` | true (cli_tools: gemini --mode write) |
| VERIFY | verifier | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/verifier/role.md` | true |
### Pipeline Structure
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: roadmap-dev

View File

@@ -88,6 +88,6 @@ Phase N: PLAN-N01 --> EXEC-N01 --> VERIFY-N01
| Prefix | Role | Role Spec | Inner Loop |
|--------|------|-----------|------------|
| PLAN | planner | `.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/planner/role.md` | true |
| EXEC | executor | `.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/executor/role.md` | true |
| VERIFY | verifier | `.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/verifier/role.md` | true |
| PLAN | planner | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/planner/role.md` | true |
| EXEC | executor | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/executor/role.md` | true |
| VERIFY | verifier | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/roles/verifier/role.md` | true |

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
"team_name": "roadmap-dev",
"team_display_name": "Roadmap Dev",
"skill_name": "team-roadmap-dev",
"skill_path": ".claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/",
"skill_path": "~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-roadmap-dev/",
"design_source": "roadmap-driven development workflow design (2026-02-24)",
"pipeline_type": "Phased",
"pipeline": {

View File

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-tech-debt/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-tech-debt/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: tech-debt

View File

@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-tech-debt/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-tech-debt/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: tech-debt

View File

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-testing/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: testing

View File

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ EXPECTED: <deliverable path> + <quality criteria>
CONSTRAINTS: <scope limits, focus areas>
---
InnerLoop: <true|false>
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-testing/roles/<role>/role.md
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/<role>/role.md
```
## Pipeline Task Registry

View File

@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ Event-driven pipeline coordination. Beat model: coordinator wake -> process -> s
| Prefix | Role | Role Spec | inner_loop |
|--------|------|-----------|------------|
| STRATEGY-* | strategist | `.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/strategist/role.md` | false |
| TESTGEN-* | generator | `.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/generator/role.md` | true |
| TESTRUN-* | executor | `.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/executor/role.md` | true |
| TESTANA-* | analyst | `.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/analyst/role.md` | false |
| STRATEGY-* | strategist | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/strategist/role.md` | false |
| TESTGEN-* | generator | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/generator/role.md` | true |
| TESTRUN-* | executor | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/executor/role.md` | true |
| TESTANA-* | analyst | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/analyst/role.md` | false |
## handleCallback
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ EXPECTED: Revised test files in <session>/tests/<layer>/
CONSTRAINTS: Only modify test files
---
InnerLoop: true
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-testing/roles/generator/role.md"
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/generator/role.md"
})
TaskCreate({
subject: "TESTRUN-<layer>-fix-<round>: Re-execute <layer> (GC #<round>)",
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ CONTEXT:
EXPECTED: <session>/results/run-<N>-gc.json
---
InnerLoop: true
RoleSpec: .claude/skills/team-testing/roles/executor/role.md",
RoleSpec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/executor/role.md",
blockedBy: ["TESTGEN-<layer>-fix-<round>"]
})
```
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-testing/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-testing/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: testing

View File

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-uidesign/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-uidesign/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: uidesign

View File

@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-uidesign/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-uidesign/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: uidesign

View File

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: ultra-analyze

View File

@@ -211,10 +211,10 @@ Find and spawn the next ready tasks.
| Task Prefix | Role | Role Spec |
|-------------|------|-----------|
| `EXPLORE-*` | explorer | `.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/role-specs/explorer.md` |
| `ANALYZE-*` | analyst | `.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/role-specs/analyst.md` |
| `DISCUSS-*` | discussant | `.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/role-specs/discussant.md` |
| `SYNTH-*` | synthesizer | `.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/role-specs/synthesizer.md` |
| `EXPLORE-*` | explorer | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/role-specs/explorer.md` |
| `ANALYZE-*` | analyst | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/role-specs/analyst.md` |
| `DISCUSS-*` | discussant | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/role-specs/discussant.md` |
| `SYNTH-*` | synthesizer | `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/role-specs/synthesizer.md` |
3. Spawn team-worker for each ready task:
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/role-specs/<role>.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/role-specs/<role>.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: ultra-analyze

