- Reduce intelligent-tools-strategy.md from 504 to 325 lines (35.5% reduction) - Merge Gemini/Qwen tool specifications into unified Analysis Tools section - Consolidate command templates and remove duplicate examples - Compress usage scenarios while preserving all critical information - Simplify guidelines to concise bullet points - Fix incorrect codex chat calls in discuss-plan.md to use proper exec format All core decision rules, permission framework, and command templates preserved. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
13 KiB
name, description, type
| name | description | type |
|---|---|---|
| intelligent-tools-strategy | Strategic decision framework for intelligent tool selection | strategic-guideline |
Intelligent Tools Selection Strategy
📋 Table of Contents
- Core Framework
- Tool Specifications
- Command Templates
- Tool Selection Guide
- Usage Patterns
- Best Practices
⚡ Core Framework
Tool Overview
- Analysis Tools (Gemini/Qwen): Analysis, understanding, exploration & documentation
- Gemini: Primary choice
- Qwen: Fallback with identical capabilities
- Codex: Development, implementation & automation
Decision Principles
- Use tools early and often - Tools are faster, more thorough, and reliable than manual approaches
- When in doubt, use both - Parallel usage provides comprehensive coverage
- Default to tools - Use specialized tools for most coding tasks, no matter how small
- Lower barriers - Engage tools immediately when encountering any complexity
- Context optimization - Based on user intent, determine whether to use
-C [directory]parameter for focused analysis to reduce irrelevant context import - ⚠️ Write operation protection - For local codebase write/modify operations, require EXPLICIT user confirmation unless user provides clear instructions containing MODE=write or MODE=auto
Quick Decision Rules
- Exploring/Understanding? → Use Analysis Tools (Gemini primary, Qwen fallback)
- Architecture/Analysis? → Use Analysis Tools
- Building/Fixing? → Use Codex
- Not sure? → Use multiple tools in parallel
- Small task? → Still use tools - they're faster than manual work
🎯 Tool Specifications
Analysis Tools: Gemini & Qwen
- Commands:
~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper|~/.claude/scripts/qwen-wrapper - Priority: Gemini (primary), Qwen (fallback - identical capabilities)
- Strengths: Large context window, pattern recognition
- Best For: Analysis, documentation generation, code exploration, architecture review
- Permissions: Default read-only analysis, MODE=write requires explicit specification (auto-enables --approval-mode yolo)
- Default MODE:
analysis(read-only) - ⚠️ Write Trigger: Only when user explicitly requests "generate documentation", "modify code", or specifies MODE=write
MODE Options
analysis(default) - Read-only analysis and documentation generationwrite- ⚠️ Create/modify codebase files (requires explicit specification, auto-enables --approval-mode yolo)
Codex
- Command:
codex --full-auto exec - Strengths: Autonomous development, mathematical reasoning
- Best For: Implementation, testing, automation
- Permissions: Requires explicit MODE=auto or MODE=write specification
- Default MODE: No default, must be explicitly specified
- ⚠️ Write Trigger: Only when user explicitly requests "implement", "modify", "generate code" AND specifies MODE
MODE Options
auto- ⚠️ Autonomous development with full file operations (requires explicit specification, enables -s danger-full-access)write- ⚠️ Test generation and file modification (requires explicit specification)- Default: No default mode, MODE must be explicitly specified
Session Management
codex resume- Resume with picker |codex exec "task" resume --last- Continue most recentcodex -i <image>- Attach images for UI/design tasks- Multi-task Pattern: First uses
exec, subsequent useexec "..." resume --last - Position:
resume --lastAFTER prompt string at command END
Auto-Resume Decision Rules
Use resume --last: Related task, requires previous context, multi-step workflow on same module
Don't use: First task, independent task, different module, no recent Codex session
🎯 Command Templates
Universal Template Structure
Every command MUST follow this structure:
- PURPOSE - Clear goal and intent
- TASK - Specific execution task
- MODE - Execution mode and permission level
- CONTEXT - File references and memory context from previous sessions
- EXPECTED - Clear expected results
- RULES - Template reference and constraints
Standard Command Formats
Analysis Tools Commands (Gemini/Qwen)
Note: Commands are identical for both tools. Use gemini-wrapper (primary) or qwen-wrapper (fallback).
