# Action: Analyze Requirements 将用户问题描述拆解为多个分析维度,匹配 Spec,评估覆盖度,检测歧义。 ## Purpose - 将单一用户描述拆解为多个独立关注维度 - 为每个维度匹配 problem-taxonomy(检测)+ tuning-strategies(修复) - 以"有修复策略"为标准判断是否满足需求 - 检测歧义并在必要时请求用户澄清 ## Preconditions - [ ] `state.status === 'running'` - [ ] `state.target_skill !== null` - [ ] `state.completed_actions.includes('action-init')` - [ ] `!state.completed_actions.includes('action-analyze-requirements')` ## Execution ### Phase 1: 维度拆解 (Gemini CLI) 调用 Gemini 对用户描述进行语义分析,拆解为独立维度: ```javascript async function analyzeDimensions(state, workDir) { const prompt = ` PURPOSE: 分析用户问题描述,拆解为独立的关注维度 TASK: • 识别用户描述中的多个关注点(每个关注点应该是独立的、可单独分析的) • 为每个关注点提取关键词(中英文均可) • 推断可能的问题类别: - context_explosion: 上下文/Token 相关 - memory_loss: 遗忘/约束丢失相关 - dataflow_break: 状态/数据流相关 - agent_failure: Agent/子任务相关 - prompt_quality: 提示词/输出质量相关 - architecture: 架构/结构相关 - performance: 性能/效率相关 - error_handling: 错误/异常处理相关 - output_quality: 输出质量/验证相关 - user_experience: 交互/体验相关 • 评估推断置信度 (0-1) INPUT: User description: ${state.user_issue_description} Target skill: ${state.target_skill.name} Skill structure: ${JSON.stringify(state.target_skill.phases)} MODE: analysis CONTEXT: @specs/problem-taxonomy.md @specs/dimension-mapping.md EXPECTED: JSON (不要包含 markdown 代码块标记) { "dimensions": [ { "id": "DIM-001", "description": "关注点的简短描述", "keywords": ["关键词1", "关键词2"], "inferred_category": "问题类别", "confidence": 0.85, "reasoning": "推断理由" } ], "analysis_notes": "整体分析说明" } RULES: - 每个维度必须独立,不重叠 - 低于 0.5 置信度的推断应标注需要澄清 - 如果用户描述非常模糊,至少提取一个 "general" 维度 `; const cliCommand = `ccw cli -p "${escapeForShell(prompt)}" --tool gemini --mode analysis --cd "${state.target_skill.path}"`; console.log('Phase 1: 执行 Gemini 维度拆解分析...'); const result = Bash({ command: cliCommand, run_in_background: true, timeout: 300000 }); return result; } ``` ### Phase 2: Spec 匹配 基于 `specs/category-mappings.json` 配置为每个维度匹配检测模式和修复策略: ```javascript // 加载集中式映射配置 const mappings = JSON.parse(Read('specs/category-mappings.json')); function matchSpecs(dimensions) { return dimensions.map(dim => { // 匹配 taxonomy pattern const taxonomyMatch = findTaxonomyMatch(dim.inferred_category); // 匹配 strategy const strategyMatch = findStrategyMatch(dim.inferred_category); // 判断是否满足(核心标准:有修复策略) const hasFix = strategyMatch !== null && strategyMatch.strategies.length > 0; return { dimension_id: dim.id, taxonomy_match: taxonomyMatch, strategy_match: strategyMatch, has_fix: hasFix, needs_gemini_analysis: taxonomyMatch === null || mappings.categories[dim.inferred_category]?.needs_gemini_analysis }; }); } function findTaxonomyMatch(category) { const config = mappings.categories[category]; if (!config || config.pattern_ids.length === 0) return null; return { category: category, pattern_ids: config.pattern_ids, severity_hint: config.severity_hint }; } function findStrategyMatch(category) { const config = mappings.categories[category]; if (!config) { // Fallback to custom from config return mappings.fallback; } return { strategies: config.strategies, risk_levels: config.risk_levels }; } ``` ### Phase 3: 覆盖度评估 评估所有维度的 Spec 覆盖情况: ```javascript function evaluateCoverage(specMatches) { const total = specMatches.length; const withDetection = specMatches.filter(m => m.taxonomy_match !== null).length; const withFix = specMatches.filter(m => m.has_fix).length; const rate = total > 0 ? Math.round((withFix / total) * 100) : 0; let status; if (rate >= 80) { status = 'satisfied'; } else if (rate >= 50) { status = 'partial'; } else { status = 'unsatisfied'; } return { total_dimensions: total, with_detection: withDetection, with_fix_strategy: withFix, coverage_rate: rate, status: status }; } ``` ### Phase 4: 歧义检测 识别需要用户澄清的歧义点: ```javascript function detectAmbiguities(dimensions, specMatches) { const ambiguities = []; for (const dim of dimensions) { const match = specMatches.find(m => m.dimension_id === dim.id); // 检测1: 低置信度 (< 0.5) if (dim.confidence < 0.5) { ambiguities.push({ dimension_id: dim.id, type: 'vague_description', description: `维度 "${dim.description}" 描述模糊,推断置信度低 (${dim.confidence})`, possible_interpretations: suggestInterpretations(dim), needs_clarification: true }); } // 检测2: 无匹配类别 if (!match || (!match.taxonomy_match && !match.strategy_match)) { ambiguities.push({ dimension_id: dim.id, type: 'no_category_match', description: `维度 "${dim.description}" 无法匹配到已知问题类别`, possible_interpretations: ['custom'], needs_clarification: true }); } // 检测3: 关键词冲突(可能属于多个类别) if (dim.keywords.length > 3 && hasConflictingKeywords(dim.keywords)) { ambiguities.push({ dimension_id: dim.id, type: 'conflicting_keywords', description: `维度 "${dim.description}" 的关键词可能指向多个不同问题`, possible_interpretations: inferMultipleCategories(dim.keywords), needs_clarification: true }); } } return ambiguities; } function suggestInterpretations(dim) { // 基于 mappings 配置推荐可能的解释 const categories = Object.keys(mappings.categories).filter( cat => cat !