View File

@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ Execute `commands/dispatch.md` inline (Command Execution Protocol):
### Initial Spawn
Find first unblocked tasks and spawn their workers. Use SKILL.md Worker Spawn Template with:
- `role_spec: .claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/roles/<role>/role.md`
- `role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ultra-analyze/roles/<role>/role.md`
- `team_name: ultra-analyze`
- `inner_loop: false`

View File

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-ux-improve/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ux-improve/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: ux-improve

View File

@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ Agent({
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: .claude/skills/team-ux-improve/roles/<role>/role.md
role_spec: ~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ux-improve/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: ux-improve

View File

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ TEXT-LEVEL ONLY. No source code reading.
├── explorations/
└── wisdom/contributions/
```
3. **Wisdom Initialization**: Copy `.claude/skills/team-ux-improve/wisdom/` to `<session>/wisdom/`
3. **Wisdom Initialization**: Copy `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ux-improve/wisdom/` to `<session>/wisdom/`
4. Initialize `.msg/meta.json` via team_msg state_update with pipeline metadata
5. TeamCreate(team_name="ux-improve")
6. Do NOT spawn workers yet - deferred to Phase 4
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Delegate to `commands/monitor.md#handleSpawnNext`:
3. **Wisdom Consolidation**: Check `<session>/wisdom/contributions/` for worker contributions
- If contributions exist -> AskUserQuestion to merge to permanent wisdom
- If approved -> copy to `.claude/skills/team-ux-improve/wisdom/`
- If approved -> copy to `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ux-improve/wisdom/`
4. Calculate: completed_tasks, total_issues_found, issues_fixed, test_pass_rate
5. Output pipeline summary with [coordinator] prefix

View File

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ UX improvement pipeline modes and task registry.
## Wisdom System
Workers contribute learnings to `<session>/wisdom/contributions/`. On pipeline completion, coordinator asks user to merge approved contributions to permanent wisdom at `.claude/skills/team-ux-improve/wisdom/`.
Workers contribute learnings to `<session>/wisdom/contributions/`. On pipeline completion, coordinator asks user to merge approved contributions to permanent wisdom at `~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ux-improve/wisdom/`.
| Directory | Purpose |
|-----------|---------|

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
"team_display_name": "UX Improve",
"team_purpose": "Systematically discover and fix UI/UX interaction issues including unresponsive buttons, missing feedback, and state refresh problems",
"skill_name": "team-ux-improve",
"skill_path": ".claude/skills/team-ux-improve/",
"skill_path": "~ or <project>/.claude/skills/team-ux-improve/",
"worker_agent": "team-worker",
"pipeline_type": "Standard",
"completion_action": "interactive",

View File

@@ -658,3 +658,41 @@ All agents (csv-wave and interactive) share a single `discoveries.ndjson` file f
8. **Max 3 Fix Cycles**: Review-fix cycle capped at 3 iterations; escalate to user after
9. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
10. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
1. Read shared discoveries: {session_folder}/discoveries.ndjson (if exists, skip if not)
2. Read project context: .workflow/project-tech.json (if exists)
3. Read task schema: .codex/skills/team-arch-opt/schemas/tasks-schema.md
3. Read task schema: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-arch-opt/schemas/tasks-schema.md
---

View File

@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ const clarifier = spawn_agent({
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-brainstorm/agents/topic-clarifier.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/agents/topic-clarifier.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (if exists)
---
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ for (let wave = 1; wave <= maxWave; wave++) {
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-brainstorm/agents/gc-controller.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-brainstorm/agents/gc-controller.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: ${sessionFolder}/discoveries.ndjson (shared discoveries)
---
@@ -685,3 +685,41 @@ When the challenger returns critique results with severity-graded verdicts:
8. **Lifecycle Balance**: Every spawn_agent MUST have a matching close_agent
9. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
10. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -627,3 +627,41 @@ See `instructions/agent-instruction.md` for the base instruction template that i
8. **Dynamic Roles**: All worker roles are generated at runtime from task analysis -- no static role registry
9. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
10. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ All agents (csv-wave and interactive) share a single `discoveries.ndjson` file f
**Format**: One JSON object per line (NDJSON):
```jsonl
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:00:00Z","worker":"SCAFFOLD-001","type":"dir_created","data":{"path":".codex/skills/team-code-review/","description":"Created skill directory structure"}}
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:00:00Z","worker":"SCAFFOLD-001","type":"dir_created","data":{"path":"~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-code-review/","description":"Created skill directory structure"}}
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:05:00Z","worker":"ROLE-001","type":"file_generated","data":{"file":"roles/coordinator/role.md","gen_type":"role-bundle","sections":["entry-router","commands"]}}
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:10:00Z","worker":"SPEC-001","type":"pattern_found","data":{"pattern_name":"full-lifecycle","description":"Pipeline with analyst -> writer -> executor -> tester"}}
```
@@ -651,3 +651,41 @@ All agents (csv-wave and interactive) share a single `discoveries.ndjson` file f
8. **Golden Sample Fidelity**: Generated files must match existing team skill patterns
9. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
10. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ Interactive tasks appear in master CSV for dependency tracking but are NOT inclu
```csv
id,title,description,role,file_target,gen_type,deps,context_from,exec_mode,wave,status,findings,files_produced,error
"SCAFFOLD-001","Create directory structure","Create complete directory structure for team-code-review skill:\n- .codex/skills/team-code-review/\n- roles/coordinator/ + commands/\n- roles/analyst/\n- roles/reviewer/\n- specs/\n- templates/","scaffolder","skill-dir","directory","","","csv-wave","1","pending","","",""
"ROUTER-001","Generate SKILL.md","Generate .codex/skills/team-code-review/SKILL.md with:\n- Frontmatter (name, description, allowed-tools)\n- Architecture diagram\n- Role registry table\n- CSV schema reference\n- Session structure\n- Wave execution engine\nUse teamConfig.json for role list and pipeline definitions","router-writer","SKILL.md","router","SCAFFOLD-001","SCAFFOLD-001","csv-wave","2","pending","","",""
"SCAFFOLD-001","Create directory structure","Create complete directory structure for team-code-review skill:\n- ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-code-review/\n- roles/coordinator/ + commands/\n- roles/analyst/\n- roles/reviewer/\n- specs/\n- templates/","scaffolder","skill-dir","directory","","","csv-wave","1","pending","","",""
"ROUTER-001","Generate SKILL.md","Generate ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-code-review/SKILL.md with:\n- Frontmatter (name, description, allowed-tools)\n- Architecture diagram\n- Role registry table\n- CSV schema reference\n- Session structure\n- Wave execution engine\nUse teamConfig.json for role list and pipeline definitions","router-writer","SKILL.md","router","SCAFFOLD-001","SCAFFOLD-001","csv-wave","2","pending","","",""
"SPEC-001","Generate pipelines spec","Generate specs/pipelines.md with:\n- Pipeline definitions from teamConfig\n- Task registry with PREFIX-NNN format\n- Conditional routing rules\n- Dynamic specialist injection\nRoles: analyst(ANALYSIS-*), reviewer(REVIEW-*)","spec-writer","specs/pipelines.md","spec","SCAFFOLD-001","SCAFFOLD-001","csv-wave","2","pending","","",""
"ROLE-001","Generate coordinator","Generate roles/coordinator/role.md with entry router and commands/analyze.md, commands/dispatch.md, commands/monitor.md. Coordinator orchestrates the analysis pipeline","role-writer","roles/coordinator/","role-bundle","SCAFFOLD-001;SPEC-001","SPEC-001","csv-wave","3","pending","","",""
"ROLE-002","Generate analyst role","Generate roles/analyst/role.md with Phase 2 (context loading), Phase 3 (analysis execution), Phase 4 (output). Prefix: ANALYSIS, inner_loop: false","role-writer","roles/analyst/role.md","role-inline","SCAFFOLD-001;SPEC-001","SPEC-001","csv-wave","3","pending","","",""
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ Interactive tasks output via structured text or JSON written to `interactive/{id
### Discovery NDJSON Format
```jsonl
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:00:00Z","worker":"SCAFFOLD-001","type":"dir_created","data":{"path":".codex/skills/team-code-review/roles/","description":"Created roles directory with coordinator, analyst, reviewer subdirs"}}
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:00:00Z","worker":"SCAFFOLD-001","type":"dir_created","data":{"path":"~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-code-review/roles/","description":"Created roles directory with coordinator, analyst, reviewer subdirs"}}
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:05:00Z","worker":"ROLE-001","type":"file_generated","data":{"file":"roles/coordinator/role.md","gen_type":"role-bundle","sections":["entry-router","phase-0","phase-1","phase-2","phase-3"]}}
{"ts":"2026-03-08T10:10:00Z","worker":"SPEC-001","type":"config_decision","data":{"decision":"full-lifecycle pipeline","rationale":"Both analyst and reviewer roles present","impact":"4-tier dependency graph"}}
```

