--- name: plan description: Batch plan issue resolution using issue-plan-agent (explore + plan closed-loop) argument-hint: "--all-pending [,,...] [--batch-size 3] " allowed-tools: TodoWrite(*), Task(*), SlashCommand(*), AskUserQuestion(*), Bash(*), Read(*), Write(*) --- # Issue Plan Command (/issue:plan) ## Overview Unified planning command using **issue-plan-agent** that combines exploration and planning into a single closed-loop workflow. ## Output Requirements **Generate Files:** 1. `.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl` - Solution with tasks for each issue **Return Summary:** ```json { "bound": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solution_id": "...", "task_count": N }], "pending_selection": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solutions": [...] }], "conflicts": [{ "file": "...", "issues": [...] }] } ``` **Completion Criteria:** - [ ] Solution file generated for each issue - [ ] Single solution → auto-bound via `ccw issue bind` - [ ] Multiple solutions → returned for user selection - [ ] Tasks conform to schema: `cat .claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/solution-schema.json` - [ ] Each task has quantified `acceptance.criteria` ## Core Capabilities - **Closed-loop agent**: issue-plan-agent combines explore + plan - Batch processing: 1 agent processes 1-3 issues - ACE semantic search integrated into planning - Solution with executable tasks and delivery criteria - Automatic solution registration and binding ## Storage Structure (Flat JSONL) ``` .workflow/issues/ ├── issues.jsonl # All issues (one per line) ├── queue.json # Execution queue └── solutions/ ├── {issue-id}.jsonl # Solutions for issue (one per line) └── ... ``` ## Usage ```bash /issue:plan [,,...] [FLAGS] # Examples /issue:plan GH-123 # Single issue /issue:plan GH-123,GH-124,GH-125 # Batch (up to 3) /issue:plan --all-pending # All pending issues # Flags --batch-size Max issues per agent batch (default: 3) ``` ## Execution Process ``` Phase 1: Issue Loading ├─ Parse input (single, comma-separated, or --all-pending) ├─ Fetch issue metadata (ID, title, tags) ├─ Validate issues exist (create if needed) └─ Group by similarity (shared tags or title keywords, max 3 per batch) Phase 2: Unified Explore + Plan (issue-plan-agent) ├─ Launch issue-plan-agent per batch ├─ Agent performs: │ ├─ ACE semantic search for each issue │ ├─ Codebase exploration (files, patterns, dependencies) │ ├─ Solution generation with task breakdown │ └─ Conflict detection across issues └─ Output: solution JSON per issue Phase 3: Solution Registration & Binding ├─ Append solutions to solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl ├─ Single solution per issue → auto-bind ├─ Multiple candidates → AskUserQuestion to select └─ Update issues.jsonl with bound_solution_id Phase 4: Summary ├─ Display bound solutions ├─ Show task counts per issue └─ Display next steps (/issue:queue) ``` ## Implementation ### Phase 1: Issue Loading (ID + Title + Tags) ```javascript const batchSize = flags.batchSize || 3; let issues = []; // {id, title, tags} if (flags.allPending) { // Get pending issues with metadata via CLI (JSON output) const result = Bash(`ccw issue list --status pending,registered --json`).trim(); const parsed = result ? JSON.parse(result) : []; issues = parsed.map(i => ({ id: i.id, title: i.title || '', tags: i.tags || [] })); if (issues.length === 0) { console.log('No pending issues found.'); return; } console.log(`Found ${issues.length} pending issues`); } else { // Parse comma-separated issue IDs, fetch metadata const ids = userInput.includes(',') ? userInput.split(',').map(s => s.trim()) : [userInput.trim()]; for (const id of ids) { Bash(`ccw issue init ${id} --title "Issue ${id}" 2>/dev/null || true`); const info = Bash(`ccw issue status ${id} --json`).trim(); const parsed = info ? JSON.parse(info) : {}; issues.push({ id, title: parsed.title || '', tags: parsed.tags || [] }); } } // Semantic grouping via Gemini CLI (max 6 issues per group) async function groupBySimilarityGemini(issues) { const issueSummaries = issues.map(i => ({ id: i.id, title: i.title, tags: i.tags })); const prompt = ` PURPOSE: Group similar issues by semantic similarity for batch processing; maximize within-group coherence; max 6 issues per group TASK: • Analyze issue titles/tags semantically • Identify functional/architectural clusters • Assign each issue to one group MODE: analysis CONTEXT: Issue metadata only EXPECTED: JSON with groups array, each containing max 6 issue_ids, theme, rationale RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/protocols/analysis-protocol.md) | Each issue in exactly one group | Max 6 issues per group | Balance group sizes INPUT: ${JSON.stringify(issueSummaries, null, 2)} OUTPUT FORMAT: {"groups":[{"group_id":1,"theme":"...","issue_ids":["..."],"rationale":"..."}],"ungrouped":[]} `; const taskId = Bash({ command: `ccw cli -p "${prompt}" --tool gemini --mode analysis`, run_in_background: true, timeout: 600000 }); const output = TaskOutput({ task_id: taskId, block: true }); // Extract JSON from potential markdown code blocks function extractJsonFromMarkdown(text) { const jsonMatch = text.match(/```json\s*\n([\s\S]*?)\n```/) || text.match(/```\s*\n([\s\S]*?)\n```/); return jsonMatch ? jsonMatch[1] : text; } const result = JSON.parse(extractJsonFromMarkdown(output)); return result.groups.map(g => g.issue_ids.map(id => issues.find(i => i.id === id))); } const batches = await groupBySimilarityGemini(issues); console.log(`Processing ${issues.length} issues in ${batches.length} batch(es) (Gemini semantic grouping, max 6 issues/agent)`); TodoWrite({ todos: batches.map((_, i) => ({ content: `Plan batch ${i+1}`, status: 'pending', activeForm: `Planning batch ${i+1}` })) }); ``` ### Phase 2: Unified Explore + Plan (issue-plan-agent) - PARALLEL ```javascript Bash(`mkdir -p .workflow/issues/solutions`); const pendingSelections = []; // Collect multi-solution issues for user selection const agentResults = []; // Collect all agent results for conflict aggregation // Build prompts for all batches const agentTasks = batches.map((batch, batchIndex) => { const issueList = batch.map(i => `- ${i.id}: ${i.title}${i.tags.length ? ` [${i.tags.join(', ')}]` : ''}`).join('\n'); const batchIds = batch.map(i => i.id); const issuePrompt = ` ## Plan Issues **Issues** (grouped by similarity): ${issueList} **Project Root**: ${process.cwd()} ### Project Context (MANDATORY - Read Both Files First) 1. Read: .workflow/project-tech.json (technology stack, architecture, key components) 2. Read: .workflow/project-guidelines.json (user-defined constraints and conventions) **CRITICAL**: All solution tasks MUST comply with constraints in project-guidelines.json ### Steps 1. Fetch: \`ccw issue status --json\` 2. Load project context (project-tech.json + project-guidelines.json) 3. **If source=discovery**: Use discovery_context (file, line, snippet, suggested_fix) as planning hints 4. Explore (ACE) → Plan solution (respecting guidelines) 5. Register & bind: \`ccw issue bind --solution \` ### Generate Files \`.workflow/issues/solutions/{issue-id}.jsonl\` - Solution with tasks (schema: cat .claude/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/solution-schema.json) ### Binding Rules - **Single solution**: Auto-bind via \`ccw issue bind --solution \` - **Multiple solutions**: Register only, return for user selection ### Return Summary \`\`\`json { "bound": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solution_id": "...", "task_count": N }], "pending_selection": [{ "issue_id": "...", "solutions": [{ "id": "...", "description": "...", "task_count": N }] }], "conflicts": [{ "file": "...", "issues": [...] }] } \`\`\` `; return { batchIndex, batchIds, issuePrompt, batch }; }); // Launch agents in parallel (max 10 concurrent) const MAX_PARALLEL = 10; for (let i = 0; i < agentTasks.length; i += MAX_PARALLEL) { const chunk = agentTasks.slice(i, i + MAX_PARALLEL); const taskIds = []; // Launch chunk in parallel for (const { batchIndex, batchIds, issuePrompt, batch } of chunk) { updateTodo(`Plan batch ${batchIndex + 1}`, 'in_progress'); const taskId = Task( subagent_type="issue-plan-agent", run_in_background=true, description=`Explore & plan ${batch.length} issues: ${batchIds.join(', ')}`, prompt=issuePrompt ); taskIds.push({ taskId, batchIndex }); } console.log(`Launched ${taskIds.length} agents (batch ${i/MAX_PARALLEL + 1}/${Math.ceil(agentTasks.length/MAX_PARALLEL)})...