---
name: workflow-req-plan
description: Requirement-level progressive roadmap planning with issue creation. Decomposes requirements into convergent layers or task sequences, creates issues via ccw issue create, and generates execution-plan.json for team-planex consumption.
argument-hint: "[-y|--yes] [-c|--continue] [-m|--mode progressive|direct|auto] \"requirement description\""
allowed-tools: spawn_agent, wait, send_input, close_agent, AskUserQuestion, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
---

# Workflow Req-Plan

## Usage

```bash
$workflow-req-plan "Implement user authentication system with OAuth and 2FA"

# With mode selection
$workflow-req-plan -m progressive "Build real-time notification system"   # Layered MVP→iterations
$workflow-req-plan -m direct "Refactor payment module"                   # Topologically-sorted task sequence
$workflow-req-plan -m auto "Add data export feature"                     # Auto-select strategy

# Continue existing session
$workflow-req-plan --continue "user authentication system"

# Auto mode (skip all confirmations)
$workflow-req-plan -y "Implement caching layer"

# Flags
-y, --yes                              Skip all confirmations (auto mode)
-c, --continue                         Continue existing session
-m, --mode <progressive|direct|auto>   Decomposition strategy (default: auto)
```

**Context Source**: cli-explore-agent (optional) + requirement analysis
**Output Directory**: `.workflow/.req-plan/{session-id}/`
**Core Innovation**: Requirement decomposition → issue creation → execution-plan.json for team-planex consumption. Each issue is standard issues-jsonl-schema format, bridging req-plan to team-planex execution pipeline.

## Overview

Requirement-level layered roadmap planning. Decomposes a requirement into **convergent layers or task sequences**, creates issues via `ccw issue create`, and generates execution-plan.json for team-planex consumption.

**Dual Modes**:
- **Progressive**: Layered MVP→iterations, suitable for high-uncertainty requirements (validate first, then refine)
- **Direct**: Topologically-sorted task sequence, suitable for low-uncertainty requirements (clear tasks, directly ordered)
- **Auto**: Automatically selects based on uncertainty level

**Core Workflow**: Requirement Understanding → Strategy Selection → Context Collection (optional) → Decomposition + Issue Creation → Validation → team-planex Handoff

## Execution Process

```
Phase 0: Initialization
   ├─ Parse arguments (--yes, --continue, --mode)
   ├─ Generate session ID (RPLAN-{slug}-{date})
   └─ Create session folder

Phase 1: Requirement Understanding & Strategy Selection
   ├─ Parse requirement: goal / constraints / stakeholders
   ├─ Assess uncertainty level
   │   ├─ High uncertainty → recommend progressive
   │   └─ Low uncertainty  → recommend direct
   ├─ ASK_USER: Confirm strategy (-m skips, -y auto-selects)
   └─ Write strategy-assessment.json + roadmap.md skeleton

Phase 2: Context Collection (Optional, Subagent)
   ├─ Detect codebase: package.json / go.mod / src / ...
   ├─ Has codebase → spawn_agent cli-explore-agent
   │   ├─ Explore relevant modules and patterns
   │   ├─ wait for completion
   │   └─ close_agent
   └─ No codebase → skip, pure requirement decomposition

Phase 3: Decomposition & Issue Creation (Inlined Agent)
   ├─ Step 3.1: CLI-Assisted Decomposition
   │   ├─ Construct CLI prompt with requirement + context + mode
   │   ├─ Execute Gemini (fallback: Qwen → manual decomposition)
   │   └─ Parse CLI output into structured records
   ├─ Step 3.2: Record Enhancement & Validation
   │   ├─ Validate each record against schema
   │   ├─ Enhance convergence criteria quality
   │   ├─ Validate dependency graph (no cycles)
   │   └─ Progressive: verify scope; Direct: verify inputs/outputs
   ├─ Step 3.3: Issue Creation & Output Generation
   │   ├─ Internal records → issue data mapping
   │   ├─ ccw issue create for each item (get ISS-xxx IDs)
   │   ├─ Generate execution-plan.json (waves + dependencies)
   │   ├─ Generate issues.jsonl session copy
   │   └─ Generate roadmap.md with issue ID references
   └─ Step 3.4: Decomposition Quality Check (MANDATORY)
       ├─ Execute CLI quality check (Gemini, Qwen fallback)
       └─ Decision: PASS / AUTO_FIX / NEEDS_REVIEW

Phase 4: Validation & team-planex Handoff
   ├─ Display decomposition results (tabular + convergence criteria)
   ├─ ASK_USER: Feedback loop (up to 5 rounds)
   └─ ASK_USER: Next steps (team-planex / wave-by-wave / view / done)
```

## Output

```
.workflow/.req-plan/RPLAN-{slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}/
├── roadmap.md                    # Human-readable roadmap with issue ID references
├── issues.jsonl                  # Standard issues-jsonl-schema format (session copy)
├── execution-plan.json           # Wave grouping + issue dependencies (team-planex bridge)
├── strategy-assessment.json      # Strategy assessment result
└── exploration-codebase.json     # Codebase context (optional)
```

| File | Phase | Description |
|------|-------|-------------|
| `strategy-assessment.json` | 1 | Uncertainty analysis + mode recommendation + extracted goal/constraints/stakeholders |
| `roadmap.md` (skeleton) | 1 | Initial skeleton with placeholders, finalized in Phase 3 |
| `exploration-codebase.json` | 2 | Codebase context: relevant modules, patterns, integration points (only when codebase exists) |
| `issues.jsonl` | 3 | Standard issues-jsonl-schema records, one per line (session copy of created issues) |
| `execution-plan.json` | 3 | Wave grouping with issue dependencies for team-planex consumption |
| `roadmap.md` (final) | 3 | Human-readable roadmap with issue ID references, convergence details, team-planex execution guide |

## Subagent API Reference

### spawn_agent
Create a new subagent with task assignment.

```javascript
const agentId = spawn_agent({
  message: `
## TASK ASSIGNMENT

### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: ~/.codex/agents/{agent-type}.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json
3. Read: .workflow/project-guidelines.json

## TASK CONTEXT
${taskContext}

## DELIVERABLES
${deliverables}
`
})
```

### wait
Get results from subagent (only way to retrieve results).

```javascript
const result = wait({
  ids: [agentId],
  timeout_ms: 600000  // 10 minutes
})

if (result.timed_out) {
  // Handle timeout - can send_input to prompt completion
}
```