View File

@@ -217,8 +217,8 @@ Each wave generates a temporary `wave-{N}.csv` with extra `prev_context` column
4. Create subdirectories: plan/, review/, artifacts/, interactive/, agents/
5. Initialize registry.json: { "active": [], "closed": [] }
6. Initialize discoveries.ndjson (empty file)
7. Read specs: .codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json
8. Read quality gates: .codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md
7. Read specs: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json
8. Read quality gates: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md
9. Log session start to context.md
```
@@ -236,9 +236,9 @@ const zhongshu = spawn_agent({
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-edict/agents/zhongshu-planner.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/agents/zhongshu-planner.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: ${sessionDir}/discoveries.ndjson (shared discoveries, skip if not exists)
3. Read: .codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json (routing rules)
3. Read: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json (routing rules)
---
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ while (!approved && reviewRound < 3) {
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-edict/agents/menxia-reviewer.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/agents/menxia-reviewer.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: ${sessionDir}/plan/zhongshu-plan.md (plan to review)
3. Read: ${sessionDir}/discoveries.ndjson (shared discoveries)
@@ -336,10 +336,10 @@ const shangshu = spawn_agent({
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-edict/agents/shangshu-dispatcher.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/agents/shangshu-dispatcher.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: ${sessionDir}/plan/zhongshu-plan.md (approved plan)
3. Read: ${sessionDir}/review/menxia-review.md (review conditions)
4. Read: .codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json (routing rules)
4. Read: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json (routing rules)
---
@@ -416,8 +416,8 @@ For each wave W in 1..max_wave:
5. EXECUTE csv-wave tasks:
spawn_agents_on_csv({
task_csv_path: "${sessionDir}/wave-{W}.csv",
instruction_path: ".codex/skills/team-edict/instructions/agent-instruction.md",
schema_path: ".codex/skills/team-edict/schemas/tasks-schema.md",
instruction_path: "~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/instructions/agent-instruction.md",
schema_path: "~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/schemas/tasks-schema.md",
additional_instructions: "Session directory: ${sessionDir}. Department: {department}. Priority: {priority}.",
concurrency: CONCURRENCY
})
@@ -457,10 +457,10 @@ const aggregator = spawn_agent({
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-edict/agents/aggregator.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/agents/aggregator.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: ${sessionDir}/tasks.csv (master state)
3. Read: ${sessionDir}/discoveries.ndjson (all discoveries)
4. Read: .codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md (quality standards)
4. Read: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md (quality standards)
---
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ Deliverables: ${sessionDir}/context.md (final report)
${listAllArtifacts()}
### Quality Gate Standards
Read from: .codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md
Read from: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md
`
})
@@ -609,9 +609,9 @@ const agent = spawn_agent({
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-edict/agents/qa-verifier.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/agents/qa-verifier.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: ${sessionDir}/discoveries.ndjson (shared discoveries)
3. Read: .codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md (quality standards)
3. Read: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md (quality standards)
---
@@ -740,3 +740,42 @@ spawn_agent({
12. **Rejection Loop Max 3**: Menxia can reject max 3 times before escalating to user
13. **Kanban is Mandatory**: All agents must report state transitions via discoveries.ndjson
14. **Quality Gates Apply**: Phase 3 aggregator validates all outputs against specs/quality-gates.md
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Crown Prince / Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned agents (Three Departments and Six Ministries). The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results into master CSV
