# Agent Template — Structural Reference Defines the structural pattern for generated **agent definition files**. The generator uses this as a guide to produce concrete, domain-specific content — NOT as a literal copy target. ## Required Structure ```markdown --- name: {$NAME} description: {One-line purpose. Spawned by /command-name orchestrator.} tools: {Read, Write, Bash, Glob, Grep} color: {green|blue|yellow|red} # optional --- You are a {role name}. You {primary action} {what you produce}. Spawned by: - `/{command}` orchestrator (standard mode) - `/{command} --flag` orchestrator (variant mode) Your job: {One sentence — what downstream consumers get from you.} **CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read** If the prompt contains a `` block, you MUST use the `Read` tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context. **Core responsibilities:** - {Verb phrase — primary task} - {Verb phrase — secondary task} - {Verb phrase — quality assurance} - Return structured results to orchestrator ## {Guiding Principle Name} {Core beliefs — 3-5 bullet points} **Anti-patterns (delete if seen):** - {Anti-pattern 1} - {Anti-pattern 2} <{domain_section_1}> ## {Domain Concept Name} {Rules, heuristics, decision tables for this aspect.} | {Condition} | {Action} | |-------------|----------| | ... | ... | {Concrete examples — good vs bad:} | TOO VAGUE | JUST RIGHT | |-----------|------------| | "..." | "..." | <{domain_section_2}> ## {Another Domain Concept} {Format templates, structural rules, required fields.} Every {output unit} has {N} required fields: - **:** {What it contains, why it matters} - **:** {What it contains, why it matters} ## Return Protocol Agent returns one of these markers to the orchestrator: ### Success ``` ## TASK COMPLETE {Structured output summary} {Artifact locations} ``` ### Blocked ``` ## TASK BLOCKED **Blocker:** {What's missing} **Need:** {What would unblock} ``` ### Checkpoint ``` ## CHECKPOINT REACHED **Question:** {Decision needed from user} **Options:** 1. {Option A} — {effect} 2. {Option B} — {effect} ``` Before returning, verify: - [ ] {Check 1 — concrete, verifiable} - [ ] {Check 2 — concrete, verifiable} - [ ] {Check 3 — concrete, verifiable} - [ ] {Check 4 — concrete, verifiable} ``` ## Section Design Guidelines ### Section Naming Name sections after the domain concept they cover: | Good | Bad | |------|-----| | `` | `` | | `` | `` | | `` | `` | | `` | `` | ### Section Independence Each section owns ONE concern. Test: can you explain the section's scope in one sentence? | One Concern | Multiple Concerns (split it) | |-------------|------------------------------| | How to size tasks | How to size tasks AND how to order them | | Review criteria | Review criteria AND how to present results | | Error handling rules | Error handling AND logging AND monitoring | ### Example Density Domain sections MUST include concrete examples. Minimum per section: | Section Type | Minimum Examples | |-------------|-----------------| | Rules/heuristics | 1 good-vs-bad table | | Format definitions | 1 complete template | | Decision logic | 1 routing table | | Quality criteria | 3+ checkbox items |