### close_agent
Clean up subagent resources (irreversible).

```javascript
close_agent({ id: agentId })
```

---

## Implementation

### Phase 0: Initialization

##### Step 0: Determine Project Root

```bash
PROJECT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)
```

```javascript
const getUtc8ISOString = () => new Date(Date.now() + 8 * 60 * 60 * 1000).toISOString()

// Parse arguments
const args = "$ARGUMENTS"
const AUTO_YES = args.includes('--yes') || args.includes('-y')
const continueMode = args.includes('--continue') || args.includes('-c')
const modeMatch = args.match(/(?:--mode|-m)\s+(progressive|direct|auto)/)
const requestedMode = modeMatch ? modeMatch[1] : 'auto'

// Clean requirement text (remove flags)
const requirement = args
  .replace(/--yes|-y|--continue|-c|--mode\s+\w+|-m\s+\w+/g, '')
  .trim()

const slug = requirement.toLowerCase()
  .replace(/[^a-z0-9\u4e00-\u9fa5]+/g, '-')
  .substring(0, 40)
const dateStr = getUtc8ISOString().substring(0, 10)
const sessionId = `RPLAN-${slug}-${dateStr}`
const sessionFolder = `${projectRoot}/.workflow/.req-plan/${sessionId}`

bash(`mkdir -p ${sessionFolder}`)

// Utility functions
function fileExists(p) {
  try { return bash(`test -f "${p}" && echo "yes"`).includes('yes') } catch { return false }
}
```

---

### Phase 1: Requirement Understanding & Strategy Selection

**Objective**: Parse requirement, assess uncertainty, select decomposition strategy.

```javascript
// 1. Parse Requirement
// - Extract core goal (what to achieve)
// - Identify constraints (tech stack, timeline, compatibility, etc.)
// - Identify stakeholders (users, admins, developers, etc.)
// - Identify keywords to determine domain

// 2. Assess Uncertainty Level
const uncertaintyFactors = {
  scope_clarity: 'low|medium|high',
  technical_risk: 'low|medium|high',
  dependency_unknown: 'low|medium|high',
  domain_familiarity: 'low|medium|high',
  requirement_stability: 'low|medium|high'
}
// high uncertainty (>=3 high) → progressive
// low uncertainty (>=3 low)  → direct
// otherwise → ask user preference

// 3. Strategy Selection
let selectedMode
if (requestedMode !== 'auto') {
  selectedMode = requestedMode
} else if (AUTO_YES) {
  selectedMode = recommendedMode  // use defaults
} else {
  const strategyAnswer = ASK_USER([
    {
      id: "strategy", type: "select",
      prompt: `Decomposition strategy selection:\n\nUncertainty: ${uncertaintyLevel}\nRecommended: ${recommendedMode}\n\nSelect:`,
      options: [
        { label: recommendedMode === 'progressive' ? "Progressive (Recommended)" : "Progressive",
          description: "Layered MVP→iterations, validate core first" },
        { label: recommendedMode === 'direct' ? "Direct (Recommended)" : "Direct",
          description: "Topologically-sorted task sequence" }
      ]
    }
  ])  // BLOCKS (wait for user response)
  selectedMode = strategyAnswer.strategy.toLowerCase().includes('progressive') ? 'progressive' : 'direct'
}

// 4. Generate strategy-assessment.json
const strategyAssessment = {
  session_id: sessionId,
  requirement: requirement,
  timestamp: getUtc8ISOString(),
  uncertainty_factors: uncertaintyFactors,
  uncertainty_level: uncertaintyLevel,
  recommended_mode: recommendedMode,
  selected_mode: selectedMode,
  goal: extractedGoal,
  constraints: extractedConstraints,
  stakeholders: extractedStakeholders,
  domain_keywords: extractedKeywords
}
Write(`${sessionFolder}/strategy-assessment.json`, JSON.stringify(strategyAssessment, null, 2))

// 5. Initialize roadmap.md skeleton
const roadmapMdSkeleton = `# Requirement Roadmap

**Session**: ${sessionId}
**Requirement**: ${requirement}
**Strategy**: ${selectedMode}
**Status**: Planning
**Created**: ${getUtc8ISOString()}

## Strategy Assessment
- Uncertainty level: ${uncertaintyLevel}
- Decomposition mode: ${selectedMode}

## Roadmap
> To be populated after Phase 3 decomposition

## Convergence Criteria Details
> To be populated after Phase 3 decomposition

## Risk Items
> To be populated after Phase 3 decomposition

## Next Steps
> To be populated after Phase 4 validation
`
Write(`${sessionFolder}/roadmap.md`, roadmapMdSkeleton)
```

**Success Criteria**:
- Requirement goal, constraints, stakeholders identified
- Uncertainty level assessed
- Strategy selected (progressive or direct)
- strategy-assessment.json generated
- roadmap.md skeleton initialized

---

### Phase 2: Context Collection (Optional, Subagent)

**Objective**: If a codebase exists, collect relevant context to enhance decomposition quality.

```javascript
// 1. Detect Codebase
const hasCodebase = bash(`
  test -f package.json && echo "nodejs" ||
  test -f go.mod && echo "golang" ||
  test -f Cargo.toml && echo "rust" ||
  test -f pyproject.toml && echo "python" ||
  test -f pom.xml && echo "java" ||
  test -d src && echo "generic" ||
  echo "none"
`).trim()

// 2. Codebase Exploration (only when hasCodebase !== 'none')
let exploreAgent = null

if (hasCodebase !== 'none') {
  try {
    exploreAgent = spawn_agent({
      message: `
## TASK ASSIGNMENT

### MANDATORY FIRST STEPS (Agent Execute)
1. **Read role definition**: ~/.codex/agents/cli-explore-agent.md (MUST read first)
2. Read: ${projectRoot}/.workflow/project-tech.json (if exists)
3. Read: ${projectRoot}/.workflow/project-guidelines.json (if exists)

---

## Task Objective
Explore codebase for requirement decomposition context.

## Exploration Context
Requirement: ${requirement}
Strategy: ${selectedMode}
Project Type: ${hasCodebase}
Session: ${sessionFolder}

## MANDATORY FIRST STEPS
1. Run: ccw tool exec get_modules_by_depth '{}'
2. Execute relevant searches based on requirement keywords

## Exploration Focus
- Identify modules/components related to the requirement
- Find existing patterns that should be followed
- Locate integration points for new functionality
- Assess current architecture constraints

## Output
Write findings to: ${sessionFolder}/exploration-codebase.json

Schema: {
  project_type: "${hasCodebase}",
  relevant_modules: [{name, path, relevance}],
  existing_patterns: [{pattern, files, description}],
  integration_points: [{location, description, risk}],
  architecture_constraints: [string],
  tech_stack: {languages, frameworks, tools},
  _metadata: {timestamp, exploration_scope}
}
`
    })

    // Wait with timeout handling
    let result = wait({ ids: [exploreAgent], timeout_ms: 600000 })

    if (result.timed_out) {
      send_input({ id: exploreAgent, message: 'Complete now and write exploration-codebase.json.' })
      result = wait({ ids: [exploreAgent], timeout_ms: 300000 })
      if (result.timed_out) throw new Error('Agent timeout')
    }

  } finally {
    if (exploreAgent) close_agent({ id: exploreAgent })
  }
}
// No codebase → skip, proceed directly to Phase 3
```

---

### Phase 3: Decomposition & Issue Creation (Inlined Agent)

**Objective**: Execute requirement decomposition, create issues, generate execution-plan.json + issues.jsonl + roadmap.md.