`); // Collect results from this chunk for (const { taskId, batchIndex } of taskIds) { const result = TaskOutput(task_id=taskId, block=true); const summary = JSON.parse(result); agentResults.push(summary); // Store for Phase 3 conflict aggregation for (const item of summary.bound || []) { console.log(`✓ ${item.issue_id}: ${item.solution_id} (${item.task_count} tasks)`); } // Collect and notify pending selections for (const pending of summary.pending_selection || []) { console.log(`⏳ ${pending.issue_id}: ${pending.solutions.length} solutions → awaiting selection`); pendingSelections.push(pending); } if (summary.conflicts?.length > 0) { console.log(`⚠ Conflicts: ${summary.conflicts.length} detected (will resolve in Phase 3)`); } updateTodo(`Plan batch ${batchIndex + 1}`, 'completed'); } } ``` ### Phase 3: Conflict Resolution & Solution Selection ```javascript // Phase 3a: Aggregate and resolve conflicts from all agents const allConflicts = []; for (const result of agentResults) { if (result.conflicts?.length > 0) { allConflicts.push(...result.conflicts); } } if (allConflicts.length > 0) { console.log(`\n## Resolving ${allConflicts.length} conflict(s) detected by agents\n`); // ALWAYS confirm high-severity conflicts (per user preference) const highSeverity = allConflicts.filter(c => c.severity === 'high'); const lowMedium = allConflicts.filter(c => c.severity !== 'high'); // Auto-resolve low/medium severity for (const conflict of lowMedium) { console.log(` Auto-resolved: ${conflict.summary} → ${conflict.recommended_resolution}`); } // ALWAYS require user confirmation for high severity if (highSeverity.length > 0) { const conflictAnswer = AskUserQuestion({ questions: highSeverity.slice(0, 4).map(conflict => ({ question: `${conflict.type}: ${conflict.summary}. How to resolve?`, header: conflict.type.replace('_conflict', ''), multiSelect: false, options: conflict.resolution_options.map(opt => ({ label: opt.strategy, description: opt.rationale })) })) }); // Apply user-selected resolutions console.log('Applied user-selected conflict resolutions'); } } // Phase 3b: Multi-Solution Selection (MANDATORY when pendingSelections > 0) if (pendingSelections.length > 0) { console.log(`\n## User Selection Required: ${pendingSelections.length} issue(s) have multiple solutions\n`); const answer = AskUserQuestion({ questions: pendingSelections.map(({ issue_id, solutions }) => ({ question: `Select solution for ${issue_id}:`, header: issue_id, multiSelect: false, options: solutions.map(s => ({ label: `${s.id} (${s.task_count} tasks)`, description: s.description })) })) }); // Bind user-selected solutions for (const { issue_id } of pendingSelections) { const selectedId = extractSelectedSolutionId(answer, issue_id); if (selectedId) { Bash(`ccw issue bind ${issue_id} ${selectedId}`); console.log(`✓ ${issue_id}: ${selectedId} bound`); } } } ``` ### Phase 4: Summary ```javascript // Count planned issues via CLI const plannedIds = Bash(`ccw issue list --status planned --ids`).trim(); const plannedCount = plannedIds ? plannedIds.split('\n').length : 0; console.log(` ## Done: ${issues.length} issues → ${plannedCount} planned Next: \`/issue:queue\` → \`/issue:execute\` `); ``` ## Error Handling | Error | Resolution | |-------|------------| | Issue not found | Auto-create in issues.jsonl | | ACE search fails | Agent falls back to ripgrep | | No solutions generated | Display error, suggest manual planning | | User cancels selection | Skip issue, continue with others | | File conflicts | Agent detects and suggests resolution order | ## Related Commands - `/issue:queue` - Form execution queue from bound solutions - `/issue:execute` - Execute queue with codex - `ccw issue list` - List all issues - `ccw issue status` - View issue and solution details