- Coordinates workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms (600s for planning, 300s for execution)
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages (e.g., jumping from Zhongshu directly to Shangshu)
- Bypass the Three Departments serial pipeline
- Execute wave N before wave N-1 completes
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time: 30-90 minutes for typical edicts
- Phase 0 (Three Departments): 15-30 minutes
- Phase 2 (Wave Execution): 10-20 minutes per wave
- Phase 3 (Aggregation): 5-10 minutes
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process

View File

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Post-wave aggregation agent -- collects all ministry outputs, validates against
4. Use Glob to find all files in `<session>/interactive/`
5. Read each interactive result file
6. Read `<session>/discoveries.ndjson` (all entries)
7. Read `.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md`
7. Read `~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md`
**Output**: All artifacts and status data collected

View File

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Xingbu (Ministry of Justice / Quality Assurance) -- executes quality verificatio
**Steps**:
1. Read `.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md`
1. Read `~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md`
2. Read `<session>/plan/dispatch-plan.md` for acceptance criteria
3. Read implementation artifacts from `<session>/artifacts/`
4. Read `<session>/discoveries.ndjson` for implementation notes

View File

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Shangshu (Department of State Affairs / Dispatch) -- parses the approved plan, r
1. Read `<session>/plan/zhongshu-plan.md`
2. Read `<session>/review/menxia-review.md`
3. Read `.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json`
3. Read `~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json`
4. Extract subtask list from plan
5. Extract conditions from review
6. Report state "Doing":

View File

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Zhongshu (Central Secretariat) -- analyzes the edict, explores the codebase, and
**Steps**:
1. Parse the edict text from the spawn message
2. Read `.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json` for routing rules
2. Read `~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json` for routing rules
3. If revision round: Read `<session>/review/menxia-review.md` for rejection feedback
4. Read `<session>/discoveries.ndjson` if it exists

View File

@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
1. Read shared discoveries: .workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/discoveries.ndjson (if exists, skip if not)
2. Read dispatch plan: .workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/plan/dispatch-plan.md (task details and acceptance criteria)
3. Read approved plan: .workflow/.csv-wave/{session-id}/plan/zhongshu-plan.md (overall strategy and context)
4. Read quality gates: .codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md (quality standards)
5. Read team config: .codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json (routing rules and artifact paths)
4. Read quality gates: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/quality-gates.md (quality standards)
5. Read team config: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-edict/specs/team-config.json (routing rules and artifact paths)
> **Note**: The session directory path is provided by the orchestrator in `additional_instructions`. Use it to resolve the paths above.

View File

@@ -475,3 +475,41 @@ if (action === "Archive & Clean") {
8. **Lifecycle Balance**: Every spawn_agent MUST have a matching close_agent (tracked in registry.json)
9. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
10. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -781,3 +781,41 @@ After TEST-001 completes, evaluate issues:
9. **Iteration Bounds**: Max 2 reproduction rounds, max 3 fix rounds
10. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
11. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -710,3 +710,41 @@ Convergence: qa.score >= 8 && qa.critical_count === 0
8. **GC Loop Cap**: Max 2 generator-critic rounds between developer and qa
9. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
10. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ for (let wave = 1; wave <= maxWave; wave++) {
spawn_agents_on_csv({
csv_path: `${sessionFolder}/wave-${wave}.csv`,
id_column: "id",
instruction: Read(".codex/skills/team-issue/instructions/agent-instruction.md"),
instruction: Read("~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-issue/instructions/agent-instruction.md"),
max_concurrency: maxConcurrency,