**CRITICAL**: After creating issues, MUST execute **Decomposition Quality Check** (Step 3.4) using CLI analysis before proceeding to Phase 4.

#### Prepare Context

```javascript
const strategy = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/strategy-assessment.json`))
let explorationContext = null
if (fileExists(`${sessionFolder}/exploration-codebase.json`)) {
  explorationContext = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/exploration-codebase.json`))
}
```

#### Internal Record Schemas (CLI Parsing)

These schemas are used internally for parsing CLI decomposition output. They are converted to issues in Step 3.3.

**Progressive Mode - Layer Record**:
```javascript
{
  id: "L{n}",               // L0, L1, L2, L3
  name: string,              // Layer name: MVP / 可用 / 完善 / 优化
  goal: string,              // Layer goal (one sentence)
  scope: [string],           // Features included
  excludes: [string],        // Features explicitly excluded
  convergence: {
    criteria: [string],         // Testable conditions
    verification: string,       // How to verify
    definition_of_done: string  // Business-language completion definition
  },
  risks: [{description, probability, impact, mitigation}],
  effort: "small" | "medium" | "large",
  depends_on: ["L{n}"]
}
```

**Direct Mode - Task Record**:
```javascript
{
  id: "T{n}",                // T1, T2, T3, ...
  title: string,
  type: "infrastructure" | "feature" | "enhancement" | "testing",
  scope: string,
  inputs: [string],
  outputs: [string],
  convergence: { criteria, verification, definition_of_done },
  depends_on: ["T{n}"],
  parallel_group: number      // Same group = parallelizable
}
```

#### Convergence Quality Requirements

| Field | Requirement | Bad Example | Good Example |
|-------|-------------|-------------|--------------|
| `criteria[]` | **Testable** | `"系统工作正常"` | `"API 返回 200 且响应体包含 user_id 字段"` |
| `verification` | **Executable** | `"检查一下"` | `"jest --testPathPattern=auth && curl -s localhost:3000/health"` |
| `definition_of_done` | **Business language** | `"代码通过编译"` | `"新用户可完成注册→登录→执行核心操作的完整流程"` |

---

#### Step 3.1: CLI-Assisted Decomposition

##### Progressive Mode CLI Template

```bash
ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Decompose requirement into progressive layers (MVP→iterations) with convergence criteria
Success: 2-4 self-contained layers, each with testable convergence, no scope overlap

REQUIREMENT:
${requirement}

STRATEGY CONTEXT:
- Uncertainty: ${strategy.uncertainty_level}
- Goal: ${strategy.goal}
- Constraints: ${strategy.constraints.join(', ')}
- Stakeholders: ${strategy.stakeholders.join(', ')}

${explorationContext ? `CODEBASE CONTEXT:
- Relevant modules: ${explorationContext.relevant_modules.map(m => m.name).join(', ')}
- Existing patterns: ${explorationContext.existing_patterns.map(p => p.pattern).join(', ')}
- Architecture constraints: ${explorationContext.architecture_constraints.join(', ')}
- Tech stack: ${JSON.stringify(explorationContext.tech_stack)}` : 'NO CODEBASE (pure requirement decomposition)'}

TASK:
• Define 2-4 progressive layers from MVP to full implementation
• L0 (MVP): Minimum viable closed loop - core path works end-to-end
• L1 (Usable): Critical user paths, basic error handling
• L2 (Complete): Edge cases, performance, security hardening
• L3 (Optimized): Advanced features, observability, operations support
• Each layer: explicit scope (included) and excludes (not included)
• Each layer: convergence with testable criteria, executable verification, business-language DoD
• Risk items per layer

MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/*
EXPECTED:
For each layer output:
## L{n}: {Name}
**Goal**: {one sentence}
**Scope**: {comma-separated features}
**Excludes**: {comma-separated excluded features}
**Convergence**:
- Criteria: {bullet list of testable conditions}
- Verification: {executable command or steps}
- Definition of Done: {business language sentence}
**Risk Items**: {bullet list}
**Effort**: {small|medium|large}
**Depends On**: {layer IDs or none}

CONSTRAINTS:
- Each feature belongs to exactly ONE layer (no overlap)
- Criteria must be testable (can write assertions)
- Verification must be executable (commands or explicit steps)
- Definition of Done must be understandable by non-technical stakeholders
- L0 must be a complete closed loop (end-to-end path works)
" --tool gemini --mode analysis
```

##### Direct Mode CLI Template

```bash
ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Decompose requirement into topologically-sorted task sequence with convergence criteria
Success: Self-contained tasks with clear inputs/outputs, testable convergence, correct dependency order

REQUIREMENT:
${requirement}

STRATEGY CONTEXT:
- Goal: ${strategy.goal}
- Constraints: ${strategy.constraints.join(', ')}

${explorationContext ? `CODEBASE CONTEXT:
- Relevant modules: ${explorationContext.relevant_modules.map(m => m.name).join(', ')}
- Existing patterns: ${explorationContext.existing_patterns.map(p => p.pattern).join(', ')}
- Tech stack: ${JSON.stringify(explorationContext.tech_stack)}` : 'NO CODEBASE (pure requirement decomposition)'}

TASK:
• Decompose into vertical slices with clear boundaries
• Each task: type (infrastructure|feature|enhancement|testing)
• Each task: explicit inputs (what it needs) and outputs (what it produces)
• Each task: convergence with testable criteria, executable verification, business-language DoD
• Topological sort: respect dependency order
• Assign parallel_group numbers (same group = can run in parallel)

MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @**/*
EXPECTED:
For each task output:
## T{n}: {Title}
**Type**: {infrastructure|feature|enhancement|testing}
**Scope**: {description}
**Inputs**: {comma-separated files/modules or 'none'}
**Outputs**: {comma-separated files/modules}
**Convergence**:
- Criteria: {bullet list of testable conditions}
- Verification: {executable command or steps}
- Definition of Done: {business language sentence}
**Depends On**: {task IDs or none}
**Parallel Group**: {number}

CONSTRAINTS:
- Inputs must come from preceding task outputs or existing resources
- No circular dependencies
- Criteria must be testable
- Verification must be executable
- Tasks in same parallel_group must be truly independent
" --tool gemini --mode analysis
```

##### CLI Fallback Chain

```javascript
// Fallback chain: Gemini → Qwen → manual decomposition
try {
  cliOutput = executeCLI('gemini', prompt)
} catch (error) {
  try {
    cliOutput = executeCLI('qwen', prompt)
  } catch {
    // Manual fallback (see Fallback Decomposition below)
    records = selectedMode === 'progressive'
      ? manualProgressiveDecomposition(requirement, explorationContext)
      : manualDirectDecomposition(requirement, explorationContext)
  }
}
```