== 'authoring_principles_violation' // 排除内部检测类别 ); return categories.slice(0, 4); // 返回最常见的 4 个作为选项 } function hasConflictingKeywords(keywords) { // 检查关键词是否指向不同方向 const categoryHints = keywords.map(k => getKeywordCategoryHint(k)); const uniqueCategories = [...new Set(categoryHints.filter(c => c))]; return uniqueCategories.length > 1; } function getKeywordCategoryHint(keyword) { // 从 mappings.keywords 构建查找表(合并中英文关键词) const keywordMap = { ...mappings.keywords.chinese, ...mappings.keywords.english }; return keywordMap[keyword.toLowerCase()]; } ``` ## User Interaction 如果检测到需要澄清的歧义,暂停并询问用户: ```javascript async function handleAmbiguities(ambiguities, dimensions) { const needsClarification = ambiguities.filter(a => a.needs_clarification); if (needsClarification.length === 0) { return null; // 无需澄清 } const questions = needsClarification.slice(0, 4).map(a => { const dim = dimensions.find(d => d.id === a.dimension_id); return { question: `关于 "${dim.description}",您具体指的是?`, header: a.dimension_id, options: a.possible_interpretations.map(interp => ({ label: getCategoryLabel(interp), description: getCategoryDescription(interp) })), multiSelect: false }; }); return await AskUserQuestion({ questions }); } function getCategoryLabel(category) { // 从 mappings 配置加载标签 return mappings.category_labels_chinese[category] || category; } function getCategoryDescription(category) { // 从 mappings 配置加载描述 return mappings.category_descriptions[category] || 'Requires further analysis'; } ``` ## Output ### State Updates ```javascript return { stateUpdates: { requirement_analysis: { status: ambiguities.some(a => a.needs_clarification) ? 'needs_clarification' : 'completed', analyzed_at: new Date().toISOString(), dimensions: dimensions, spec_matches: specMatches, coverage: coverageResult, ambiguities: ambiguities }, // 根据分析结果自动优化 focus_areas focus_areas: deriveOptimalFocusAreas(specMatches) }, outputFiles: [ `${workDir}/requirement-analysis.json`, `${workDir}/requirement-analysis.md` ], summary: generateSummary(dimensions, coverageResult, ambiguities) }; function deriveOptimalFocusAreas(specMatches) { const coreCategories = ['context', 'memory', 'dataflow', 'agent']; const matched = specMatches .filter(m => m.taxonomy_match !== null) .map(m => { // 映射到诊断 focus_area const category = m.taxonomy_match.category; if (category === 'context_explosion' || category === 'performance') return 'context'; if (category === 'memory_loss') return 'memory'; if (category === 'dataflow_break') return 'dataflow'; if (category === 'agent_failure' || category === 'error_handling') return 'agent'; return null; }) .filter(f => f && coreCategories.includes(f)); // 去重 return [...new Set(matched)]; } function generateSummary(dimensions, coverage, ambiguities) { const dimCount = dimensions.length; const coverageStatus = coverage.status; const ambiguityCount = ambiguities.filter(a => a.needs_clarification).length; let summary = `分析完成:${dimCount} 个维度`; summary += `,覆盖度 ${coverage.coverage_rate}% (${coverageStatus})`; if (ambiguityCount > 0) { summary += `,${ambiguityCount} 个歧义点待澄清`; } return summary; } ``` ### Output Files #### requirement-analysis.json ```json { "timestamp": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z", "target_skill": "skill-name", "user_description": "原始用户描述", "dimensions": [...], "spec_matches": [...], "coverage": {...}, "ambiguities": [...], "derived_focus_areas": [...] } ``` #### requirement-analysis.md ```markdown # 需求分析报告 ## 用户描述 > ${user_issue_description} ## 维度拆解 | ID | 描述 | 类别 | 置信度 | |----|------|------|--------| | DIM-001 | ... | ... | 0.85 | ## Spec 匹配 | 维度 | 检测模式 | 修复策略 | 是否满足 | |------|----------|----------|----------| | DIM-001 | CTX-001,002 | sliding_window | ✓ | ## 覆盖度评估 - 总维度数: N - 有检测手段: M - 有修复策略: K (满足标准) - 覆盖率: X% - 状态: satisfied/partial/unsatisfied ## 歧义点 (如有) ``` ## Error Handling | Error | Recovery | |-------|----------| | Gemini CLI 超时 | 重试一次,仍失败则使用简化分析 | | JSON 解析失败 | 尝试修复 JSON 或使用默认维度 | | 无法匹配任何类别 | 全部归类为 custom,触发 Gemini 深度分析 | ## Next Actions - 如果 `requirement_analysis.status === 'completed'`: 继续到 `action-diagnose-*` - 如果 `requirement_analysis.status === 'needs_clarification'`: 等待用户澄清后重新执行 - 如果 `coverage.status === 'unsatisfied'`: 自动触发 `action-gemini-analysis` 进行深度分析