# Analysis Mode (read-only, default)
cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/{gemini,qwen}-wrapper -p "
PURPOSE: [clear analysis goal]
TASK: [specific analysis task]
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: [file references and memory context]
EXPECTED: [expected output]
RULES: [template reference and constraints]
"
# Write Mode (requires explicit MODE=write)
# NOTE: --approval-mode yolo must be placed AFTER wrapper command, BEFORE -p
cd [directory] && ~/.claude/scripts/{gemini,qwen}-wrapper --approval-mode yolo -p "
PURPOSE: [clear goal]
TASK: [specific task]
MODE: write
CONTEXT: [file references and memory context]
EXPECTED: [expected output]
RULES: [template reference and constraints]
"
Codex Commands
# Codex Development (requires explicit MODE=auto)
# NOTE: --skip-git-repo-check and -s danger-full-access must be placed at command END
codex -C [directory] --full-auto exec "
PURPOSE: [clear development goal]
TASK: [specific development task]
MODE: auto
CONTEXT: [file references and memory context]
EXPECTED: [expected deliverables]
RULES: [template reference and constraints]
" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
# Codex Test/Write Mode (requires explicit MODE=write)
# NOTE: --skip-git-repo-check and -s danger-full-access must be placed at command END
codex -C [directory] --full-auto exec "
PURPOSE: [clear goal]
TASK: [specific task]
MODE: write
CONTEXT: [file references and memory context]
EXPECTED: [expected deliverables]
RULES: [template reference and constraints]
" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
Directory Context Configuration
Tools execute in current working directory:
- Analysis Tools:
cd path/to/project && ~/.claude/scripts/{gemini,qwen}-wrapper -p "prompt" - Codex:
codex -C path/to/project --full-auto exec "task"(Codex supports -C flag) - Path types: Supports both relative (
../project) and absolute (/full/path) paths - Token analysis: For analysis tools, token counting happens in current directory
RULES Field Format
RULES: $(cat "~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/[category]/[template].txt") | [constraints]
⚠️ CRITICAL: Command Substitution Rules
- NEVER use escape characters:
\$,\",\'break command substitution - Correct:
$(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/pattern.txt) - WRONG:
\$(cat ...)or$(cat \"...\") - Why: Shell subshell handles path expansion safely
Examples: $(cat "template.txt") | Focus on security | @{src/**/*.ts,CLAUDE.md}
File Pattern Reference
Common patterns: @{**/*} (all), @{src/**/*} (source), @{*.ts,*.tsx} (TypeScript), @{**/*.test.*} (tests)
Complex Pattern Discovery: Use semantic tools (rg, MCP) → Extract paths → Build CONTEXT
# 1. Discover: rg "export.*Component" --files-with-matches --type ts
# 2. Build CONTEXT: @{src/components/Auth.tsx,src/types/auth.d.ts}
# 3. Execute CLI with precise file references
📊 Tool Selection Guide
Selection Matrix
| Task Type | Tool | Use Case | Template |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis | Analysis Tools | Code exploration, architecture review, patterns | analysis/pattern.txt |
| Architecture | Analysis Tools | System design, architectural analysis | analysis/architecture.txt |
| Documentation | Analysis Tools | Code docs, API specs, guides | analysis/quality.txt |
| Development | Codex | Feature implementation, bug fixes, testing | development/feature.txt |
| Planning | Analysis Tools | Task breakdown, migration planning | planning/task-breakdown.txt |
| Security | Codex | Vulnerability assessment, fixes | analysis/security.txt |
| Refactoring | Multiple | Analysis Tools for analysis, Codex for execution | development/refactor.txt |
| Module Documentation | Analysis Tools | Universal module/file documentation for all levels | memory/claude-module-unified.txt |
Template System
Base: ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/
| Category | Template | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Analysis | pattern.txt, architecture.txt, security.txt, quality.txt | Code/architecture review |
| Development | feature.txt, refactor.txt, testing.txt | Implementation tasks |
| Memory | claude-module-unified.txt | Module documentation |