##### CLI Output Parsing

```javascript
// Parse progressive layers from CLI output
function parseProgressiveLayers(cliOutput) {
  const layers = []
  const layerBlocks = cliOutput.split(/## L(\d+):/).slice(1)

  for (let i = 0; i < layerBlocks.length; i += 2) {
    const layerId = `L${layerBlocks[i].trim()}`
    const text = layerBlocks[i + 1]

    const nameMatch = /^(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
    const goalMatch = /\*\*Goal\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
    const scopeMatch = /\*\*Scope\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
    const excludesMatch = /\*\*Excludes\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
    const effortMatch = /\*\*Effort\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
    const dependsMatch = /\*\*Depends On\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n|$)/.exec(text)
    const riskMatch = /\*\*Risk Items\*\*:\n((?:- .+?\n)*)/.exec(text)

    const convergence = parseConvergence(text)

    layers.push({
      id: layerId,
      name: nameMatch?.[1].trim() || `Layer ${layerId}`,
      goal: goalMatch?.[1].trim() || "",
      scope: scopeMatch?.[1].split(/[,，]/).map(s => s.trim()).filter(Boolean) || [],
      excludes: excludesMatch?.[1].split(/[,，]/).map(s => s.trim()).filter(Boolean) || [],
      convergence,
      risks: riskMatch
        ? riskMatch[1].split('\n').map(s => s.replace(/^- /, '').trim()).filter(Boolean)
            .map(desc => ({description: desc, probability: "Medium", impact: "Medium", mitigation: "N/A"}))
        : [],
      effort: normalizeEffort(effortMatch?.[1].trim()),
      depends_on: parseDependsOn(dependsMatch?.[1], 'L')
    })
  }

  return layers
}

// Parse direct tasks from CLI output
function parseDirectTasks(cliOutput) {
  const tasks = []
  const taskBlocks = cliOutput.split(/## T(\d+):/).slice(1)

  for (let i = 0; i < taskBlocks.length; i += 2) {
    const taskId = `T${taskBlocks[i].trim()}`
    const text = taskBlocks[i + 1]

    const titleMatch = /^(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
    const typeMatch = /\*\*Type\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
    const scopeMatch = /\*\*Scope\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
    const inputsMatch = /\*\*Inputs\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
    const outputsMatch = /\*\*Outputs\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n)/.exec(text)
    const dependsMatch = /\*\*Depends On\*\*:\s*(.+?)(?=\n|$)/.exec(text)
    const groupMatch = /\*\*Parallel Group\*\*:\s*(\d+)/.exec(text)

    const convergence = parseConvergence(text)

    tasks.push({
      id: taskId,
      title: titleMatch?.[1].trim() || `Task ${taskId}`,
      type: normalizeType(typeMatch?.[1].trim()),
      scope: scopeMatch?.[1].trim() || "",
      inputs: parseList(inputsMatch?.[1]),
      outputs: parseList(outputsMatch?.[1]),
      convergence,
      depends_on: parseDependsOn(dependsMatch?.[1], 'T'),
      parallel_group: parseInt(groupMatch?.[1]) || 1
    })
  }

  return tasks
}

// Parse convergence section from a record block
function parseConvergence(text) {
  const criteriaMatch = /- Criteria:\s*((?:.+\n?)+?)(?=- Verification:)/.exec(text)
  const verificationMatch = /- Verification:\s*(.+?)(?=\n- Definition)/.exec(text)
  const dodMatch = /- Definition of Done:\s*(.+?)(?=\n\*\*|$)/.exec(text)

  const criteria = criteriaMatch
    ? criteriaMatch[1].split('\n')
        .map(s => s.replace(/^\s*[-•]\s*/, '').trim())
        .filter(s => s && !s.startsWith('Verification') && !s.startsWith('Definition'))
    : []

  return {
    criteria: criteria.length > 0 ? criteria : ["Task completed successfully"],
    verification: verificationMatch?.[1].trim() || "Manual verification",
    definition_of_done: dodMatch?.[1].trim() || "Feature works as expected"
  }
}

// Helpers
function normalizeEffort(effort) {
  if (!effort) return "medium"
  const lower = effort.toLowerCase()
  if (lower.includes('small') || lower.includes('low')) return "small"
  if (lower.includes('large') || lower.includes('high')) return "large"
  return "medium"
}

function normalizeType(type) {
  if (!type) return "feature"
  const lower = type.toLowerCase()
  if (lower.includes('infra')) return "infrastructure"
  if (lower.includes('enhance')) return "enhancement"
  if (lower.includes('test')) return "testing"
  return "feature"
}

function parseList(text) {
  if (!text || text.toLowerCase() === 'none') return []
  return text.split(/[,，]/).map(s => s.trim()).filter(Boolean)
}

function parseDependsOn(text, prefix) {
  if (!text || text.toLowerCase() === 'none' || text === '[]') return []
  const pattern = new RegExp(`${prefix}\\d+`, 'g')
  return (text.match(pattern) || [])
}
```

##### Fallback Decomposition

```javascript
// Manual decomposition when CLI fails
function manualProgressiveDecomposition(requirement, context) {
  return [
    {
      id: "L0", name: "MVP", goal: "最小可用闭环",
      scope: ["核心功能"], excludes: ["高级功能", "优化"],
      convergence: {
        criteria: ["核心路径端到端可跑通"],
        verification: "手动测试核心流程",
        definition_of_done: "用户可完成一次核心操作的完整流程"
      },
      risks: [{description: "技术选型待验证", probability: "Medium", impact: "Medium", mitigation: "待评估"}],
      effort: "medium", depends_on: []
    },
    {
      id: "L1", name: "可用", goal: "关键用户路径完善",
      scope: ["错误处理", "输入校验"], excludes: ["性能优化", "监控"],
      convergence: {
        criteria: ["所有用户输入有校验", "错误场景有提示"],
        verification: "单元测试 + 手动测试错误场景",
        definition_of_done: "用户遇到问题时有清晰的引导和恢复路径"
      },
      risks: [], effort: "medium", depends_on: ["L0"]
    }
  ]
}

function manualDirectDecomposition(requirement, context) {
  return [
    {
      id: "T1", title: "基础设施搭建", type: "infrastructure",
      scope: "项目骨架和基础配置",
      inputs: [], outputs: ["project-structure"],
      convergence: {
        criteria: ["项目可构建无报错", "基础配置完成"],
        verification: "npm run build (或对应构建命令)",
        definition_of_done: "项目基础框架就绪，可开始功能开发"
      },
      depends_on: [], parallel_group: 1
    },
    {
      id: "T2", title: "核心功能实现", type: "feature",
      scope: "核心业务逻辑",
      inputs: ["project-structure"], outputs: ["core-module"],
      convergence: {
        criteria: ["核心 API/功能可调用", "返回预期结果"],
        verification: "运行核心功能测试",
        definition_of_done: "核心业务功能可正常使用"
      },
      depends_on: ["T1"], parallel_group: 2
    }
  ]
}
```

