mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-05 01:50:27 +08:00
- Move -s parameter to end of command: codex --full-auto exec "..." -s danger-full-access - Change default sandbox mode from workspace-write to danger-full-access - Add missing --full-auto parameter to commands requiring autonomous development - Add missing exec parameter to all codex commands - Add missing -s danger-full-access parameter to multi-line commands - Update all documentation and examples to use consistent syntax - Fix CLAUDE.md detection functionality in detect_changed_modules.sh script Files updated: - Core configuration: CLAUDE.md, RELEASE_NOTES_v1.3.0.md - Documentation: tools-implementation-guide.md, intelligent-tools-strategy.md - Command files: All .claude/commands/codex/*.md and workflow/*.md files - Agent templates: action-planning-agent.md - Scripts: detect_changed_modules.sh 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.8 KiB
2.8 KiB
Development Guidelines
Overview
This document defines project-specific coding standards and development principles.
CLI Tool Context Protocols
For all CLI tool usage, command syntax, and integration guidelines:
- Tool Selection Strategy: @~/.claude/workflows/intelligent-tools-strategy.md
- Implementation Guide: @~/.claude/workflows/tools-implementation-guide.md
Intelligent Context Acquisition
Core Rule: No task execution without sufficient context. Must gather project understanding before implementation.
Context Tools:
- Structure: Bash(~/.claude/scripts/get_modules_by_depth.sh) for project hierarchy
- Module Analysis: Bash(cd [module] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "analyze patterns")
- Full Analysis:
Bash(cd [module] && ~/.claude/scripts/gemini-wrapper -p "analyze [scope] architecture")
Bash(codex --full-auto exec "analyze [scope] architecture" -s danger-full-access)
Context Requirements:
- Identify 3+ existing similar patterns before implementation
- Map dependencies and integration points
- Understand testing framework and coding conventions
Philosophy
Core Beliefs
- Incremental progress over big bangs - Small changes that compile and pass tests
- Learning from existing code - Study and plan before implementing
- Pragmatic over dogmatic - Adapt to project reality
- Clear intent over clever code - Be boring and obvious
Simplicity Means
- Single responsibility per function/class
- Avoid premature abstractions
- No clever tricks - choose the boring solution
- If you need to explain it, it's too complex
Project Integration
Learning the Codebase
- Find 3 similar features/components
- Identify common patterns and conventions
- Use same libraries/utilities when possible
- Follow existing test patterns
Tooling
- Use project's existing build system
- Use project's test framework
- Use project's formatter/linter settings
- Don't introduce new tools without strong justification
Important Reminders
NEVER:
- Make assumptions - verify with existing code
ALWAYS:
- Plan complex tasks thoroughly before implementation
- Generate task decomposition for multi-module work (>3 modules or >5 subtasks)
- Track progress using TODO checklists for complex tasks
- Validate planning documents before starting development
- Commit working code incrementally
- Update plan documentation and progress tracking as you go
- Learn from existing implementations
- Stop after 3 failed attempts and reassess
Content Uniqueness Rules
- Each layer owns its abstraction level - no content sharing between layers
- Reference, don't duplicate - point to other layers, never copy content
- Maintain perspective - each layer sees the system at its appropriate scale
- Avoid implementation creep - higher layers stay architectural