max_runtime_seconds: 1200,
output_csv_path: `${sessionFolder}/wave-${wave}-results.csv`,
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ for (let wave = 1; wave <= maxWave; wave++) {
const pendingInteractive = interactiveTasks.filter(t => t.status === 'pending')
for (const task of pendingInteractive) {
// Read agent definition
const agentDef = Read(`.codex/skills/team-issue/agents/reviewer.md`)
const agentDef = Read(`~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-issue/agents/reviewer.md`)
// Build context from upstream tasks
const contextIds = (task.context_from || '').split(';').filter(Boolean)
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ for (let wave = 1; wave <= maxWave; wave++) {
message: `## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-issue/agents/reviewer.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-issue/agents/reviewer.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: ${sessionFolder}/discoveries.ndjson (shared discoveries)
3. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (if exists)
@@ -700,3 +700,41 @@ Both csv-wave and interactive agents share the same discoveries.ndjson file:
8. **Lifecycle Balance**: Every spawn_agent MUST have a matching close_agent
9. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
10. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ const analyzer = spawn_agent({
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-iterdev/agents/task-analyzer.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/agents/task-analyzer.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (if exists)
---
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ for (let wave = 1; wave <= maxWave; wave++) {
const waveResult = spawn_agents_on_csv({
csv_path: `${sessionFolder}/wave-${wave}.csv`,
id_column: "id",
instruction: Read(`.codex/skills/team-iterdev/instructions/agent-instruction.md`),
instruction: Read(`~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/instructions/agent-instruction.md`),
max_concurrency: maxConcurrency,
max_runtime_seconds: 900,
output_csv_path: `${sessionFolder}/wave-${wave}-results.csv`,
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ for (let wave = 1; wave <= maxWave; wave++) {
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-iterdev/agents/gc-controller.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-iterdev/agents/gc-controller.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: ${sessionFolder}/discoveries.ndjson (shared discoveries)
---
@@ -786,3 +786,41 @@ When the reviewer returns review results with severity-graded verdicts:
8. **Lifecycle Balance**: Every spawn_agent MUST have a matching close_agent
9. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
10. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ const clarifier = spawn_agent({
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/agents/requirement-clarifier.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/agents/requirement-clarifier.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (if exists)
---
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ for (let wave = 1; wave <= maxWave; wave++) {
const waveResult = spawn_agents_on_csv({
csv_path: `${sessionFolder}/wave-${wave}.csv`,
id_column: "id",
instruction: Read(`.codex/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/instructions/agent-instruction.md`)
instruction: Read(`~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/instructions/agent-instruction.md`)
.replace(/{session-id}/g, sessionId),
max_concurrency: maxConcurrency,
max_runtime_seconds: 900,
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ for (let wave = 1; wave <= maxWave; wave++) {
## TASK ASSIGNMENT
### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: .codex/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/agents/supervisor.md (MUST read first)
1. **Read role definition**: ~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle-v4/agents/supervisor.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: ${sessionFolder}/discoveries.ndjson (shared discoveries)
---
@@ -735,3 +735,41 @@ All agents across all waves share `discoveries.ndjson`. This enables cross-role
8. **Lifecycle Balance**: Every spawn_agent MUST have a matching close_agent
9. **Cleanup Temp Files**: Remove wave-{N}.csv after results are merged
10. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous execution until all waves complete or all remaining tasks are skipped
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -866,3 +866,41 @@ The orchestrator dynamically adds DEV-FE-NNN and QA-FE-NNN tasks to the state fi
| Requirements Template | templates/requirements-prd.md | DRAFT-002 |