---

#### Step 3.2: Record Enhancement & Validation

```javascript
// Validate progressive layers
function validateProgressiveLayers(layers) {
  const errors = []

  // Check scope overlap
  const allScopes = new Map()
  layers.forEach(layer => {
    layer.scope.forEach(feature => {
      if (allScopes.has(feature)) {
        errors.push(`Scope overlap: "${feature}" in both ${allScopes.get(feature)} and ${layer.id}`)
      }
      allScopes.set(feature, layer.id)
    })
  })

  // Check circular dependencies
  const cycleErrors = detectCycles(layers, 'L')
  errors.push(...cycleErrors)

  // Check convergence quality
  layers.forEach(layer => {
    errors.push(...validateConvergence(layer.id, layer.convergence))
  })

  // Check L0 is self-contained (no depends_on)
  const l0 = layers.find(l => l.id === 'L0')
  if (l0 && l0.depends_on.length > 0) {
    errors.push("L0 (MVP) should not have dependencies")
  }

  return errors
}

// Validate direct tasks
function validateDirectTasks(tasks) {
  const errors = []

  // Check inputs/outputs chain
  const availableOutputs = new Set()
  const sortedTasks = topologicalSort(tasks)

  sortedTasks.forEach(task => {
    task.inputs.forEach(input => {
      if (!availableOutputs.has(input)) {
        // Existing files are valid inputs - only warn
      }
    })
    task.outputs.forEach(output => availableOutputs.add(output))
  })

  // Check circular dependencies
  errors.push(...detectCycles(tasks, 'T'))

  // Check convergence quality
  tasks.forEach(task => {
    errors.push(...validateConvergence(task.id, task.convergence))
  })

  // Check parallel_group consistency
  const groups = new Map()
  tasks.forEach(task => {
    if (!groups.has(task.parallel_group)) groups.set(task.parallel_group, [])
    groups.get(task.parallel_group).push(task)
  })
  groups.forEach((groupTasks, groupId) => {
    if (groupTasks.length > 1) {
      const ids = new Set(groupTasks.map(t => t.id))
      groupTasks.forEach(task => {
        task.depends_on.forEach(dep => {
          if (ids.has(dep)) {
            errors.push(`Parallel group ${groupId}: ${task.id} depends on ${dep} but both in same group`)
          }
        })
      })
    }
  })

  return errors
}

// Validate convergence quality
function validateConvergence(recordId, convergence) {
  const errors = []

  const vaguePatterns = /正常|正确|好|可以|没问题|works|fine|good|correct/i
  convergence.criteria.forEach((criterion, i) => {
    if (vaguePatterns.test(criterion) && criterion.length < 15) {
      errors.push(`${recordId} criteria[${i}]: Too vague - "${criterion}"`)
    }
  })

  if (convergence.verification.length < 10) {
    errors.push(`${recordId} verification: Too short, needs executable steps`)
  }

  const technicalPatterns = /compile|build|lint|npm|npx|jest|tsc|eslint/i
  if (technicalPatterns.test(convergence.definition_of_done)) {
    errors.push(`${recordId} definition_of_done: Should be business language, not technical commands`)
  }

  return errors
}

// Detect circular dependencies
function detectCycles(records, prefix) {
  const errors = []
  const graph = new Map(records.map(r => [r.id, r.depends_on]))
  const visited = new Set()
  const inStack = new Set()

  function dfs(node, path) {
    if (inStack.has(node)) {
      errors.push(`Circular dependency detected: ${[...path, node].join(' → ')}`)
      return
    }
    if (visited.has(node)) return

    visited.add(node)
    inStack.add(node)
    ;(graph.get(node) || []).forEach(dep => dfs(dep, [...path, node]))
    inStack.delete(node)
  }

  records.forEach(r => {
    if (!visited.has(r.id)) dfs(r.id, [])
  })

  return errors
}

// Topological sort
function topologicalSort(tasks) {
  const result = []
  const visited = new Set()
  const taskMap = new Map(tasks.map(t => [t.id, t]))

  function visit(taskId) {
    if (visited.has(taskId)) return
    visited.add(taskId)
    const task = taskMap.get(taskId)
    if (task) {
      task.depends_on.forEach(dep => visit(dep))
      result.push(task)
    }
  }

  tasks.forEach(t => visit(t.id))
  return result
}
```

---

#### Step 3.3: Issue Creation & Output Generation

##### 3.3a: Internal Records → Issue Data Mapping

```javascript
// Progressive mode: layer → issue data (issues-jsonl-schema)
function layerToIssue(layer, sessionId, timestamp) {
  const context = `## Goal\n${layer.goal}\n\n` +
    `## Scope\n${layer.scope.map(s => `- ${s}`).join('\n')}\n\n` +
    `## Excludes\n${layer.excludes.map(s => `- ${s}`).join('\n') || 'None'}\n\n` +
    `## Convergence Criteria\n${layer.convergence.criteria.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n')}\n\n` +
    `## Verification\n${layer.convergence.verification}\n\n` +
    `## Definition of Done\n${layer.convergence.definition_of_done}\n\n` +
    (layer.risks.length ? `## Risks\n${layer.risks.map(r => `- ${r.description} (P:${r.probability} I:${r.impact})`).join('\n')}` : '')

  const effortToPriority = { small: 4, medium: 3, large: 2 }

  return {
    title: `[${layer.name}] ${layer.goal}`,
    context: context,
    priority: effortToPriority[layer.effort] || 3,
    source: "text",
    tags: ["req-plan", "progressive", layer.name.toLowerCase(), `wave-${getWaveNum(layer)}`],
    affected_components: [],
    extended_context: {
      notes: JSON.stringify({
        session: sessionId,
        strategy: "progressive",
        layer: layer.id,
        wave: getWaveNum(layer),
        effort: layer.effort,
        depends_on_issues: [],    // Backfilled after all issues created
        original_id: layer.id
      })
    },
    lifecycle_requirements: {
      test_strategy: "integration",
      regression_scope: "affected",
      acceptance_type: "automated",
      commit_strategy: "per-task"
    }
  }
}

function getWaveNum(layer) {
  const match = layer.id.match(/L(\d+)/)
  return match ? parseInt(match[1]) + 1 : 1
}

// Direct mode: task → issue data (issues-jsonl-schema)
function taskToIssue(task, sessionId, timestamp) {
  const context = `## Scope\n${task.scope}\n\n` +
    `## Inputs\n${task.inputs.length ? task.inputs.map(i => `- ${i}`).join('\n') : 'None (starting task)'}\n\n` +
    `## Outputs\n${task.outputs.map(o => `- ${o}`).join('\n')}\n\n` +
    `## Convergence Criteria\n${task.convergence.criteria.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n')}\n\n` +
    `## Verification\n${task.convergence.verification}\n\n` +
    `## Definition of Done\n${task.convergence.definition_of_done}`

  return {
    title: `[${task.type}] ${task.title}`,
    context: context,
    priority: 3,
    source: "text",
    tags: ["req-plan", "direct", task.type, `wave-${task.parallel_group}`],
    affected_components: task.outputs,
    extended_context: {
      notes: JSON.stringify({
        session: sessionId,
        strategy: "direct",
        task_id: task.id,
        wave: task.parallel_group,
        parallel_group: task.parallel_group,
        depends_on_issues: [],    // Backfilled after all issues created
        original_id: task.id
      })
    },
    lifecycle_requirements: {
      test_strategy: task.type === 'testing' ? 'unit' : 'integration',
      regression_scope: "affected",
      acceptance_type: "automated",
      commit_strategy: "per-task"
    }
  }
}
```

