mirror of
https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow.git
synced 2026-02-14 02:42:04 +08:00
0afbeac710
- Create /workflow:verify command for plan validation before execution - Implement gemini strategic analysis and codex technical analysis - Add cross-validation framework with user approval workflow - Enhance brainstorm auto.md with comprehensive pre_analysis configuration - Include specialized verification prompt templates for structured analysis 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.3 KiB
Plaintext
65 lines
3.3 KiB
Plaintext
Cross-validation analysis of gemini strategic and codex technical assessments for workflow implementation plan:
|
|
|
|
## Required Cross-Validation Analysis:
|
|
1. **Consensus Identification**
|
|
- Identify areas where both analyses agree on issues or strengths
|
|
- Document shared concerns and aligned recommendations
|
|
- Highlight consistent risk assessments and mitigation strategies
|
|
- Establish priority consensus for implementation focus
|
|
|
|
2. **Conflict Resolution Analysis**
|
|
- Identify discrepancies between strategic and technical perspectives
|
|
- Analyze root causes of conflicting assessments
|
|
- Evaluate trade-offs between strategic goals and technical constraints
|
|
- Provide balanced recommendations for resolution
|
|
|
|
3. **Risk Level Synthesis**
|
|
- Combine strategic and technical risk assessments
|
|
- Establish overall implementation risk profile
|
|
- Prioritize risks by impact and probability
|
|
- Recommend risk mitigation strategies
|
|
|
|
4. **Recommendation Integration**
|
|
- Synthesize strategic and technical recommendations
|
|
- Resolve conflicting suggestions with balanced approach
|
|
- Prioritize recommendations by impact and effort
|
|
- Establish implementation sequence and dependencies
|
|
|
|
5. **Quality Assurance Framework**
|
|
- Establish combined quality metrics and success criteria
|
|
- Define validation checkpoints and review gates
|
|
- Recommend monitoring and feedback mechanisms
|
|
- Ensure both strategic and technical quality standards
|
|
|
|
## Input Analysis Sources:
|
|
- **Gemini Strategic Analysis**: Architecture, business alignment, strategic risks
|
|
- **Codex Technical Analysis**: Implementation feasibility, code quality, technical risks
|
|
- **Original Implementation Plan**: IMPL_PLAN.md, task definitions, context
|
|
|
|
## Output Requirements:
|
|
### Cross-Validation Summary:
|
|
- **Overall Assessment Grade** (A-F): Combined strategic and technical evaluation
|
|
- **Implementation Confidence** (1-10): Combined feasibility assessment
|
|
- **Risk Profile**: High/Medium/Low with specific risk categories
|
|
- **Recommendation Priority Matrix**: Urgent/Important classification
|
|
|
|
### Synthesis Report:
|
|
- **Consensus Areas**: Shared findings and aligned recommendations
|
|
- **Conflict Areas**: Divergent perspectives requiring resolution
|
|
- **Integrated Recommendations**: Balanced strategic and technical guidance
|
|
- **Implementation Roadmap**: Phased approach balancing strategic and technical needs
|
|
|
|
### User Approval Framework:
|
|
- **Critical Changes**: Must-implement modifications (blocking issues)
|
|
- **Important Improvements**: High-value enhancements (quality/efficiency)
|
|
- **Optional Enhancements**: Nice-to-have improvements (future consideration)
|
|
- **Trade-off Decisions**: User choice between competing approaches
|
|
|
|
### Modification Categories:
|
|
- **Task Structure**: Task merging, splitting, or reordering
|
|
- **Dependencies**: Dependency additions, removals, or modifications
|
|
- **Context Enhancement**: Requirements, acceptance criteria, or documentation
|
|
- **Technical Adjustments**: Implementation approach or tool changes
|
|
- **Strategic Alignment**: Business objective or success criteria refinement
|
|
|
|
Focus on balanced integration of strategic and technical perspectives. Provide clear user decision points with impact analysis and implementation guidance. Prioritize recommendations by combined strategic and technical value. |