| Architecture Template | templates/architecture-doc.md | DRAFT-003 |
| Epics Template | templates/epics-template.md | DRAFT-004 |
---
## Coordinator Role Constraints (Main Agent)
**CRITICAL**: The coordinator (main agent executing this skill) is responsible for **orchestration only**, NOT implementation.
15. **Coordinator Does NOT Execute Code**: The main agent MUST NOT write, modify, or implement any code directly. All implementation work is delegated to spawned team agents. The coordinator only:
- Spawns agents with task assignments
- Waits for agent callbacks
- Merges results and coordinates workflow
- Manages workflow transitions between phases
16. **Patient Waiting is Mandatory**: Agent execution takes significant time (typically 10-30 minutes per phase, sometimes longer). The coordinator MUST:
- Wait patiently for `wait()` calls to complete
- NOT skip workflow steps due to perceived delays
- NOT assume agents have failed just because they're taking time
- Trust the timeout mechanisms defined in the skill
17. **Use send_input for Clarification**: When agents need guidance or appear stuck, the coordinator MUST:
- Use `send_input()` to ask questions or provide clarification
- NOT skip the agent or move to next phase prematurely
- Give agents opportunity to respond before escalating
- Example: `send_input({ id: agent_id, message: "Please provide status update or clarify blockers" })`
18. **No Workflow Shortcuts**: The coordinator MUST NOT:
- Skip phases or stages defined in the workflow
- Bypass required approval or review steps
- Execute dependent tasks before prerequisites complete
- Assume task completion without explicit agent callback
- Make up or fabricate agent results
19. **Respect Long-Running Processes**: This is a complex multi-agent workflow that requires patience:
- Total execution time may range from 30-90 minutes or longer
- Each phase may take 10-30 minutes depending on complexity
- The coordinator must remain active and attentive throughout the entire process
- Do not terminate or skip steps due to time concerns

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Seed analysis, codebase exploration (via shared explore subagent), and multi-dim
## Identity
- **Type**: `produce`
- **Role File**: `~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/analyst.md`
- **Role File**: `~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/analyst.md`
- **Prefix**: `RESEARCH-*`
- **Tag**: `[analyst]`
- **Responsibility**: Seed Analysis -> Codebase Exploration -> Context Packaging -> Inline Discuss -> Report
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ if (cached) {
// Cache MISS - spawn explore subagent
const explorer = spawn_agent({
message: `### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
1. Read: ~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md
1. Read: ~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md
---
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ After packaging, spawn discuss subagent (Pattern 2.8):
```javascript
const critic = spawn_agent({
message: `### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
1. Read: ~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/discuss-agent.md
1. Read: ~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/discuss-agent.md
## Multi-Perspective Critique: DISCUSS-001
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ This agent spawns two utility subagents during its execution:
### Explore Subagent (Phase 3)
**When**: After seed analysis, when project files detected
**Agent File**: `~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md`
**Agent File**: `~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md`
**Pattern**: 2.9 (Cache-Aware Exploration)
See Phase 3 code block above. Cache is checked before spawning. If cache hit, the spawn is skipped entirely.
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ See Phase 3 code block above. Cache is checked before spawning. If cache hit, th
### Discuss Subagent (Phase 4b)
**When**: After context packaging (spec-config.json + discovery-context.json written)
**Agent File**: `~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/discuss-agent.md`
**Agent File**: `~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/discuss-agent.md`
**Pattern**: 2.8 (Inline Subagent)
See Phase 4b code block above.
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ if (cached) {
// Cache MISS - spawn explore subagent, result cached by explore-agent
const explorer = spawn_agent({
message: `### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
1. Read: ~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md
1. Read: ~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md
---