##### 3.3b: Create Issues via ccw issue create

```javascript
// Create issues sequentially (get formal ISS-xxx IDs)
const issueIdMap = {}  // originalId → ISS-xxx

for (const record of records) {
  const issueData = selectedMode === 'progressive'
    ? layerToIssue(record, sessionId, getUtc8ISOString())
    : taskToIssue(record, sessionId, getUtc8ISOString())

  // Create issue via ccw issue create
  try {
    const createResult = bash(`ccw issue create --data '${JSON.stringify(issueData)}' --json`)
    const created = JSON.parse(createResult.trim())
    issueIdMap[record.id] = created.id
  } catch (error) {
    // Retry once
    try {
      const retryResult = bash(`ccw issue create --data '${JSON.stringify(issueData)}' --json`)
      const created = JSON.parse(retryResult.trim())
      issueIdMap[record.id] = created.id
    } catch {
      // Log error, skip this record, continue with remaining
      console.error(`Failed to create issue for ${record.id}`)
    }
  }
}

// Backfill depends_on_issues into extended_context.notes
for (const record of records) {
  const issueId = issueIdMap[record.id]
  if (!issueId) continue
  const deps = record.depends_on.map(d => issueIdMap[d]).filter(Boolean)
  if (deps.length > 0) {
    const currentNotes = JSON.parse(issueData.extended_context.notes)
    currentNotes.depends_on_issues = deps
    bash(`ccw issue update ${issueId} --notes '${JSON.stringify(currentNotes)}'`)
  }
}
```

##### 3.3c: Generate execution-plan.json

```javascript
function generateExecutionPlan(records, issueIdMap, sessionId, requirement, selectedMode) {
  const issueIds = records.map(r => issueIdMap[r.id]).filter(Boolean)

  let waves
  if (selectedMode === 'progressive') {
    waves = records.filter(r => issueIdMap[r.id]).map((r, i) => ({
      wave: i + 1,
      label: r.name,
      issue_ids: [issueIdMap[r.id]],
      depends_on_waves: r.depends_on.length > 0
        ? [...new Set(r.depends_on.map(d => records.findIndex(x => x.id === d) + 1))]
        : []
    }))
  } else {
    const groups = new Map()
    records.filter(r => issueIdMap[r.id]).forEach(r => {
      const g = r.parallel_group
      if (!groups.has(g)) groups.set(g, [])
      groups.get(g).push(r)
    })

    waves = [...groups.entries()]
      .sort(([a], [b]) => a - b)
      .map(([groupNum, groupRecords]) => ({
        wave: groupNum,
        label: `Group ${groupNum}`,
        issue_ids: groupRecords.map(r => issueIdMap[r.id]),
        depends_on_waves: groupNum > 1 ? [groupNum - 1] : []
      }))
  }

  const issueDependencies = {}
  records.forEach(r => {
    if (!issueIdMap[r.id]) return
    const deps = r.depends_on.map(d => issueIdMap[d]).filter(Boolean)
    if (deps.length > 0) {
      issueDependencies[issueIdMap[r.id]] = deps
    }
  })

  return {
    session_id: sessionId,
    requirement: requirement,
    strategy: selectedMode,
    created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
    issue_ids: issueIds,
    waves: waves,
    issue_dependencies: issueDependencies
  }
}

const executionPlan = generateExecutionPlan(records, issueIdMap, sessionId, requirement, selectedMode)
Write(`${sessionFolder}/execution-plan.json`, JSON.stringify(executionPlan, null, 2))
```

##### 3.3d: Generate issues.jsonl Session Copy

```javascript
const sessionIssues = []
for (const originalId of Object.keys(issueIdMap)) {
  const issueId = issueIdMap[originalId]
  if (!issueId) continue
  const issueJson = bash(`ccw issue status ${issueId} --json`).trim()
  sessionIssues.push(issueJson)
}
Write(`${sessionFolder}/issues.jsonl`, sessionIssues.join('\n') + '\n')
```