| Planning | task-breakdown.txt | Task decomposition |
| Roles | system-architect.md, security-expert.md, feature-planner.md | Planning perspectives |
| Tech Stacks | typescript-dev.md, python-dev.md, react-dev.md | Language conventions |
🚀 Usage Patterns
Workflow Integration (REQUIRED)
When planning any coding task, ALWAYS integrate CLI tools:
- Understanding Phase: Use Analysis Tools for codebase analysis
- Architecture Phase: Use Analysis Tools for design and architecture review
- Implementation Phase: Use Codex for development
- Quality Phase: Use Codex for testing and validation
Common Scenarios
Analysis Example
# Architecture analysis using Analysis Tools
cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
PURPOSE: Analyze authentication system architecture
TASK: Review JWT-based auth system design
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{src/auth/**/*} Existing patterns and requirements
EXPECTED: Architecture analysis report with recommendations
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/analysis/architecture.txt) | Focus on security
"
# Note: Replace 'gemini-wrapper' with 'qwen-wrapper' if Gemini unavailable
Codex Development (Multi-task with Resume)
# First task
codex -C project --full-auto exec "
PURPOSE: Implement user authentication
TASK: JWT-based auth system
MODE: auto
CONTEXT: @{src/auth/**/*}
EXPECTED: Complete auth module
RULES: $(cat ~/.claude/workflows/cli-templates/prompts/development/feature.txt)
" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
# Continue session
codex --full-auto exec "Add JWT validation" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
codex --full-auto exec "Generate auth tests" resume --last --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
🔧 Best Practices
General Guidelines
- ✅ Use templates for consistency | Be specific in PURPOSE/TASK/EXPECTED
- ✅ Use rg/MCP for file discovery → Build precise CONTEXT
- ✅ Reference CLAUDE.md for project context
- ⚠️ NEVER use escape characters (
\$,\",\') in CLI commands
Context Optimization Strategy
Directory Navigation: Use cd [directory] && for focused analysis to reduce token usage
Decision Rules:
- Specific directory →
cd directory &&pattern - Focused analysis → Target specific directory
- Multi-directory scope → Stay in root, use explicit paths
Example:
# Analysis Tools - Focused analysis
cd src/auth && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "
PURPOSE: Understand authentication patterns
TASK: Analyze auth implementation
MODE: analysis
CONTEXT: @{**/*.ts}
EXPECTED: Pattern documentation
RULES: Focus on security best practices
"
# Codex - Implementation
codex -C src/auth --full-auto exec "
PURPOSE: Improve auth implementation
TASK: Review and enhance auth code
MODE: auto
CONTEXT: @{**/*.ts}
EXPECTED: Code improvements and fixes
RULES: Maintain backward compatibility
" --skip-git-repo-check -s danger-full-access
Planning Checklist
For every development task:
- Purpose defined - Clear goal and intent
- Mode selected - Execution mode and permission level determined
- Context gathered - File references and session memory documented
- Analysis completed - Use Analysis Tools for understanding
- Template selected - Appropriate template chosen
- Constraints specified - File patterns, scope, requirements
- Implementation approach - Tool selection and workflow
- Quality measures - Testing and validation plan
- Tool configuration - Review tool-specific configs if needed
⚙️ Execution Configuration
Core Execution Rules
- Dynamic Timeout: 20-40min (simple), 40-60min (medium), 60-120min (complex)
- Codex Multiplier: 1.5x allocated time
- Apply to: All bash() wrapped commands (Analysis Tools, Codex)
- Auto-detect: Based on PURPOSE and TASK complexity
Permission Framework
- ⚠️ WRITE PROTECTION: Codebase write/modify requires EXPLICIT user confirmation
- Default: Read-only analysis mode (safe for auto-execution)
- Write Mode: User must explicitly state MODE=write or MODE=auto
- Exception: Clear instructions like "modify", "create", "implement"
- Analysis Tools Write:
--approval-mode yoloAFTER wrapper command when MODE=write - Codex Write:
-s danger-full-access --skip-git-repo-checkAFTER prompt when MODE=auto - Default Behavior: All tools start in read-only mode