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Lightweight multi-perspective critique engine. Called inline by produce agents (
## Identity
- **Type**: `utility`
- **Role File**: `~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/discuss-agent.md`
- **Role File**: `~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/discuss-agent.md`
- **Tag**: `[discuss]`
- **Responsibility**: Read Artifact -> Multi-CLI Perspective Analysis -> Divergence Detection -> Consensus Determination -> Write Discussion Record -> Return Verdict

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Shared codebase exploration utility with centralized caching. Callable by any ag
## Identity
- **Type**: `utility`
- **Role File**: `~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md`
- **Role File**: `~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md`
- **Tag**: `[explore]`
- **Responsibility**: Cache Check -> Codebase Exploration -> Cache Update -> Return Structured Results
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ if (cached && !forceRefresh) {
// After seed analysis, explore codebase context (Pattern 2.9 in analyst)
const explorer = spawn_agent({
message: `### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
1. Read: ~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md
1. Read: ~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md
---
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ for (const angle of angles) {
// Cache check happens inside explore-agent
const explorer = spawn_agent({
message: `### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
1. Read: ~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md
1. Read: ~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/explore-agent.md
---

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Product Brief, Requirements/PRD, Architecture, and Epics & Stories document gene
## Identity
- **Type**: `produce`
- **Role File**: `~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/writer.md`
- **Role File**: `~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/writer.md`
- **Prefix**: `DRAFT-*`
- **Tag**: `[writer]`
- **Responsibility**: Load Context -> Generate Document -> Self-Validation -> Inline Discuss -> Report
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ After validation, spawn discuss subagent (Pattern 2.8) for this task's discuss r
```javascript
const critic = spawn_agent({
message: `### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
1. Read: ~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/discuss-agent.md
1. Read: ~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/discuss-agent.md
## Multi-Perspective Critique: <DISCUSS-NNN>
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ This agent spawns the discuss subagent during Phase 4b:
### Discuss Subagent (Phase 4b)
**When**: After self-validation of generated document
**Agent File**: `~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/discuss-agent.md`
**Agent File**: `~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/agents/discuss-agent.md`
**Pattern**: 2.8 (Inline Subagent)
See Phase 4b code block above. The round ID and perspectives vary per doc type -- use the Inline Discuss Mapping table.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Phase 1: Requirement Clarification
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: This is an execution document. After context compression, phase instructions become summaries only. You MUST immediately re-read this file via `Read("~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/phases/01-requirement-clarification.md")` before continuing. Never execute based on summaries.
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: This is an execution document. After context compression, phase instructions become summaries only. You MUST immediately re-read this file via `Read("~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/phases/01-requirement-clarification.md")` before continuing. Never execute based on summaries.
## Objective

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Phase 2: Team Initialization
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: This is an execution document. After context compression, phase instructions become summaries only. You MUST immediately re-read this file via `Read("~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/phases/02-team-initialization.md")` before continuing. Never execute based on summaries.
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: This is an execution document. After context compression, phase instructions become summaries only. You MUST immediately re-read this file via `Read("~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/phases/02-team-initialization.md")` before continuing. Never execute based on summaries.
## Objective

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Phase 3: Task Chain Creation
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: This is an execution document. After context compression, phase instructions become summaries only. You MUST immediately re-read this file via `Read("~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/phases/03-task-chain-creation.md")` before continuing. Never execute based on summaries.
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: This is an execution document. After context compression, phase instructions become summaries only. You MUST immediately re-read this file via `Read("~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/phases/03-task-chain-creation.md")` before continuing. Never execute based on summaries.
## Objective

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Phase 4: Pipeline Coordination
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: This is an execution document. After context compression, phase instructions become summaries only. You MUST immediately re-read this file via `Read("~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/phases/04-pipeline-coordination.md")` before continuing. Never execute based on summaries.
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: This is an execution document. After context compression, phase instructions become summaries only. You MUST immediately re-read this file via `Read("~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/phases/04-pipeline-coordination.md")` before continuing. Never execute based on summaries.
## Objective

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Phase 5: Completion Report
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: This is an execution document. After context compression, phase instructions become summaries only. You MUST immediately re-read this file via `Read("~/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/phases/05-completion-report.md")` before continuing. Never execute based on summaries.
> **COMPACT PROTECTION**: This is an execution document. After context compression, phase instructions become summaries only. You MUST immediately re-read this file via `Read("~/~ or <project>/.codex/skills/team-lifecycle/phases/05-completion-report.md")` before continuing. Never execute based on summaries.
## Objective

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More