##### 3.3e: Generate roadmap.md (with Issue ID References)

```javascript
// Progressive mode roadmap
function generateProgressiveRoadmapMd(layers, issueIdMap, input) {
  return `# 需求路线图

**Session**: ${input.sessionId}
**需求**: ${input.requirement}
**策略**: progressive
**不确定性**: ${input.strategy.uncertainty_level}
**生成时间**: ${new Date().toISOString()}

## 策略评估

- 目标: ${input.strategy.goal}
- 约束: ${input.strategy.constraints.join(', ') || '无'}
- 利益方: ${input.strategy.stakeholders.join(', ') || '无'}

## 路线图概览

| 层级 | 名称 | 目标 | 工作量 | 依赖 | Issue ID |
|------|------|------|--------|------|----------|
${layers.map(l => `| ${l.id} | ${l.name} | ${l.goal} | ${l.effort} | ${l.depends_on.length ? l.depends_on.join(', ') : '-'} | ${issueIdMap[l.id]} |`).join('\n')}

## Issue Mapping

| Wave | Issue ID | Title | Priority |
|------|----------|-------|----------|
${layers.map(l => `| ${getWaveNum(l)} | ${issueIdMap[l.id]} | [${l.name}] ${l.goal} | ${({small: 4, medium: 3, large: 2})[l.effort] || 3} |`).join('\n')}

## 各层详情

${layers.map(l => `### ${l.id}: ${l.name} (${issueIdMap[l.id]})

**目标**: ${l.goal}

**范围**: ${l.scope.join('、')}

**排除**: ${l.excludes.join('、') || '无'}

**收敛标准**:
${l.convergence.criteria.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n')}
- **验证方法**: ${l.convergence.verification}
- **完成定义**: ${l.convergence.definition_of_done}

**风险项**: ${l.risks.length ? l.risks.map(r => `\n- ${r.description} (概率: ${r.probability}, 影响: ${r.impact}, 缓解: ${r.mitigation})`).join('') : '无'}

**工作量**: ${l.effort}
`).join('\n---\n\n')}

## 风险汇总

${layers.flatMap(l => l.risks.map(r => `- **${l.id}** (${issueIdMap[l.id]}): ${r.description} (概率: ${r.probability}, 影响: ${r.impact})`)).join('\n') || '无已识别风险'}

## Next Steps

### 使用 team-planex 执行全部波次
\`\`\`
$team-planex --plan ${input.sessionFolder}/execution-plan.json
\`\`\`

### 按波次逐步执行
\`\`\`
${layers.map(l => `# Wave ${getWaveNum(l)}: ${l.name}\n$team-planex ${issueIdMap[l.id]}`).join('\n')}
\`\`\`

路线图文件: \`${input.sessionFolder}/\`
- issues.jsonl (标准 issue 格式)
- execution-plan.json (波次编排)
`
}

// Direct mode roadmap
function generateDirectRoadmapMd(tasks, issueIdMap, input) {
  const groups = new Map()
  tasks.forEach(t => {
    const g = t.parallel_group
    if (!groups.has(g)) groups.set(g, [])
    groups.get(g).push(t)
  })

  return `# 需求路线图

**Session**: ${input.sessionId}
**需求**: ${input.requirement}
**策略**: direct
**生成时间**: ${new Date().toISOString()}

## 策略评估

- 目标: ${input.strategy.goal}
- 约束: ${input.strategy.constraints.join(', ') || '无'}

## 任务序列

| 组 | ID | 标题 | 类型 | 依赖 | Issue ID |
|----|-----|------|------|------|----------|
${tasks.map(t => `| ${t.parallel_group} | ${t.id} | ${t.title} | ${t.type} | ${t.depends_on.length ? t.depends_on.join(', ') : '-'} | ${issueIdMap[t.id]} |`).join('\n')}

## Issue Mapping

| Wave | Issue ID | Title | Priority |
|------|----------|-------|----------|
${tasks.map(t => `| ${t.parallel_group} | ${issueIdMap[t.id]} | [${t.type}] ${t.title} | 3 |`).join('\n')}

## 各任务详情

${tasks.map(t => `### ${t.id}: ${t.title} (${issueIdMap[t.id]})

**类型**: ${t.type} | **并行组**: ${t.parallel_group}

**范围**: ${t.scope}

**输入**: ${t.inputs.length ? t.inputs.join(', ') : '无（起始任务）'}
**输出**: ${t.outputs.join(', ')}

**收敛标准**:
${t.convergence.criteria.map(c => `- ${c}`).join('\n')}
- **验证方法**: ${t.convergence.verification}
- **完成定义**: ${t.convergence.definition_of_done}
`).join('\n---\n\n')}

## Next Steps

### 使用 team-planex 执行全部波次
\`\`\`
$team-planex --plan ${input.sessionFolder}/execution-plan.json
\`\`\`

### 按波次逐步执行
\`\`\`
${[...groups.entries()].sort(([a], [b]) => a - b).map(([g, ts]) =>
  `# Wave ${g}: Group ${g}\n$team-planex ${ts.map(t => issueIdMap[t.id]).join(' ')}`
).join('\n')}
\`\`\`

路线图文件: \`${input.sessionFolder}/\`
- issues.jsonl (标准 issue 格式)
- execution-plan.json (波次编排)
`
}

// Write roadmap.md
const roadmapInput = {
  sessionId, requirement, sessionFolder,
  strategy: { ...strategy }
}
const roadmapMd = selectedMode === 'progressive'
  ? generateProgressiveRoadmapMd(records, issueIdMap, roadmapInput)
  : generateDirectRoadmapMd(records, issueIdMap, roadmapInput)
Write(`${sessionFolder}/roadmap.md`, roadmapMd)
```

---

#### Step 3.4: Decomposition Quality Check (MANDATORY)

After creating issues and generating output files, **MUST** execute CLI quality check before proceeding.

##### Quality Dimensions

| Dimension | Check Criteria | Critical? |
|-----------|---------------|-----------|
| **Requirement Coverage** | All aspects of original requirement addressed in issues | Yes |
| **Convergence Quality** | criteria testable, verification executable, DoD business-readable | Yes |
| **Scope Integrity** | Progressive: no overlap/gaps; Direct: inputs/outputs chain valid | Yes |
| **Dependency Correctness** | No circular deps, proper ordering, issue dependencies match | Yes |
| **Effort Balance** | No single issue disproportionately large | No |

##### CLI Quality Check

```bash
ccw cli -p "
PURPOSE: Validate roadmap decomposition quality
Success: All quality dimensions pass

ORIGINAL REQUIREMENT:
${requirement}

ISSUES CREATED (${selectedMode} mode):
${issuesJsonlContent}

EXECUTION PLAN:
${JSON.stringify(executionPlan, null, 2)}

TASK:
• Requirement Coverage: Does the decomposition address ALL aspects of the requirement?
• Convergence Quality: Are criteria testable? Is verification executable? Is DoD business-readable?
• Scope Integrity: ${selectedMode === 'progressive' ? 'No scope overlap between layers, no feature gaps' : 'Inputs/outputs chain is valid, parallel groups are correct'}
• Dependency Correctness: No circular dependencies, wave ordering correct
• Effort Balance: No disproportionately large items

MODE: analysis
EXPECTED:
## Quality Check Results
### Requirement Coverage: PASS|FAIL
[details]
### Convergence Quality: PASS|FAIL
[details and specific issues per record]
### Scope Integrity: PASS|FAIL
[details]
### Dependency Correctness: PASS|FAIL
[details]
### Effort Balance: PASS|FAIL
[details]

## Recommendation: PASS|AUTO_FIX|NEEDS_REVIEW
## Fixes (if AUTO_FIX):
[specific fixes as JSON patches]

CONSTRAINTS: Read-only validation, do not modify files
" --tool gemini --mode analysis
```

##### Auto-Fix Strategy

| Issue Type | Auto-Fix Action |
|-----------|----------------|
| Vague criteria | Replace with specific, testable conditions |
| Technical DoD | Rewrite in business language |
| Missing scope items | Add to appropriate issue context |
| Effort imbalance | Suggest split (report to user) |

After fixes, update issues via `ccw issue update` and regenerate `issues.jsonl` + `roadmap.md`.

---

### Phase 4: Validation & team-planex Handoff

**Objective**: Display decomposition results, collect user feedback, provide team-planex execution options.

```javascript
// 1. Display Decomposition Results
const executionPlan = JSON.parse(Read(`${sessionFolder}/execution-plan.json`))
const issueIds = executionPlan.issue_ids
const waves = executionPlan.waves
```

**Progressive Mode** display:
```markdown
## Roadmap Overview

| Wave | Issue ID | Name | Goal | Priority |
|------|----------|------|------|----------|
| 1 | ISS-xxx | MVP | ... | 2 |
| 2 | ISS-yyy | Usable | ... | 3 |

### Convergence Criteria
**Wave 1 - MVP (ISS-xxx)**:
- Criteria: [criteria list]
- Verification: [verification]
- Definition of Done: [definition_of_done]
```

**Direct Mode** display:
```markdown
## Task Sequence

| Wave | Issue ID | Title | Type | Dependencies |
|------|----------|-------|------|--------------|
| 1 | ISS-xxx | ... | infrastructure | - |
| 2 | ISS-yyy | ... | feature | ISS-xxx |
```

