mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-15 02:42:45 +08:00
Convert workflow commands to unified skill structure with thin router pattern: - workflow-lite-plan: routes lite-plan + lite-execute with prompt enhancement - workflow-multi-cli-plan: routes multi-cli-plan + lite-execute with prompt enhancement Both preserve original command content verbatim in phase files.
4.5 KiB
4.5 KiB
name, description, allowed-tools
| name | description | allowed-tools |
|---|---|---|
| workflow-multi-cli-plan | Multi-CLI collaborative planning and execution skill - route to multi-cli-plan or lite-execute with prompt enhancement. Triggers on "workflow:multi-cli-plan", "workflow:lite-execute". | Skill, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, mcp__ace-tool__search_context |
Workflow Multi-CLI Plan
Unified multi-CLI collaborative planning and execution skill. Routes to multi-cli-plan (ACE context + multi-CLI discussion + plan generation) or lite-execute (execution engine) based on trigger, with prompt enhancement for both modes.
Architecture Overview
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SKILL.md (Router + Prompt Enhancement) │
│ → Detect mode → Enhance prompt → Dispatch to phase │
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌───────────┼───────────┐
↓ ↓
┌──────────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│multi-cli-plan│ │lite-execute│
│ Phase 1 │ │ Phase 2 │
│ Plan+Exec │─handoff→│ Standalone │
└──────────────┘ └───────────┘
Mode Detection & Routing
const args = $ARGUMENTS
const mode = detectMode()
function detectMode() {
if (skillName === 'workflow:lite-execute') return 'execute'
return 'plan' // default: workflow:multi-cli-plan
}
Routing Table:
| Trigger | Mode | Phase Document | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
workflow:multi-cli-plan |
plan | phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md | Multi-CLI collaborative planning (ACE context → discussion → plan → execute) |
workflow:lite-execute |
execute | phases/02-lite-execute.md | Standalone execution (in-memory / prompt / file) |
Prompt Enhancement
Before dispatching to the target phase, enhance context:
// Step 1: Check for project context files
const hasProjectTech = fileExists('.workflow/project-tech.json')
const hasProjectGuidelines = fileExists('.workflow/project-guidelines.json')
// Step 2: Log available context
if (hasProjectTech) {
console.log('Project tech context available: .workflow/project-tech.json')
}
if (hasProjectGuidelines) {
console.log('Project guidelines available: .workflow/project-guidelines.json')
}
// Step 3: Dispatch to phase
if (mode === 'plan') {
// Read phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md and execute
} else {
// Read phases/02-lite-execute.md and execute
}
Execution Flow
Plan Mode (workflow:multi-cli-plan)
1. Parse flags (-y/--yes, --max-rounds, --tools, --mode) and task description
2. Enhance prompt with project context availability
3. Read phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md
4. Execute multi-cli-plan pipeline (Phase 1-5 within the phase doc)
5. Phase 5 internally calls workflow:lite-execute via Skill handoff
Execute Mode (workflow:lite-execute)
1. Parse flags (--in-memory, -y/--yes) and input
2. Enhance prompt with project context availability
3. Read phases/02-lite-execute.md
4. Execute lite-execute pipeline (input detection → execution → review)
Usage
# Multi-CLI plan mode
/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Implement user authentication"
/workflow:multi-cli-plan --yes "Add dark mode support"
/workflow:multi-cli-plan "Refactor payment module" --max-rounds=3 --tools=gemini,codex
# Execute mode (standalone)
/workflow:lite-execute "Add unit tests for auth" # Prompt description
/workflow:lite-execute plan.json # File input
/workflow:lite-execute --in-memory # Called by multi-cli-plan internally
Phase Reference Documents
| Phase | Document | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | phases/01-multi-cli-plan.md | Complete multi-CLI planning pipeline: ACE context, iterative discussion, options, user decision, plan generation, handoff |
| 2 | phases/02-lite-execute.md | Complete execution engine: input modes, task grouping, batch execution, code review |