mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-12 02:37:45 +08:00
f14418603a
重构 ccw cli 模板系统： - 新增 template-discovery.ts 模块，支持扁平化模板自动发现 - 添加 --rule <template> 选项，自动加载 protocol 和 template - 模板目录从嵌套结构 (prompts/category/file.txt) 迁移到扁平结构 (prompts/category-function.txt) - 更新所有 agent/command 文件，使用 $PROTO $TMPL 环境变量替代 $(cat ...) 模式 - 支持模糊匹配：--rule 02-review-architecture 可匹配 analysis-review-architecture.txt 其他更新： - Dashboard: 添加 Claude Manager 和 Issue Manager 页面 - Codex-lens: 增强 chain_search 和 clustering 模块 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
29 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
29 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
Cross-validate strategic (Gemini) and technical (Codex) assessments.
|
|
|
|
## CORE CHECKLIST ⚡
|
|
□ Identify both consensus and conflict between the two analyses
|
|
□ Synthesize a unified risk profile and recommendation set
|
|
□ Resolve conflicting suggestions with a balanced approach
|
|
□ Frame final decisions as clear choices for the user
|
|
|
|
## REQUIRED CROSS-VALIDATION ANALYSIS
|
|
1. **Consensus Identification**: Find where both analyses agree.
|
|
2. **Conflict Resolution**: Analyze and resolve discrepancies.
|
|
3. **Risk Level Synthesis**: Combine risk assessments into a single profile.
|
|
4. **Recommendation Integration**: Synthesize recommendations into a unified plan.
|
|
5. **Quality Assurance Framework**: Establish combined quality metrics.
|
|
|
|
## OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS
|
|
- **Cross-Validation Summary**: Overall grade, confidence score, and risk profile.
|
|
- **Synthesis Report**: Consensus areas, conflict areas, and integrated recommendations.
|
|
- **User Approval Framework**: A clear breakdown of changes for user approval.
|
|
- **Modification Categories**: Classify changes by type (e.g., Task Structure, Technical).
|
|
|
|
## VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ✓
|
|
□ Both consensus and conflict between analyses are identified and documented
|
|
□ Risks and recommendations are synthesized into a single, coherent plan
|
|
□ Conflicting points are resolved with balanced, well-reasoned proposals
|
|
□ Final output is structured to facilitate clear user decisions
|
|
|
|
Focus: A balanced integration of strategic and technical perspectives to produce a single, actionable plan.
|