#### User Feedback Loop (up to 5 rounds, skipped when AUTO_YES)

```javascript
if (!AUTO_YES) {
  let round = 0
  let continueLoop = true

  while (continueLoop && round < 5) {
    round++
    const feedback = ASK_USER([
      {
        id: "feedback", type: "select",
        prompt: `Roadmap validation (round ${round}):\nAny feedback on the current decomposition?`,
        options: [
          { label: "Approve", description: "Decomposition is reasonable, proceed to next steps" },
          { label: "Adjust Scope", description: "Some issue scopes need adjustment" },
          { label: "Modify Convergence", description: "Convergence criteria are not specific or testable enough" },
          { label: "Re-decompose", description: "Overall strategy or layering approach needs change" }
        ]
      }
    ])  // BLOCKS (wait for user response)

    if (feedback.feedback === 'Approve') {
      continueLoop = false
    } else {
      // Handle adjustment based on feedback type
      // After adjustment, re-display and return to loop top
    }
  }
}
```

#### Post-Completion Options

```javascript
if (AUTO_YES) {
  // Auto mode: display summary and end
  console.log(`路线图已生成，${issueIds.length} 个 issues 已创建。`)
  console.log(`Session: ${sessionFolder}`)
} else {
  const nextStep = ASK_USER([
    {
      id: "next", type: "select",
      prompt: `路线图已生成，${issueIds.length} 个 issues 已创建。下一步：`,
      options: [
        { label: "Execute with team-planex",
          description: `启动 team-planex 执行全部 ${issueIds.length} 个 issues（${waves.length} 个波次）` },
        { label: "Execute first wave",
          description: `仅执行 Wave 1: ${waves[0].label}` },
        { label: "View issues",
          description: "查看已创建的 issue 详情" },
        { label: "Done",
          description: "保存路线图，稍后执行" }
      ]
    }
  ])  // BLOCKS (wait for user response)
}
```

| Selection | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Execute with team-planex | `$team-planex --plan ${sessionFolder}/execution-plan.json` |
| Execute first wave | `$team-planex ${waves[0].issue_ids.join(' ')}` |
| View issues | Display issues summary table from issues.jsonl |
| Done | Display file paths, end |

> **Implementation sketch**: 编排器内部使用 `Skill(skill="team-planex", args="--plan ...")` 接口调用，
> 此为伪代码示意，非命令行语法。

---

## JSONL Schema Design

### Issue Format (issues.jsonl)

Each line follows the standard `issues-jsonl-schema.json` (see `.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/issues-jsonl-schema.json`).

| Field | Source | Description |
|-------|--------|-------------|
| `id` | `ccw issue create` | Formal ISS-YYYYMMDD-NNN ID |
| `title` | Layer/task mapping | `[LayerName] goal` or `[TaskType] title` |
| `context` | Convergence fields | Markdown with goal, scope, convergence criteria, verification, DoD |
| `priority` | Effort mapping | small→4, medium→3, large→2 |
| `source` | Fixed | `"text"` |
| `tags` | Auto-generated | `["req-plan", mode, name/type, "wave-N"]` |
| `extended_context.notes` | Metadata JSON | session, strategy, original_id, wave, depends_on_issues |
| `lifecycle_requirements` | Fixed | test_strategy, regression_scope, acceptance_type, commit_strategy |

### Execution Plan Format (execution-plan.json)

```json
{
  "session_id": "RPLAN-{slug}-{date}",
  "requirement": "Original requirement description",
  "strategy": "progressive|direct",
  "created_at": "ISO 8601",
  "issue_ids": ["ISS-xxx", "ISS-yyy"],
  "waves": [
    {
      "wave": 1,
      "label": "MVP",
      "issue_ids": ["ISS-xxx"],
      "depends_on_waves": []
    },
    {
      "wave": 2,
      "label": "Usable",
      "issue_ids": ["ISS-yyy"],
      "depends_on_waves": [1]
    }
  ],
  "issue_dependencies": {
    "ISS-yyy": ["ISS-xxx"]
  }
}
```

**Wave mapping**:
- Progressive mode: each layer → one wave (L0→Wave 1, L1→Wave 2, ...)
- Direct mode: each parallel_group → one wave (group 1→Wave 1, group 2→Wave 2, ...)

---

## Session Configuration

| Flag | Default | Description |
|------|---------|-------------|
| `-y, --yes` | false | Auto-confirm all decisions |
| `-c, --continue` | false | Continue existing session |
| `-m, --mode` | auto | Decomposition strategy: progressive / direct / auto |

**Session ID format**: `RPLAN-{slug}-{YYYY-MM-DD}`
- slug: lowercase, alphanumeric + CJK characters, max 40 chars
- date: YYYY-MM-DD (UTC+8)

---

## Error Handling

| Error | Resolution |
|-------|------------|
| cli-explore-agent timeout | Retry once with send_input prompt, then skip exploration |
| cli-explore-agent failure | Skip code exploration, proceed with pure requirement decomposition |
| No codebase | Normal flow, skip Phase 2 |
| CLI decomposition failure (Gemini) | Fallback to Qwen, then manual decomposition |
| Issue creation failure | Retry once, then skip and continue with remaining |
| Circular dependency detected | Prompt user to adjust dependencies, re-decompose |
| User feedback timeout | Save current state, display `--continue` recovery command |
| Max feedback rounds reached | Use current version to generate final artifacts |
| Session folder conflict | Append timestamp suffix |
| Quality check NEEDS_REVIEW | Report critical issues to user for manual resolution |

## Core Rules

1. **Explicit Lifecycle**: Always close_agent after wait completes to free resources
2. **DO NOT STOP**: Continuous multi-phase workflow. After completing each phase, immediately proceed to next
3. **NEVER output vague convergence**: criteria must be testable, verification executable, DoD in business language
4. **NEVER skip quality check**: Step 3.4 is MANDATORY before proceeding to Phase 4
5. **ALWAYS write all three output files**: issues.jsonl, execution-plan.json, roadmap.md

## Best Practices

1. **Clear requirement description**: Detailed description → more accurate uncertainty assessment and decomposition
2. **Validate MVP first**: In progressive mode, L0 should be the minimum verifiable closed loop
3. **Testable convergence**: criteria must be writable as assertions or manual steps; definition_of_done should be judgeable by non-technical stakeholders
4. **Incremental validation**: Use `--continue` to iterate on existing roadmaps
5. **team-planex integration**: Issues created follow standard issues-jsonl-schema, directly consumable by `$team-planex` via execution-plan.json

## Usage Recommendations

**Use `$workflow-req-plan` when:**
- You need to decompose a large requirement into a progressively executable roadmap
- Unsure where to start, need an MVP strategy
- Need to generate a trackable task sequence
- Requirement involves multiple stages or iterations
- Want automatic issue creation + team-planex execution pipeline

**Use `$workflow-lite-plan` when:**
- You have a clear single task to execute
- The requirement is already a layer/task from the roadmap
- No layered planning needed

**Use `$team-planex` directly when:**
- Issues already exist (created manually or from other workflows)
- Have an execution-plan.json ready from a previous req-plan session

---

**Now execute req-plan workflow for**: $ARGUMENTS