Files
Claude-Code-Workflow/.claude/skills/prompt-generator/templates/agent-md.md
catlog22 e6255cf41a Add agent, command, and conversion specifications; introduce templates for agent and command structures
- Created `agent-design-spec.md` detailing agent identity, knowledge, and structure.
- Established `command-design-spec.md` outlining command orchestration, user interaction, and agent coordination.
- Introduced `conversion-spec.md` for guidelines on converting existing files to GSD conventions without content loss.
- Added `agent-md.md` and `command-md.md` templates to standardize the creation of agent and command files.
2026-03-17 10:52:05 +08:00

3.5 KiB

Agent Template — Structural Reference

Defines the structural pattern for generated agent definition files. The generator uses this as a guide to produce concrete, domain-specific content — NOT as a literal copy target.

Required Structure

---
name: {$NAME}
description: {One-line purpose. Spawned by /command-name orchestrator.}
tools: {Read, Write, Bash, Glob, Grep}
color: {green|blue|yellow|red}  # optional
---

<role>
You are a {role name}. You {primary action} {what you produce}.

Spawned by:
- `/{command}` orchestrator (standard mode)
- `/{command} --flag` orchestrator (variant mode)

Your job: {One sentence — what downstream consumers get from you.}

**CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read**
If the prompt contains a `<files_to_read>` block, you MUST use the `Read` tool
to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your
primary context.

**Core responsibilities:**
- {Verb phrase — primary task}
- {Verb phrase — secondary task}
- {Verb phrase — quality assurance}
- Return structured results to orchestrator
</role>

<philosophy>
## {Guiding Principle Name}

{Core beliefs — 3-5 bullet points}

**Anti-patterns (delete if seen):**
- {Anti-pattern 1}
- {Anti-pattern 2}
</philosophy>

<{domain_section_1}>
## {Domain Concept Name}

{Rules, heuristics, decision tables for this aspect.}

| {Condition} | {Action} |
|-------------|----------|
| ...         | ...      |

{Concrete examples — good vs bad:}

| TOO VAGUE | JUST RIGHT |
|-----------|------------|
| "..." | "..." |
</{domain_section_1}>

<{domain_section_2}>
## {Another Domain Concept}

{Format templates, structural rules, required fields.}

Every {output unit} has {N} required fields:
- **<field_1>:** {What it contains, why it matters}
- **<field_2>:** {What it contains, why it matters}
</{domain_section_2}>

<output_contract>
## Return Protocol

Agent returns one of these markers to the orchestrator:

### Success

TASK COMPLETE

{Structured output summary} {Artifact locations}


### Blocked

TASK BLOCKED

Blocker: {What's missing} Need: {What would unblock}


### Checkpoint

CHECKPOINT REACHED

Question: {Decision needed from user} Options:

  1. {Option A} — {effect}
  2. {Option B} — {effect}
</output_contract>

<quality_gate>
Before returning, verify:
- [ ] {Check 1 — concrete, verifiable}
- [ ] {Check 2 — concrete, verifiable}
- [ ] {Check 3 — concrete, verifiable}
- [ ] {Check 4 — concrete, verifiable}
</quality_gate>

Section Design Guidelines

Section Naming

Name sections after the domain concept they cover:

Good Bad
<task_breakdown> <rules>
<dependency_graph> <guidelines>
<code_style> <misc>
<review_dimensions> <other>

Section Independence

Each section owns ONE concern. Test: can you explain the section's scope in one sentence?

One Concern Multiple Concerns (split it)
How to size tasks How to size tasks AND how to order them
Review criteria Review criteria AND how to present results
Error handling rules Error handling AND logging AND monitoring

Example Density

Domain sections MUST include concrete examples. Minimum per section:

Section Type Minimum Examples
Rules/heuristics 1 good-vs-bad table
Format definitions 1 complete template
Decision logic 1 routing table
Quality criteria 3+ checkbox items